There’s no ‘disinformation’ exception to the First Amendment
If, despite all best efforts, disinformation continues to infect the marketplace of ideas, then our First Amendment jurisprudence clearly holds that that is the price of our right to speak freely.
But muh rule thREEEEE!
see rules 1 and 2? if you say its anything about anonymous its past your bed time. rules of the internet started as a bbs message board thing. Far before search engines predating anonymous 4 chan and any of your pastas.
Do not cite the deep magic to me, witch. I was there when it was written.
i still have some of my old website directories i bought at Tandy Electronics it became compUSA before it became circuit city before it became a Chinese buffet before it became filled with homeless people and pooop
Man O War, what happened to that bbs? Ahhh, those were the day's.
Rules made by men are made to be broken. Heck, we can't even manage 10 made by GOD.
Pretty cuck isn't it?
Love how they threw in Anti Semitism in the definition because we all know why they created it in the first place.
Shall I mention the only reason?
That sounds anti-Semitic and faggot hate, off to the gulag with you.
I always get anti-Semitic and anti-semantic mixed up. Apparently the ADL has that same problem.
Remember that this also means it’s nearly impossible to force news media companies to publish truth when they lie
you learn how to play the game that they play
"some sources say media member: name sucks dick for nickels" for example
what they do isn't hard or impressive, it's just that most people aren't filthy disgusting trash like they are. however when you mudsling at these filth, you're probably not lying. just make sure you use those magic words to protect you from libel.
another magic phrase they like to use that you frequently see is "sources close to the thinking of name"
I want all media headquarters flattened with truck bombs. Fuck playing their bullshit games.
IGNORE THEM. Make then like Bud Light.
They LOVE us noticing and being outraged. Where have you been?
I've been the same place, but they love the spotlight as they commit their evil acts.
No adjectives between Free and Speech.
What's up liberal.
Only MSM watchers that identify as child rapist use the dumb ass term Stormfag.
Oo, you're scary.
I accept them because while they may be crazy bastards, they're OUR crazy bastards. At the end of the day, they want what's best for this country. Which you can't say about ANY liberal or Democrat voter.
So glad they're here to inform us of this obvious fact.
Don't worry, it's still not ok to be white and men can get pregnant.
If you call slicing open a man's abdomen, stuffing it with someone else's fetus, and then giving them both enough drugs to not immediately die "pregnant" then sure.
Otherwise, fuck your pronouns.
He probably was.
Disinformation is a word used when people lack the intelligence and ability to articulate their thoughts.
Disinformation is when you spread deliberately false information, such as saying “The Covid-19 vaccine is as safe and effective as all other vaccines approved by the FDA.” The evidence says otherwise, but you make the claim anyways. Or another one is “Mail-in ballots are as safe and secure as in-person voting.”
But why do we need to reinvent the word "propaganda"?
Why do commies do anything?
Regrettably, the need exists due to left wing propaganda groups, including foreign-run state-sponsored media. Vet your sources. For example, BBC is less likely to lie to you compared to RT.
There's either Truth or Lies. Anything else is spin.
I would add "mistake" for ordinary people. Members of our government deliberately lie.
How about "True" or "False"?
Too simplistic. The source of most of the media’s power is reporting largely true information but isolating it out of its proper context or re-framing it selectively with new context to influence people’s thought patterns. You can report truth all day and still manipulate people’s mind by pretending other information doesn’t exist. That’s why the media are so evil: they actively curate people’s thoughts
So...Spin by way of selective truth and lies by omission.
“First amendment rights are important, everyone has a right to speak their opinion… but we’re not going to let you comment on this article. No comment section for you!”
I remember when all major news sites had comment sections. That was a great time. Learned a lot from those comments and had interesting discussions. Then they panicked and in a coordinated effort they all removed their comment sections. Some retained a highly censored comment section where you cannot question the left's sacred cows or offend anyone.
Bullshit. We all know what they call disinformation. It's questioning the government. The whole fucking point of the 1st Amendment is to question the government, report on the government, and believe what you want to believe.
The government is never going to outlaw agreeing with them. The 1st Amendment is there to so they can't outlaw disagreeing with them.
People are in jail for memes.
Some are trapped in memes and can't wake up
What does it say about asking questions about certain historical events?
Ask a question, go to jail. That's how our founding fathers did it.
Actually no, they wrote their opinions about every question.
Your rights upset them.
Your happiness upsets them
Some are always upset and looking for someone to blame.
Typical passive / aggressive feminine trait. It's why there are almost no Matriarchal Societies.
There's no "hate speech' in the First Amendment either. Suck on that, Libs.
the problem with a "disinformation" exception is who do we trust to be tbe authority on disinformation without actually weaponizing it against their political opponents, and the answer is nobody
Since the legacy media plays a huge role in spreading disinformation, we have no choice but to dismantle it and replace it with media under our control
And control being the issue
The first amendment is there to cut through the disinformation in the first place.
Wow, no shit. I have the education of a 1st grader as well.
Stays the same no matter how much BS (bullshit) , MS (more shit) PHD (piled higher & deeper)
What the left deemed as disinformation, is the truth. We could have saved more people from the vax & jabs if they allowed our free speech to be seen and heard. They still don't even know the truth about the government and the covid vaccines. "The case before the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals focused on government efforts to control published information about COVID-19 and election interference. Regarding COVID-19, the government’s stated purpose was to encourage social media companies to remove any speech that discouraged people from following government public health guidelines, including masking and obtaining a COVID-19 vaccination. Some people who did not follow government recommendations or failed to get the vaccination may have died because of their behavior."
Lmao that's a stretch
"If freedom of speech is taken away, then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter."
“It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat.” Teddy R.
The entire point of our Constitution's first amendment is to make explicitly crystal clear and in absolutely no uncertain terms that there is no "disinformation exception" to freedom of speech, and that actually the goal is in fact to protect disinformation no matter how much it may be disdained.
dis·in·for·ma·tion
/ˌdisənfərˈmāSH(ə)n,disˌinfərˈmāSH(ə)n/
noun
false information which is intended to mislead, especially propaganda issued by a government organization to a rival power or the media.
Wrong again, libtard idiots! The Hill are the fascist propagandists.
The photo depicts the first amendment emblazoned on stone donning the edifice of the now vacant Newseum building in Washington DC. A self-edifying monument the purveyors of fake news created for themselves.
The Newseum, however, wasn’t popular enough to justify the cost of the building. So they had to leave.
I drove by daily as construction crews dismantled the stones containing the words of the first amendment from the front of that building, piece by piece. I marveled at the metaphor - the fake news dismantling the first amendment.
Too bad the Redress of Grievances isn't scribed into the walls of DC Courts. Oh wait
How are we even talking about this? It's absolutely frightening we even need to point out why this disinformation bullshit is dangerous to our civilization.
Because anything can be labeled as misinformation. The idea of misinformation shouldn't even make sense to liberals who have adopted the idea of "my truth" instead of "the truth."
TLDR: social media platforms essentially acted as agents of the federal government when the platforms removed or de-amplified posts based on government-created criteria of truth or falsity. In doing so, the court found that the government unconstitutionally censored the speakers’ and listeners’ First Amendment rights.
SCOTUS erred when they came up with the yelling fire in a crowded theater argument. Once "reasonable limits" are imposed, reasonable soon becomes UNREASONABLE because someone has to define REASONABLE and it's not the people, but the masters that do it.
And the scared Democrat machine slowly moves to the middle for the elections...
You're joking (probably) but I bet the junk in Mountain Dew is less harmful overall than the fluoride in toothpaste.
Lies are free speech.
Misinformation is free speech.
Disinformation is free speech.
"Hate speech" is free speech.
There is no reason to censor speech even if wrong. It can be destroyed with truth and facts. Which is why truth always prevails.
The problem is they don't have the truth on their side and think they can control natural law. God's law. And they spew fake news trying to hide obvious things.
Well almost , They believe they can come to a negotiated agreement with God , if they are or have a good enough Lawya or pay enough for their indulgences.
Sure some feel that way. Others are team Satan and think thats a prospect. Some claim to be one thing and serve the opposite.
Others are team Satan and think thats a prospect , never said which God they Negotiate the price with.........common for them to double deal.
What every Communist dictator thug claimed as well.
hey, whaddayaknow, the broken clock principle is proven right once again...
pretty surprising this is coming from that rag
While we do have the right to spread “disinformation” under the 1A, that’s not the problem we are facing. The problem is twofold. 1. The left is spreading flat out lies and censoring the truth from the right and calling the truth disinformation. 2. People on our side are arguing about this as if that premise is true and framing their arguments from that position. This makes the argument appear to be that the right wants to lie to everyone and the left is virtuous and honest. We have to stop being nice and accepting the commie’s premises as factual. Call these people, ALL OF THEM, liars to their faces about everything.
Democrats Inc don't belong in a free society. Something's wrong with their madula oblongatas. Instead of it being too high tuned, it's set too low to automaton coward levels. High or low, it makes them ornery.