In the US our system considers you innocent until proven guilty. The issue here isn't that the despotic and corrupt UK parliament has an opinion we should disregard and insult, rightly. It's that US actors such as Google are operating as the state in place of our own, were never elected, and are violating human rights at great scale.
Then after that our "alliance" with nations intent on betraying Western values and reverting to their past totalitarian ways becomes important. But first, we do not want this garbage to spread any further here.
Exactly. Joe Biden has been accused of sexual crimes and crickets from the media. Russell just needs to demand equal treatment. I am also curious why a government agency is getting involved with a business deal between a company and a private citizen? It is none of their business if someone is monetizing their content. If he is guilty, prove it in a court and punish him accordingly. If he is not, leave him alone.
It's guilty if accused, unless proven democrat/globalist! Tara Reid, Paula Jones, completely unbelieved! It's only if you accuse someone who goes against the globalist narrative!
It was a half-ass response. Those fuckers are silencing him based upon allegations. Period. They have no proof if he's guilty. Even if he is, they have no right to silence him.
The response from Rumble was way too wordy. A simple, "Blow me!", would've sufficed.
They just outed UK government as being the originator behind the curtailing of Russel Brand's speech. I don't think you appreciate how far Rumble just stuck their neck out for one of their users.
Consider that Rumble themselves are enfranchised under Trudeau's fascist boot in Canada and if you think the Canadian government isn't going to retaliate over this, you've not been paying attention.
I bet the UK gov't did it at Biden's request. Remember his court order to not collude and coordinate with social media to restrict 1st amendment rights?
nah, I am sure it was on their own initiative. If you watch UK politics for a bit (for example tune in to Lotus Eaters once in a while) you will see that UK globohomos are way more heavy handed that anything in US.
Their police, their gestapo political offices, their media. Its all much, much worse than in US. Plus, even on the global stage, as far Ukraine war goes, UK have sent less aid over all, but the things they did send was targeted to escalate the war far more significantly.
Uranium munition is one example, but they were also the ones to send special aquatic torpedoes and drones for direct attack on the Sevastopol port.
I think you misunderstand the Canadian corruption.
Canada's corruption is ALL about greed; the only time we reach for a tall glass of woke is if there is money to be made. Don't believe me...ask the first nations about drinking water; or how Caledonia ended.
If there is no money to be made in going after Russell Brand our government could care less. Transition surgery is $$$, Vaccines are $$$$ - so we go after priests and truckers that stick a finger in the public eye.
I Canada the government is too lazy to constantly watch you - but get in its way and your gonna get fucked if your not on side.
And he has a right to restitution if he's found innocent. They should understand that and they should be challenged about that right now. If we had a "media' they'd be all over the UK Parliament demanding a response to the question "and if he is innocent?"
These people are sick. If he is innocent, is the author if this letter going to pay for his lost income? They clearly should have to. They're educated, so they should understand justice and liability. So why attack the accused ahead of a trial?
Why should Parliament attack an accused media personality ahead of a trial?
No i think you are misunderstanding his point. In the US you are innocent until the moment you are found guilty. Therefore you cannot be found innocent because you already are pressumed to be so. You can only be found guilty or not guilty, and only during a guilty verdict are you ever anything other than innocent. That's how its supposed to work.
Oh? Have the allegations been brought to the legal authorities? If so, that's news to me. I'm hearing that the allegations only made it as far as the media.
Lots of shorts on the market. It's a shorts ploy. They short the stock hard and then pay Robinhood and other brokers to borrow the stocks.
Let them pay the interest and keep buying.
If the common man owns all the stocks and holds, they will end up over-shorting, and they'll eventually need to buy shares to close their books. If we keep buying the shares at low prices, they will eventually have to buy the shares at high prices because they won't be able to keep shorting without ballooning their short positions.
Right now, shorts are 15% of the float. It'll get worse, I suspect.
It is being heavily shorted already and retail traders have no power against that like they did with GME. Have to be really careful here. It's a shame.
Thanks for the lecture but I don't invest actually, I day trade. And I have a 50 acre farm in a nice rural area surrounded by resources and like minded patriots. I'll keep trying to offer any advice where I thinkbit can help fellow pedes, thank you.
Apparently one of them did go to the police and even did the whole rape kit thing back when it happened. Doesn't appear anything ever came of it though until now when it's all of a sudden convenient to try and silence him (which the above letter makes quite clear what this is really all about).
Supposedly the "rape kit" was just an STD check, but there's a lot of silly shit around this now. She didn't go to the cops, she did go to some rape crisis center, but that could be because they provide those services for free to victims.
Not to go full Alex Jones, but you've seen what governments are willing to do to shut him up in the letter above. It wouldn't be beyond them to fake some of that - they could just do it at the journalist or even law enforcement level. Hell, the media would probably do it on their own for free.
Never go full Alex Jones. Always go full Bill Cooper.
Why would THE UK PARLIAMENT try to silence someone on the basis of tenuous media allegations?
There are only two plausible answers. Either (A) Russell has been saying things the UK doesn't want to be said, or (B) they are trying to INCREASE his credibility, by establishing him as a persecuted figure.
100% correct. Bonus points for the Blasey Ford quote. I read it while hearing her purposefully infantile voice. And fuck the asshole who downvoted you.
It recently happened to that Rammstein front singer as well.
They got famous, the system demanded proof that they are bendable. They didn’t do it.
Now, years later, accusations coming from Latvia or whatever, that he drugged some girls and raped them. Lynchmob-media we’re having the time of their lives. Now, after it all fell apart, he is looking for payback, suing them all.
One girl was young (legal), but feels she was taken advantage of
It has hard for me to take such accusations seriously after women started suggested that casting couch whores were being taken advantage of rather than shaming them. Putting your legs up to get a leg up in your career hurts all women.
Russell Brand had sex with a lot of women over a long period of time. A smear merchant dug through them and found a few incidents of women feeling awkward or regretful. The articles don't mention it because even the accusations are nothing-burgers. As in them being true wouldn't make you think worse of Brand. Since the real goal here is character assassination of Russell Brand they keep them vague so people assume the worst.
It's the grab em by the pussy moment all over again.
Rich men have groupies.
Russell was a stud back then, so it's no shocker that he banged random women every night. He's rich, famous, and attractive. Dude lived like a degenerate leftist for a long time too. It's not like he was known for being a saint.
If you have a company with employees posting stuff you made prior sure, business obviously doesn't stop. But if it's a company of 1 then the convicted is SOL.
So, if the convict is an artist or author, they should be forced not to draw or write while in prison just because some other convict can't go to their day job? What about someone who earns their living through investments? Do they have to sell their stocks just to be fair?
The part of the story that makes me think it wasn't about the news is that you have "journalists" from several different outlets getting together to get the story and then releasing a documentary about it at a later date. How often do you know of that actual journalists get together and share a "scoop"? Particularly when they work for different companies?
Government censorship. 100% this is because he spoke out against continuing the war in Ukraine.
UK government has been the main driver of escalation in that conflict - more so than USA.
Remember. If your nation is wypipo majority, then nationalism is baaaaad. Unless you traffic your kiddies (Ukraine). Then your nationalism and links to actual Nazis (Bandera) needs to be celebrated.
Still trying to figure out when and how Slavs become white? Is it the "White Russian" thing or Cossacks? Why would English, French, German, Polish, Ukrainian, and Russian people be lumped together after centuries of being enemies and killing each other?
Why would the French and the English? Or the English and the Scots? Or the English and the Welsh?
I think anything West of the Caucasus into Europe (i.e. where the idea of Caucasian as an ethnotype begins) is generally considered "White". There is still a massive difference between a swarthy Sicilian and a Nordic Swede, but they're still White.
Sure, the slavs would have more exposure to asiatic peoples, middle eastern people, but Euros were still exposed to light skinned Africans across North Africa.
Or, do you deny Melania as being White? If you were being honest and drawing a consistent arc through the continent of where "Slavic" people live, she'd be on the slavic side of it.
I don't know that anyone might have considered the Tsar and his historic familial line as anything other than white.
As far as how far into Russia is the line? I've seen it said as far West as Moscow, or as far in as the Urals.
It's already happening. They are trying to tank RUM stock so that the WEF can buy it up for pennies, break it up, and sell the pieces to the wind.
Don't let them. Buy Rumble stock. Profits are good, but freedom is gooder.
You have the power to make a political difference if you even have $1k. Do you choose to invest on a bet on freedom? Or do you invest in Google or Microsoft, knowing you could make a nice profit in a year. What is the cost of freedom?
I can't say I'm that big of a Russell Brand fan. I find him a little annoying personally, but it's clear he was over the target with some of his commentary, and it's also clear they were uncomfortable with the size of his audience
So congrats globalist fuckwads, now I'm going to make a point to watch some of his videos just to show support for an enemy of my enemies.
Same. The recent dip felt like a good time to lower my average cost. I believe in the company. Hell, I used to only use them once or twice every two weeks, now I use them every other day to every day.
Please can you help me with this. I read Rumble has 30 mil or so active users..and growing at 10% month on month or so... But I see this does not show in the share price - you in act mention its dropped..... I want to buy shares but what do you think will happen to the share price as it does not look like going up even with the last years amazing growth. 30 million is in terms of global use fuck all....however just USA its very good.I think Twitter is taking a bite of their cake...With Tucker hitting 270million views.... I have no idea what the biggest Rumble video views are but it cant be more than a couple of million.
So a few things with Rumble stock and value currently.
First off, the main reason for the large dip currently is that insiders were just recently allowed to sell off their stocks, which had been previously locked up for 1.5 years.
Now, Rumble last quarter had 44 million monthly active users. In the last quarter of 2022, it had 80 million.
I assume it gets much more views during the heat of a political election.
The main reason Rumbles value isn't increasing though is because they haven't yet introduced a real monetization setup.
No ads essentially. They're in the middle of building this system, which is going to be ground breaking from the sounds of it.
They're also starting beta testing of their cloud service, which is the business that makes Amazon so much money. Conservatives will flock to using Rumble as a provider for web hosting and whatnot.
All in all, if Rumble successfully implements monetization and has ads work, it will 10x + the profit they made last quarter minimum.
At least in my opinion.
If they can start bringing in $350 million a year, they're value will increase dramatically.
I don't think this is a quick buck to make. I think its something I'm expecting to do well on a financial standpoint in the next 2 to 4 years.
And still, I could be wrong.
The one thing I'll say about tech companies is any of them can fail and lose relevance.
Apple or Microsoft could be dead in 10 years.
It doesn't take long for someone on top of the world to fall down, if they fail to innovate.
Sure thing fren. It's tough to say... idk if right now is a great time to buy much of anything.
I'm not a day trader though, I'm strictly long term, so I'm not flipping stocks going up and down 5%.
Personally, my favorite stocks are oil stocks like exxonmobil, but I wouldn't buy any at all until it comes down to $90 or less.
Though if you are new to investing, I'd saying spending a small amount once a week to start building a portfolio is smart. Diversity is smart too, to have different types of markets.
If we somehow lose all our money but Rumble keeps banned voices online, we will have won on that prospect alone.
If the conservatives who watch their favorite shows on Rumble all put 5% of their portfolios into Rumble, I'm sure it would go gangbusters, and people would be talking about how being pro-free speech is actually a highly profitable endeavor.
I am formally accusing Youtube of sexual assault. It came at me late in the night with skimpy yoga videos and lingerie videos... And I just didn't want it... But Youtube made me feel like I had to... I have lived in shame ever since.
Youtube should not be able to monetize and make money.
Uh, if you think about the sort of "education" that is being pushed for people at the moment, then think that Youtube allows otherwise banned content under the guise of "education", take a guess as to what sort of content can be readily found on Youtube...
It’s disgusting that a government can interfere on allegations alone… Notice, YouTube only demonetized him, and didn’t remove his account because then they would have to do the same to Robert L Peters for the Tara Reade accusations
Though I think RB may be screwed, if they are going for this they probably have a crazy eyed "rape is sexy" useful tool to make it stick waiting in the wings. Unless he really did rape, then he deserves all he gets. But my confidence leans more towards this being a political hit.
There's no doubt he did lots of stuff when he was on drugs. He admits that. These women didn't come forward five years ago. They're coming forward now because the powers that be want to take him down.
Alex Jones said that they investigate all women that have ever had contact with him and try to uncover dirt on them so they can be blackmailed into accusing him. Or they pay them off etc. They tried that vs Alex too.
Even if found guilty he shouldn't be banned for off platform behavior 20 years ago. Community guidelines should only apply to on platform content and behavior.
Minister for Women and Equalities: In her role as Minister for Women and Equalities, Dinenage implemented the Gender Pay Gap reporting regulations which came into force in April 2017.
Aha! The MeToo connection! The Bitter Women getting paid from somewhere...same people who tried to take down Johnny Depp.
The Rothschild Khazarians in London were the British Empire's Central Bankers for centuries. Now Klaus/WEF is their face plate. They are America's oldest Enemy. WEF Loyalists among us are no different, indistinguishable, from the Crown Loyalists of 1776. Same Masters.
Caroline Dinenage knows who is orchestrating the mob against Russell Brand because she's in on it. She very well could have been the instigator of the YouTube ban.
In fairness, Rumble is based in Canada, where they remain a constitutional monarchy, with the Queen of England as their head of state. And their military even takes an oath of loyalty to the crown. It’s not really that big of a leap.
FUCK HER. She addressed the letter to Chris, not to Mr. Pavloski, which is way too familiar for a formal letter, and also condescending. She used her full name AND full title signing it.
And government has ZERO business trying to punish a person against whom ZERO official charges or offenses have been established in court!
Looks like Rumble is about to be banned in the UK. That letter is basically a threat stating that if Rumble doesn't cancel Brand then the decency police in the UK will be forced to censor the entire platform due to the UK governments inability to intimidate or otherwise control Rumble as a platform based on whatever the current popular thing to cancel is at the time.
Makes me wonder what the future looks like. EU recently enacted some kind of digital censorship deal, and it’ll be difficult for platforms to run different operations for all the different countries they serve. Meaning US citizens will likely be caught up in their censorship efforts.
So it looks like we end up with… no speech? Or only speech that kowtows to the WEF agenda on the big platforms, perhaps with smaller, country-specific operations. Looks bleak.
Unlimited upside. My strike was $8, and I have about 100 contracts (each represents 100 shares), so my 20k purchased the right to buy 10,000 shares at $8 until Jan 2025.
If the price stays below $8 Ill lose all 20k (contracts are worthless). If the price is $10 then I make 20,000 ($2 gain ×10k). If it hits $20 then its 120k. Higher rumble goes the more I make (using my contract to buy at $8 a share and then selling at market price)
Options are a good way to gamble with limited losses, since the most I can lose is the initial 20k.
Thank you rumble. We need more who refuse to bow the cancel, woke
In the US our system considers you innocent until proven guilty. The issue here isn't that the despotic and corrupt UK parliament has an opinion we should disregard and insult, rightly. It's that US actors such as Google are operating as the state in place of our own, were never elected, and are violating human rights at great scale.
Then after that our "alliance" with nations intent on betraying Western values and reverting to their past totalitarian ways becomes important. But first, we do not want this garbage to spread any further here.
Sic semper tyrannis.
Now it's guilty if accused
Guilty if accused BY THE LEFT
And their fake "media" which is defrauding everyone with this kind of horseshit.
Ahhh, someone who knows the difference between bullshit and horseshit!
Exactly. Joe Biden has been accused of sexual crimes and crickets from the media. Russell just needs to demand equal treatment. I am also curious why a government agency is getting involved with a business deal between a company and a private citizen? It is none of their business if someone is monetizing their content. If he is guilty, prove it in a court and punish him accordingly. If he is not, leave him alone.
because red faggot coats never give up.
Provided you're not more important than the accuser.
Believe all women, except for that whore Tara Reid. And Jaunita Broaddrick. And Paula Jones. And…
It's called a wrap up smear, ask Pelosi how it works
It's guilty if accused, unless proven democrat/globalist! Tara Reid, Paula Jones, completely unbelieved! It's only if you accuse someone who goes against the globalist narrative!
Which is it's own shame that people should be held accountable for.
Always has been
laws with prima facie guilt enter the chat
It was a half-ass response. Those fuckers are silencing him based upon allegations. Period. They have no proof if he's guilty. Even if he is, they have no right to silence him.
The response from Rumble was way too wordy. A simple, "Blow me!", would've sufficed.
They just outed UK government as being the originator behind the curtailing of Russel Brand's speech. I don't think you appreciate how far Rumble just stuck their neck out for one of their users.
Consider that Rumble themselves are enfranchised under Trudeau's fascist boot in Canada and if you think the Canadian government isn't going to retaliate over this, you've not been paying attention.
I bet the UK gov't did it at Biden's request. Remember his court order to not collude and coordinate with social media to restrict 1st amendment rights?
nah, I am sure it was on their own initiative. If you watch UK politics for a bit (for example tune in to Lotus Eaters once in a while) you will see that UK globohomos are way more heavy handed that anything in US.
Their police, their gestapo political offices, their media. Its all much, much worse than in US. Plus, even on the global stage, as far Ukraine war goes, UK have sent less aid over all, but the things they did send was targeted to escalate the war far more significantly.
Uranium munition is one example, but they were also the ones to send special aquatic torpedoes and drones for direct attack on the Sevastopol port.
Biden: "Have the FBI censor him!"
Courts: "You can't do that."
Biden: "Tell my ex staffers within Youtube to censor him!"
Courts: "Nope, that's... that's legally the same thing. Still can't do that."
Biden: "Tell my allies in the British government to tell my ex staffers within Youtube to censor him!"
Courts: "Are you fucking kidding me?"
I think you misunderstand the Canadian corruption.
Canada's corruption is ALL about greed; the only time we reach for a tall glass of woke is if there is money to be made. Don't believe me...ask the first nations about drinking water; or how Caledonia ended.
If there is no money to be made in going after Russell Brand our government could care less. Transition surgery is $$$, Vaccines are $$$$ - so we go after priests and truckers that stick a finger in the public eye.
I Canada the government is too lazy to constantly watch you - but get in its way and your gonna get fucked if your not on side.
They moved to florida at least a year ago. Thats why DJT jr is one of their advisors and biggest users.
I believe Rumble has, or is in the process of, formally relocating to the US explicitly because of those issues.
They opened a new HQ in Florida not long ago.
https://www.tampabay.com/news/business/2021/11/02/video-platform-rumble-announces-hq-move-to-sarasota-county/
And he has a right to restitution if he's found innocent. They should understand that and they should be challenged about that right now. If we had a "media' they'd be all over the UK Parliament demanding a response to the question "and if he is innocent?"
These people are sick. If he is innocent, is the author if this letter going to pay for his lost income? They clearly should have to. They're educated, so they should understand justice and liability. So why attack the accused ahead of a trial?
Why should Parliament attack an accused media personality ahead of a trial?
This is a fundamental misunderstanding of how the US justice system (should) works.
It does work this way in the US. Of course there are those who betray us.
No i think you are misunderstanding his point. In the US you are innocent until the moment you are found guilty. Therefore you cannot be found innocent because you already are pressumed to be so. You can only be found guilty or not guilty, and only during a guilty verdict are you ever anything other than innocent. That's how its supposed to work.
Makes sense to me.
Oh? Have the allegations been brought to the legal authorities? If so, that's news to me. I'm hearing that the allegations only made it as far as the media.
There was nothing illegal in the allegations.
Well, according to the UK government larping as a "news outlet" another faction of the UK government is urging accusers to come forward.
Brainwash, suggest, it's all the same
I prefer the best one-word reply in history.
NUTS!
“Deeply inappropriate.” Rumble’s response was clearly written by a woman
Or a fag.
He should have told that dame to kiss his ass.
"I refer you to the reply given in Arkell and Pressdram" would have been the lawyer way to say it politely LOL
We as the people need to put our money where our mouth is.
Rumble is a publicly traded company. RUM. Put a chunk of your portfolio into it. Whatever you think freedom is worth.
The banksters will short sell RUM into the ground and then attempt a hostile takeover. Buy up the shares and hodl for freedom.
I’ve lost 60% on my RUM investment so far.
Not unless you sold.
George Washington lost over 60% of his battles in the Revolutionary War.
Nope haven’t sold. Funny thing is, I can’t see an obvious reason for the stock price declines over the last several months…
Lots of shorts on the market. It's a shorts ploy. They short the stock hard and then pay Robinhood and other brokers to borrow the stocks.
Let them pay the interest and keep buying.
If the common man owns all the stocks and holds, they will end up over-shorting, and they'll eventually need to buy shares to close their books. If we keep buying the shares at low prices, they will eventually have to buy the shares at high prices because they won't be able to keep shorting without ballooning their short positions.
Right now, shorts are 15% of the float. It'll get worse, I suspect.
I drank 80% of my RUM investment over the weekend!
Pina Coladas for everybody!
Not Financial Advice: $RUM is on sale right now. Lowest price in a year.
It is being heavily shorted already and retail traders have no power against that like they did with GME. Have to be really careful here. It's a shame.
Why do you say we don't have power as we did with GME?
The market makers will never let something like that happen again, things only run if they aren't paying attention or are "ok" with it now.
If you think the game is totally rigged now, it's best you stop investing in all stocks and bonds because all it does is enrich them.
Figure out how to survive or learn to die.
Thanks for the lecture but I don't invest actually, I day trade. And I have a 50 acre farm in a nice rural area surrounded by resources and like minded patriots. I'll keep trying to offer any advice where I thinkbit can help fellow pedes, thank you.
There’s only one acceptable response from Rumble: Fuck you.
We certainly do.
Tel: 020 7219 6188
It’s Uk so….
+44 20 7219 6188
A thousand hells awaits them all
Hell of horny dragon.
I read two articles about the Russell Brand issue and I still don't know what he's accused of exactly.
It's the same old story
Happened years ago, bitch never filed a police report and didn't say a word until now
It's indelible in her hippocampus so to speak
Apparently one of them did go to the police and even did the whole rape kit thing back when it happened. Doesn't appear anything ever came of it though until now when it's all of a sudden convenient to try and silence him (which the above letter makes quite clear what this is really all about).
Supposedly the "rape kit" was just an STD check, but there's a lot of silly shit around this now. She didn't go to the cops, she did go to some rape crisis center, but that could be because they provide those services for free to victims.
I've been talked into taking off the condom, years ago. Do I have a rape claim?!
Depends, does your rapist support Ukraine, or are they a terrorist?
Do they support orange man? If so, then you have a valid claim.
only if the other person is famous somehow and needs to be controlled
Not to go full Alex Jones, but you've seen what governments are willing to do to shut him up in the letter above. It wouldn't be beyond them to fake some of that - they could just do it at the journalist or even law enforcement level. Hell, the media would probably do it on their own for free.
Never go full Alex Jones. Always go full Bill Cooper.
Why would THE UK PARLIAMENT try to silence someone on the basis of tenuous media allegations?
There are only two plausible answers. Either (A) Russell has been saying things the UK doesn't want to be said, or (B) they are trying to INCREASE his credibility, by establishing him as a persecuted figure.
I am sure AJ has really creative excuses why he doesn't want to wear a rubber.
I was wondering how long it would take. Most of it knew it was coming eventually
Beach friends will corroborate her story.
Probably a major hippo campus
100% correct. Bonus points for the Blasey Ford quote. I read it while hearing her purposefully infantile voice. And fuck the asshole who downvoted you.
It recently happened to that Rammstein front singer as well.
They got famous, the system demanded proof that they are bendable. They didn’t do it.
Now, years later, accusations coming from Latvia or whatever, that he drugged some girls and raped them. Lynchmob-media we’re having the time of their lives. Now, after it all fell apart, he is looking for payback, suing them all.
It has hard for me to take such accusations seriously after women started suggested that casting couch whores were being taken advantage of rather than shaming them. Putting your legs up to get a leg up in your career hurts all women.
All of them dated him for another 3 months after THE EVENT until they found him in bed with another woman….
He then asked her to join in a threesome and she became enraged…
<K. Harris has entered the chat>
<K. Harris has left the chat>
What is crazier is her mother knew and did not stop it - like yea pimp out your daughter to the famous guy. Still this one is.... not good
Women have too much power these days.
I'm afraid if I ever run for office, a girl who I dated in my teens will come out and claim I raped her.
That's how this dumb shit works.
Russell Brand had sex with a lot of women over a long period of time. A smear merchant dug through them and found a few incidents of women feeling awkward or regretful. The articles don't mention it because even the accusations are nothing-burgers. As in them being true wouldn't make you think worse of Brand. Since the real goal here is character assassination of Russell Brand they keep them vague so people assume the worst.
It's the grab em by the pussy moment all over again.
Rich men have groupies.
Russell was a stud back then, so it's no shocker that he banged random women every night. He's rich, famous, and attractive. Dude lived like a degenerate leftist for a long time too. It's not like he was known for being a saint.
Went against “The Message.”
Especially the Pharma message!
Dear UK,
"Allegations" are just that. Prove it in a court of law first, then get back to us.
Regards,
Logical People
Even if he's convicted and sentenced, there's no reason he shouldn't be able to make a living making videos after he's done his time.
But this isn't really about 20 year old rape allegations is it?
Of course not, none of the women went to the police with allegations, they were groomed by the fake media.
There is no reason, Constitutionally or morally, that he shouldn't be able to continue making videos WHILE serving time.
Disagree. If one is convicted and going to prison, they don't get to keep going to work every day at their day job.
But as long as it's not new content, what's the problem? Do convicts investments get paused during confinement?
If you have a company with employees posting stuff you made prior sure, business obviously doesn't stop. But if it's a company of 1 then the convicted is SOL.
So, if the convict is an artist or author, they should be forced not to draw or write while in prison just because some other convict can't go to their day job? What about someone who earns their living through investments? Do they have to sell their stocks just to be fair?
It's like being sued by a stripper because you touched her titty that one time at the club.
It's fucking nonsense and any self respecting judge would throw that case out.
20 years? Give me a break.
Well I think that letter pretty much prooves that this was a coordinated attack.
The part of the story that makes me think it wasn't about the news is that you have "journalists" from several different outlets getting together to get the story and then releasing a documentary about it at a later date. How often do you know of that actual journalists get together and share a "scoop"? Particularly when they work for different companies?
Snowden?
Government censorship. 100% this is because he spoke out against continuing the war in Ukraine. UK government has been the main driver of escalation in that conflict - more so than USA.
How soon until Rumble is accused of bring racist russian sympathizing nazis?
Again?
About five minutes
Wikipedia says this in the first paragraph:
So, it is already on the list of unapproved websites and is unsuitable for viewing by moral, upstanding people.
Remember. If your nation is wypipo majority, then nationalism is baaaaad. Unless you traffic your kiddies (Ukraine). Then your nationalism and links to actual Nazis (Bandera) needs to be celebrated.
Still trying to figure out when and how Slavs become white? Is it the "White Russian" thing or Cossacks? Why would English, French, German, Polish, Ukrainian, and Russian people be lumped together after centuries of being enemies and killing each other?
Why would the French and the English? Or the English and the Scots? Or the English and the Welsh?
I think anything West of the Caucasus into Europe (i.e. where the idea of Caucasian as an ethnotype begins) is generally considered "White". There is still a massive difference between a swarthy Sicilian and a Nordic Swede, but they're still White.
Sure, the slavs would have more exposure to asiatic peoples, middle eastern people, but Euros were still exposed to light skinned Africans across North Africa.
Or, do you deny Melania as being White? If you were being honest and drawing a consistent arc through the continent of where "Slavic" people live, she'd be on the slavic side of it.
I don't know that anyone might have considered the Tsar and his historic familial line as anything other than white.
As far as how far into Russia is the line? I've seen it said as far West as Moscow, or as far in as the Urals.
It's already happening. They are trying to tank RUM stock so that the WEF can buy it up for pennies, break it up, and sell the pieces to the wind.
Don't let them. Buy Rumble stock. Profits are good, but freedom is gooder.
You have the power to make a political difference if you even have $1k. Do you choose to invest on a bet on freedom? Or do you invest in Google or Microsoft, knowing you could make a nice profit in a year. What is the cost of freedom?
I can't say I'm that big of a Russell Brand fan. I find him a little annoying personally, but it's clear he was over the target with some of his commentary, and it's also clear they were uncomfortable with the size of his audience
So congrats globalist fuckwads, now I'm going to make a point to watch some of his videos just to show support for an enemy of my enemies.
I fucking love Rumble.
I will continue to accumulate shares of this company… if we win it should be a good pay day
Same. The recent dip felt like a good time to lower my average cost. I believe in the company. Hell, I used to only use them once or twice every two weeks, now I use them every other day to every day.
Please can you help me with this. I read Rumble has 30 mil or so active users..and growing at 10% month on month or so... But I see this does not show in the share price - you in act mention its dropped..... I want to buy shares but what do you think will happen to the share price as it does not look like going up even with the last years amazing growth. 30 million is in terms of global use fuck all....however just USA its very good.I think Twitter is taking a bite of their cake...With Tucker hitting 270million views.... I have no idea what the biggest Rumble video views are but it cant be more than a couple of million.
So a few things with Rumble stock and value currently.
First off, the main reason for the large dip currently is that insiders were just recently allowed to sell off their stocks, which had been previously locked up for 1.5 years.
Now, Rumble last quarter had 44 million monthly active users. In the last quarter of 2022, it had 80 million.
I assume it gets much more views during the heat of a political election.
The main reason Rumbles value isn't increasing though is because they haven't yet introduced a real monetization setup.
No ads essentially. They're in the middle of building this system, which is going to be ground breaking from the sounds of it.
They're also starting beta testing of their cloud service, which is the business that makes Amazon so much money. Conservatives will flock to using Rumble as a provider for web hosting and whatnot.
All in all, if Rumble successfully implements monetization and has ads work, it will 10x + the profit they made last quarter minimum.
At least in my opinion.
If they can start bringing in $350 million a year, they're value will increase dramatically.
I don't think this is a quick buck to make. I think its something I'm expecting to do well on a financial standpoint in the next 2 to 4 years.
And still, I could be wrong.
The one thing I'll say about tech companies is any of them can fail and lose relevance.
Apple or Microsoft could be dead in 10 years.
It doesn't take long for someone on top of the world to fall down, if they fail to innovate.
I appreciate the rundown.
Thanks for the post fellow Pede! Do you have any other stock you think is a buy?
Sure thing fren. It's tough to say... idk if right now is a great time to buy much of anything.
I'm not a day trader though, I'm strictly long term, so I'm not flipping stocks going up and down 5%.
Personally, my favorite stocks are oil stocks like exxonmobil, but I wouldn't buy any at all until it comes down to $90 or less.
Though if you are new to investing, I'd saying spending a small amount once a week to start building a portfolio is smart. Diversity is smart too, to have different types of markets.
What exactly is this system going to be then?
Gimme 10 minutes to finish cooking, I'll come back with my full understanding of it!
If we somehow lose all our money but Rumble keeps banned voices online, we will have won on that prospect alone.
If the conservatives who watch their favorite shows on Rumble all put 5% of their portfolios into Rumble, I'm sure it would go gangbusters, and people would be talking about how being pro-free speech is actually a highly profitable endeavor.
"serious allegations" huh? Who gets to decide which ones are serious? The same group that decides which ones are credible?
Tara Reade? not serious
Christine Blasey Ford? EXTREMELY SERIOUS
Anonymous Brad accusers? EXTEMELY SERIOUS
This is purely coincidence, of course.
I am formally accusing Youtube of sexual assault. It came at me late in the night with skimpy yoga videos and lingerie videos... And I just didn't want it... But Youtube made me feel like I had to... I have lived in shame ever since.
Youtube should not be able to monetize and make money.
Disgusting, I'll definitely need the links for those to ensure I don't accidentally visit them!
Uh, if you think about the sort of "education" that is being pushed for people at the moment, then think that Youtube allows otherwise banned content under the guise of "education", take a guess as to what sort of content can be readily found on Youtube...
Legislative action to punish an individual without trial? Sounds an awful lot like a Bill of Attainder to me 🤷🏻♂️
It’s disgusting that a government can interfere on allegations alone… Notice, YouTube only demonetized him, and didn’t remove his account because then they would have to do the same to Robert L Peters for the Tara Reade accusations
Easy. It draws the line at wherever the globalist cabal says to draw the line.
How dare Russell Brand defend himself against rape allegations!
This is Orwellian level bull shit.
By WEF Rothschild's/Klaus, the people who drink the blood of children using False Morality. It's a giant pile of bull shit.
"Potentially illegal"
Sounds like a pre-crime diktat.
Though I think RB may be screwed, if they are going for this they probably have a crazy eyed "rape is sexy" useful tool to make it stick waiting in the wings. Unless he really did rape, then he deserves all he gets. But my confidence leans more towards this being a political hit.
There's no doubt he did lots of stuff when he was on drugs. He admits that. These women didn't come forward five years ago. They're coming forward now because the powers that be want to take him down.
Alex Jones said that they investigate all women that have ever had contact with him and try to uncover dirt on them so they can be blackmailed into accusing him. Or they pay them off etc. They tried that vs Alex too.
Your tax dollars at work..
Yep. It'll be 2k if you say he was mean to you, 5k if you say sexual assault, 10k if you're willing to say rape.
Whether he raped or not, he's still innocent until proven guilty.
Even if found guilty he shouldn't be banned for off platform behavior 20 years ago. Community guidelines should only apply to on platform content and behavior.
That's a good point of distinction.
Of course, that should have gone without saying.
I just followed him on Rumble, too.
I made the Rumble account to follow Salty Cracker and haven't bothered to seek people out and follow them...until now.
fuck the uk
Gee, I wonder if the brit-fag "Culture, Media, and Sport Committee" sent a copy of that letter to Torba. Can just imagine HIS response...
He would have hastily busted open a few tabs of gay porn and started beating off vigorously like he normally does.
BarneyFrank looked like a shill--front hole protruding--in his blue shirt before TheDonald. Very very disrespectful.
It's great to see the the parallel economy finally starting to actually wield some power.
Fuck those authoritarian commie cunts.
The face of a SERF
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caroline_Dinenage
and she's supposedly a conservative
Conservatives squeeze in between left-of-Stalin and actually Stalin in the UK.
She is! She's just trying to conserve the SERFS FARM !
"The Lady Lancaster of Kimbolton". That name sounds more like an AKC Springer Spaniel bitch.
Aha! The MeToo connection! The Bitter Women getting paid from somewhere...same people who tried to take down Johnny Depp.
"Career: 2015-2021 Public Retard."
I met her mother once. Nice lady.
Censorship and Free Speech is one of the many reasons for 1776!
The Rothschild Khazarians in London were the British Empire's Central Bankers for centuries. Now Klaus/WEF is their face plate. They are America's oldest Enemy. WEF Loyalists among us are no different, indistinguishable, from the Crown Loyalists of 1776. Same Masters.
EXACTLY!
Alex Jones recently said that the Rothschilds own around 80% of Blackrock.
Caroline Dinenage knows who is orchestrating the mob against Russell Brand because she's in on it. She very well could have been the instigator of the YouTube ban.
The "YouTube did our bidding; why won't you?" tone of the letter is disgusting.
Innocent until proven guilty, until then go fuck yourself
I do enjoy watching Russel Brand on Rumble.
Holy shit, a national government is trying to tell a business of a different country how to behave?!
One MP
In fairness, Rumble is based in Canada, where they remain a constitutional monarchy, with the Queen of England as their head of state. And their military even takes an oath of loyalty to the crown. It’s not really that big of a leap.
FUCK HER. She addressed the letter to Chris, not to Mr. Pavloski, which is way too familiar for a formal letter, and also condescending. She used her full name AND full title signing it.
And government has ZERO business trying to punish a person against whom ZERO official charges or offenses have been established in court!
Chris is the man!
Oh look, more attempts to definitely-not-compel censorship via thinly veiled threats.
Good work rumble!
standing ovation
Looks like Rumble is about to be banned in the UK. That letter is basically a threat stating that if Rumble doesn't cancel Brand then the decency police in the UK will be forced to censor the entire platform due to the UK governments inability to intimidate or otherwise control Rumble as a platform based on whatever the current popular thing to cancel is at the time.
UK have been going after Tommy Robinson for a long time and he has a rumble account. How the government targeted him is worrying.
https://rumble.com/user/TommyRobinsonOfficial
Wouldn't surprise me if they wanted to ban Rumble if they can't control it.
Makes me wonder what the future looks like. EU recently enacted some kind of digital censorship deal, and it’ll be difficult for platforms to run different operations for all the different countries they serve. Meaning US citizens will likely be caught up in their censorship efforts.
So it looks like we end up with… no speech? Or only speech that kowtows to the WEF agenda on the big platforms, perhaps with smaller, country-specific operations. Looks bleak.
I would print out that email, shred it, and then burn it.
I'd frame it. Along with Arkell vs Pressdram as a reminder of how to reply.
Awesome. Good for them.
This isn't a conviction is a pair is questionable accusations
As censorship ramps up again for elections, I think rumble is a good investment. I bought 20k worth of Jan 2025 calls today.
JC, what's the upside potential on that $20k?
Unlimited upside. My strike was $8, and I have about 100 contracts (each represents 100 shares), so my 20k purchased the right to buy 10,000 shares at $8 until Jan 2025.
If the price stays below $8 Ill lose all 20k (contracts are worthless). If the price is $10 then I make 20,000 ($2 gain ×10k). If it hits $20 then its 120k. Higher rumble goes the more I make (using my contract to buy at $8 a share and then selling at market price)
Options are a good way to gamble with limited losses, since the most I can lose is the initial 20k.
Thank you for the explanation.
The fucking nerve of them Limey fucks.
Dame, lol...UK is faggots
Ya, still clinging to a title that comes from a patriarchal, elitist class system. So woke. Dumb fuck.
It just means she donated a bunch of money to the party.