1418 Biden DOJ Asks Supreme Court To Fast-Track Case That Could Reinstate Federal Gun Ban (www.zerohedge.com) COME AND TAKE IT posted 78 days ago by EatMyBallsAmerican 78 days ago by EatMyBallsAmerican +1419 / -1 Biden DOJ Asks Supreme Court To Fast-Track Case That Could Reinstate Federal Gun Ban ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero www.zerohedge.com 121 comments share 121 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Oh for fucks sake, this is getting as old and annoying as the abortion conversation.
It's what communists do. You shouldn't be annoyed by a bird eating a worm or a shark eating a fish, same thing here, you should'nt be annoyed by a communist regime trying to disarm and totally control it's populace. Expect it. And start training.
I'm still annoyed, though.
I enjoy seeing a shark eating a fish. Now if after eating that fish the shark started subverting my country with shark related degeneracy then I'd be annoyed.
Annoyed? I'm irate.
If worms had machine guns birds wouldn't fuck with them
Well, when birds won't shut the fuck up when I couldn't sleep the night before and I'm just starting to nod off finally, which is cool because it's my day off.....I feel similarly as I do about communists when I'm just trying to live my life and they keep fucking with everything.
This is why the "live and let live crowd" are useful idiots at best.
Do you want a clean, beautiful country you'd be happy and eager to father 8 children into knowing they'd be well off if you just raise them right? It isn't free.
You want a dirty, GDamned and hideous country you're terrified o fathering a single child into and then doubly afraid of affording the bare minimum that child would need just to have him or her be perverted and turned against you? Well friend, that shit is freeeeeeEEE! Just sit on the couch, do your job and let it be.
They're cockroaches, not birds or sharks. And who isn't annoyed by cockroaches?
It's how the left works. This fight will never be over. Even if the Supreme Court came right out and said "all gun control legislation is a violation of the Constitution," it still wouldn't be settled as far as the left is concerned. They'll keep pushing and pushing and pushing to disarm the populous until eventually they get their way, and once that happens THEN it becomes "settled" that no one is allowed to change it. Just like with Roe v. Wade and Obamacare.
Agreed. Like right here…
Doesn’t matter how much of a challenge it is for the govt. the govt is not allowed to infringe upon our rights (though they do all the time).
And like you faggots give a shit about public safety.
Everybody should care about public safety, but this safety must not come at the expense of infringing upon civil liberties.
They can't be reasoned with, they can't be bargained with, and they will never stop trying, ever.
They're too psychotic to feel pity, or remorse, or fear. And they absolutely will not stop, ever, until you are dead.
Only one way to end this.
This is what 'doing stuff' looks like, they will never stop until it costs them each time they try.
Honestly, I hope they do fast track it. I get the feeling it will end up going YUGELY in our favor given the last few gun rulings by the Supreme Court.
I think they’re freaking out about this because in the Bruen case, the Supreme Court essentially said that if it wasn’t a criminal offense way back during our country’s founding, then restrictions on the 2nd Amendment cannot apply to the individual.
However, the Federal Courts omitted anything about the States denying gun rights.
Blue States don’t want any kind of precedent striking down gun control laws.
Even in my Blue State of New Jersey, people are going to Court challenging the overly restrictive process to get a legal firearm, using the Bruen case as their basis.
New Jersey intentionally has a Judicial Shortage so that they can continuously deny your gun rights via huge backlogs.
all permitting and taxes related to firearms are fundamentally unconstitutional.
there cannot be any permit or tax on being black.
there cannot be any permit or tax on being jewish.
there cannot be any permit or tax on having an attorney defend you in court.
the only permits that have survived constitutional muster are those on constitutional rights are those using "the commons", meaning it's public space and demand from the public outstrips supply of that space. in that case, there are huge restrictions on what the government can require with that permitting. firearms do not involve any sort of public commons.
when the government is saying they can tax or require a permit for firearms, they are demanding the right to tax people on being black or jewish or exercising any other constitutional right. label these shitbags are racist and antisemitic relentlessly whenever they push this shit. they simply cannot win.
States are prevented from infringing due to the 14th Amendment.
I don’t know if that Amendment number was a typo or not, but do you really think Blue States won’t try every dirty trick to take away constitutional rights?
Even having federal background checks themselves are unconstitutional, because if you can just run away to a less restrictive State and get you get your rights back immediately, Blue politicians don’t like that.
They want you to suffer as long as possible.
I would agree with you the blue states will do what they do and be tryrants until a court makes them comply. The 14th amendment is what applies the rest of the bill of rights to the states. Its why NY laws can and should be struck down by SCOTUS.
You must be from Washington
Your old state must be Commiefornia
Its a disgrace that you have to 'pass laws' that say you must 'follow the law' because of lawless Democrats. This shit needs to be shunned from society and brought up in each and every debate.
You must be from CO?
Lol there's no ban here. I can go buy a 40 round Pmag right now in a store in Denver in front of cops. Nothing will happen. I've done it.
The 5th circuit based their decision on Bruen. Unless SCOTUS has changed its mind about Bruen in the last 8 months this is going nowhere. AG Garland is a faggot.
Well, here's the opportunity for SCOTUS to strike down ALL gun bans. They need to paint with a very wide brush leaving ZERO interpretation in their ruling. End the goddamn madness once and for all. Explain "shall not be infringed" and "the people" in crayon font if necessary.
That won't happen with this SCOTUS. Roberts is a cuck. Barrett also won't support that.
Bruen was narrow because it had to be to win support of the Court. I'm sure Alito and Thomas would support what you're describing and striking down the NFA and other laws one by one, but I don't see Roberts or Barrett supporting that.
the Rahimi case is garbage in the first place.
they're talking about ex parte orders being usable to strip your constitutional rights. these do not require evidence, and you get no opportunity to defend your own rights. it's blatantly unconstitutional not just under the 2nd amendment but also under the 4th amendment.
imagine a law that says someone can report a gay man as having been talking to an unrelated child at a playground, and a court order is issued without his knowledge or opportunity to hearing, that says he must wear a chastity belt and penis cage indefinitely. all on allegation alone.
or imagine a law that says someone can report a jewish lender as offering bad credit terms, so the lender's entire portfolio is frozen. blatant restriction of fundamental constitutional rights without evidence or a hearing. that's what biden is demanding here.
With the Bruen case recently established, future "assault gun ban" cases will now focus on the AR15 and courts like the 5th along and possibly SCOTUS could find that the AR is in fact a "common use" firearm in the US. I'm sure the based 5th Circuit will take up a case on specific firearms and rule this way. Best court in the land. The dem's play will be to focus on "features" like collapsing stocks, detachable mags and ALL semi-autos.
I have no doubt that Bruen will lead to some state law reversions especially regarding things like subjective weapon descriptions.
But that big concern I think we should be aiming towards is repealing the NFA as it is plainly in violation of both the Second Amendment and the Bruen decision....but like I pointed out there is no chance that can happen with this court led by Roberts.
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
In other words, no.
Tell that to Washington state who just banned a slew of gun sales
And if the Supreme Court disagrees, they're not upholding the constitution and deserve to be replaced.
Yea no one cares what these faggots do or want
The 2A could not be reached for comment.
2A is definitely a "don't call us, we'll call you" type of thing.
Can you imagine what the douche-nozzle would have done with a lifetime SCOTUS seat?
Nobody fuckin cares what these fucking queers have to say
The fuckin legislation they want to revive explicitly says it sunsets at 10 yrs. So no
I said this before and I will repeat it again and again, it is illegal for them to ban guns, and if they do follow through with it, we are protected by the Constitution to defend ourselves.
As many said before, this is how they treat you when you are armed, wait until they take your weapons away.
They are scared for 2024 They want to steal it but they know if you have guns it will not go their way. They are trying to steal your elections and take your power away!!
Yep, sure stopped them in 18, 20, and 22.
This time we'll do something.
As long as da foosball isn't on that weekend.
They're afraid of the Epstein client list getting released. They're afraid of the Coovid truth being revealed. They are afraid of the 2020 election theft being exposed.
Probably because the constitution doesn't fucking care about safety.
There is no such thing as "public" safety anymore than there is "public" health or the "public" good.
There is no "public." It's a fiction created by NPCs and tyrants to justify violating people's rights.
Thank you Donald Trump for the fifth and sixth reasonably sane justices. They may not always go our way, but they usually do. I'll take those odds.
Normally I would say its a good idea, restricting people who have been charged with DV from having guns. But you never know with this admin, they will just say everyone white person has been charged with DV. So fuck em.
I know several guys flat out falsely charged with DV because their wife decided it would give them an advantage when blindsiding them with a divorce. Legitimate domestic violence is awful, but let’s not even pretend that it isn’t horribly weaponized.
Exactly. Now, if you can prove say, the injuries to the wife or girlfriend, could only have been caused by the boyfriend or husband through irrefutable evidence, then maybe you may have a point. However, if it’s a he said/she said case, then you should not be allowed to take anyone’s right away.
If thats the case, then you should already be in jail, so buying a gun is a moot point. I get thats not whats happening. DA's let them out then they buy a gun, so the gun is somehow the problem and not the DA.
A charge is literally just: Person says guy hit girl-->Cop arrests guy.
No evidence. No due process. No nothing.
Stripping guns for a DV charge is just the original red flag law.
Actually its even worse than that, I knew someone who had zero contact with any authority and just got a notice of a restraining order based on a text message to a parent calling their daughter a whore (rightly so, IMO). And to make things worse, the restraining order was served to him at work! He ended up losing his job AND compromised his gun rights!
"Found Guilty" is what I meant.
Felons do still lose their gun rights.
How about fast-tracking overturning the Brady Bill--they've avoided that abomination since the '80s. They are still waiting to get to the NFA, as well. SCOTUS avoiding blatantly unconstitutional laws is just another mark in the "why this institution should be burned to the ground" column.
Yes I'm sure the same Supreme Court that overturned Roe v Wade is going to "ban assault rilfes" lol
I can think of a few things we need to fast track, and none of them are a weapons ban.
Good. SCOTUS will be pissed and hopefully decide to overturn all state and federal gun laws.
hey you guys rule over and over the same way, maybe this time you'll do it differently?
WW3 is about to go hot, the economy is in the shitter, and our borders are wide open.
I can understand why a illigitament administration that is hell bent on the destruction of our great nation would be in favor of this.
Unfortunately for us now that election theft is the norm we will never have another GOP president or senate majority.
SCOTUS is only a matter of time
Shall not be infringed, mother fucker.
Lol with the Bruen decision this won't happen lmao
Write it up differently and try and get it passed. if they get denied, write it up differently and try and get it passed. that way if they get something through the cracks, they will use this against every American. Every person in America will be a domestic violator to somebody. this person yelled at his wife, he beat his kid, she abused a dog, NO GUNS FOR YOU
These pedophiles don't like armed resistance.
Don’t care. Right to keep & bear arms is an Enumerated right. Hands off!
They really want to disarm us and really wish us to just be in FEMA camps already under their boot.
This reads like Ukraine is declaring war on America
This is what happens when cheating in elections is tolerated!
Garland- pencil-necked little faggot soy boy.