Why is this loony post stickied? That standing ovation was in the Canadian parliament, US Democrats had nothing to do with it. And the rest of the post...sheer nuttery.
Why does our side always fuck up a bad story for the left by adding fake news to it?
Because they're not on our side and never have been. They're on their own side and they need to gatekeep us from anything they think is a "dangerous idea"'; that includes recognizing they are collaborators.
Ah yes. The Nazis control the world right now. Next time you wonder why there is a global effort to genocide Whites in their homelands, think of the Nazis.
There seems to have been a concerted effort from the controlled opposition as of late to ply the right with a bunch of retarded conspiracy theories because they're afraid we're having a little too much to think and are coming to more sensible conclusions regarding WW2 and other historical events.
Holy shit you triggered the lamest leftist on this site.
He makes up quotes you've never said, defends socialism (as long as it's his version) and goes crazy trying to waste your time.
Use lots of points, don't care about saying much. Just dump ideas on him and let him spend hours making responses. Lead him in circles and make him repeat himself. He's not autistic but probably isn't a bot.
Right? Pretty sure one of his top priorities was to destroy the Communists. It’s too bad we were massively funding/arming them or else the Soviet Union would’ve been crushed over 80 years ago, and we probably wouldn’t be dealing with communist infiltration like we are today.
You’re too stupid to be alive. You know fuck all about history or modern ideology. Shut the absolute fuck up about things you don’t understand, neocon.
Maybe you should try less belittling and more explaining.
You're going to have to explain what he's going on about because mostly all I'm getting is WASP, trying to sell a book, and a lot of typical "Jews control everything" comments.
It's moments like this that make me most wonder if you actually believe anything you say or if you're just a really dedicated troll that's just doing this for kicks and giggles.
A non-aggression pact is nowhere near an "alliance" of the sort you are claiming. Most countries that have NAPs are enemies who mutually agree to stand down so they can separately pursue their own goals without interference - that's a state of neutrality, not mutual allegiance.
Our country is the one that actually allied with the communists by giving them money, manufacturing capacity and other forms of support. We assisted them in achieving their goals. That's a far more traditional alliance.
And the NAP between Germany and the Soviet Union (one of many countries that had a similar pact with the Soviet Union) didn't last very long.
Most countries that have NAPs are enemies who mutually agree to stand down so they can separately pursue their own goals without interference - that's a state of neutrality, not mutual allegiance.
And the NAP between Germany and the Soviet Union (one of many countries that had a similar pact with the Soviet Union) didn't last very long.
And yet somehow it still debunks the major pro-Nazi arugment that Hitler was actually the good guy because he was an anti-Communist crusader.
He still successfully stopped communism in Germany - something we have completely failed to do here. Hitler and Pinochet proved that the only way to actually stop communists is to round them up and execute them as well as the banker collaborators who are financing them. Anything else is a half-measure that results in them ultimately demoralizing and destroying your country.
This is what we should have done with antifa and all of the other satellite groups agitating on behalf of a certain group of wealthy rootless cosmopolitans.
So because he got rid of Communism in Germany - the same way the Nazis rid Germany every threat to Nazi power - Hitler was such an anti-Communist crusader that he was happy to make peace with Communist Russia while going to war with the rest of Europe rather than teaming up with the rest of Europe to stop Communist Russia?
Hitler and Pinochet proved that the only way to actually stop communists is to round them up and execute them as well as the banker collaborators who are financing them.
Yet somehow we manage to avoid having the same debates about Pinochet that we have about Hitler.
So because he got rid of Communism in Germany - the same way the Nazis rid Germany every threat to Nazi power
Yes, states should destroy foreign threats to their people, why are you surprised by this? I'd love it if our state would round up all of the hostile invaders in our country.
Hitler was such an anti-Communist crusader that he was happy to make peace with Communist Russia
We've already been over this, stop resetting your dialog NPC.
teaming up with the rest of Europe
Much of Europe also signed a NAP with the Soviet Union: Lithuania, Finland, Latvia, Estonia, Poland, France, Italy, Yugoslavia. These were all countries threatened by the Soviet Union. A NAP gave them some assurances that they'd not be invaded - like I said, the countries most likely to sign an NAP are the ones more likely to be adversaries in a war.
Yet somehow we manage to avoid having the same debates about Pinochet that we have about Hitler.
We only have debates about Hitler because of media manipulation by the usual suspects. A clear majority wanted no part of another war with Germany and the vast majority (around 90%) did even want the usual suspects migrating here after the end of WW2 - they were sneaked in.
One of the motivating factors of the Hart-Celler act was to force the USA to accept these people, Emanuel Cellar being one of aforementioned usual suspects.
Yes, states should destroy foreign threats to their people, why are you surprised by this? I'd love it if our state would round up all of the hostile invaders in our country.
You're making the mistake of making it just about 'foreign threat'.
By comparison, Hitler did what the Democrats would like to do by getting rid of MAGA.
Are you likewise going to excuse Hitler being assigned absolute power as dictator and never having to face the challenge of another legitimate election?
Much of Europe also signed a NAP with the Soviet Union: Lithuania, Finland, Latvia, Estonia, Poland, France, Italy, Yugoslavia. These were all countries threatened by the Soviet Union. A NAP gave them some assurances that they'd not be invaded - like I said, the countries most likely to sign an NAP are the ones more likely to be adversaries in a war.
And yet who was ultimately the aggressor and who did he get aggressive against first?
We only have debates about Hitler because of media manipulation by the usual suspects.
And why is it that Pinochet hasn't gotten the same treatment as Hitler?
True, the USSR had nothing to do with russia... other than the fact that Moscow served as it's capital, and the Russian sfsr was its most populated Republic lol...
This is new to me... so, what are you saying? The purpose of the soviet union was to destroy Russia? Or that it was non ethnic Russians leading the union?
I'm not knocking you, in curious, never really learned too much about it.
Hitler didn't die in 2003, that was a body double, the real Hitler is being kept cryogenically frozen in Antarctica waiting for Nazi paperclip scientists(who are now being kept alive as brains in a jar) to develop a nuclear powered mech suit with life support capable of sustaining him forever. When the mech suit is ready the blackhats will kill the power and transfer complete control of the world's nuclear arsenal under his control and all illusions of national sovereignty will be destroyed.
That is unless trump's white hats can retake control from the Communist royal family and drain the life support goo from the Nazi brain(that's what he means when he says "drain the swamp")
Hitler didn't die in 2003, that was a body double, the real Hitler is being kept cryogenically frozen in Antarctica waiting for Nazi paperclip scientists(who are now being kept alive as brains in a jar) to develop a nuclear powered mech suit with life support capable of sustaining him forever. When the mech suit is ready the blackhats will kill the power and transfer complete control of the world's nuclear arsenal under his control and all illusions of national sovereignty will be destroyed.
That is unless trump's white hats can retake control from the Communist royal family and drain the life support goo from the Nazi brain(that's what he means when he says "drain the swamp")
This is the comment that should actually be stickied.
Must be way over target about something if a post this dumb has been updooted this much. Not organic by any means boys. But who “nose” who this could be???
They say that the side to bring up a comparison to Nazis first is the one that has lost the argument, but that saying fails when they are literally doing the exact same things they did to rise to power.
Here's the thing. If this is true than when they complete the takeover there gonna kill the gays and trannies first right??
So maybe a stand down on our part just to see what happens.
After the last 3 years, do not automatically discount ANYTHING
I mean, if we're not automatically discounting anything...
"Turns out Biden is secretly a MAGA double agent who is just pretending to be senile, he's actually working with Trump to show the country just how bad Democrats really were all along!"
You quote Hitler himself saying that he's a National Socialist and trying to use Hitler saying they're National Socialists to claim that saying Hitler and the Nazis were National Socialists is akin to actually believing in transsexuality.
Thanks for admitting that marxian socialism and national socialism are diametrically opposed and that you’re too mentally defective to be holding this conversation.
It's hilarious the way you're able to bend over backwards to rewrite any conversation to mean exactly what you want it to mean.
I need to make a meme of chad beard guy going "National Socialists" and a raging bearded soyjack responding "They're liars! They weren't really socialists, because..." trailing off into a book length garbled paragraph of text.
Hitler teamed up with Stalin to start WW2. Molotov Ribbentrop Pact.
Only leftists try and diminish the fact national socialists worked together to start WW2. They thought FDR was on their side thanks to FDR 's policies and open collaboration with Mussolini.
It's not quite the way you say but somewhat close.
Soviet Communists and National Socialists are both PROGRESSIVE ideologies. Flip side of the same coin. They don't "work together" so much as "Progressives eat their own" because Progressivism (of any stripe) is quite literally a cult.
They're different denominations of the same cult. They get along together right up until they stab each other in the back, which is a 100% guarantee if they're genuine Progressives.
Molotov Ribbentrop pact meant they did work together. That's how WW2 in Europe started.
They're both national socialist ideologies. That's why Ukraine exists. Other oblasts or states were created out of thin air. Ethnic cleansing, genocide, mass deaths, gun control, restrictions on free speech, political purges, wealth nationalization, hatred of capitalism, moralistic do-gooders (to your point about the nature of progressivism) - they had the same overall policies with different flavors of implementation.
Hitler thought FDR would go in with him thanks to the collusion between Mussolini and the most important progressive president of the early\mid 20th century. Never cancelled even though he openly praised fascism and repeated Goebbels' propaganda almost verbatim. Chose a racist VP, too.
Molotov Ribbentrop pact meant they did work together. That's how WW2 in Europe started.
They "worked together" in so much as two forms of cancer "work together". They also eat each other alive. I'm not saying there was no pact I am saying they just operated like all Progressive ideologies do: they eat each other alive. It's how ALL Progressivism works.
Says the man who can't be bothered to make a genuine counter argument or say anything of actual value; he just finds new ways of saying "Nuh uh, you're wrong!"
Ah, good, another known paid shill can’t help but come to his coworker’s rescue.
When you insist on trying to dismiss me as only saying something because I'm paid to do so and that somehow I know the guy you were replying to, all it does is weaken your own argument and make you look like you are yourself a paid agent or a troll.
You cannot be a ‘progressive’ and a ‘fascist’ simultaneously. Not even under the artificial contemporary definitions.
The artificial contemporary definitions are how the left tries to make the case that Conservatives are Fascist rather than their own policies. Fascism is exactly the kind of ideology the Democrats and political left were all on board with until Hitler gave it a bad name that nobody wanted to be affiliated with.
Do you know what Fascism actually represents?
Look at China. You think they're actually Communist China anymore? China is probably the best representation of Fascism in the modern world, and guess who would most like to emulate it.
Fascism tends to include a belief in the supremacy of one national or ethnic group, a contempt for democracy, an insistence on obedience to a powerful leader, and a strong demagogic approach.
Let's see - who in America actually most aligns with that description?
Supremacy of an ethnic group, the way the Democrats first insisted on the supremacy of whites and then used underhanded tactics to destroy the black community and stick them on the plantation; and then have turned around to project anti-white sentiments as a political weapon.
Contempt for democracy (or, if you prefer, at republican form of government); the way Democrats hate that they have to actually get elected and think they deserve power, the way that RINOs think their voters owe them.
Insistence on obedience to a powerful leader, the way the Democrats insist they are owed power and deserve blind obedience.
A strong demagogic approach, which is basically the Democrat playbook in a nutshell.
You want to tell me that the Democrats aren't both "Progressive" and "Fascist"?
No, it has no effect or measure upon my own argument.
And I'm sure Democrats arguments suffer no loss in validity despite their absurd argument tactics.
IF YOU ARE THE OPPOSITE OF ME IT MEANS YOU ARE THE SAME AS ME
If I'm not mistaken, "Projection" is a frequent topic of discussion on this very board regarding Democrats, Globalists, and Neo-Feudalists who keep calling other people that which they themselves demonstrably are.
So fucking shit at your job.
What job?
Correct.
Incorrect.
Incorrect.
Maybe try actually developing an argument beyond "No, that's wrong."
until Hitler gave it a bad name
Also incorrect. Fuck, you don’t even know your own propaganda anymore, do you?
What, Hitler didn't give Fascism a bad name?
How are you a threat to anyone?
Don't ask me, you're the one that treats me like a threat.
Do you know what Fascism actually represents?
Yep.
Then please, tell me how you define Fascism.
Look at China.
Not fascist, yeah. What about them?
Why, because they call themselves "Communist China"?
I guess that North Korea is a Democratic People's Republic because they call themselves the "Democratic People's Republic of Korea"?
Try looking at what Communism is, try looking at how China is run, and then get back to me on that.
You’re a living caricature.
You know how I mentioned "Projection" earlier?
Yeah...
All western political parties, because they are also run by communists, yes.
The fuck
Hitler died in 2003? What? Why is this stickied
Our moderation team has to be infiltrated.
f_b_i has shot your dog
Hitler died in 2003, JFK is actually alive and will run for President as MAGA, patriots are in control in DC, trust the plan and 2 more weeks.
oh, and china also controls adolf hitler himself
Elvis gonna be his VP
And don't forget about the secret Nazi moonbases!
This reminds me of an old-school meme: https://omgsecretnaziforest.ytmnd.com/
Retarded sticky. Jannies are still hungover from Saturday night.
Retarded OP
I mean, I would completely believe that Hitler made it to Argentina. But I don't think he was giving anyone orders to anyone in the 90s. Lol
The mods are all drunk probably.
It's going off the rails lol
10/10 fanfic, did lol
Why is this loony post stickied? That standing ovation was in the Canadian parliament, US Democrats had nothing to do with it. And the rest of the post...sheer nuttery.
Because they're not on our side and never have been. They're on their own side and they need to gatekeep us from anything they think is a "dangerous idea"'; that includes recognizing they are collaborators.
the title is BS but the zerohedge article is good
Ah yes. The Nazis control the world right now. Next time you wonder why there is a global effort to genocide Whites in their homelands, think of the Nazis.
Even Qboomers aren’t this retarded. Or are they?
Those darned white supremacist nazis and their policies to pack Europe with Africans!
dude the nazi secret base is in Antarctica
There seems to have been a concerted effort from the controlled opposition as of late to ply the right with a bunch of retarded conspiracy theories because they're afraid we're having a little too much to think and are coming to more sensible conclusions regarding WW2 and other historical events.
But this? This reeks of sheer desperation.
FDR agreed with Goebbels. He kept hitlers camps open. He worked with Mussolini.
My username was made for you wolves in sheep's clothing.
Be like Dresden.
This isn't true, at all. What a stupid lie to tell.
Holy shit you triggered the lamest leftist on this site.
He makes up quotes you've never said, defends socialism (as long as it's his version) and goes crazy trying to waste your time.
Use lots of points, don't care about saying much. Just dump ideas on him and let him spend hours making responses. Lead him in circles and make him repeat himself. He's not autistic but probably isn't a bot.
Hitler was the biggest anti commie. he is the one who started a big anti commie thing.
Right? Pretty sure one of his top priorities was to destroy the Communists. It’s too bad we were massively funding/arming them or else the Soviet Union would’ve been crushed over 80 years ago, and we probably wouldn’t be dealing with communist infiltration like we are today.
Hitler and the Nazis were socialists like bernie and AOC
Maybe you should try less belittling and more explaining.
https://cozy.tv/emichaeljones/replays/2023-09-15
You're going to have to explain what he's going on about because mostly all I'm getting is WASP, trying to sell a book, and a lot of typical "Jews control everything" comments.
It appears that I really struck a nerve with you.
It's moments like this that make me most wonder if you actually believe anything you say or if you're just a really dedicated troll that's just doing this for kicks and giggles.
By joining forces with Stalin.
Holy shit the Dems have done a number on peoples' brains.
Has he even admitted it? Do you have a link?
That guy is pure gaslighting starting with his name.
Marx was a jew. The product of two famous rabbinical families marrying.
You're lying
Hitler... died in 2003? And wanted to push communism? Even though he fought ww2 against communists? Huh?
A non-aggression pact is nowhere near an "alliance" of the sort you are claiming. Most countries that have NAPs are enemies who mutually agree to stand down so they can separately pursue their own goals without interference - that's a state of neutrality, not mutual allegiance.
Our country is the one that actually allied with the communists by giving them money, manufacturing capacity and other forms of support. We assisted them in achieving their goals. That's a far more traditional alliance.
And the NAP between Germany and the Soviet Union (one of many countries that had a similar pact with the Soviet Union) didn't last very long.
And yet somehow it still debunks the major pro-Nazi arugment that Hitler was actually the good guy because he was an anti-Communist crusader.
It doesn't as far as I'm concerned.
He still successfully stopped communism in Germany - something we have completely failed to do here. Hitler and Pinochet proved that the only way to actually stop communists is to round them up and execute them as well as the banker collaborators who are financing them. Anything else is a half-measure that results in them ultimately demoralizing and destroying your country.
This is what we should have done with antifa and all of the other satellite groups agitating on behalf of a certain group of wealthy rootless cosmopolitans.
So because he got rid of Communism in Germany - the same way the Nazis rid Germany every threat to Nazi power - Hitler was such an anti-Communist crusader that he was happy to make peace with Communist Russia while going to war with the rest of Europe rather than teaming up with the rest of Europe to stop Communist Russia?
Yet somehow we manage to avoid having the same debates about Pinochet that we have about Hitler.
Yes, states should destroy foreign threats to their people, why are you surprised by this? I'd love it if our state would round up all of the hostile invaders in our country.
We've already been over this, stop resetting your dialog NPC.
Much of Europe also signed a NAP with the Soviet Union: Lithuania, Finland, Latvia, Estonia, Poland, France, Italy, Yugoslavia. These were all countries threatened by the Soviet Union. A NAP gave them some assurances that they'd not be invaded - like I said, the countries most likely to sign an NAP are the ones more likely to be adversaries in a war.
We only have debates about Hitler because of media manipulation by the usual suspects. A clear majority wanted no part of another war with Germany and the vast majority (around 90%) did even want the usual suspects migrating here after the end of WW2 - they were sneaked in.
One of the motivating factors of the Hart-Celler act was to force the USA to accept these people, Emanuel Cellar being one of aforementioned usual suspects.
You're making the mistake of making it just about 'foreign threat'.
By comparison, Hitler did what the Democrats would like to do by getting rid of MAGA.
Are you likewise going to excuse Hitler being assigned absolute power as dictator and never having to face the challenge of another legitimate election?
And yet who was ultimately the aggressor and who did he get aggressive against first?
And why is it that Pinochet hasn't gotten the same treatment as Hitler?
That's like saying Japan and the USA colluded with each other to start WW2.
Good point; I guess I should say fought the Russians, who were the largest communist power at the time.
True, the USSR had nothing to do with russia... other than the fact that Moscow served as it's capital, and the Russian sfsr was its most populated Republic lol...
This is new to me... so, what are you saying? The purpose of the soviet union was to destroy Russia? Or that it was non ethnic Russians leading the union?
I'm not knocking you, in curious, never really learned too much about it.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Żydokomuna
Spoiler: The poles were right and it’s not a conspiracy.
Take your meds
This is not MAGA
Yeah, this isn’t the work of an aryan nationalist. At. All.
Umm... okay. That's a new one.
This post should not be stickied, but reported and deported, fake and gay
Hitler didn't die in 2003, that was a body double, the real Hitler is being kept cryogenically frozen in Antarctica waiting for Nazi paperclip scientists(who are now being kept alive as brains in a jar) to develop a nuclear powered mech suit with life support capable of sustaining him forever. When the mech suit is ready the blackhats will kill the power and transfer complete control of the world's nuclear arsenal under his control and all illusions of national sovereignty will be destroyed.
That is unless trump's white hats can retake control from the Communist royal family and drain the life support goo from the Nazi brain(that's what he means when he says "drain the swamp")
This is the comment that should actually be stickied.
Chrystia Freeland's grandfather worked for Goebbels
Hitler died in 2003? So you're saying Hitler lived until he was 114? 🤦
Come on now
"communist queer"? That's a first.
Can we get this guy muted from making posts?
What did they give a Patriot named Ashli Babbitt?
Must be way over target about something if a post this dumb has been updooted this much. Not organic by any means boys. But who “nose” who this could be???
No way this post got this many upvotes organically.
They told us the whole game plan too in early 2000s in a movie
They say that the side to bring up a comparison to Nazis first is the one that has lost the argument, but that saying fails when they are literally doing the exact same things they did to rise to power.
Here's the thing. If this is true than when they complete the takeover there gonna kill the gays and trannies first right?? So maybe a stand down on our part just to see what happens.
I'm joking.
socialist democrat ... the foundation of 1940s socialist democrat nazi ... no difference w/ our current democrat party in america
After the last 3 years, do not automatically discount ANYTHING
hmmm, and there ARE nazi's in Ukraine....
I mean, if we're not automatically discounting anything...
"Turns out Biden is secretly a MAGA double agent who is just pretending to be senile, he's actually working with Trump to show the country just how bad Democrats really were all along!"
Klaus Schwab's father was literally a Nazi officer
National Socialists
Imagine having so weak an argument that you have to rely on equating a reference to the Nazis own admitted ideology to a belief in transsexuality.
You quote Hitler himself saying that he's a National Socialist and trying to use Hitler saying they're National Socialists to claim that saying Hitler and the Nazis were National Socialists is akin to actually believing in transsexuality.
It's hilarious the way you're able to bend over backwards to rewrite any conversation to mean exactly what you want it to mean.
I need to make a meme of chad beard guy going "National Socialists" and a raging bearded soyjack responding "They're liars! They weren't really socialists, because..." trailing off into a book length garbled paragraph of text.
Hitler teamed up with Stalin to start WW2. Molotov Ribbentrop Pact.
Only leftists try and diminish the fact national socialists worked together to start WW2. They thought FDR was on their side thanks to FDR 's policies and open collaboration with Mussolini.
It's not quite the way you say but somewhat close.
Soviet Communists and National Socialists are both PROGRESSIVE ideologies. Flip side of the same coin. They don't "work together" so much as "Progressives eat their own" because Progressivism (of any stripe) is quite literally a cult.
They're different denominations of the same cult. They get along together right up until they stab each other in the back, which is a 100% guarantee if they're genuine Progressives.
Molotov Ribbentrop pact meant they did work together. That's how WW2 in Europe started.
They're both national socialist ideologies. That's why Ukraine exists. Other oblasts or states were created out of thin air. Ethnic cleansing, genocide, mass deaths, gun control, restrictions on free speech, political purges, wealth nationalization, hatred of capitalism, moralistic do-gooders (to your point about the nature of progressivism) - they had the same overall policies with different flavors of implementation.
Hitler thought FDR would go in with him thanks to the collusion between Mussolini and the most important progressive president of the early\mid 20th century. Never cancelled even though he openly praised fascism and repeated Goebbels' propaganda almost verbatim. Chose a racist VP, too.
They "worked together" in so much as two forms of cancer "work together". They also eat each other alive. I'm not saying there was no pact I am saying they just operated like all Progressive ideologies do: they eat each other alive. It's how ALL Progressivism works.
Progressives have always been fascists.
https://townhall.com/columnists/dineshdsouza/2018/08/22/hitler-mussolini-and-fdr-the-secret-history-of-a-mutual-admiration-society-n2512040
Says the man who can't be bothered to make a genuine counter argument or say anything of actual value; he just finds new ways of saying "Nuh uh, you're wrong!"
When you insist on trying to dismiss me as only saying something because I'm paid to do so and that somehow I know the guy you were replying to, all it does is weaken your own argument and make you look like you are yourself a paid agent or a troll.
The artificial contemporary definitions are how the left tries to make the case that Conservatives are Fascist rather than their own policies. Fascism is exactly the kind of ideology the Democrats and political left were all on board with until Hitler gave it a bad name that nobody wanted to be affiliated with.
Do you know what Fascism actually represents?
Look at China. You think they're actually Communist China anymore? China is probably the best representation of Fascism in the modern world, and guess who would most like to emulate it.
Let's see - who in America actually most aligns with that description?
Supremacy of an ethnic group, the way the Democrats first insisted on the supremacy of whites and then used underhanded tactics to destroy the black community and stick them on the plantation; and then have turned around to project anti-white sentiments as a political weapon.
Contempt for democracy (or, if you prefer, at republican form of government); the way Democrats hate that they have to actually get elected and think they deserve power, the way that RINOs think their voters owe them.
Insistence on obedience to a powerful leader, the way the Democrats insist they are owed power and deserve blind obedience.
A strong demagogic approach, which is basically the Democrat playbook in a nutshell.
You want to tell me that the Democrats aren't both "Progressive" and "Fascist"?
And I'm sure Democrats arguments suffer no loss in validity despite their absurd argument tactics.
If I'm not mistaken, "Projection" is a frequent topic of discussion on this very board regarding Democrats, Globalists, and Neo-Feudalists who keep calling other people that which they themselves demonstrably are.
What job?
Maybe try actually developing an argument beyond "No, that's wrong."
What, Hitler didn't give Fascism a bad name?
Don't ask me, you're the one that treats me like a threat.
Then please, tell me how you define Fascism.
Why, because they call themselves "Communist China"?
I guess that North Korea is a Democratic People's Republic because they call themselves the "Democratic People's Republic of Korea"?
Try looking at what Communism is, try looking at how China is run, and then get back to me on that.
You know how I mentioned "Projection" earlier?
Yeah...
Way to ignore actual substance.
Facts hurt your feelings. You are pretending to be an American. You'll never be able to prove you actually are one.
https://files.catbox.moe/lfzm08.png
https://files.catbox.moe/fimrrj.jpg
This doesn't make any sense. Why do you make up quotes just to argue with yourself?
What you're saying comes off as pro socialist.