Thank you for this! I watched this stuff like a hawk in the beginning, and concluded pretty quickly that someone would need to cut through the bs like this because they were never going to give us anything that would help measure vax deaths or other problems. This guy is very reserved, never on the cutting edge of what's known but never a whackjob either. That used to be called "conservative."

This shows that most excess deaths happened before the clot shot was available. I didn't expect to see that. People here claiming there is no virus and it was only flu renamed are BTFO. A lot of that did happen but that's not the only thing. This data could show that the clot shot even reduced total deaths overall, but it could also be showing that the virus simply mutated to be less deadly. There's plenty of excess deaths to be caused by the clot shot, but it still follows the basic pattern of more dying in the winter which follows disease moreso than vax.

We see pandemic levels of excess deaths. We also see that people die as a result of the clot shot, and it's not rare. I still say that those involved in various stages of developing this say 10 years is the valid time frame. The extent to which both raw data and graphs can be manipulated to cover up the truth over a time frame of 10 years is pretty extreme.

Very significant is why illegal aliens were the first to be exempted from vax requirements.