Homogenous cultures can develop high trust. This can result in suicidal philanthropy when citizens assume all people are or can be like them. I hope Norway wakes up soon enough.
Women use a consensus/acceptance heuristic to make decisions. If they are faced with overwhelming shaming and backlash for their stupidity, they’ll stop. They have only had as much power as men have chosen to allow them; feminists acknowledge as much.
You are absolutely correct about the female consensus filter, but male submission has become a compound problem with no one-step solution:
We ourselves have been indoctrinated to reject any male authority as "misogynistic" and therefore immoral. A lot of men are beginning to understand why feminism is wrong about literally everything and always has been, but it's a slow process while feminists control every educational institution. The explosion in homeschooling following parental insight into CRT garbage during Covid will help with this.
The structure of power is not flat, and feminists have taken control of HR departments and their equivalents in every institution to hold male providers' livelihoods hostage and destroy anyone who rejects the narrative. This silences most men with dependents, because we're hardwired to prioritize providing for our families, and we ourselves are financially and logistically dependent upon a system controlled by our enemies.
The solution may involve creating our own businesses in a parallel economy, but scaling up a company to anything socially influential requires hiring more people, which results in the equivalent of an HR department. The larger your company gets, the harder it is to filter out feminist/Woke/etc. ideologues from positions of authority, because government anti-discrimination laws are so purposely biased.
Because of all this, the moral leadership of wise men is essentially stuck in a tight crevice. Either we wiggle it out with a lot of finesse, or the right person with the right charisma will need to come by to pull the sword from the stone. The more that state laws start diverging from each other though, and the more irrelevant federal supremacy becomes, the sooner we'll pry apart the feminist death grip on HR departments, and the sooner we'll have a critical mass of responsible men speaking openly under their real names.
This was written like that Saturday Night Live skit - Deep Thoughts
"I can picture in my mind a world without war, a world without hate. And I can picture us attacking that world, because they'd never expect it." — Jack Handey
Interestingly the genetic distancing a highly scientific method of determining the similarities between groups it shows that a sub-Saharan African is as different from a Caucasian ethnic British man a gray wolf is to a coyote in fact there is more genetic distancing.
Does that mean I'm saying we should hate other groups of course not. I'm simply saying that we are different and that difference is not just cranial slope bone density propensity towards certain genetic disorders and incompatible blood types but may extend to other areas.
For example I happen to be an a negative blood type my sister is also a negative. There is basically no sub-Saharan Africans with an Rh negative blood type unless they were highly mixed with Caucasian DNA and even then it's less than 1%. If my sister were to fall deeply in love with Daquan because he moves bricks and it's true to the thug life it would be unfortunate because if she were to become pregnant and the baby had an RH positive blood type like many people especially sub-Saharan Africans her own body will reject the fetus and attack it as a foreign object. It's almost as if her very cells were aware of these differences and hated them to the point of murder.
The ethnic group with the highest rate of Rh- blood is the Basque people in Northern Spain (Northeast? Can't remember...). The Basque language is a lingual isolate, meaning it has no known close relatives. Neither Spanish, Iberians, Celto-Iberian, or any other language spoken in the past 2,000 years that's survived to present day bears any resemblance to Basque, barring a few loan words here or there.
No, take into account Plato's exact description. Beyond the pillars of Hercules (the Straights of Gibraltar) is the islands of Atlantis. On today's maps, that area is the Azores archipelago, an archipelago that sits on a submerged chunk of land called the Azores Plateau. That chunk of land is actually continental crust, left over from when the Americas split off of Europe and Africa millions of years ago. Furthermore, deep sea dredging has found evidence of shallow water fossils on the plateau at a depth of 3,000 feet, far higher than the proposed sea level rise at the end of the last ice age. Limestone samples from that same depth show sighs of having spent significant amounts of time above sea level, exposed to open air.
Considering that the Mid Atlantic Ridge is a weak point in the Earth's crust, and considering all the weight of the ice caps on North America and Europe, it's not inconceivable that the pressure caused the Azores Plateau to be higher in elevation than it is today. For example, while it was under 2 miles of ice, the area around Hudson Bay was about 1000 feet lower than it is today; geologists have recorded the moving shorelines to prove this. That kind of land elevation movement coupled with sea level rise, and it's not impossible that the Azores Plateau was above sea level before the end of the last Ice Age. Add in the alleged maritime culture Plato claimed the Atlanteans had, and it's possible that they had colonies on the Iberian peninsula, or possibly even in the Caribbean and Central America.
While I'm not going quite so far as to claim Atlantis was real, or that the Basques/Rh- people are the descendants of Atlanteans, I think there may be some truth to Plato's story.
Especially when one considers that 9000 years before the time when the story was passed to Solon, who lived around 600 BC, and you get 9600 BC, or 11,600 years before present, which is exactly the end of the Ice Age. (Solon heard the story from an Egyptian priest, and Plato read about it in Solon's journals).
I'm just saying, I think the existence of Atlantis is plausible.
Interesting Basque folklore tells that they came from an island that crumbled into the sea. The details vary but they claim to have had some great city etc that met a calamitous end.
PITBULLS ARE THE MOST LOVING DOGS EVER!!! THEY'RE JUST MISUNDERSTOOD BY DOG BIGOTS LIKE YOU!!! THEY HARDLY EVER GNAW CHILDREN'S FACES OFF!!! ACTUALLY IT'S THE KID'S FAULT!!! MY PIT CUJO ONLY GENTLY BIT THIS FUCKING KID'S FACE OFF FOR SMILING AT HIM!!!
I'm sorry but it's fucking science. Homogeneous society will be happier. I know that grinds people's gears and you think your this erudite citizen of the world and shit but aside from short visits it doesn't make any sense.
I like Japan. I'm not Japanese nor will I ever be, if I married a Japanese girl and had a bunch of happa kids I know they will never be accepted. And that's OK! Check out the book "bowling alone" and do a bit of research. It doesn't make you racist.
I live next door to an actual black supremacist separatist we were cordial with each other and even friendly enough to drink together and play video games however I understood his position he wanted some type of Afro futurist Neo wakanda and he frankly told me that I would not be allowed except perhaps on special tourist visas. And that's totally okay. Now we all have seen the Ugandan Space Program and so I wish him lots of luck with the flying pyramids and whatnot but the main idea is still valid he wants something for his people and that's fine
Race and ethnicity is much more than "skin color" and while you can be comfortable; all animals display in group preferences. I for example have a background and cultural anthropology and clinical research psychology I grew up all over Southeast Asia and have been exposed to people from all over the world but i still have in group preferences its Nothing to be ashamed of. In a related example studying attractiveness people wanted "similar but slightly different, they equivalent of a 3rd cousin". This correlates to studies showing the greatest reproductive rates were with test subjects similarly related.
This example is just kind of fun but if you were to download the app face app and then using a good picture of yourself swap the gender in this particular apps case use the second version of the gender such as female 2 or male 2. I think that you will find the person that you see is somewhat attractive to you because it is you.
This tendency is a broad theme and of course is not always true individually bur over all the patern is clear. An east African woman is unlikely to choose a South Korean man, but the exceptions that prove the rule, are often an assemblage of racial fetishizations.
Im not ashamed a bit. It does feel like youre trying to tell me Im wrong about what I enjoy and prefer though, while implying that Im ashamed of what you think I should actually like...which is comical to say the least.
I've explained that there are exceptions, fetishizations, etc, you may indeed be telling me the truth that you, would feel totally at home in a foreign land with radically different cultural norms their own Mores, and Taboos, humor, and cognitive abstractions; that you are comfortable or at most ambivalent with the relative safety of your children and family in such a place - but you'd be an exception and one that does not grant you any accolades or some worldly cosmopolitan extra kewl person that is lethally committed to cultural relativism trophies.
Too bad they all can't be black separatists. I mean, Africa is a huge continent, and on the average sparsely populated (might have to do something about that pesky desert up north).
Native Americans trusted the new people to their land and broke bread with them, offered them assistance, offered them peace. And they were quickly and easily conquered for their trouble.
I just hope these 3rd world South Americans at least give me and my family a casino to operate one day…
Yea I honestly couldn’t give a crap about the Indians tbh. They’re still wearing masks and are extremely subservient. They’re a drain on our society with all the $$$ they get.
Native Americans usually, though sadly and very TRAGICALLY not always, got what they asked for breaking bread. You are ignoring the OTHER HALF of the "natives" that were a rapin and a murderin and cutting up young children-a-ring thing.
The conquistadors didn't get help from the natives for shits and giggles, they were a few men who could be done away with in the middle of the night after being dined, wined, and given pussy. They weren't because THE OTHER HALF WERE GENOCIDAL PRICKS who shouldn't be defended or their way of life glorified; they were strong man take all strong man take what he wants they just couldn't put aside their bullshit long enough to build civilization.
Natives WORE CLOTHES and BOUGHT LAND in the "new world" once it was settled but you won't hear about those people because why? Someone wants to paint the white man as an invader? Okay, so ... when the USA liberates a country or supports a COMMUNIST TAKEOVER and gives money to marxist islamists... you see where this is going.
You won't hear about the guy who bought land and integrated because he became an American (for better or for worse) but you'll hear about the guy who chose to stay on the res. But let's talk about all the people who have indian blood in them, shall we? I can't throw a rock around the USA and not hit someone with part injun blood in them unless it happens to be Pocahontas' family. That's still amazing to me, how she claimed to be indian and she's one of the most racially pure americans there is. ROFLMAO
I guess it's complicated. Sometimes, trust was misplaced. Other times, it was a case of the lesser evil. Other times, the new world picked some bad hombres to support. And there's no excuse for the trail of tears. However, giving land "back" to some of the raper tribes? Miss me with that shit and cry me a river.
I think you missed the point of my post. It wasn’t some bleeding heart plea for people to feel bad about how the evil white man stole native land or some shit like that. It was to say there were people here, and because those people didn’t act out of self-preservation, they were conquered.
America is doing the EXACT same thing right now, and one day this country is going to look like MexiHondurAgua and people are going to say how did wandering hordes of South Americans take down the most powerful country in the world? And the answer will be because we let them.
I didn't miss it. I just felt like it needed saying. You're not wrong and I don't disagree with you. I need to work on my communication skills a lot more.
its definitely not israel, they have very strict immigration laws there! they cant just have their homogenous culture ruined by too many outsiders after all. that would be the 145th totally real holocaust of them. 6,000,000 might actually die this time!
This has been such a pervasive line of thinking among left-leaning people (myself included, for much of my life). It's good that people are finally beginning to realize the error of that way.
I would like to master the art of being a completely evil asshole one day while convincing everyone that you're "nice" and "cute" and "fair" and "caring" and every damn antithesis there is in the thesaurus. FFS.
It amazes my primitive mind that it's even possible.
A lot of this thought starts with, "it's different because..." and, just fill in the blank. Lots of contradiction, but lots of appealing to authority. This is probably an oversimplification, but it's how it seems to be.
Africa consists of hundreds of tribes. Kenya alone has 56. While some tribes will be cordial to others, every tribe really hates every other tribe. You can't marry outside your tribe unless you want to be shunned. Hating what's not like you is the norm for Africans, unless you're white or maybe Indian. Then they see you as a resource to gain a better life so being nice to you is better than killing you. The reason Africa is so screwed up is tribalism. Whenever Africa was made into different countries, it forced together dozens of tribes that hate each other. The weakest tribes made deals with the colonizers and now rule the countries. The two or three ruling tribes run the entire government and give favor only to their people who now live in disgusting cities. When Africa gets money and loans from white countries, ALL of the money goes to the politicians. There's no foreign aid reaching regular people because why would oppressors give money to the people they're oppressing?
It's not "racism". It is "culturism". Phrasing it this way gives the lefties what they want. It is not the skin color. It is the raping and stealing and generally being obnoxious.
Mfw christians stab you in the back, face, flank, and dick for profit and are lying sociopaths. It's like I'm stuck in hell sometimes where the preacher gets on the pulpit and spreads woke horseshit then goes on facebook and tells everyone "guns r bad m'kay".
This is bullshit, Nordic countries(including Norway) spent billions funding terrorists in Africa. They are literally the start of a lot of our current problems globally.
"This paper shows that, in 1986, the Nordic Governments have provided well
over 100 million dollars in assistance to the oppressed people and their liberation
movements and over 500 million dollars in assistance to Frontline and
neighbouring States in southern Africa. Their total assistance to date for these
purposes is three or four billion dollars. "
Exactly! And it has nothing to do with the color of their skin and everything to do with their BEHAVIOR! Does their skin color prevent them from being well mannered?
It's almost like opening the doors for foreign invaders is bad or something. A lesson that lefty women have never learned, yet they're the majority of the female vote.
Adams is not right. We shouldn’t run away from them. That’s a loser mentality and allowing them to win. We need to stand our ground and fight fire with fire don’t back down.
Homogenous cultures can develop high trust. This can result in suicidal philanthropy when citizens assume all people are or can be like them. I hope Norway wakes up soon enough.
I feel that we are on the cusp of the "Great White Awakening"... and quite frankly; it is about flipping time.
I sure hope all these great awakenings happen before we’re all dead. Just two more weeks right?
What about the significant portion of white lefty women? Or antifa-types like Grosskreutz?
I'd rather have homogeneity in respect of foundational American values.
Women use a consensus/acceptance heuristic to make decisions. If they are faced with overwhelming shaming and backlash for their stupidity, they’ll stop. They have only had as much power as men have chosen to allow them; feminists acknowledge as much.
You are absolutely correct about the female consensus filter, but male submission has become a compound problem with no one-step solution:
Because of all this, the moral leadership of wise men is essentially stuck in a tight crevice. Either we wiggle it out with a lot of finesse, or the right person with the right charisma will need to come by to pull the sword from the stone. The more that state laws start diverging from each other though, and the more irrelevant federal supremacy becomes, the sooner we'll pry apart the feminist death grip on HR departments, and the sooner we'll have a critical mass of responsible men speaking openly under their real names.
Holy hell, this is well-said! I would love to pick your brain over a cold one.
Part of awakening is realizing women shouldn't be allowed to vote and the sexual revolution was a mistake.
This was written like that Saturday Night Live skit - Deep Thoughts
Japan is similar. Very peaceful place. The tribe is attempting to “diversify” them
I heard that they fear the samurai.
It just took a while for bushido to grow back in Japan. Hopefully now, they'll stop scaring everyone with their cartoons and robots.
This is why we will vacation in Japan for our 30th anniversary.
"Suicidal philanthropy"
Pefect framing.
A pit bull is not a Labrador. They’re both dogs but they ain’t the same
Interestingly the genetic distancing a highly scientific method of determining the similarities between groups it shows that a sub-Saharan African is as different from a Caucasian ethnic British man a gray wolf is to a coyote in fact there is more genetic distancing.
Does that mean I'm saying we should hate other groups of course not. I'm simply saying that we are different and that difference is not just cranial slope bone density propensity towards certain genetic disorders and incompatible blood types but may extend to other areas.
For example I happen to be an a negative blood type my sister is also a negative. There is basically no sub-Saharan Africans with an Rh negative blood type unless they were highly mixed with Caucasian DNA and even then it's less than 1%. If my sister were to fall deeply in love with Daquan because he moves bricks and it's true to the thug life it would be unfortunate because if she were to become pregnant and the baby had an RH positive blood type like many people especially sub-Saharan Africans her own body will reject the fetus and attack it as a foreign object. It's almost as if her very cells were aware of these differences and hated them to the point of murder.
That being said people with Rh negative blood types are actually Atlantean and a separate sub race in my crazy schizo opinion
I was...following you until that last part...
No, no, he's got a point.
The ethnic group with the highest rate of Rh- blood is the Basque people in Northern Spain (Northeast? Can't remember...). The Basque language is a lingual isolate, meaning it has no known close relatives. Neither Spanish, Iberians, Celto-Iberian, or any other language spoken in the past 2,000 years that's survived to present day bears any resemblance to Basque, barring a few loan words here or there.
No, take into account Plato's exact description. Beyond the pillars of Hercules (the Straights of Gibraltar) is the islands of Atlantis. On today's maps, that area is the Azores archipelago, an archipelago that sits on a submerged chunk of land called the Azores Plateau. That chunk of land is actually continental crust, left over from when the Americas split off of Europe and Africa millions of years ago. Furthermore, deep sea dredging has found evidence of shallow water fossils on the plateau at a depth of 3,000 feet, far higher than the proposed sea level rise at the end of the last ice age. Limestone samples from that same depth show sighs of having spent significant amounts of time above sea level, exposed to open air.
Considering that the Mid Atlantic Ridge is a weak point in the Earth's crust, and considering all the weight of the ice caps on North America and Europe, it's not inconceivable that the pressure caused the Azores Plateau to be higher in elevation than it is today. For example, while it was under 2 miles of ice, the area around Hudson Bay was about 1000 feet lower than it is today; geologists have recorded the moving shorelines to prove this. That kind of land elevation movement coupled with sea level rise, and it's not impossible that the Azores Plateau was above sea level before the end of the last Ice Age. Add in the alleged maritime culture Plato claimed the Atlanteans had, and it's possible that they had colonies on the Iberian peninsula, or possibly even in the Caribbean and Central America.
While I'm not going quite so far as to claim Atlantis was real, or that the Basques/Rh- people are the descendants of Atlanteans, I think there may be some truth to Plato's story.
Especially when one considers that 9000 years before the time when the story was passed to Solon, who lived around 600 BC, and you get 9600 BC, or 11,600 years before present, which is exactly the end of the Ice Age. (Solon heard the story from an Egyptian priest, and Plato read about it in Solon's journals).
I'm just saying, I think the existence of Atlantis is plausible.
Interesting Basque folklore tells that they came from an island that crumbled into the sea. The details vary but they claim to have had some great city etc that met a calamitous end.
I love that analogy
PITBULLS ARE THE MOST LOVING DOGS EVER!!! THEY'RE JUST MISUNDERSTOOD BY DOG BIGOTS LIKE YOU!!! THEY HARDLY EVER GNAW CHILDREN'S FACES OFF!!! ACTUALLY IT'S THE KID'S FAULT!!! MY PIT CUJO ONLY GENTLY BIT THIS FUCKING KID'S FACE OFF FOR SMILING AT HIM!!!
Lol But my pit is as sweet as a lab!!! But but not all blacks…
Wtf... Pitbulls are fucking dangerous. They're so fucking clumsy, the saying should be pitbull in a lumberyard.
Hahahahaha
Agreed, my brothers Pit is 10-ply compared to my Lab.
I'm sorry but it's fucking science. Homogeneous society will be happier. I know that grinds people's gears and you think your this erudite citizen of the world and shit but aside from short visits it doesn't make any sense.
I like Japan. I'm not Japanese nor will I ever be, if I married a Japanese girl and had a bunch of happa kids I know they will never be accepted. And that's OK! Check out the book "bowling alone" and do a bit of research. It doesn't make you racist.
I live next door to an actual black supremacist separatist we were cordial with each other and even friendly enough to drink together and play video games however I understood his position he wanted some type of Afro futurist Neo wakanda and he frankly told me that I would not be allowed except perhaps on special tourist visas. And that's totally okay. Now we all have seen the Ugandan Space Program and so I wish him lots of luck with the flying pyramids and whatnot but the main idea is still valid he wants something for his people and that's fine
I am perfectly comfortable around people that share my values regardless of skin color.
Race and ethnicity is much more than "skin color" and while you can be comfortable; all animals display in group preferences. I for example have a background and cultural anthropology and clinical research psychology I grew up all over Southeast Asia and have been exposed to people from all over the world but i still have in group preferences its Nothing to be ashamed of. In a related example studying attractiveness people wanted "similar but slightly different, they equivalent of a 3rd cousin". This correlates to studies showing the greatest reproductive rates were with test subjects similarly related.
This example is just kind of fun but if you were to download the app face app and then using a good picture of yourself swap the gender in this particular apps case use the second version of the gender such as female 2 or male 2. I think that you will find the person that you see is somewhat attractive to you because it is you.
This tendency is a broad theme and of course is not always true individually bur over all the patern is clear. An east African woman is unlikely to choose a South Korean man, but the exceptions that prove the rule, are often an assemblage of racial fetishizations.
Im not ashamed a bit. It does feel like youre trying to tell me Im wrong about what I enjoy and prefer though, while implying that Im ashamed of what you think I should actually like...which is comical to say the least.
I've explained that there are exceptions, fetishizations, etc, you may indeed be telling me the truth that you, would feel totally at home in a foreign land with radically different cultural norms their own Mores, and Taboos, humor, and cognitive abstractions; that you are comfortable or at most ambivalent with the relative safety of your children and family in such a place - but you'd be an exception and one that does not grant you any accolades or some worldly cosmopolitan extra kewl person that is lethally committed to cultural relativism trophies.
Same. We all just want to be left alone and with our own kind
Too bad they all can't be black separatists. I mean, Africa is a huge continent, and on the average sparsely populated (might have to do something about that pesky desert up north).
ScottAdamsSmirks.jpg
that's not a smirk. that's bells palsy from the jab
Damn. LOL.
That bald fuck
When do the lamppost parties start for WEF members and their selected accomplices?
Native Americans trusted the new people to their land and broke bread with them, offered them assistance, offered them peace. And they were quickly and easily conquered for their trouble.
I just hope these 3rd world South Americans at least give me and my family a casino to operate one day…
Yea I honestly couldn’t give a crap about the Indians tbh. They’re still wearing masks and are extremely subservient. They’re a drain on our society with all the $$$ they get.
Native Americans usually, though sadly and very TRAGICALLY not always, got what they asked for breaking bread. You are ignoring the OTHER HALF of the "natives" that were a rapin and a murderin and cutting up young children-a-ring thing.
The conquistadors didn't get help from the natives for shits and giggles, they were a few men who could be done away with in the middle of the night after being dined, wined, and given pussy. They weren't because THE OTHER HALF WERE GENOCIDAL PRICKS who shouldn't be defended or their way of life glorified; they were strong man take all strong man take what he wants they just couldn't put aside their bullshit long enough to build civilization.
Natives WORE CLOTHES and BOUGHT LAND in the "new world" once it was settled but you won't hear about those people because why? Someone wants to paint the white man as an invader? Okay, so ... when the USA liberates a country or supports a COMMUNIST TAKEOVER and gives money to marxist islamists... you see where this is going.
You won't hear about the guy who bought land and integrated because he became an American (for better or for worse) but you'll hear about the guy who chose to stay on the res. But let's talk about all the people who have indian blood in them, shall we? I can't throw a rock around the USA and not hit someone with part injun blood in them unless it happens to be Pocahontas' family. That's still amazing to me, how she claimed to be indian and she's one of the most racially pure americans there is. ROFLMAO
I guess it's complicated. Sometimes, trust was misplaced. Other times, it was a case of the lesser evil. Other times, the new world picked some bad hombres to support. And there's no excuse for the trail of tears. However, giving land "back" to some of the raper tribes? Miss me with that shit and cry me a river.
I think you missed the point of my post. It wasn’t some bleeding heart plea for people to feel bad about how the evil white man stole native land or some shit like that. It was to say there were people here, and because those people didn’t act out of self-preservation, they were conquered.
America is doing the EXACT same thing right now, and one day this country is going to look like MexiHondurAgua and people are going to say how did wandering hordes of South Americans take down the most powerful country in the world? And the answer will be because we let them.
I didn't miss it. I just felt like it needed saying. You're not wrong and I don't disagree with you. I need to work on my communication skills a lot more.
Maybe the progressive libtards are right about bringing back segregation. Like go back to Africa segregation. And see how that works out for you
There's a cause I could get behind.
Chicago could be a nice place if all the joggers get shipped to Africa
its definitely not israel, they have very strict immigration laws there! they cant just have their homogenous culture ruined by too many outsiders after all. that would be the 145th totally real holocaust of them. 6,000,000 might actually die this time!
Israel is about 18% Muslim, they need to do their fair share and take more “refugees”
John Adams knew his cultural homogeneity.
Vikings were not racist. They killed everybody
Enslaved a shitload of white people too. Some of them neighbors. LOL
Is it worth it to ask for sauce on this site any more?
It reminds me of redditors arguing that there's no reason to require somehting to differentiate between news and paid content.
This has been such a pervasive line of thinking among left-leaning people (myself included, for much of my life). It's good that people are finally beginning to realize the error of that way.
I would like to master the art of being a completely evil asshole one day while convincing everyone that you're "nice" and "cute" and "fair" and "caring" and every damn antithesis there is in the thesaurus. FFS.
It amazes my primitive mind that it's even possible.
A lot of this thought starts with, "it's different because..." and, just fill in the blank. Lots of contradiction, but lots of appealing to authority. This is probably an oversimplification, but it's how it seems to be.
"Norwegian" you might be now but "they" will be aswell.
Close. 'Import the third world, become the third world' has it the other way around.
Africa consists of hundreds of tribes. Kenya alone has 56. While some tribes will be cordial to others, every tribe really hates every other tribe. You can't marry outside your tribe unless you want to be shunned. Hating what's not like you is the norm for Africans, unless you're white or maybe Indian. Then they see you as a resource to gain a better life so being nice to you is better than killing you. The reason Africa is so screwed up is tribalism. Whenever Africa was made into different countries, it forced together dozens of tribes that hate each other. The weakest tribes made deals with the colonizers and now rule the countries. The two or three ruling tribes run the entire government and give favor only to their people who now live in disgusting cities. When Africa gets money and loans from white countries, ALL of the money goes to the politicians. There's no foreign aid reaching regular people because why would oppressors give money to the people they're oppressing?
It's not "racism". It is "culturism". Phrasing it this way gives the lefties what they want. It is not the skin color. It is the raping and stealing and generally being obnoxious.
Christ is the difference.
Generations of faith created that culture of trust in the Wesr.
He's complaining about vulgar Muslims where a man:
Such low standards produces selfish monsters incapable of trusting others let alone being trustworthy themselves.
And geography.
Do not discount what is necessary to live as far north as we do.
-_____________________________-
Mfw christians stab you in the back, face, flank, and dick for profit and are lying sociopaths. It's like I'm stuck in hell sometimes where the preacher gets on the pulpit and spreads woke horseshit then goes on facebook and tells everyone "guns r bad m'kay".
They are there to jack your shit and nothing else
This is bullshit, Nordic countries(including Norway) spent billions funding terrorists in Africa. They are literally the start of a lot of our current problems globally.
https://www.sahistory.org.za/sites/default/files/NORDIC%20ASSISTANCE.pdf
"This paper shows that, in 1986, the Nordic Governments have provided well over 100 million dollars in assistance to the oppressed people and their liberation movements and over 500 million dollars in assistance to Frontline and neighbouring States in southern Africa. Their total assistance to date for these purposes is three or four billion dollars. "
100 million. Those are rookie numbers. Biden just left 86 Billion to the taliban
Remove the invaders by force
Europe needs Trump way more than we do, and we really need Trump.
now rise up - reclaim your viking old ways - and drive out the invaders - reclaim your country and heritage
Brevik was right. Over half of Norway said so when he went off. Btw
Diversity is discord
Ah you read the comment section on PJW’s most recent video, too.
Norwegians have some catchy, happy folk tunes
This one will ride you all day - better not give it quick listen.
OK, I warned you:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGZeAd_kkeY
Based viking!
Ding Ding Ding Ding.
Too late camel’s nose under the tent and soon sleeping in your bed and screwing your children and farm animals
Anyone got the link to the video? Got restricted on twitter, want to see this rant.
My personal experience with diversity
Exactly! And it has nothing to do with the color of their skin and everything to do with their BEHAVIOR! Does their skin color prevent them from being well mannered?
It's almost like opening the doors for foreign invaders is bad or something. A lesson that lefty women have never learned, yet they're the majority of the female vote.
Adams is not right. We shouldn’t run away from them. That’s a loser mentality and allowing them to win. We need to stand our ground and fight fire with fire don’t back down.
Post is CORRECT âś… Just look at that flag kneeler sueing his parents now. Ungrateful pieces of crap,better to adopt a Dog. My opinion.