Was it the cause? (honest question). I've done the hypobaric chamber test and for me hypoxia takes a while to manifest and hits very quicky after that. He may have been so far gone that he could not descend and elected to pull the handle.
I heard of problems with the onboard O2 generating system. You'd think there would be an O2 sensor in the pipe with an advisory light somewhere. There's an O2 sensor in my car if they want to try it out...
If he ejected, he had a good reason and that was what the checklist ordered. Unless xir snagged his purse on the ejection hanle. This type of thing happened before, where an aircraft (even a jet) flew on after the crew left. A guess would be the loss of flight controls (edit: or as posted above, the pilot electing to leave the aircraft because of hypoxia) 80 miles is about 10 minute for a jet. A slow descent at 3000 feet per minute from 30 000 feet would give you numbers like that. So the jet was trimmed and just flew on, like a good little jet.
maybe the pilot accidentally put on the auto pilot without realizing it — and then, when the plane was not responding to his attempts to control it, he freaked out and bailed.
Just a wild guess because this story is otherwise so nonsensical:
if auto pilot was on and functioning correctly — why the bail out?
if the pilot needed to bail out in anticipation of a crash — why did the plane continue to fly?
I only heard 2 pilots pray. When I was flying back seat in a jet, that particular pilot always said a little prayer to the trim on takeoff. "The trim is your friend, you must master the trim, etc etc." This particular jet was of 60's vintage, so change in speed would require lots of trim work, the kind of aircraft that you always have to adjust the trim to ease the workload. The second one was me, and I wasn't praying to the trim.
I heard the Pentagon was working on fixing the potential hacking issue. So far they have hired over 100 Reddit moderators to ban anyone trying to hack in.
It's actually a great feature that's saved a handful of F-16 guys but I'm not sure what the implications are in this scenario. I've heard it's supposed to return to the last waypoint but if you're not coupled to a sequence I'd guess it would just hold the last heading and altitude
Likely the plane can far exceed the pilot's ability to maintain consciousness in the event of a high g maneuver. You would want a auto pilot feature to save the pilot and or plane.
Actually, if you look at a Cessna 150 that was built way back in the 60's, two modern people bring it over max gross because it wasn't designed for fat people. People were smaller back then.
Same problem with old ejection seats. If you keep these old aircraft too long, you run into the problem of heavier pilots exceeding seat design limits. For the pilot's bennefit though, they keep putting more and more equipment on them that t pilots did not have to wear in the fifties.
Jokes aside, they are moving in the right direction and will eventually get there. There's been great strides made in the battery industry over the last 10 years, and there certainly will be even better over the next 10 years. CATL is a a leader in battery manufacturing and here's a few of their news releases from this year.
Absolutely absurd. Battery-powered airplanes is the most retarded idea the leftists have ever had. Airplanes are extremely weight sensitive so that kind of inefficiency totally destroys their payload and range. They can make them fly but they can't make them be useful at all.
People don't realize how much energy is contained in hydrocarbons. They also don't realize how much energy a fighter burns. In the old F-18, I remember the fuel load with a centerline was something like 12,500lbs of gas. It could be gone in less than an hour if they did air combat.
Some Chinese companies will say anything to get a buck from western Gov'ts.
Folks, this is the Captian speaking,
we ran into a head wind and our batteries are running low so we're going to have to ditch the airplane.
We never carry any life vests or inflatable life rafts because of the weight, and the fact is that you'll be electrocuted as soon as we hit the ocean, but thanks anyways for flying DEI Air.
Haha, agreed but this isn't just some Chinese company, they are the biggest battery maker in the world. So there's going to be real world testing pretty soon and either they'll be laughed at for not being able to back up their claims or they'll be pretty busy since most auto companies aren't producing their own batteries but still want the best range.
"With a market share of 32.6% in 2021, CATL is the biggest lithium-ion battery manufacturer for EVs in the world, producing 96.7 GWh of the global 296.8 GWh, up 167.5% from the prior year."
We’ll never find out, but it is unclear whether the pilot punched on their own volition or the software was “buggy” or the software was compromised by the enemy somehow a la StuxNet type of attack, causing random ejecto seato, cuz.
Whatever is concluded from an investigation, you’ll never know the truth, if they even say anything at all it will be bullshit.
Correct, most radars. But not the ones the military uses across the country. Stealth tech is useless with world powers. It's only functional with 3rd world countries that have very old radar systems.
That's literally how stealth works. It functionally shrinks the effective range of radar systems, so an overlapping SAM network now has lots of gaps in it.
The ETL is not in the cockpit. It's aft. It's a fucking fifth generation fighter. They knew precisely where it was. So I'm wondering what the end game is, here.
The F-35 transponder is software. The system is designed to wipe itself, but there's still firmware in place in other systems that takes over if/when that software goes down. Flight control systems can work autonomously, which is likely how the aircraft remained stable and gliding. You can fully power off the ICP and still have control authority.
The entire brain of the F-35 functionally runs on RAM. Every time you power on the aircraft, it has to load the OFP from the VMCs. If you power it off, everything is wiped. It's basically as if every time you turned on your computer you had to install Windows.
I'm not the expert on how the internal software fully works, but it would make complete sense for the CNI to dump itself upon ejection. This would DISABLE THE TRANSPONDER, because the transponder is running out of the CNI.
The CNI isn't even central to aircraft ops, it's literally just the communication and navigation rack. EGI, IFF, MADL, etc. all runs through there. You can rip that whole rack out and still steer the aircraft around because the flight controls don't need it. You can literally power the entire fucking rack off mid-flight if you wanted.
It's fucking software and it's standard to erase software upon ejection.
Kinda defeats the purpose too if your 100 million dollar jet hits a Skyhawk flying vfr in between the military training areas too. I've had traffic calls for these from atc at work so they run with their transponders at least in national airspace for atc separation of traffic for ifr.
It's not in combat. And it is is controlled airspace. The FAA keeps track of everything in the air, so it's transponder should have been active. Once the pilot declared his in-flight emergency additional trackers works have been fired. The sign itself uses satcom so unless a collector is flying directly over the aircraft, it is not going to impact stealth. And yes I spent time in the military and as a defense contractor.
And yes I spent time in the military and as a defense contractor.
Then how did you forget that the transponder runs off of software in the CNI rack which is almost certainly dumped upon ejection, like all the other volatile memory in the aircraft?
Gps doesn't broadcast, it is passive tech. For example your phone just picks up time broadcasts from gps satellites that are geostationary. It can then triangulate your location based upon relative location to these satellites.
Gps would never reveal your location.
A transponder signal, which is an faa requirement would definitely show your location. These are generally required per faa over the US.
High value Proprietary software and encryption software deletion is very sensible in the event of crash or ejection.
I wouldn't be surprised if there was self destruct equipment in place for classified aircraft
The transponder works out of the CNI rack. The CNI, EW, and ICP rack all run off of volatile software that gets loaded every time the aircraft is powered on.
The software almost certainly erases itself upon ejection, meaning the transponder will stop working.
Also a transponder is not "geolocation data". It's a fucking four digit code and it doesn't even have to share altitude information in certain circumstances.
Potentially any broadbeam communications can be triangulated by the enemies satellites.
The only way around this is a narrow beam communications system, which is possible but could be a bunch more complex.
They may have this, but they may or may not have been using a system like that.
It could have also been damaged by the hot exhaust gas from the ejection system.
A missing canopy would all of a sudden also be a problem with some of the electronics, as the temperature and pressure changes could cause havoc with them.
Also transmissions broken up into short bursts are very difficult to fix and track. And if you beam them straight up to waiting satellites, they could only be effectively detected by other satellites. They also will use frequencies that are in heavy use by other sources, like cell towers and aircraft weather radars, making it hard to parse out the ones broadcast by the stealth aircraft.
Transponder yes, and distress beacons and others. Geolocation, course, speed, etc would have been noted as soon as the in flight emergency was declared. WHT? Because had this happened in a combat zone the craft would be destroyed as soon as it was determined to be unrecoverable.
He fucking ejected. You think maybe that would kick off all kinds of action? I have a question for you. Have you ever sat next to air control in CIC when everything goes to shit with a plane in the air? Yeah, shit gets really exciting really quick.
No dumbfuck because it is an F35. Spend a little time in the military/defense contracting so you understand what the fuck you are talking about. No tesla here, they are for faggots like you. Now be a good little cuck and clean up your wife, her bull is done with her.
I've just had to educate your stupid fucking ass on how the transponder works in an F-35. If I were to ask you what physical part in the aircraft actually "is" the transponder, you'd have no idea what the fuck to say, because you don't know shit about the F-35.
Well that's a lie, but try again. A transponder is not 'geolocation data'. Do you think every hobbyist in a single-engine shitheap from the 80s has all this fancy tech in there?
According to FAA regulations, a transponder and altitude encoder are required for aircraft operating in Class A, B, or C airspace, or at an altitude of over 10,000' MSL, or within a 30 nautical mile radius of the primary airport in Class B airspace. The regulations regarding transponder and altitude-reporting requirements are found in 14 CFR 91.215.1 Transponders are required to be inspected by an FAA Certified Repair Station every 24 calendar months according to FAR 91.413 in accordance with FAR 43 Appendix F. If an altitude encoder interfaced to the transponder, the correlation must be checked with the altimeter at the same time according to FAR 91.411 in accordance with FAR 43 Appendix E Part c. Mode C transponders are required for all aircraft in Class A, B, and C airspace, and for all aircraft in all airspace within 30 nm of an airport listed in appendix D, section 1 of Part 91 (Class B and military) from the surface upward to 10,000 feet msl.0 However, any aircraft that was not originally certified with an engine-driven electrical system or that has not subsequently been certified with one, or a balloon or glider
A transponder is a signal produced that can be triangulated fairly easily as long as it is transmitting.
A transponder is a signal produced that can be triangulated fairly easily as long as it is transmitting.
Or is this your attempt and rolling back "geolocation data", and pretending 'that's what I meant'?
Also the F-35s transponder operates on volatile software in the CNI rack that's dumped every time the aircraft powers off and reloaded every time the pilot powers on and decrypts the aircraft. It does that to protect sensitive data.
When the pilot ejects, the aircraft erases all of its software, which means the transponder turns off. Which is a good thing, because why the fuck would you want your F-35 wreck broadcasting where it landed? To help the enemy locate it easier?
I honestly think all these new cybersecurity jobs are being staffed by half wits who don't understand the engineering behind computers. We will always be behind. It's a shame.
Yes sadly I do notice a lot of these people don't have the necessary understanding to protect anything. Mention smashing the stack or memory architecture testing and their eyes would glaze over.
My guess is that plane is either in Ukraine blowing up Russian shit, or in China being reversed engineered. I don't buy the US Military just letting one of their jets fly off into the sunset after the pilot ejected, without shooting it down. He had a wingman.
They needed to wait for a Chinese balloon to pass overhead to get the precise coordinates.
Did they give a reason why the pilot ejected outta a perfectly good plane ??
Because she was a diversity and inclusion hire and they/them decided that flying was raysys and homophobic so Pat pulled the handle.
You're wrong.
Xirs name was Chris!
🎵🎵A lot of people say who’s that…
…it’s Pat🎵🎵
It's time for androgenyyyy!
https://youtu.be/OQ39LCzqpFQ?si=9NYxXbT7CXqvudZU
Was doing her make-up and pressed the wrong button.
more likely posting a tiktok video, felt a little turbulence, got scared and ejected!
Life support malfunctioning led to the pilot ejection for lack of oxygen
Was it the cause? (honest question). I've done the hypobaric chamber test and for me hypoxia takes a while to manifest and hits very quicky after that. He may have been so far gone that he could not descend and elected to pull the handle.
Ya. It’s a common problem with this particular jet and a lot of pilots complain about it, including other software related issues.
I heard of problems with the onboard O2 generating system. You'd think there would be an O2 sensor in the pipe with an advisory light somewhere. There's an O2 sensor in my car if they want to try it out...
hopefully those parts in the jet weren't made in Chyyyna
If he ejected, he had a good reason and that was what the checklist ordered. Unless xir snagged his purse on the ejection hanle. This type of thing happened before, where an aircraft (even a jet) flew on after the crew left. A guess would be the loss of flight controls (edit: or as posted above, the pilot electing to leave the aircraft because of hypoxia) 80 miles is about 10 minute for a jet. A slow descent at 3000 feet per minute from 30 000 feet would give you numbers like that. So the jet was trimmed and just flew on, like a good little jet.
maybe the pilot accidentally put on the auto pilot without realizing it — and then, when the plane was not responding to his attempts to control it, he freaked out and bailed.
Just a wild guess because this story is otherwise so nonsensical:
Yup. The trim tab. Proof a small piece of metal is more capable of flying the plane than any pilot.
I only heard 2 pilots pray. When I was flying back seat in a jet, that particular pilot always said a little prayer to the trim on takeoff. "The trim is your friend, you must master the trim, etc etc." This particular jet was of 60's vintage, so change in speed would require lots of trim work, the kind of aircraft that you always have to adjust the trim to ease the workload. The second one was me, and I wasn't praying to the trim.
I heard the Pentagon was working on fixing the potential hacking issue. So far they have hired over 100 Reddit moderators to ban anyone trying to hack in.
The balloons are WAY more useful than the F-35 lol
And probably a tiny fraction of the cost!
The jet has a mode designed to keep it from impacting the ground. So it'll keep saving itself until it runs out of gas.
Sounds like a suicide drone but with extra steps
It's actually a great feature that's saved a handful of F-16 guys but I'm not sure what the implications are in this scenario. I've heard it's supposed to return to the last waypoint but if you're not coupled to a sequence I'd guess it would just hold the last heading and altitude
Kamala Harris was supposed to record the voice that warns you to 'Pull up' but they couldn't get her not to say 'Pull out'.
Haha. Shit I'd punch out if she started talking too
It's a Bitchin' Betty that's hard to ignore, though.
Terrain following is a mode you have to actively engage.
It's not terrain following
Likely the plane can far exceed the pilot's ability to maintain consciousness in the event of a high g maneuver. You would want a auto pilot feature to save the pilot and or plane.
We should have Elon build jets running on his batteries, as they never run out of gas.
There's a pretty big electric plane industry. But it's having trouble...getting off the ground
They should ban land whales first and see if it'll fly.
If that doesn't work, next step is to ban all passengers.
Actually, if you look at a Cessna 150 that was built way back in the 60's, two modern people bring it over max gross because it wasn't designed for fat people. People were smaller back then.
Same problem with old ejection seats. If you keep these old aircraft too long, you run into the problem of heavier pilots exceeding seat design limits. For the pilot's bennefit though, they keep putting more and more equipment on them that t pilots did not have to wear in the fifties.
Problem is the battery weight. It's like the rocket fuel dilemma where you need more fuel because you have more fuel
Jokes aside, they are moving in the right direction and will eventually get there. There's been great strides made in the battery industry over the last 10 years, and there certainly will be even better over the next 10 years. CATL is a a leader in battery manufacturing and here's a few of their news releases from this year.
https://www.catl.com/en/news/6015.html
https://electrek.co/2023/07/21/catl-exploring-electric-airplane-development-with-new-aviation-unit/
Absolutely absurd. Battery-powered airplanes is the most retarded idea the leftists have ever had. Airplanes are extremely weight sensitive so that kind of inefficiency totally destroys their payload and range. They can make them fly but they can't make them be useful at all.
It's okay. Their next idea is balsa wood planes, with the rubber band driven prop that you need to wind up before take off.
People don't realize how much energy is contained in hydrocarbons. They also don't realize how much energy a fighter burns. In the old F-18, I remember the fuel load with a centerline was something like 12,500lbs of gas. It could be gone in less than an hour if they did air combat.
Kinda like their cars.
Lol ok
Literally the most inefficient way to use energy, but you keep thinking they'll get it right eventually..
620 mile range for a flight, hahaaaaaa
Some Chinese companies will say anything to get a buck from western Gov'ts.
Folks, this is the Captian speaking,
we ran into a head wind and our batteries are running low so we're going to have to ditch the airplane.
We never carry any life vests or inflatable life rafts because of the weight, and the fact is that you'll be electrocuted as soon as we hit the ocean, but thanks anyways for flying DEI Air.
Haha, agreed but this isn't just some Chinese company, they are the biggest battery maker in the world. So there's going to be real world testing pretty soon and either they'll be laughed at for not being able to back up their claims or they'll be pretty busy since most auto companies aren't producing their own batteries but still want the best range.
"With a market share of 32.6% in 2021, CATL is the biggest lithium-ion battery manufacturer for EVs in the world, producing 96.7 GWh of the global 296.8 GWh, up 167.5% from the prior year."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CATL
If CATL has been able to come up with the battery chemistry to achieve what they claim, then I'm sure Elon's Tesla isn't far behind them.
He should just burn up the batteries and funnel that exhaust as high velocity thrust.
If you ever saw a Tesla burn it looks like a upside down rocket engine.
Don't worry about the toxic nickel and lithium compounds produced, as the EPA doesn't seem to care at all about this hazardous waste air pollution.
Good thinking
Or they could land on a barge without damage to be reused.
Have we heard anything about why the pilot ejected yet or is that still a mystery?
the cockpit was too gay.
We’ll never find out, but it is unclear whether the pilot punched on their own volition or the software was “buggy” or the software was compromised by the enemy somehow a la StuxNet type of attack, causing random ejecto seato, cuz.
Whatever is concluded from an investigation, you’ll never know the truth, if they even say anything at all it will be bullshit.
Agreed on all counts.
Accidental mishap is the last thing i read... wtf!?
"What dis button do?"
Can’t use the word “mishap” when we’re talking about $80 million.
That's literally the aviation term.
had to go take a shit.
Was it a ma'am pilot?
Jogger.... hit the eject button by mistake when he thought he was rolling down the window
Because the stealth is THAT good, LOL.
Should've covered it in dildos, air force would find it in 5min
It was covered in the Epstein flight logs.
They had no way of knowing where it was or if it ever existed in the first place.
Yes, I would like an answer to that. But, like everything “controversial” with the government, we’ll never get the real reason.
I found a picture of the Pentagon DEI Search & Rescue Team
"Have you found anything?" "We haven't found Shit!"
i knew that is what it was going to be before i clicked it. good job
It took days to find missing F22 back in 2010. https://www.jber.jb.mil/News/News-Articles/Article/291404/missing-f-22-pilot-update/
Shh, we're busy with a narrative here, we don't need context facts
Crash vs. Diversity Hire hitting the wrong button...
AKA, it's a piece of overpriced junk riddled with bugs.
It's actually not but I dunno, making shit up for upvotes from hicks who don't know any better is a good option too.
Not a single picture of identifiable F-35 wreckage
What,
you think the CCP doesn't have internet access? ( If they don't already have all the plans, that is. )
Doesn't appear to be a plane at the "crash site".
It’s not unheard of for a plane to keep flying after a pilot ejects. This might have been one of the rare instances where that happened
Payne Stewart would have thoughts on this.. If he could..
Especially if they ejected for no good reason, which likely would necessitate a flying stand-down...
Crashed my ass. The military and their pimps are playing shenanigans again.
They have transponders. They are lying.
The transponder could have been easily disabled by the hot exhaust gas from the ejection seat.
Was the satellite tracking disabled by sun flairs? What about the nationwide radar tracking? Storms off in the Atlantic?
It's a stealth fighter, the stealth part means it cannot be picked up on most radars.
Correct, most radars. But not the ones the military uses across the country. Stealth tech is useless with world powers. It's only functional with 3rd world countries that have very old radar systems.
You literally have no idea what you're talking about, and the question is, when you know you don't know, why do you open your yap and speak?
"The radar systems the military uses across the country"? What fucking systems, you mean basic-ass bitch air traffic control radar? Those systems?
Disrespectful and worthless handshake.
Dude they're jet and military experts this week, they know more than everyone because they read each other's incorrect comments
I know with the original Stealth Fighter they'd plot their courses away from the centers of the Iraqi (USSR) radar systems to minimize detection.
That's literally how stealth works. It functionally shrinks the effective range of radar systems, so an overlapping SAM network now has lots of gaps in it.
At some point,
a flock of birds can potentially make more "noise" than most stealth aircraft.
If you shoot at the wrong thing, all you get is a very, very expensive main course for dinner.
The ETL is not in the cockpit. It's aft. It's a fucking fifth generation fighter. They knew precisely where it was. So I'm wondering what the end game is, here.
The F-35 transponder is software. The system is designed to wipe itself, but there's still firmware in place in other systems that takes over if/when that software goes down. Flight control systems can work autonomously, which is likely how the aircraft remained stable and gliding. You can fully power off the ICP and still have control authority.
The entire brain of the F-35 functionally runs on RAM. Every time you power on the aircraft, it has to load the OFP from the VMCs. If you power it off, everything is wiped. It's basically as if every time you turned on your computer you had to install Windows.
I'm not the expert on how the internal software fully works, but it would make complete sense for the CNI to dump itself upon ejection. This would DISABLE THE TRANSPONDER, because the transponder is running out of the CNI.
The CNI isn't even central to aircraft ops, it's literally just the communication and navigation rack. EGI, IFF, MADL, etc. all runs through there. You can rip that whole rack out and still steer the aircraft around because the flight controls don't need it. You can literally power the entire fucking rack off mid-flight if you wanted.
It's fucking software and it's standard to erase software upon ejection.
Trannies and blacks?
Should have been broadcasting all sorts of geolocation data.
kind of defeats the purpose of stealth if its broadcasting constantly
Kinda defeats the purpose too if your 100 million dollar jet hits a Skyhawk flying vfr in between the military training areas too. I've had traffic calls for these from atc at work so they run with their transponders at least in national airspace for atc separation of traffic for ifr.
The transponder runs off of software that is almost certainly dumped upon ejection.
It's not in combat. And it is is controlled airspace. The FAA keeps track of everything in the air, so it's transponder should have been active. Once the pilot declared his in-flight emergency additional trackers works have been fired. The sign itself uses satcom so unless a collector is flying directly over the aircraft, it is not going to impact stealth. And yes I spent time in the military and as a defense contractor.
it was a joke
Then how did you forget that the transponder runs off of software in the CNI rack which is almost certainly dumped upon ejection, like all the other volatile memory in the aircraft?
Exactly right.
Exactly wrong. GPS broadcast via secure satcom does not impact stealth.
lighten up Francis. its a joke
Gps doesn't broadcast, it is passive tech. For example your phone just picks up time broadcasts from gps satellites that are geostationary. It can then triangulate your location based upon relative location to these satellites.
Gps would never reveal your location.
A transponder signal, which is an faa requirement would definitely show your location. These are generally required per faa over the US.
High value Proprietary software and encryption software deletion is very sensible in the event of crash or ejection.
I wouldn't be surprised if there was self destruct equipment in place for classified aircraft
The transponder works out of the CNI rack. The CNI, EW, and ICP rack all run off of volatile software that gets loaded every time the aircraft is powered on.
The software almost certainly erases itself upon ejection, meaning the transponder will stop working.
Also a transponder is not "geolocation data". It's a fucking four digit code and it doesn't even have to share altitude information in certain circumstances.
Potentially any broadbeam communications can be triangulated by the enemies satellites.
The only way around this is a narrow beam communications system, which is possible but could be a bunch more complex.
They may have this, but they may or may not have been using a system like that.
It could have also been damaged by the hot exhaust gas from the ejection system.
A missing canopy would all of a sudden also be a problem with some of the electronics, as the temperature and pressure changes could cause havoc with them.
Also transmissions broken up into short bursts are very difficult to fix and track. And if you beam them straight up to waiting satellites, they could only be effectively detected by other satellites. They also will use frequencies that are in heavy use by other sources, like cell towers and aircraft weather radars, making it hard to parse out the ones broadcast by the stealth aircraft.
You mean a transponder? It's like a fancy pager lol.
you mean GPS nav and engine telematics?
No. I mean transponder. Maybe ads-b at best.
Transponder yes, and distress beacons and others. Geolocation, course, speed, etc would have been noted as soon as the in flight emergency was declared. WHT? Because had this happened in a combat zone the craft would be destroyed as soon as it was determined to be unrecoverable.
Who says he declared an emergency?
He fucking ejected. You think maybe that would kick off all kinds of action? I have a question for you. Have you ever sat next to air control in CIC when everything goes to shit with a plane in the air? Yeah, shit gets really exciting really quick.
If a tree ejects in the forest and no one is there to hear it...
And you "know" he had time to declare an emergency before ejection? And you know this how exactly?
Why,
because your Tesla does this?
No dumbfuck because it is an F35. Spend a little time in the military/defense contracting so you understand what the fuck you are talking about. No tesla here, they are for faggots like you. Now be a good little cuck and clean up your wife, her bull is done with her.
I've just had to educate your stupid fucking ass on how the transponder works in an F-35. If I were to ask you what physical part in the aircraft actually "is" the transponder, you'd have no idea what the fuck to say, because you don't know shit about the F-35.
And just why the fuck would a stealth fighter be broadcasting geolocation data?
Faa legal requirement when flying over us Air space
Dude...I mean....wow
Well that's a lie, but try again. A transponder is not 'geolocation data'. Do you think every hobbyist in a single-engine shitheap from the 80s has all this fancy tech in there?
According to FAA regulations, a transponder and altitude encoder are required for aircraft operating in Class A, B, or C airspace, or at an altitude of over 10,000' MSL, or within a 30 nautical mile radius of the primary airport in Class B airspace. The regulations regarding transponder and altitude-reporting requirements are found in 14 CFR 91.215.1 Transponders are required to be inspected by an FAA Certified Repair Station every 24 calendar months according to FAR 91.413 in accordance with FAR 43 Appendix F. If an altitude encoder interfaced to the transponder, the correlation must be checked with the altimeter at the same time according to FAR 91.411 in accordance with FAR 43 Appendix E Part c. Mode C transponders are required for all aircraft in Class A, B, and C airspace, and for all aircraft in all airspace within 30 nm of an airport listed in appendix D, section 1 of Part 91 (Class B and military) from the surface upward to 10,000 feet msl.0 However, any aircraft that was not originally certified with an engine-driven electrical system or that has not subsequently been certified with one, or a balloon or glider
A transponder is a signal produced that can be triangulated fairly easily as long as it is transmitting.
And where does that say "Geolocation data"?
Or is this your attempt and rolling back "geolocation data", and pretending 'that's what I meant'?
Also the F-35s transponder operates on volatile software in the CNI rack that's dumped every time the aircraft powers off and reloaded every time the pilot powers on and decrypts the aircraft. It does that to protect sensitive data.
When the pilot ejects, the aircraft erases all of its software, which means the transponder turns off. Which is a good thing, because why the fuck would you want your F-35 wreck broadcasting where it landed? To help the enemy locate it easier?
Why didn't you know that?
Called it!
Full Self-Flying :/
I honestly think all these new cybersecurity jobs are being staffed by half wits who don't understand the engineering behind computers. We will always be behind. It's a shame.
But hey they have vaginas or they are black or they want to chop off the dick they do have!v"hire for the attitude"
Tech is getting beyond retarded .
Yes sadly I do notice a lot of these people don't have the necessary understanding to protect anything. Mention smashing the stack or memory architecture testing and their eyes would glaze over.
I've met people with masters degrees in "cyber security" who struggled running command line based programs.
AI….it has begun…. ;-)
They couldn't find it because Cletus and Clem took it and tried to put it on a 68 Camaro chassis
SENTIENT A.I.?
Because the crash site was created not discovered.
Admitting that it could have been hacked means they need ground and inspect all of them.
A movie set??
They needed to allow time for Chinese spies to rush to the scene and take pictures first.
Sounds like a female pilot was at it again.
Hacked by China? Has Taiwan been invaded yet?
My guess is that plane is either in Ukraine blowing up Russian shit, or in China being reversed engineered. I don't buy the US Military just letting one of their jets fly off into the sunset after the pilot ejected, without shooting it down. He had a wingman.
All those backdoors can also be used by AI's. This worries me, a rogue piece of software authorizing military operations by itself.
It didn't crash. It landed and now being given away to China or some shit
The dude in charge or should I say the lady in charge make up must have run down her face 🤦♂️
If the transponder is switched off then there is no way to track an F-35 in the sky even with the most sophisticated military radar technology.
It had a second plane with it that went back to based when the pilot of the first plane ejected.
That makes no sense to me.
Jogger pilot saw a fat ass woman and had to go back and talk to her.
The plane is extremely stealthy. Hard to follow to site via radar and hard to find on the ground without a visual.
The US military isn't legally allowed to fly over the US and collect Intel imagery with drones by law.
This makes more sense than you might think