1868 Obligatory StoneToss (media.patriots.win) posted 68 days ago by JZSquared 68 days ago by JZSquared +1868 / -0 87 comments download share 87 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
Faggot worship is at an all-time high.
Roman decadence era is back.
See also: Weimar Republic.
Gays, Troons, pedos, and probably Communists.
> Sounds like the Democrat National Convention!
Look at the types of books that were burned...
Now how many books have been destroyed, rewritten, statues torn down, and other cultural monuments destroyed and people cancelled by the socialist left in the US? That's been happening here...except they're doing it ALL themselves. Will the favor be returned...?
Turns out the statues they tear down are all democrats
> "The first large burning came on 6 May 1933. The German Student Union made an organised attack on Magnus Hirschfeld's Institut für Sexualwissenschaft (roughly: Institute of Sex Research). Its library and archives of around 20,000 books and journals were publicly hauled out and burned in the street. Its collection included unique works on intersexuality, homosexuality, and transgender topics."
(Also linked in another comment) The facility in question https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Institut_f%C3%BCr_Sexualwissenschaft not only housed books promoting gay/trans/degenerate "lifestyles," but also provided "services" like primitive experimental "sex change" surgeries and related mutilations, along with other questionable activities. It wasn't just a "library" of sex-related books, there was a lot of very shady stuff going on at that place.
Say what u want but they set degeneracy and communism back by 100 years
We even had a man with less brains than a horse installed in the Senate.
And Secdef Vader
Yeah, notice how they are all fatasses?
Probably suck'd their way.
Faggot and chemically castrated individuals don't produce babies so that why they are promoting it so hard in their goal to depopulate the human race
Sodomites. Use Biblical language to describe them
It's all so tiresome
I ain't taking any policy from a dude named after a vacuum cleaner
Yeah, for real, that guy sucks!
It has everything to do with Klaus Schwab calling up BlackRock and cutting off the Biden admin if they don't comply with his bullshit.
It was a core part of foreign policy under Trump, too. DJT said a major FP goal was to end the criminalization of gays.
If true, he shouldn't have been doing that. Other countries need to have the right to decide that for themselves. And criminalizing it is looking like it's not that bad an option compared to the alternative.
There are Good Gays and Bad Gays. We need the good Gays to help us fight the Bad Gays.
Normalization and public promotion leads to the bad side of that coin IMO. Definitely shouldn't be a foreign policy goal
I'm not talking about normalization or public promotion. I'm saying we need good people...it's a simple concept even though people are complex.
Don't be an idiot. Not every gay is a groomer. We need the non-groomers to help fight the groomer. Think tactically and strategically.
Think strategically? So what's more strategic, trying to enlist the help of an unknown percentage of the tiny percent of the population that is gay, who haven't done anything to protect kids from grooming, or to enlist the vast majority of the population who isn't gay?
Look, we tried. For several decades now we've given the boomer experiment of tolerance a chance, and the only thing that happened was an increase in the amount of kids being victimized and government schools teaching kids to be gay trannies. Enough. It's time to step away from the kids and get back in the closet.
It would happen anyways. They need these people, they're the perfect bullies, and for a few candy bar and doritos ads they will make themselves tools of the state. Biden really wouldn't have a choice.
When they want something out of Biden they threaten Hunter. Ever noticed that?
"America is going to Faggotize YOUR country next"
And suddenly the world banded together against America, for no reason at all.
With all this faggotry on offer, it's a wonder Afghanistan decided they'd rather have the Taliban.
This is exactly what is happening. American liberalism exported was just an annoyance but this exported hyper liberal faggotry has no value and is seen as an actual threat. These countries that see the threat aren't going to save us after they destroy the USA because we were too weak to stop it. Even professional totalitarian regimes know there are certain lines you don't cross or society stops existing.
B-b-b-but Islam is incompatible with our Western twerking TikTok thot values. Their daughters will never assimilate!
I'll take "Who is Mia Khalifa?" for $3.50, Alex!
At this point invade us. I will likely prefer working for those overlords rather than the sodomite overlords we have now
This is exactly why the west has already lost the world's respect they view us as pussies braiding eachothers hair and playing dress up instead of being a gun behind every blade of grass.
You don't even have to tell me that you're a faggot without saying that you are a faggot... we already know that you're all a bunch of faggots.
Someone needs to submit "burgers" to the adl hate speech database.
It has everything to do with foreign policy, thats how you weaken other countries, letter soup people don't procreate, they're usually hedonistic and don't plan ahead, they don't care about their countries, they're usually internationalists with no sense of patriotism.
Trying to coerce the rest of the world to adopt our latest ‘universal truth’ when the (leadership of the) West only 180’d to this position itself ~15 years ago is ridiculous. Most of the people who would be doing the coercing have publicly held the opposite position (ie. the traditional Western position) during their careers.
If the + stands for everyone else, why can't we just say "human rights" like we used to?
Because "cis gendered" people (aka normal people) are not included in their inclusive agenda.
What this means is forcing 1.5 Billion Muslims to except LGBTQXRTAYEU+ This is what they stand for, and this is why ALL the Muslim countries hate our country, force their ways on the world, screw them
I honestly respect Muslims for the most part, just need them to stay where they're at.
That said, we should stay out of their countries too
Good luck with that.
Spreading Islam by conquest or invasion seems to be a major pillar of their religion.
Spreading LGBTQIA+ by conquest or invasion seems to be our religion now.
Got to love our government. We got our clowns showing up to meetings and the world is laughing. The Nazis got this right. This shit leads to really bad things. Our retarded asses can't even figure out what a girl is. Look into people who really want to explain and teach history. Much of the gay Roman stuff is gay propaganda. Its a great way to control the population and the people.
They've been running the same playbook since the 1960s... the problem is that they have to keep finding new norms to break to keep the scam going.
And they wonder why Russia and China formed an alliance?
That Stonetoss comic perfectly illustrates the blatant Leftist Agenda propaganda infesting many modern "advertisements," many of which are deliberately focused on promoting gay/trans "lifestyles," race-mixing, sexuality in general, bratty "behavior," condescending attitudes toward normalcy and tradition, and above all: the portrayal of white males and father figures as bumbling incompetent weaklings, berated by women who are consistently portrayed as strong sassy problem-solvers.
> There are a plethora of "woke" commercial scenes that can be inserted into easel in the second panel, with the last panel referring to the neglected product. (Related: Here is one of my edits of this Stonetoss comic from Halloween of 2021, if I'm not mistaken.) https://patriots.win/p/13zzVsuvmj/happy-halloween-3-3-3-/c/
It is often unclear exactly what product these "advertisements" are pushing: their ham-handed glorification of disrespectful children, social media obsession, promiscuity, LGBTQRSLOLWTF HIV+/- Rainbow-Parade revelry, nagging women ridiculing cowering hen-pecked husbands, all are distractions to either ignore or overshadow the product that is supposedly being promoted.
At one time, I questioned why a corporation paying millions of dollars for the production and airtime of their commercials would consent to having their product shunned in their own high-budget ads. Especially in the case of Christmas or Super Bowl ads in recent years, many "advertisements" are miniature movies that do not feature the product- or barely mention it- and these spots cost yuge money to produce, not to mention the massive cost of commercial airtime to run them during a high-rated TV show, ball game, etc.
The people in charge of producing/airing corporate advertisements know exactly how their ad budgets are being spent, and how their airtime is being used. Normally, they spend a great deal of time and money on demographic research of their "target audience," as well as studying the opinions of "focus groups" and test-audiences who view a screening of the commercial before it airs. (They are extremely involved in the content of these ads: in a recent ad-content-scandal, Balenciaga claimed they were not aware of the questionable use of children in their creepy sexualized advertisements. This is ridiculous of course, no ad agency would have produced ads of that nature- and received payment for it- without high-level Balenciaga personnel approving it.)
> Hollywood movie producers definitely do this: they will re-edit a movie, changing scenes and/or the ending if the "test audience" did not respond well. I once saw a "test screening" of a movie and was surprised at how drastically they edited out certain "problematic?" elements for the official release. They cut an important scene (with a very big-name actor) and diminished his role in general, changing the ending completely. I'm not a movie fan in general, but I did find the test-screening interesting while the released version was much less so.
My point there is: there is no way those "commercials" go to air without full approval of the corporate big-wigs in charge of the advertising budget- if not the demographic researchers and "focus groups." They know their products are being sidelined while their ad budget is spent on promoting Leftist Agenda causes and narratives. This seems questionable, considering that they normally would seek to maximize awareness of their product in the most efficient manner possible, in a cost-effective manner that minimizes wasted funding. Maybe their goal is "starting the conversation?" (in Leftist parlance,) in hopes that there will be an MSM/social-media "news cycle" talking about their commercial. Even so, the Leftist Agenda content is what gets most attention from the "journalists" while the corporation or product is barely mentioned.
Here is a really "good" example of the result of this nonsense, from a Fox "news" affiliate no less, gushing praise for the J&B whiskey "holiday ad" that shows a grandpa/older relative shopping for womens' items, trying out lipstick, then sneaking a young boy away to the bathroom to doll him up in makeup. Maybe this was intended as a cautionary tale about drinking too much and making bad life decisions- but since the whiskey is not shown in the commercial, I don't think so. https://www.fox9.com/news/jb-whisky-christmas-commercial-grandfather-wears-makeup-transgender-acceptance
tl;dr Clown World is no joke.
Legendary Meme Template
An old one, but somehow always relevant 👌🏻
THIS guy definitely throws hammer parties on the reg...
Absolutely. So you'll be bringing this up with the Saudis I assume?
It means they'll bribe foreign leaders to pay lipservice to the gay.
A.k.a. money out your pocket into the pockets of dictators and commies, but they'll wave a rainbow flag once in a while.
It means USA will no longer be bringing Democracy with Abrams tanks but LGBTQ rights LOL
Foreign countries know this. That’s why they are choosing China. They don’t want to be regime changed when they refuse the gay tranny agenda.
Who are these people motivated to pick up a rifle to fight for faggots?
I get what you're going for but it kind of falls apart when 'Foreign Policy' is written into the talking point yet it being written into the talking point is immediately ignored.
Great - sign those bitches up and put boots on the ground....
Im sure Saudi Arabia is thrilled
Their policy is to stick foreign objects up their...
It is part of their foreign policy. Activating fringe groups in the name of social justice is exactly how the dems are able to create divisiveness and unrest throughout the world. At some point, most people get sick of fighting the fight and they just conform, thus taking another step toward the new world order. The smallest groups are the loudest people and they're all from the left. The left knows that they will form makeshift militia's (albeit soy based and laughable) that will riot, loot, and destroy property and lives.
These fucking clowns say some batshit crazy things. But don't be so sure that they are tripping up and accidentally being "too PC". It's very calculated, and it doesn't matter if they show their entire hand...because their mindset is, "who's going to do anything about it?"
They don't care about gays, it's about control.
What’s the + for? Huh?
Fastest way to wreck a country
How’s that core part of your foreign policy working out with the Middle East? Moron.