You're right, but in doing so granted the left a propaganda favor.
They called the Bill of Rights as such to make it citizen-friendly. That is, it seems to be rights carved out for citizens.
That's not exactly accurate in that it is a set of prohibitions against government abuse.
The second literally states that the government may not touch firearms at all. No laws, no prohibitions. This fundamental misunderstanding by citizens means they now tolerate "regulation".
They are not retarded. They are tyrants and they know the 2A is there to prevent them from doing what they REALLY want to do to the population. So they use any excuse to get rid of it. The excuses may sound retarded, but their motives are not.
"2. You can have any gun you want, big ones, little ones, short ones, long ones, and no one can take them away, and if they try to, use your gun to stop them!"
They also say we can overthrow the government any time we want, if I interpret it right. A lot of you faggots still like this one so that’s not on the table though.
There are a lot of moral people, I’d guess the majority. The problem is that a lot are brainwashed or have been neutered by .gov propaganda for better than a half century.
There’s a reason the first thing they do in war is cut communications and bring their own.
They’ve been eroding the Constitution for since before I was born, we need to claw it back. Sue your local police department every chance you get. Record every interaction and sue them every chance you get for unConstitutional shit every chance you get.
shall not be infringed is pretty fucking clear. Our Founders knew that laws - in order to be obeyed - must be understood. That's why The Constitution and the Bill of Rights were written in plain language.
Democrats just don't care. They believe "group rights" trump individual rights. And when you try to explain to them that group rights aren't a thing: their heads explode.
They don’t believe it’s a group right either as they’re trying to ban and classify militias as domestic terrorism. They’re just using whatever argument they can to gun grab.
This is mostly true. Everyone should periodically read the Declaration of Independence. You'll be shocked how many things Jefferson called out King George on that we're currently undergoing right now.
The context is important: the Founding Fathers knew that they wouldn't win a war trying to defeat monarchism itself: they had to fight for independence. For self governance.
It's a concept that is almost entirely forgotten today.
The psyop that the enemy wants people to believe is that only that initial revolution was needed... when in fact it's a fight we'll have for the rest of our days. It parallels with the fight we have to live for Jesus Christ and to fight against evil and temptation always.
The moral of the story is simple - you cannot reform or change a government; its like a battery. You can recharge it for a bit but eventually its going to fail you as it gets weaker and weaker. You need to replace the old broken thing rather then try to debug all the errors that pop up over the years.
And the country would have changed for the better. Oh wait, can’t say that. I must have just committed seditious conspiracy. And probably “defamation”. And throw racism in there too I’m sure.
I would also ask them for a state electoral collage so that one or two cities don't dictate the politics of the entire state. It wasn't a problem then but it is now
The problem with this meme is they wrote it in their time so a 5 year old could understand it. Our politicians aren't as intelligent as a 5 year old in 1792.
They could write it in the most specific, 5-year-old-friendly, way possible and the end result would be the same to Leftists. It's not that they don't understand the intention, it's that they despise it.
If anything, I'd use my time machine to have them keep 'Life, Liberty, and Property' in the Declaration, ban all forms of collectivism, include an amendment for states to have the right to secede without any permission / votes needed from U.S. Congress, prohibit a federal reserve, and put far more limits on the federal government (address the eLaStIc and cOmMeRcE clauses).
They know what it means. The founders wrote exactly what the 2nd meant in the federalist papers . Since the left are dishonest america hating commies they pretend the federalist papers dont exist so they can pretend the words as written mean something else.
Tbh it doesn’t really matter how good you word it past a certain point. Lefties don’t want guns legal because they want to abdicate the responsibility and don’t like the idea of other people accepting the responsibility because it makes the feel weak and scared. Tyrants want to ban them because it allows people to oppose them and if they plan on becoming tyrants they don’t really care about the law. The enforcement class doesn’t want citizens to have them because it gives them competition and is a check to their authority.
More like women will eventually be able to vote. Make sure to spell out why each amendment is resolute and important. Black people will also be able to judge it in the supreme court.
Had the Founders formatted every tenant and amendment of the Constitution to reflect who, what, where, when, how, and why where need be, there would be far less "interpretation" by self-serving agenda-driven Supreme Courts and Marxists
a goin' on. For example, the Second Tenant in the Bill of Rights exclusively exists to threaten tyranny with annihilation (the why), ect.
Plot twist: They did write it like they were talking to a 5 year old from their time period. :P
You're right, but in doing so granted the left a propaganda favor.
They called the Bill of Rights as such to make it citizen-friendly. That is, it seems to be rights carved out for citizens.
That's not exactly accurate in that it is a set of prohibitions against government abuse.
The second literally states that the government may not touch firearms at all. No laws, no prohibitions. This fundamental misunderstanding by citizens means they now tolerate "regulation".
The Bill of The Government Cannot Changes These Under Any Circumstances. Yes, Even During Any Public Health Emergencies.
Doesn't roll off the tongue.
Shall not be INFRINGED.
n0 tHaT is FoR a MiLiTiA AKA yOur LoCal PoLicE
Shall not be infringed...
So much infringing. 5 year Olds can understand that.
For real. I don't know how much more clear they could have written it.
Not mentioned 'regulated' although I know it meant fine-tuned or trained back in the day.
Came to say this
Founders: Young sir we did write it for a 5 year old.
That was a 1700's five year old which is far beyond the retarded comprehension level of today's senators and potatus.
They are not retarded. They are tyrants and they know the 2A is there to prevent them from doing what they REALLY want to do to the population. So they use any excuse to get rid of it. The excuses may sound retarded, but their motives are not.
Potatus is dumber than a modern 5 year old. Shits himself more, too.
Well to be fair, a 5 year old back in 1791 would be 237 years old today...
"2. You can have any gun you want, big ones, little ones, short ones, long ones, and no one can take them away, and if they try to, use your gun to stop them!"
High capacity ones, scary ones, quiet ones...
Ones that'll make a harmless welt and ones that will make you completely disappear.
...ones mounted on conveyances of any type...
See, we believe in diversity. Of guns.
Ownership of any weapon type, sufficient to ensure the ability of militia to directly challenge an unjust federal tyranny
Yup. They also said a standing army is dangerous towards Liberty iirc.
You know, the whole “F-15s and nukes” thing.
They also say we can overthrow the government any time we want, if I interpret it right. A lot of you faggots still like this one so that’s not on the table though.
IANAL
Camo eggs and h-ammo
That is basically the second amendment anyways.
No, the wording is fine.
yes, give us better recourse against those that break their oaths
This. They wrote a constitution for a moral people, expecting that they wouldn't tolerate a breach of their oath.
There are a lot of moral people, I’d guess the majority. The problem is that a lot are brainwashed or have been neutered by .gov propaganda for better than a half century.
There’s a reason the first thing they do in war is cut communications and bring their own.
The third amendment should be:
Watch them argue that only the well-educated have a right to own books.
They’ve been eroding the Constitution for since before I was born, we need to claw it back. Sue your local police department every chance you get. Record every interaction and sue them every chance you get for unConstitutional shit every chance you get.
shall not be infringed is pretty fucking clear. Our Founders knew that laws - in order to be obeyed - must be understood. That's why The Constitution and the Bill of Rights were written in plain language.
Democrats just don't care. They believe "group rights" trump individual rights. And when you try to explain to them that group rights aren't a thing: their heads explode.
They can't think for themselves.
4/5 people vote for gang beatings. Therefore it's the democratic process! Just let yourself get beaten up! It's for the common good!
They don’t believe it’s a group right either as they’re trying to ban and classify militias as domestic terrorism. They’re just using whatever argument they can to gun grab.
If I had a Time Machine for 1 trip. I would go back to the 1770s and start educating them on what is going to happen.
They knew. They had just lived through it.
The whole point is they were trying to educate us.
This is mostly true. Everyone should periodically read the Declaration of Independence. You'll be shocked how many things Jefferson called out King George on that we're currently undergoing right now.
The context is important: the Founding Fathers knew that they wouldn't win a war trying to defeat monarchism itself: they had to fight for independence. For self governance.
It's a concept that is almost entirely forgotten today.
The psyop that the enemy wants people to believe is that only that initial revolution was needed... when in fact it's a fight we'll have for the rest of our days. It parallels with the fight we have to live for Jesus Christ and to fight against evil and temptation always.
The moral of the story is simple - you cannot reform or change a government; its like a battery. You can recharge it for a bit but eventually its going to fail you as it gets weaker and weaker. You need to replace the old broken thing rather then try to debug all the errors that pop up over the years.
Well, it probably educated them back again. But it apparently wasn’t good enough for the stupid liberal to understand
The King loves us. The King takes care of us. Who are we to question the King.
Same mentality today.
1600's........turn that boat around back to Africa.
Hahahaha
I would tell them to pick their own cotton.
I was born in 2035, this is accurate.
Did we win?
Let's just say it would be a great idea to invest in some asbestos underpants.
We burning bitches?
*britches
Every one of them would have entered The Capitol Building, on January 6th, and every one of them would have brought their flintlock pistols.
And the country would have changed for the better. Oh wait, can’t say that. I must have just committed seditious conspiracy. And probably “defamation”. And throw racism in there too I’m sure.
If George Washington saw a man shoot an unarmed woman, he would have pulled his prized Braddock pistol and put a .71 caliber hole in their dome.
They DID write it like it was for 5 years olds.
It literally says: Freedom depends on armed citizens therefore it is illegal for the government to infringe on your ability to own a firearm.
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
This would be like saying: "Oxygen, being necessary for life, the right of the person to breathe, shall not be infringed."
I would also ask them for a state electoral collage so that one or two cities don't dictate the politics of the entire state. It wasn't a problem then but it is now
The bigger problem then was the "Federal government" telling the independent States how they should operate and elect their representatives...
5 year olds back there were smarter than 45 year olds today.
"Write it so that it can't be misinterpreted by communists, feminists and homosexual activists."
"Don't be ridiculous. Only patriotic, rational-minded, heterosexual, married, Christian white men will be allowed on the supreme court."
"All of those subversive types were appointed by our last Kenyan president,"
"Oh, no".
You're assuming the leftists don't understand that they're wrong. They do, they just dont care.
They should have made it disqualifying to hold office if you propose any law that attacks the Bill of Rights.
No but legit though.
Wish they hadn't just written down the spirit but actually put on paper:
"This means there can be no ban on caliber, size, type or ammunition of any arm of any type."
Similar to that retard that drafted the 14th which he took on good faith people wouldb't abuse and now anchorbabies are a thing.
And while you're at it let’s firm up immigration.
The problem with this meme is they wrote it in their time so a 5 year old could understand it. Our politicians aren't as intelligent as a 5 year old in 1792.
the state will suffer no competition. And it will always grow.
They could write it in the most specific, 5-year-old-friendly, way possible and the end result would be the same to Leftists. It's not that they don't understand the intention, it's that they despise it.
If anything, I'd use my time machine to have them keep 'Life, Liberty, and Property' in the Declaration, ban all forms of collectivism, include an amendment for states to have the right to secede without any permission / votes needed from U.S. Congress, prohibit a federal reserve, and put far more limits on the federal government (address the eLaStIc and cOmMeRcE clauses).
Shall not be infringed is so clear a newborn could understand it.
Even a 5 year old can understand elmo
I’d give them a full rundown on socialism and communism of the 1800’s and the millions of people dead in the 1900’s
They know what it means. The founders wrote exactly what the 2nd meant in the federalist papers . Since the left are dishonest america hating commies they pretend the federalist papers dont exist so they can pretend the words as written mean something else.
They should've made it white only in the constitution
"Rewrite the second one to include a clause legitimizing individual citizens right to use force to remedy breaches and attempted breaches."
They wouldn’t care how it’s written. But I could think of a few better points to take the time machine back to lol.
I'm a fucking aspie and even I knew what the 2nd amendment meant when I heard it in school.
Boys with a Time Machine: so you are the Babylonian royal family? Bye bang bang bang
Me with time machine: McCain CANNOT leave this pow camp alive.
And add that killing babies in the womb is under no circumstances allowed.
well it is written simply...even a 5 yr old (Back then) understood it
Tbh it doesn’t really matter how good you word it past a certain point. Lefties don’t want guns legal because they want to abdicate the responsibility and don’t like the idea of other people accepting the responsibility because it makes the feel weak and scared. Tyrants want to ban them because it allows people to oppose them and if they plan on becoming tyrants they don’t really care about the law. The enforcement class doesn’t want citizens to have them because it gives them competition and is a check to their authority.
More like women will eventually be able to vote. Make sure to spell out why each amendment is resolute and important. Black people will also be able to judge it in the supreme court.
"How's england?"
Even worse....
Lol they did
Had the Founders formatted every tenant and amendment of the Constitution to reflect who, what, where, when, how, and why where need be, there would be far less "interpretation" by self-serving agenda-driven Supreme Courts and Marxists a goin' on. For example, the Second Tenant in the Bill of Rights exclusively exists to threaten tyranny with annihilation (the why), ect.