Obama Appointed Judge Rules ‘THERE ARE ONLY TWO GENDERS’ T-Shirt is Not a "Protected Speech" (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by G...
Guest Post By Shawn Bradley Witzemann (TMI) A Federal Judge has ruled the First Amendment does not protect 12-year-old Liam Morrison’s right to express his opinion on a t-shirt while attending public school in Massachusetts.
It's more than just Constitutionally Protected - it's scientifically provable...
People think we are far removed from the Copernicus days of being persecuted for simply saying the earth revolves around the sun, we are not.
My own mother wanted me institutionalized because I didn’t want to take an experimental gene therapy. We are so far gone it’s terrifying
Both parents said me and my siblings had gone insane too. Thankfully it's gotten better and I've been able to replace the (crack they were smoking) MSNBC with a smart TV and a lot of YTer channels they've become very interested in.
Good job pede
That's the way we win, by not giving up and slowly but consistently waking up all of the apolitical people who really don't have much of a dog in the fight one way or the other as far as their day-to-day personal lives are concerned
Bitchute
My mother thought I was crazy as well. She was conned into the "vaccine" shots by the talking heads and "medical" establishment, she now has severe mental degeneration and I'm taking care of her. They basically killed my mother prematurely. I can't even explain the problem to her and I wouldn't even if she could understand it. That would do no good unless the process were reversible.
For me the demand for criminal trials and public executions is something I will be publicly calling for, for the remainder of my life. The people who pushed the shots are murderers, thieves and war criminals. It isn't any more complicated than that.
I’m sorry to hear that man. My gram died in her nursing home like 2 months into the lockdowns. She had visitors daily to zero prettt much over night.
Tell her, when she gets too old to take care of herself, you 'promise' not to warehouse her in a filthy convalescent home. (~_^)
I'd argue we're in a worse position than those days.
Earth revolving around the sun was, up to that point, not easily provable by the common man. All they had to go on was that the sun shows up every day and sets every day then comes back. Basic logic would then dictate the sun does go around the earth, stating the opposite would be tantamount to crazy-talk.
Today people get persecuted for saying men are men and women are women, something which is easily provable and has been observed both in and out of scientific contexts for thousands of years. There are notable physical differences and mental/psychological differences. But, today, you're silenced for acknowledging them.
"You can't handle the truth!"
"You want me on that wall! You need me on that wall!"
"Then he must be a woman, take that bigots"
So the question is, Why is the machine promoting gender fluidity?
I'm of the belief it's designed to slow population growth. Confuse already confused kids with gender fluidity and they'll just remain virgins..
It is a variety of reasons but mostly it is about creating noise, confusion and distraction. This is the reason why I make it a big point to explain to people why I don't listen to any media other than independent people and even those are carefully picked and always held to scrutiny.
People need to understand that in order to parse the world, the noise level must be kept low so you can work out fact from fiction.
Well Baphomet is trans, sko there's that
And he's always depicted with children
Even insects are aware of the differences of gender.
Some insects switch gender, but that’s a good point: it’s such a basic part of life.
Why wouldn't you rethink your position now that you've seen them lie about literally everything?
Good point.
Whether or not the earth was round was also largely immaterial for most people back then. The vast majority of people lived and died in the same town without venturing very far. The same argument today would be exactly how many light years it is to Alpha Centauri. It simply doesn't matter to anyone but scientists.
Today's heresy is things that directly impact everyone's lives, like whether or not your school should tell your children that they're trans, or that everyone needs to inject Pfizers mystery fluid. We're in a far worse position scientifically today.
Nope, we are not. Currently, the only difference is the form that persecution takes.
We've made a full revolution around the woke sun.
Copernicus was never even "persecuted", and Galileo was treated quite well considering the model he proposed didnt work and he continued to promulgate it after the Inquisition told him to stop. It was mathematically less reliable than the geo-heliocentric model they were using and used elliptical orbits. The whole Galileo affair, much like the sex abuse scandal, was overblown by the enemies of the Church to defame it and delegitimize its teachings.
I got slammed for this in another thread, but I stand by it. All speech is protected. Like that fat lady saying Trump should be shot? Even extreme cases like that ought to be protected.
Saying someone needs to be shot, a specific person, on national television is not protected speech! That is insane.
Its still just an opinion, not a direct call to violence, and something that should be protected . The whole administration should be hung but im not offering a reward to or commanding anyone to.
Just imagine if Jim Jordan got on Hannity and said that, "Joe Biden needs to be shot." Now imagine the reaction and adjust accordingly.
I mean itd probably be the first time they told the truth in a long time.
But how does it harm anyone?
Words cannot hurt. Believing words can harm is how we have Tumblr girls saying “literal murder speech!” when you simply crack a joke.
And even less serious are digital threats. Like, pixels on a screen are going to harm you? Do you not know where the on/off button it?
Conspiring to commit a crime is illegal. Using speech to do so makes it unprotected.
Using speech to tell someone to kill another person makes the speech a conspiracy to commit a crime.
Using speech to tell someone to commit a crime is a criminal act if it is reasonable that your speech has implied force, like a mob boss telling an underling to "take him out". Merely stating my opinion to nobody in particular that the world would be a better place if a specific person were to die is absolutely protected speech. It's a legal fact.
I agree. There is a fuzzy line between calling for violence and stating an opinion. It comes down to what you can prove in court.
It doesn't harm anyone until someone listens and does something. Thoughts create words and words create thoughts in others, which then can lead to action. They're doing A TON of psyops right now with this in mind.
If they were talking about YOU on national television and someone said, "He needs to be shot." That would NOT be protected speech.
By sheer virtue of her position and her influence (on national television), her words rise to the level of a threat, like yelling "fire" in a crowded place, and are not protected speech. She knew what she was doing - it was calculated.
If that's the standard that we're using to determine what's protected speech and what's not, watch the fuck out, because then everything you say is on the chopping block.
Say someone does something. Prove that what you said didn't cause that.
Yes, and the left is wrong and we disagree with them. Right?
The fire example is used by the left, and you apparently, to make the false claim that if speech is used and harm follows then the speech was criminal. Yelling fire in a crowded theater is absolutely not against the law. What if there actually is a fire and you are warning people? What if there isn't a fire, but you reasonably believe that there is one? It's only against the law if it's concluded that your intent was to cause harm and it therefore wasn't your actual opinion. Intent. That's what makes speech criminal or not. All examples and circumstances of stating your sincerely held opinion or belief is protected speech, regardless of the outcome.
You are clinically a moron, and more than likely a paid provocateur.
I don't condone or agree with saying "George Soros needs to be killed and tortured." Soros is evil and is the devil, but he needs to be tried for his crimes, convicted by his fellow man, and then hung from the neck until death. This includes his son and all appointed judges.
To say that calling to violence is protected speech, you don't belong here.
To find common ground, I agree anyone can say whatever they want, but calling for violence does not come without legal issues.
Literally calling to violence was how the country was founded and was the way prescribed by the founding fathers as the way to protect liberty through the 2nd when the 1st failed. If a person cant say Biden should be shot without fear of government reprisal than he needs to be . When the system fails to uphold justice like it clearly has, its time to shed the system, and go back to basics. We are only obligated to government and courts so long as theyre fair and unbiased which they are not at all. I dont want to hear about courts or trials anymore, the only way to deal with these people is swift deletion, otherwise they'll continue to weasel their way out everytime in this corrupted system
That's not correct. The revolutionaries didn't just make calls to violence. They essentially said, "the system is unjust and our peaceful attempts to correct it have failed, so we must resort to violence".
Contrast that with what the congresswoman basically said: "Trump represents a strong political enemy and I want someone to shoot him".
Wishing violence upon another isn't illegal, but it sure pushes the limit. If she had actually said something like "shoot Trump if you get the chance" then that would be illegal speech, which is not protected under the First Amendment.
You would be surprised. I was genocided by net neutrality a few years back. It was a dark time for many of us.
I mean, saying they need to be, should be protected, calling out for the outright death of the person should not be.
I should be able to say, "wow that motherfucker needs hit by a truck" or something like that about someone without government repercussions.
Agree 💯
That is protected speech as long as you don't say "I want you to shoot person XYZ"
Agreed. The "threats aren't protected" crowd are the reason why people now try to make speech equal to violence.
A specific threat of violence is not protected. That interferes with the other person's right to a peaceful existence.
Indira Talwani is a proud Muslim born to immigrant parents in Engelwood, NJ.
Remind me again. Do Muslims love free speech?
What is....science?
Don't ask questions. Just trust the science. Right!?!? RIIIGHT??!??!
Not really. Gender is a made up term. There is only sex if the person.
Time for Rs to ban every pro lgBS t shirts from schools now. (They wont)
So if you can't say there are only two genders because it's offensive to some people, you can't say there are more than two genders because that also is offensive. Problem is, the latter group of people isn't the government approves group of people.
Dress codes are back on the menu
if we can't teach the Bible in school then lgbtq+ horseshit shouldn't be allowed either as it's a religion to them.
this. if "2 genders" is not protected, then "there are more than 2 genders" also isn't protected... otherwise it's blatant viewpoint discrimination, and even this SCOTUS would 9-0 that case.
We are doomed...
No she's doomed, if the kid plays his cards right he can get her debenched. I've done it, it's much more euphoric than punking cops.
You've gotten a judge removed? Care to provide any details?
Well technically a magistrate but that's only because she was to stupid to become a judge. Traffic court, she says defense for guy A, I repeat what she says (motion to dismiss same charge same place) she says no, kicks me out of court, denial about kicking me out of court, tell her I have the recording, file complaint and lawsuit with her resignation as the only amicable way for her to leave, she filed her resignation few days later, traffic court that everyone used to talk shit to me when I was there now does exactly what I say without question and near zero unprofessionalism.
I consider it my win since it went exactly like I said it would. I asked the court bailiff "how effective my YouTube law degree worked for me?" He just smiled because he knows they got punked.
It was so bad the courts deleted my last arraignment from the court records, hence why I record. Which was for pulling over a CHP and then him giving me a ticket for his infraction, just so I could debench a judge.
I know a guy being abused by the court system in one city. Can you elaborate on the process by which you began the lawsuit and requested the resignation?
Which state is he in? California makes it easy by laws but hard by enforcement/corruption.
First thing I did was find a speeding CHP and followed him flashing my lights then he pulled me over. Once he realized I was using him as a trap (I blatantly told him) he got very arrogant. You need to record his crime and his cover up of said crime.
Second thing was to point out his crime and how the ticket was unlawful. Also make sure to get the judge to say "beyond a reasonable doubt" I use the question "Will you use preponderance of the evidence or clear and concise?" if they can't or don't answer this question it's a huge hit for a judicial complaint. Before arraignment I send documents telling the courts I will PPA (citizens arrest) them if they don't equally enforce the laws, so give the cop his ticket too or drop mine or else it's a judge trap.
Third is to make they pick the trap, you have to use the PPA and/or get them to violate your rights, first amendment, 6th amendment tend to work. You make them pick the trap by pissing on their egos. For Marie Sovey Silveira I used her age and her inability to comprehend law (COVID helped me since is used it against them from both sides. I said the COVID mandate is unlawful but your inability to follow it makes your actions unlawful under the COVID mandate.)
Fifth file ethics complaints and crime complaints if they violated the law. Send demand letters and class action lawsuit letters.
Sixth file lawsuit if they don't respect you by now.
This whole process took 3 tickets, one they illegal said was true so I made two more. One was the same and one was a different violation but same defense. They still didn't understand what happened until they got the first letter explaining the conspiracy paradox they had created and thusly released me from their jurisdiction.
Basically it was a lawsuit that said all judges are to be in this case and any judge would have to side with me based on case law, coded law and the constitution. The payment wasn't monetary but public admission of guilt through apology. This wouldn't be good since the judges would have to admit to breaking the law, which in return makes appeals cases against them easier.
I gotta hear this
I don't believe him, he's just pounding his chest.
Edit: I take back my assertion, he came back and provided a thorough explanation. I know a guy just as crazy as this and is willing to go through the legal system so I can kind of believe it (at least the attempt).
Exactly. I don’t need an “expert” on law to help me sound out the “big words” in the first amendment. It is written plainly and shall be adhered to and defended accordingly
More doomed in that this is even a debate in western civilizations now. This would have been an insane conversation just a few years ago. It's a battle against the insane.
Because a judge says 2+2=5 doesn't make it so.
I'd argue this satanic insanity is making our case for allowing Christ back in schools even easier
The problem is that even though you know the answer is 4, now the official answer is 5 and it will be spread far and wide, forced down your throat at work, school, your kids watching Sesame Street, etc.
Until you start removing the root of the problem, the weeds will continue to grow unchecked.
We have to stop saying "there are two genders"
Gender is a gotcha word that they invented to set up this whole premise, there are two sexes, and gender is made up bullshit.
Gender was always the polite/non-embarrasing way to say "sex", until they changed the definition to mean, basically "personality".
Gender is an adjective (female nurse) and sex is a noun (short woman).
Gender is a good term (borrowed from linguistics) to separate the biology of sex from the cultural aspects that arrive from the reality of sex. For instance clothes don't have a sex, but they often have a gender that goes beyond purely functional differences to accommodate different body sizes and shapes. Unlike sex, which is immutable, gender is highly variable: from place to place, time to time, situation to situation.
This is useful if you want to discuss not what is a man or woman, but what is it to be a man or woman in a particular place, time, social position, age, etc. For instance, there are different rules for old and young women. These rule and conventions are wholly unwritten, but you might immediately notice if a 60 year old woman were dressed like a 16 year old girl, or if a 12 year old dressed like a 18 year old.
For the most part, we effortlessly navigate this every day, but if you were to move to another country, it might not be immediately obvious what the rules are. Even across town the conventions could be subtly different. This is one of the ways trannies fail to pass, even with the best physical mimicry. They break rules they don't know exist because they haven't had the experience of being the opposite sex since birth.
Tall athletic women are rarely hyper feminine, they're more likely to have been jocks and in the jock clique. Short scrawny men are rarely hyper masculine, they're more likely to have been nerds, and in the nerd clique. Men and women spend years in adolescence and their 20s figuring out who they are and who they are not, accepting what they're good at and what they suck at.
Gender doesn't have anything to do with culture. It was synonymous with "sex" until more recently when they started making shit up about identity. In fact, "gender" stems from the same Greek word as "gene" does.
What you're describing is what it means to be feminine/masculine, not gender.
Gender has been widely used this way in fields like anthropology, sociology, and psychology since at least the 1940s. Common terms have adopted for highly specific uses, especially in the academy. Consider essence, substance, and phenomenon. These have very specific meanings in the context of philosophy
Yeah I'd definitely believe they started making this shit up in the 40s, with what was happening in the world at that time. It's garbage. What you're describing are real things, I just think it shouldn't be described as gender. They took over that word with this crap and started calling it something that it isn't.
RStroud is correct. Gender is a reference to specific instances of "masculine" or "feminine" in a particular culture. The concept of gender is based on the two sexes, so there are still only two genders. The most basic example is how they use pink for girls and blue for boys in maternity wards. If you want to be an effective advocate against left wing ideology you should at least understand what the words mean so you can take part in the general conversation.
Gender and sex are the same thing when talking about people.
I agree that there is massive overlap, and can be used interchangeably most of the time. The issue has come to a head though, and we need to know the difference so we can argue effectively. It's especially helpful in disproving their ideas to know when gender is influenced by biological sex, for example in courting rituals in societies around the world. Men are more aggressive and women more defensive because women are the ones who get pregnant, so sex puts them at greater risk. This proves that not all gendered behaviors and societal norms are socially constructed, some are based on biology, therefore biological sex is the predominant fact of reality that society is based on and gender is a mere cultural artifact of minor interest.
I made this point to my wife, and now she says it to her co-workers. The language game is so important.
That’s how they control a lot of these issues by controlling the language surrounding the issue for example “gun control” is just a euphemism for civilian disarmament
Gender afirming care = sex change butcher job
This is their argument. This is what allows them to have unlimited genders. There are two. Only two.
No they are trying to change the definition of long standing words and norms for their agenda.
When I join the IRS I'm gonna audit this terrorist.
Yeah my homestate blacklisted me from being a local cop because of my social media.
So now I'm gonna go one step further and go federal.
Or sue for discrimination
I don't have the money yet.
this is the way
We would be better off shutting down all schools and universities at this point.
We should at least take our kids out of schools. Letting some adult stranger be around your kid all day every day when you're not there to see what's going on is kind of crazy if you think about it
Its always been insane and the only reason it was ever tolerated is because our government brainwashed our women into believing they should have careers and brainwashed our men into believing they should waste 8 hours a day working for rootless cosmoplitans instead of raising their children
That's where you're wrong, faggot
If the judge had also ruled that T-Shirts expressing Pride, BLM, Islam (or other things that could "offend" conservative students, they might have a leg to stand on, as far as disrupting school. I'm sure this sack of cat feces judge (Judge Indira Talwani) didn't.
The founding fathers would have dumped these judges into the Boston harbor along with the tea, if they would have known how much they would rule against the Constitution.
This is decided law.
It was ruled by SCOTUS, in Tinker vs Des Moines Independent Community School District, that the right to free speech doesn't end at the schoolhouse gates after two students were suspended for wearing black armbands to protest The Vietnam War.
And she cites Massachusetts laws against bullying, but state laws can't override the federal constitution. Even if the shirt were overt "bullying", that doesn't change the fact that it is protected speech.
This will form a solid basis by which the MA law is deemed unconstitutional.
I can't believe the government is arresting people that wear that shirt.
I don't think anybody got arrested. They just said they can't wear it to school because it goes against the narrative that they've been working so hard to push on your kids. They're happy the kid sued so they could use it as a virtue signal and make an example out of him.
I make Iron-on shirts all the time to trigger leftists. I love they looks they give.
That's good because they aren't.
He got sent home from school. I got sent home for wearing a "big Johnson" shirt. I wonder what the statute of limitations is on that heinous crime.
She is wrong. It's not even a question.
Yeah, it was a red-pill for me, one of the harder ones for me to get. But they do NOT care about being consistent. It's all about feeling for them. So if he wore a shirt that said there are MORE than 2 genders and got kicked out, she'd sing the exact opposite tune. And doesn't care if you point it out.
Well then that judge is retarded and needs to be de-benched. Unbenched. Fired.
This country needs hundreds of dead judges if it's ever going to begin righting itself.
This is one of them.
Disbar. So fucking tired of the make believe bullshit.
Hope the kid and parents have the balls and funds to bring this all the way up to the Supreme Court
the govt cant fix your problem when your problem is the govt.
We need to purge all these creatures from the judiciary system, until not a single one of them remain.
And they are NOT allowed to 'teach law' as a lecturer at a university when they are no longer a judge.
We need to purge all unelected bureaucrats period. they are the swamp
To the Supreme Court I guess?
It happens pretty often nowadays.
"Your honor, the sky is blue."
"Well, I'm not a skyologist."
A few years later.
They're all subversive communists.
"On September 24, 2013, President Barack Obama nominated Talwani to serve as a United States district judge of the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts."
"She began her legal career as a law clerk to Judge Stanley Alexander Weigel of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, from 1988 to 1989."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indira_Talwani
"In 1949, Weigel represented a group of professors at the University of California dismissed for refusing to sign an anti-Communist loyalty oath."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanley_Alexander_Weigel
This guy was a "notable individual affected" by the Leveraging Act:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harold_Lewis
^^^Read Lewis's views on climate change...
Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.
Remember. Judges have Qualified Immunity. It gives them the power to do whatever the fuck they want and use the government's resources to fight back against you if you stand up for yourself. Same with cops and (s)elected officials. Until Qualified Immunity is done away with, don't expect anything in the judicial system to improve. Not a damn thing.
I think it is time for a mass wearing of that t-shirt.
My shirt is on the way. I also have a small bodycam. Maybe I can become internet famous.
Well, there you go.
Diversity is our strength, though.
Yes it is demon.
First appeal judge is going to laugh at the absurdity of this one… unless it’s another extreme leftist commie
I could see this ghoul snacking on a plate of baby fetuses.
There should be no women judges.
I saw that over the last 5 years, Republican support for LGBT has dropped.
This is why.
“We just want to get married!” Was the biggest lie ever fed to people. That community is home to the biggest narcissists on planet earth it should’ve been clear as day they wanted more
Worse are the gays who notice the same shit we notice, but will do NOTHING to fight against it. As they don't want to get kicked out of the alphabet, despite the fact that the first 3 letters fucking hate trannies.
This ruling means I now have to get 10 of these shirts.
YES IT DOES YOU COMMUNIST BITCH
The shirt would be protected speech if it said there were one gender, two genders, or 4 and a half genders. The truth of the statement has not baring on one's freedom to say it on a t shirt.
Yep, I would just go right on ahead and make a shirt that makes up a bunch of numbers and end them with question mark. And the last spot an infinity sign with questionmark and an eyeroll emoji.
Can't wait for another court to slap this cocksucker into tomorrow.
Yes, yes it is, it will be protected by the public. If they won't uphold it, we will.
Only native born Americans born to native born Americans should serve in our government in any capacity.