We mocked him by pointing out that he was wrong, and thereby hurt his feelings. The other guys lied to him and endangered his health. He was apparently smart enough to realize which side is, or at least needs to be, his side.
I for one, stand ready to cancel him all over again for the slightest infraction. Just like we did last time because we're no different than the faggot cancelers on the Left.
They don't get it. Eve as their stuff continues to be posted, continues to be discussed, continues to not be banned from the site, they are buthurt about it and don't respond to logic.
"piled on him" =/= "completely banned from all public discourse and never spoken of again."
"Don't like that they are a backstabbing rino" =/= "completely banned from all public discourse and never spoken of again."
These people bitching about purity tests have no idea what "canceling" even means. Somehow they think any criticism at all is "just as bad as the left."
Right but i think that's so a 16/18 or 17/19 year old couple are okay. Which TBH isn't that bad.
I do not think it's legal if it's a 24 year old with a 16 year old.
I agree this push for "children's rights" absolutely has the end goal of sex with minors being legal.
It's funny because lefty women lose their minds at couples like Trump/Melania or other large age gaps with the man being much older.
Now we're gona be saying children and teens have enough bodily autonomy to be consenting to sexual relations with someone decades older than they are? GTFO
Now we're gona be saying children and teens have enough bodily autonomy to be consenting to sexual relations with someone decades older than they are?
That is what they're saying. We aren't gonna be saying it.
They are very slyly, cleverly laying the pathway to no penalties for sex with a child of any age, since a child at any age can decide its gender. The stunning cunning of the left is jaw-dropping.
18 is just as arbitrary as 16 or 15 though. If you think we should raise the age of consent to 18, why not 20? Our brains don't stop developing until 25 after all.
It's authority, they destroyed the family unit by taking away the man's authority In a marriage with no fault divorce, they are now taking away the parental authority to further destabilize and destroy
some do, some don't. But, overall better if all kids could have good mothers and fathers. Some fathers (and some mothers) are so terrible, their kids truly are better off without them.
Some do? Doubt it. Every single divorced household I have seen has kids that go crazy as teenagers, particularly if that divorce happened while they were young. Teenagers are crazy anyway, but throw in a dash of such a disadvantage as divorce and you are doomed to fail.
My good friend was sexually abused by her father and then her parents divorced when she was in middle school. She turned out great, though the abuse certainly left its scars. She turned out much better than if her dad had stuck around.
Thank God she escaped from that. Absolutely horrid.
I don't make the point that I did to be contrarian. It is just the general truth. Even her situation speaks to that. Divorce and broken families are not the way we aspire to greatness in our country. We must demand something better of ourselves.
It is a fact that divorce is a disadvantage to families. You keep on being the exception to the rule, though.
As to purity? Yeah, our country could use some purity. It is stupid to be impure. Aspire to be perfect, deal with your shortcomings, and when tried by fire come out pure.
During the first Christmas during lockdown, I binge watched an old tv show from the late 1960s. One of the stars was an actor that was around a lot for a few years after, then seemed to disappear. He was never on Johnny Carson later on, etc. I looked up the guy, wondering what happened to him. I found out that he never married or had kids. Ok, he was gay. I read further, and discovered that he was schooled in an all boy’s Catholic school run by priests in a hard core Catholic country. Ok, now I know why. Indeed, that’s how they reproduce. Every gay man I’ve ever gotten to know even slightly was either molested by an adult man, or their father was missing (either dead, emotionally checked out, divorced and gone, working non stop, etc.) or both. Two gay men I knew actually used the word “affair” to describe what was done to them. One said he was eight years old when his 50 something year old neighbor routinely came over and ejaculated on his face. Yes, 8 year old him was “having an affair.” The other was repeatedly molested by his priest when he was 10, 11, 12 years old. He said they were “having an affair” and said how sophisticated it felt to little him. These predators are demons.
milo got cancelled for saying it because the left already hates him for leaving the plantation... then the right gave up on him when he said it in an interview. he admitted he was groomed by pedos, and that grooming is so unbelievably common in the gay community. then the interviewer asked him whether he groomed young boys and he danced around it but basically admitted it.
that's the different between the left and the right. the left is a bunch of brainless tribalist wanks. i say "pedophiles should be hunted for sport" and then they say "what about priests, you would hunt pedophile priests too?" and my response is "your terms are acceptable". they're just floored because they were expecting a tribalist defense of pedo priests. it breaks their brains when we stand firm on moralized stances because they don't have morality, only NPC programming to defend the tribe.
There's the Stonetoss comic. The straight guy says to the gay guy that he didn't choose his sexuality. Cut to the gay guy as a child, innocently playing with his toys when a stranger's shadow falls over him. Back to the present he says: "Neither did I."
It's because if you start before puberty it lets you be more passable. Girls can hit puberty as young as 9, so there's a push to start when they're 8.
How do I know? Watching Chris Chan documentaries, where he talks about it like 10 - 15 years ago. Who knew Chris Chan's crazy ideas would get pushed 10+ years later. How could Chris Chan think up such a thing? He can't. The people getting in his head sure can.
The autogynphelia fetish is arousal at the fantasy of becoming a woman, the sexier the better. All the trappings (the shoes, the lingerie, the makeup, the hair) is an extra boost on the arousal meter.
The older the transvestite is, the more "issues" he has with looking convincing. And some of them imagine "Gosh, how much hotter would I be if I started before puberty!"
Jazz Jenkins has one miserable life from starting before puberty. Can't even have an orgasm. That always seems to escape the calculus.
But they're putting their sexuality on others. Like the flasher in the trench coat, making you a part of his fetish whether you want to or not.
Too bad all the genital mutilation surgeries are even less successful if the person has not had a normal puberty because there is not enough tissue to work with.
If lefties believed children had rights, they wouldn't be tearing them limb from limb the womb and they certainly be talking to a child's right to a mother and father in a stable home.
They can only reproduce memetically. Kids work best. Probably most gays were molested as kids or statutory raped. They cope with it by just calling themselves gay.
Just wait until the "I identify as a 5 yr old" movement comes out. I mean clearly if you can identify as another gender, or another race, you should certainly be able to identify as a different age. And to them it wouldn't be pedophilia if they're the same age. It's coming people. It's the only logical progression of this whole bullshit movement.
The same goal they push by accustoming children to the sight of deviant men stripping in front of them, for them, and making them comfortable in settings where explicitly sexual activities take place.
Oh yeah, they will absolutely push younger and younger kids to vote. I've seen a movement to put the voting age back to 16 even. I'm sure if they get there, then it'll be 14. THen 12, etc.
I'm sure if we're still at perpetual war, they'll want younger and younger to be able to enlist. Like the African dictators in Liberia using child armies to do their bidding.
One of the funniest lines I heard from Scott Adams... back when I still listened to his show... was when he was talking indirectly about Cuties (he didn't actually name the show)
His monologue went like this.
"Socially, I'm to the Left of Bernie Sanders. If you don't like something, don't watch it. Don't listen to it. I heard about a show that made people so angry that they wanted the people who made it to be thrown in jail. And I thought that was absurd. If you don't like it, change the channel. What could be so bad that you'd want the people who made it thrown in jail? So I decided to look at this show to get some more context on the issue. So I found it and I took a look. And after I watched it, I decided that I wanted the people who made it... to be thrown in jail."
You know, whenever you see these pedos on the internet advocating for legalisation of sex with children, I always ask them one question: If you had a kid, would YOU be OK with them having a sexual relationship with an adult man they met?
"Children's rights" would be banning unnecessary traumatic surgery like circumcision. A barbaric practice from a desert religion that 98.5% of Americans don't even subscribe to, yet we engage in this practice. Shameful.
Clot riding the shit out of that redemption arc
It's such a high arc it feels like it's going to the moon!
🚀
We mocked him by pointing out that he was wrong, and thereby hurt his feelings. The other guys lied to him and endangered his health. He was apparently smart enough to realize which side is, or at least needs to be, his side.
I for one, stand ready to cancel him all over again for the slightest infraction. Just like we did last time because we're no different than the faggot cancelers on the Left.
They don't get it. Eve as their stuff continues to be posted, continues to be discussed, continues to not be banned from the site, they are buthurt about it and don't respond to logic.
Huh, sounds a lot like clotty boy himself.
Purity tests for all. Fuck every politician on the right who isnt Trump.
This country could use a little purity. Let's have some principles.
We piled on him for being a smug cunt. That goes beyond politics
"piled on him" =/= "completely banned from all public discourse and never spoken of again."
"Don't like that they are a backstabbing rino" =/= "completely banned from all public discourse and never spoken of again."
These people bitching about purity tests have no idea what "canceling" even means. Somehow they think any criticism at all is "just as bad as the left."
Thus : 'Hell has no fury like a woman scorned'
I'm starting to pick up on your sarcasm.
Not sure what his latest health status is, but if he's on his way out, he can make a difference. God Bless.
We're all on our way out--eventually. Act accordingly.
If he's terminal maybe he can strap on a suicide vest and visit some leftist event.
Adams is the very embodiment of the phrase "In for a dime, in for a dollar"
Besides the Pedo shit it’s also how they perpetuate their little group. Gotta keep making more little freaksZ
They are trying to legalize child abuse.
In most states the age of consent is 2-4 years below the adult age of 18 so all of this is already a big problem of which most people are unaware.
Right but i think that's so a 16/18 or 17/19 year old couple are okay. Which TBH isn't that bad.
I do not think it's legal if it's a 24 year old with a 16 year old.
I agree this push for "children's rights" absolutely has the end goal of sex with minors being legal.
It's funny because lefty women lose their minds at couples like Trump/Melania or other large age gaps with the man being much older.
Now we're gona be saying children and teens have enough bodily autonomy to be consenting to sexual relations with someone decades older than they are? GTFO
That is what they're saying. We aren't gonna be saying it.
They are very slyly, cleverly laying the pathway to no penalties for sex with a child of any age, since a child at any age can decide its gender. The stunning cunning of the left is jaw-dropping.
in all fairness most vermin are more or less intelligent/cunning. and just like vermin they congregate in large population centers.
and just like vermin the only way to handle them is extermination
Correct...yet we are not doing that
we aint the only tenants brother. gonna take time for people to get sick of the rats
18 is just as arbitrary as 16 or 15 though. If you think we should raise the age of consent to 18, why not 20? Our brains don't stop developing until 25 after all.
Good idea.
Now were talkin'!
LMAO, every girl hitting the wall before getting laid? Depressing!
It's authority, they destroyed the family unit by taking away the man's authority In a marriage with no fault divorce, they are now taking away the parental authority to further destabilize and destroy
Kids without dads always do so great in life. /s
some do, some don't. But, overall better if all kids could have good mothers and fathers. Some fathers (and some mothers) are so terrible, their kids truly are better off without them.
Some do? Doubt it. Every single divorced household I have seen has kids that go crazy as teenagers, particularly if that divorce happened while they were young. Teenagers are crazy anyway, but throw in a dash of such a disadvantage as divorce and you are doomed to fail.
My good friend was sexually abused by her father and then her parents divorced when she was in middle school. She turned out great, though the abuse certainly left its scars. She turned out much better than if her dad had stuck around.
Thank God she escaped from that. Absolutely horrid.
I don't make the point that I did to be contrarian. It is just the general truth. Even her situation speaks to that. Divorce and broken families are not the way we aspire to greatness in our country. We must demand something better of ourselves.
I totally agree. We should work to fix and support families that can be fixed. Everyone would be better off.
If you wanna call what i'm doing failing, i'd hate to see the bar for what you call success
Muh purity tests tho
It is a fact that divorce is a disadvantage to families. You keep on being the exception to the rule, though.
As to purity? Yeah, our country could use some purity. It is stupid to be impure. Aspire to be perfect, deal with your shortcomings, and when tried by fire come out pure.
Men give away their authority. Parents give away their authority. No one is taking it.
Homosexuals reproduce by touching children
During the first Christmas during lockdown, I binge watched an old tv show from the late 1960s. One of the stars was an actor that was around a lot for a few years after, then seemed to disappear. He was never on Johnny Carson later on, etc. I looked up the guy, wondering what happened to him. I found out that he never married or had kids. Ok, he was gay. I read further, and discovered that he was schooled in an all boy’s Catholic school run by priests in a hard core Catholic country. Ok, now I know why. Indeed, that’s how they reproduce. Every gay man I’ve ever gotten to know even slightly was either molested by an adult man, or their father was missing (either dead, emotionally checked out, divorced and gone, working non stop, etc.) or both. Two gay men I knew actually used the word “affair” to describe what was done to them. One said he was eight years old when his 50 something year old neighbor routinely came over and ejaculated on his face. Yes, 8 year old him was “having an affair.” The other was repeatedly molested by his priest when he was 10, 11, 12 years old. He said they were “having an affair” and said how sophisticated it felt to little him. These predators are demons.
this shit is so common.
milo yiannopolous got cancelled for saying it out loud.
But it was okay when some leftie gay said the same thing. I forget who it was.
milo got cancelled for saying it because the left already hates him for leaving the plantation... then the right gave up on him when he said it in an interview. he admitted he was groomed by pedos, and that grooming is so unbelievably common in the gay community. then the interviewer asked him whether he groomed young boys and he danced around it but basically admitted it.
that's the different between the left and the right. the left is a bunch of brainless tribalist wanks. i say "pedophiles should be hunted for sport" and then they say "what about priests, you would hunt pedophile priests too?" and my response is "your terms are acceptable". they're just floored because they were expecting a tribalist defense of pedo priests. it breaks their brains when we stand firm on moralized stances because they don't have morality, only NPC programming to defend the tribe.
George Takei, by his own ultra creepy, smarmy, smug admission, was molested at 14 by a camp counselor.
That's it!
There's the Stonetoss comic. The straight guy says to the gay guy that he didn't choose his sexuality. Cut to the gay guy as a child, innocently playing with his toys when a stranger's shadow falls over him. Back to the present he says: "Neither did I."
Stonetoss has the energy we need. These cretins are so wicked it is unimaginable. They need their evils brought to light.
That’s heartbreaking
Which is why they put a huge emphasis on hiring LGBTQ for teachers in kindergarten through middle school. It is literally a breeding ground.
Didn't work on me.
It's because if you start before puberty it lets you be more passable. Girls can hit puberty as young as 9, so there's a push to start when they're 8.
How do I know? Watching Chris Chan documentaries, where he talks about it like 10 - 15 years ago. Who knew Chris Chan's crazy ideas would get pushed 10+ years later. How could Chris Chan think up such a thing? He can't. The people getting in his head sure can.
^ You're not wrong and this is also why I was thinking they were/are trying to push it before kids hit puberty
The autogynphelia fetish is arousal at the fantasy of becoming a woman, the sexier the better. All the trappings (the shoes, the lingerie, the makeup, the hair) is an extra boost on the arousal meter.
The older the transvestite is, the more "issues" he has with looking convincing. And some of them imagine "Gosh, how much hotter would I be if I started before puberty!"
Jazz Jenkins has one miserable life from starting before puberty. Can't even have an orgasm. That always seems to escape the calculus.
But they're putting their sexuality on others. Like the flasher in the trench coat, making you a part of his fetish whether you want to or not.
Too bad all the genital mutilation surgeries are even less successful if the person has not had a normal puberty because there is not enough tissue to work with.
If lefties believed children had rights, they wouldn't be tearing them limb from limb the womb and they certainly be talking to a child's right to a mother and father in a stable home.
We all know they want to rape them.
They can only reproduce memetically. Kids work best. Probably most gays were molested as kids or statutory raped. They cope with it by just calling themselves gay.
I would be astounded if even 1% of child-rapists were not themselves sexually abused as children
Where else do you get the idea to actually do that to a child
Quick trial, execution
They got the dumb ass adults with the vaxx and now they are going after the next generation with castration
Open your spiritual eyes and you'll see it clear as day.
Yeah, that's always been a big reason for a push with atheism for dictators/communist etc.
If you believe in nothing, you can be tricked into believing anything.
That is not going to go how they think it will
I sincerely hope you are right.
Dude gonna OD on redpills by living in a liberal fantasy up until he got cancelled and eaten by what he thought was his own kind.
Now hes care free to say anything that doesnt make sense to him logically and ask the questions he never was allowed to ask before getting cancelled
Just wait until the "I identify as a 5 yr old" movement comes out. I mean clearly if you can identify as another gender, or another race, you should certainly be able to identify as a different age. And to them it wouldn't be pedophilia if they're the same age. It's coming people. It's the only logical progression of this whole bullshit movement.
The same goal they push by accustoming children to the sight of deviant men stripping in front of them, for them, and making them comfortable in settings where explicitly sexual activities take place.
Yeah we know where it's headed.
Legalizing pedophilia.
If a child can make these big life decisions then they are certainly eligible to vote.
Oh yeah, they will absolutely push younger and younger kids to vote. I've seen a movement to put the voting age back to 16 even. I'm sure if they get there, then it'll be 14. THen 12, etc.
I'm sure if we're still at perpetual war, they'll want younger and younger to be able to enlist. Like the African dictators in Liberia using child armies to do their bidding.
One of the funniest lines I heard from Scott Adams... back when I still listened to his show... was when he was talking indirectly about Cuties (he didn't actually name the show)
His monologue went like this.
"Socially, I'm to the Left of Bernie Sanders. If you don't like something, don't watch it. Don't listen to it. I heard about a show that made people so angry that they wanted the people who made it to be thrown in jail. And I thought that was absurd. If you don't like it, change the channel. What could be so bad that you'd want the people who made it thrown in jail? So I decided to look at this show to get some more context on the issue. So I found it and I took a look. And after I watched it, I decided that I wanted the people who made it... to be thrown in jail."
They want to cum inside your child's little asshole. And they will use the state and the media to achieve their sexual desires!
Am I the only one who can't find this actual tweet on twitter? Did he delete it? Or is this fake?
Where's the sauce?
I'm not a huge fan of Adams, he's not fully MAGA, but boy he's got the right angle on this one.
You know, whenever you see these pedos on the internet advocating for legalisation of sex with children, I always ask them one question: If you had a kid, would YOU be OK with them having a sexual relationship with an adult man they met?
Never ever gotten a straight answer.
Maybe ask for a gay answer then
A lot of them I'm sure would declare that they'd never want their own children.
They don't want their own kids to have to raise and feed and love and be responsible for. They just want to rape your kids .
Why are we listening to degenerative fags about our children?
So they can suicide because of all the bad choices they made, later. Population control.
<KNOWING WINK>
"Children's rights" would be banning unnecessary traumatic surgery like circumcision. A barbaric practice from a desert religion that 98.5% of Americans don't even subscribe to, yet we engage in this practice. Shameful.
I'm disappointed I didn't connect the dots; good find
There really is more than one way to commit suicide
yup.
I pointed this same thing out a while ago. It has nothing to do with trans this or that, it's all about giving kids the ability to consent.
Because they want to fuck your kids, and because they don't have kids themselves, they need to reproduce by poisoning other people's kids.
They are creating a deviant and confused generation that's running into a wall of depression and suicide