South Africa: Using Only Pistols, Local Militia Stops 15 Armed Robbers with AK-47s Who Blew Up Armored Truck | The Gateway Pundi...
On Thursday, 9/21, local farmer militiamen in South Africa stopped a gang of 15 armed robbers armed with AK-47s who had just robbed an armored car, killing the driver.
they got handed over the richest country in Africa and ruined it.
The funny part about them taking farms from whites is that they were given the option of a farm or cash after apartheid. Most took cash and the ones that took farms pretty much went out of business. One lady was charged with animal cruelty cause she basically just abandoned all her animals to starve
You can't farm when the concept of "tomorrow" is just some sort of vague idea.
Planning for the future and delayed gratification are racist.
Instant gratification is a conditioning issue, it becomes an addiction. Handing illegal aliens sophisticated computers and giving them $500 a night hotel rooms is long term dooming this country the same way as remote learning.
My kids remotely learn too. Qe got 21 acres and homeschool. Id say thats pretty remote.
Remote learning for school where children are isolated away from social interaction. Suffering malnutrition, mental decline and failing grades. After terrible domestic situations, turning to gangs and violence. Most of the home school kids around went to public school at a certain stage, better adjustment and street smarts if you will. The one who's parents brought them to activities and sports, only after they were home schooled for the day, don't know them assume they went to college and did alright. Dont see them at the reunion.
Street smarts are really up to the dad. Mine gave me none cuz he had none
When your life motto is being “Kangz and shieet”, work sounds like the last thing you’re accustomed to.
When it’s warm year round, planning for future issues such as frozen ground and bad weather doesn’t mean anything.
Frozen ground. Dude.
This isn't Germany.
Exactly, this is why deferred satisfaction and future planning are hard for people who evolved in equatorial areas..
In northern Europe, the ones who didn't plan for the winter and stored away food died... evolutionary science 101
Yep. Northern climates select for k-type reproduction, general intelligence and pro-social personality.
Equatorial climates select for r-type reproduction/ early puberty, physical strength and anti social personality.
That's his point. South Africa doesn't have the wide seasonal variation of Europe, which is why Europeans got good at delayed gratification and forward planning. They had to think ahead to survive the harsh winter. Africans did not. This spiraled into things like infrastructure and architecture.
That's my point too.
It's pretty close to the south pole?
It's closer to the equator than Sydney. Not cold at all.
Not to mention the concept of "work"
Well when you are 100% jogger you have to contend with a loss of concepts such as "later" or " how would you feel if someone did this to you" Scientifically they just don't pick up on those things as well as others.
and that's exactly why reparations would never work here. no matter how much you give, they'll want more. free shit never ends
"You gave us modern medicine, modern technology, modern agriculture, modern infrastructure... We demand reparations!"
Bring back colonialism.
Because it's absolutely beautiful and rich and natural resources. Whites were able to turn South Africa into a paradise, the problem is letting blacks in.
Let someone else play world police, the US has the coup to unravel.
Issue isn't race, skin color doesn't determine how people govern or fix/ruin things. Same thing as leftist complaining about whites.
The problem is blacks.
Same thing as the lefts "The problem is whites". Honestly this is fed talk man, I love you but this isn't conservatives values.
Blacks are a biological weapon that destroy everything they touch.
Ok, I'll play, low IO, culturally self destructive people then... damn Norwegians!
Lol... Hate to break it to you. You keep trying to dismiss race. However average IQ of a race has been scientifically researched. Now if you want to argue that law, Indoctrination and environment are a huge cause of poor outcomes in all individuals then you might have a point. But when you just say that race does not make a difference after I have seen video of Africans eating out of holes in the ground, robbing and burning their own communities and murdering people in those communities, as well as bringing all those people from every country to a single location all at once with no education or assimilation; that is a whole nother nut roll. People like you are exactly why we can't fix society: you are too soft and you have no patience to let a tried and true system just work and so you get emotional and cry racism because your pathetic worldview and as far as I can tell your IQ are both skewed and below average.
First I'd like a source for your info on IQs, I do know generally blacks have lower IQs in testing, but when you think about it race isn't the issue. Blacks in the USA have an issue of fatherless homes, and decades of other satanic forms of silent destruction after the democrats realized they can't win that original battle, so they pretended to love them while harming them. Blacks were better off during Jim crow and even slavery in my opinion because they had a lot more mom and dad in the house, more Christians blacks, and a very good path forward. Then the people who hated them put their work in the shadows, so they couldn't see the attacks, for example the welfare state was like a nuke in that war. I don't know how far back the Globalists and the USA Deep state go, but they hate everyone that isn't a commie like them, they've done the same to whites, and we fell for it too, man look how most of antifa is white men and women, and how white people are often the ones burning black owned businesses I'm the name of "BLM". This is a satanic sin issue and an USSR ideological subversive issue. You have fallen for it, too, by taking the "black man bad" pill, so while people are like "white man bad" and "black man bad" the satanic globalists can keep you distracted by race.
While I agree with a lot of what you are saying... You misrepresent what I am saying. There are plenty of fine and upstanding black men in the western world... But the people coming to our country are not the same as those we share kinship with. Many of these savages simply are not compatible with our country and our values... Just take a look at the somalis. They are literally too stupid to obey very basic laws. There are plenty of other animals from the black population right here at home as well. Then you start seeing those blacks who have some white in them and they are actually smarter and more successful than a vast majority of pure blacks. Don't try to say that race doesn't matter. The blacks in America are probably about 30% white DNA themselves which is why they have much lighter skin. This alone is a testament that this country is nowhere near as racist as people want to believe. I think it is you who are brainwashed for even simply implying that I am a racist for pointing out simple and basic truths.
Fuck you, doomer handshake.
Parasites are still in the cities. Farming requires work, they only believe in slaves.
Plantations were the preferred ideal of SUPREMACISTs 160 years ago. Gold mines/diamonds preferred now.
That is just progressivism with better uniforms. Seriously, mercantilism \ imperialism \ progressivism are all ways to centralize power, minimize rights, secure monopolized private profit from public efforts, take over other nations and bastardize trading into a system of favors and influence (corruption.)
They're also highly moralistic - using violence to enforce their version of morality. Edicts rather than laws accountable to the people.
Edit: one of the most important progressive presidents we ever had gave us Banana Republics down south. Another gave us internment camps full of a deadly flu in WW1 - and laws that banned free speech like saying you're against the war. The most important one also had internment camps and used those same laws to nationalize Americans' gold and silver wealth using an executive order. That's what King George III did.
At some point all governments are enforcing some version of morality. Why is it illegal to steal? To murder? Does it deprive someone of their rights? Well why is that wrong? The concept that people have rights that should not be violated is a moral argument.
It's more about a "community ethos" (which sounds socialist) but means we all work to preserve, use lightly and improve our common resources
Which is how our ancestors survived at least two ice ages.
What you're saying is different than being moralistic. Using morals as a weapon is different than having principles.
The king or president or uniparty BS shouldn't be allowed to just say, "beards are illegal" and anyone caught with one beat up or killed.
The mask and mRNA epidemic scared a lot of people. But now they can admit the chemicals inhaled from n95s may not outweigh the risk of covid. Moralism would demand masks be used and defended until the leader told us different.
I ask - where did all the cults go... or did they go mainstream?
All principles are morals. Those are literally synonymous terms
This is a larger discussion and I'm busy today but I'll try and give you my take later.
"MORALITY VERSUS MORALISM
One of the most striking features of contemporary American politics is that political rhetoric is increasingly moralistic while the actual ability of governing systems to achieve moral ends is in decline. These are related phenomena: Moralistic politics is prone to stalemate because it disdains such instruments of effective political practice as barter and compromise. Its insistence on its own correctness, elevated to the urgency of the moral plane, makes compromise not merely imprudent but indefensible. Because of its tendency toward monomaniacal focus on single issues to the exclusion of all others, it cannot engage in horse-trading.
Where the politician sees shades of gray and operates in a world of contradictions and tensions, the moralist, hostile to nuance, perceives only darkness and light. This has a dual effect. First, it limits what is often the very value being proclaimed — liberty — since the moralist denies the variety of moral concerns and forecloses options other than his own. When moral questions are oversimplified, there is no room for liberty and the responsibility that should attend it. When imperatives are categorical, prudence is impossible. This dissolves liberty in favor of a one-dimensional and allegedly unimpeachable moral truth.
Second, cautious, partial steps toward moral ends cannot satisfy the moralizer because he operates in an environment in which more of the object in view is always better than less. Moralism cannot tolerate the fact, evident to James Madison in Federalist No. 10, that disagreement is "sown in the nature of man." The moralist thus has neither the capacity nor the desire for intellectual empathy, the ability to see an issue from another's point of view." https://nationalaffairs.com/publications/detail/the-moralistic-style-in-american-politics
YOU'RE NOT WRONG BUT I'M TALKING ABOUT SOMETHING DIFFERENT
Just because you can get too caught up in trying to legislate your own morals doesnt mean morals arent the underpinning of any legal system. The debate as to how much is too much will go on forever, but saying "you cant legislate morality" as a blanket statement is simply wrong on its face. Legal and illegal are the government's take on morality at any given moment.
OP knows
Someone had to beta test the BLM communist model.
They're doing it to the richest country in the world, ever, right now, look around America.
Trained with pistols vs untrained with AK-47s.
It is common practice for Africans to adjust the sights on their AK's to the maximum distance. They believe the sight is a power knob and turning it up makes the weapon lethal at greater distances. This causes them to miss high in a firefight and get absolutely cornholed by a proficient enemy force.
Most of these groups in the middle east and Africa have no clue that you actually have to sight a weapon. In just a few hours of training you can become somewhat proficient. They are too lazy to try and understand this is my opinion.
It's not laziness, it's sub 80 IQ retardation. Studies have proven that Africans are genetically low IQ. Without the benefit of even basic schooling they're just dumb asses. They literally have no complex thought or problem solving.
https://human-intelligence.org/africans/
No need to even have an opinion about it, this is factual and hundreds of data based studies from decades of research prove it.
It's why the globalists want to flood the USA and Europe with these clowns.
They want to turn us into them.
nods in large frontal lobe
whites normalize out around 100ish. Sub Africans average out at about 80. half being less
In fairness, it doesn't mean they're not also lazy. But absolutely correct, sadly.
So "Trust the Science"?
No, I said trust the data.
"Trust the science" very specifically is not based on any data.
Different wording, same intent.
"Listen and believe."; "Don't ask questions, just blindly accept whatever I tell you as fact".
Consider that your linked site doesn't have any information about who's running it.
Consider that the so-called FAQ is mostly just a summary of the argument the website is trying to make; it doesn't answer basic questions like "How do you test IQ", "How do you even test the IQ of sub-80 IQ retards?", "Who is actually going out perform these IQ tests in these regions?", etc - you know, questions that might actually be 'frequently asked' and might actually be useful in an 'FAQ'.
Consider that you're making the case that "this site proves that blacks are inferior because their average IQ is lower than ours" but doesn't consider the subsequent argument that "this site also proves that asians are superior because of their higher IQ and so we should all just accept the superiority of our rightful Asian overlords".
Consider the very nebulous nature of 'data' that is very much dependent on the process used to acquire that data and whoever is interpreting it.
Consider that it wouldn't be the first time that what scientists present as 'data' proving what people to believe doesn't line up with real-world observation - how long has it been that we've been presented with 'data' that 'proves' climate change is a real issue only for that same data to not hold up if you actually pay attention to the real world? (see, for example, claims of rising sea levels against photos year apart that refute the data).
And I'm just supposed to blindly accept 'the data' without question?
Bit of a difference between a rushed experimental drug and literal centuries of observation.
Because 'rushed experimental drugs' are the only place where so-called 'scientists' have a habit of manipulating the research and data to arrive at the outcome they want to arrive at anyway?
A you seriously suggesting there is a multigenerational global conspiracy to make blacks look bad? So they really wuz kangs? Tariq Nasheed, is that you?
Really funny way to reply to a post about IQs.
How so?
Sight? You are assuming they use the sights. Watch videos of these room temperature IQ morons; they lift the weapon in the general direction of the target and pull the trigger.
Example: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nd9a0uvcNJM&t=134s
They couldn't hit the broadside of a barn. Just taking turns running into the street to pop off their weapons and show their
stupidity"bravery". A single competent shooter could wipe their entire group out.This is true, but unfortunately, the natural extension of that is one random bullet can still end you. One bullet. One RPG. One plasma jet rocket head. One IED. For every thousand idiots, you have but one life... and they have a thousand lives. You live a high performance high risk life. They risk nothing but collectively achieve almost nothing.
If nobody was ever willing to risk their lives to stand up to evil people, this nation wouldn't even exist. Better to die for a righteous cause than live in fear under the boot of tyranny.
The higher the risk, the higher the reward. The dead don't collect - by definition.
Ah, the Liberian civil war, where some guys wore bright orange life vests thinking they were body armor and others went into battle in drag, claiming they can't die if death doesn't recognize them.
General Butt Naked was marginally more proficient I hear. Doing boom boom right before a battle helps I hear.
That was eye opening to watch. Here's another good one. https://youtu.be/QxYmm5yCJBg?si=cSgYdPFguZ4w3JdK
There was a civil war in Wakanda?
Lazy - That's generous
This is true and it's how the military can make someone with below average intelligence operate efficiently in a specialized task.
Mr. Spock, Bones, set your phasers to kill.
Hadn't heard that one, but it makes sense.
I have heard that throughout parts of Africa they don't bother with sighting their weapons, but rather just hammer down the trigger because they believe that Allah will send the bullets to their targets. This, I guess, is why you see a lot of militants firing their AK's at weird angles above their heads, or hip firing.
Say what you want about the combat effectiveness, but it does say a lot about their faith, or fanaticism.
I believe in Newtonian physics.
Fight me bro.
How could those farmers possibly just shoot those guys!?
Physics.
(Mixes corn starch in water to make slurry)
Challenge accepted.
They seem to do better when sights are attached to the bolt
That stood out to me as well. None of the farmers were injured? I thought that only happened in Hollywood.
Look up casualty counts for battles from the Rhodesian bush war sometime and you'll see a lot more heavily lopsided results.
Wasn't the casualty count in The Mog during Black Hawk Down something like 100 to 1?
Reading it now. We lost 18 killed. Enemy losses were estimated at 500–1500.
Camo: brushstroke
Shorts: short
Floppies: slotted
Is that part of the Boer wars?
IIRC, it was a group of around 500 that wound up killing 8000. All in short shorts.
No, the Boer wars were Boer settlers vs the British for control of South Africa. The Bush War was the Rhodesians defending themselves against armies of foreign communists that were trained and equipped by the Soviets.
The Soviets are gone, but have no fear - the globalist Marxists have infiltrated the West and made sure the same destructive anti-Western policies are continued, just in Europe and the US now as well.
And we're looking at the same type of battle if we don't fix this first.
You’re thinking of the battle of Rorke’s Drift, as depicted in the movie Zulu.
Honestly, I might have conflated a few conflicts... because when I search the Boer war (too late after commenting) it was far earlier, and I remember seeing video that might have been 70's or 80's where the dudes are fighting in short shorts.
I'm just not sure anymore.
The video of the dude fighting in shorts was probably the Rhodesian Bush War. It took place in the 70's.
Fuck me that's the one I had in mind. Conflated with the "second boer war" (now that you assholes are putting me on the spot to be accurate).
The saving grace in each case is that the conflicts were each examples where tactics and skills overwhelms greater numbers.
Operation Dingo, innit?
Now they have AK-47s.
These guys defeated a better armed group with pistol skill and tactics. Outstanding.
And guts.
Africans do not have bravery, only recklessness. They risk their worthless lives in foolish ways to gain meaningless rewards.
Western men have the intelligence to know the danger they are in, the understanding to prepare, and the wisdom to execute plans with accuracy, precision, and purpose. We risk our full and virtuous lives, in wise ways, to gain eternal reward for us and our posterity.
👏
Why is that ANTIFA is made up of white people and you don't really see any non-whites committing idiotic climate protest actions like gluing themselves to things and trying to block traffic?
(((white)))
(((Yes))), (((as))) (((I))) (((said))), (((white))).
(((Unless))) (((you))) (((have))) (((something))) (((to))) (((show))) (((me))) (((about))) (((how))) (((those))) (((ANTIFA))) (((goons))) (((and))) (((climate))) (((protest))) (((idiots))) (((aren't))) (((white)))?
and now they have better arms
Fences exist for reasons.
Not gonna lie, I wish every American owned an AK at a minimum.
I'm okay then.
"We" 🌟🟥⚒️ are not us.
Hey look at that, open warfare between organized groups of armed men, with targets being selected by group membership.
According to the calculus of social substitutability, this violence is classified as "war"
Coming to a city or town near you.
It's already reality in Germany. Criminal gangs from neighboring Benelux countries (the African mafia is really big over there) come to Germany and raid banks by blowing up ATMs all the time.
Of course Germans can't have guns so nobody is stopping them. And the government refuses to go after "diverse" criminals so their only response is to blame the banks for "lax security". Security that somehow wasn't necessary before all that diversity "enriched" us.
That would be their last mistake.
To be fair, they could have been pelted with books to get the same result.
And work boots.
Paper Planes made out of Job Applications...
Paternity tests.
Skills are every bit as important as firepower. Training with your gun is as important as having one.
That hoodie the carcass has on is interesting. TRIBE blah blah blah.
I think it said
Tribe Strength Honour Mastery
Maybe I missed one. It definitely didn't say dead on it or thief.
now this is based, from their "statute":
The Victim’s Support Unit is a group of volunteers who represent the community, Hoedspruit Farmwatch and the Hoedspruit SAPS to assist victims of crime or traumatic incidents. The volunteers of the Victim’s Support Unit will assist anyone who has been traumatized by violent crime such as: Armed Robbery Domestic Violence Rape Indecent Assault Hijacking Murder Assault
There's white genocide in South Africa and it's following to Europe, America, and the rest of the Anglosphere
They'll arrest the farmers and hang them for white supremacy.
Not if they start raising hogs, too! 😉
Most of these thugs just spray and pray. They don't sight their rifles, shoot in controlled bursts, or seek cover to reload/in case of jam.
If you have cover and a pistol and training, one man could eliminate a squad.
If they were diligent and disciplined, they'd have jobs.
They were diligent and disciplined enough to eliminate 15 black militants... I call that a win.
I was talking about the robbers.
looks like ak pistols, that shit looks like it would bounce all over the place with auto fire. Atleast a pistol be accurate. I can group my bullets 70 ish feet away about the size of a basketball, with a glock
If there's one thing we know about "youths" it's they can't aim for shit.
when you spec into one handed weapons.
from 1969.
and you only played DnD.
twice.
But assault weapons are weapons of war! How could this happen?? I don't get it. Someone explain it like I'm a Democrat.
Love it. And it's started here too.
I guess those assault rifles aren't so badass after all
Also helps if your AK has a stock on it based on that picture
For real, makes scary noises though.
Also helps if they know how to aim.
Hopefully the AKs had burned up to dust in the explosion before the police arrived.
What color were the perps?
Red all over
Skills > tools
what's wrong with this picture
FAFO
That had to be an intense gun fight.
FAFO
If that happened here they'd charge the good guys with snivel rights violations
Mega based
Have full autos, still cant hit shit. Too busy 'haytin' da hwhyte mahn' instead of learning how to shoot
Good riddance
Guess farmers need to do the same...
Now they have AK47s too.
I imagine the ones they caught will be released swiftly
Rhodesia!!!!!!!! Let’s fucking goooo
Did the militia take the AKs? They should have. Officer shitskin asks where the weapons are, just tell then someone must have stolen them.
If you kill someone with a pistol and they have an ak-47. Boom. You now are dual weilding a pistol and ak-47.