All satanic kid fuckers are pagans. Not all pagans are satanic kid fuckers, so you're partially correct. Most pagans just want to dance naked in a corn field. satanics want to fuck kids in the corn fields and then drink their blood. Big difference.
"We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion….Our Constitution was made only for a religious and moral people. It is wholly inadequate for the government of any other."
Really? Christians preach Jesus's sacrifice on the cross but believe in something else that is totally contrary and unbiblical. To see how many doctrines we believe are not originally from Jesus but from Rome, read this article.
Commies took over because of a vacuum left by shitty parenting, an uninformed populace and “representatives” in government who only represented their own financial/ideological interests.
Commies took over because they were allowed to usurp power that wasn’t given to them by the constitution. You think giving religious zealots the same unconstitutional power is somehow going to fix anything? Lol
The federal government’s power is supposed to be extremely limited. That goes for Globohomos and religious zealots alike. I’m in favor of restoring the constitution and dramatically limiting the power anyone has over my life.
Nothing funnier than watching “conservatives” clamor for government control over their lives, just because they think it will comport with their “values”. It’s the road to serfdom but you’re too shortsighted to see it.
In order to be left alone, one must first conquer everything and everyone that promises to do the opposite. This is the lolbertarian paradox, because not only are they not willing to engage in the requisite conquest necessary to their ideal outcome, they actively discourage against it. So, at the end of the day, they're just impotent whiners who don't believe in their own bullshit.
Those are pretty much the agreed upon values we’ve delegated to law enforcement authorities to enforce and, as it is, I think government has already abused that contract beyond recognition. I have no reason to believe a more “virtuous” regime would be any different.
Notice that those examples all involve instances of our actions impacting someone else.
That’s not good enough for most zealots, though. Those calling for using government to impose their brand of Christian values on others would like to see that list grow significantly, to include actions that impact no one but the individual. I think that’s dangerous; a case of the pendulum swinging too far back the other way, to the point of it being the other side of the same coin.
Considering how far left and unhinged they’ve pushed things, I think it was inevitable this type of sentiment would arise, by design or not.
That's the funny thing about individual liberty. You can choose which god you will serve, and even a prisoner in chains on the rack has it. Some choose themselves, some choose the one true God.
In my experience, people like you have tunnel vision. You only see the Government as an infringement on your rights.
When thieves and criminals can easily be the largest infringement of rights of all. Just look at all the cities nobody feels safe walking outside in.
If you can't feel safe exiting your home, do you have any 'rights'? Doesn't sound like it.
Look at El Salvador. You'd call their President a totalitarian, I am sure. He's systematically rounding up gang members wholesale. The country has seen crime lower dramatically, and the citizens are jubilant.
You'd disapprove of his actions, wouldn't you? But how are you going to use courts and due process to take out a gang problem that was far too massive for such civilized processes to deal with? You have no answer for that.
In my experience, people like you have a problem understanding the distinctions between a constitutionally limited federal government and no government or laws at all. Until recently, they were usually just liberals, though.
Just so we’re clear, liberal cities defunded their police departments and Soros DAs ignore laws and fail to hold criminals accountable, so you want to use the federal government to force my family and me to comply with your values? Lol
Which Christian values will be imposed upon the country? All of them, or do politicians get to decide? Do you really expect these “virtuous” politicians to adhere to the standards they set for everyone else?
What happens if I don’t agree with all of your values? What if I choose to teach my children differently? What if I teach them that many powerful Christians are just as corrupt and morally bankrupt as Marxists?Will I get fined? Lose my job? Will they kick my door in? Jimmy Swaggart reeducation camp for the whole family?
It just sounds like a hysterical statist argument to me and maybe even the Hegelian Dialectic at work.
They defunded the police and stopped prosecuting crime to create chaos. If I were you, I’d be trying to determine what they want as a result of that chaos, and how they’ll use the chaos to get it. Maybe they want you scared and pissed off. Maybe they want the public calling for authoritarian measures. Have you considered that possibility?
It’s amazing to me that, with the amount of historical examples available, people calling for authoritarianism never anticipate those measures eventually being used against them personally.
Restore the constitution. Dramatically reduce the power of the federal government. Promote your values culturally. Participate in the education process. Hold school boards’ feet to the fire. Resist the urge to use the explicit threat of prison or government violence to control other people.
It’s individual liberty or nothing. It’s not up for negotiation.
Where do you think it comes from? Do you think you're immune to the formative effects of brain chemistry and social pressures because you're just so much le higher IQ than all the normie sheeple NPCs? Because that's vanity talking.
You claim it’s a myth but this question suggests you don’t really understand what individual liberty actually means. Maybe you’ve confused it with free will?
Individual liberty:
“the liberty of those persons who are free from external restraint in the exercise of those rights which are considered to be outside the province of a government to control”
That has nothing to do with brain chemistry or social pressures.
Except that only the White European Christian population (specifically in Northwestern Europe at that) could even come up with that idea, due to aforementioned.
Though since you bring it up, does a man have the "right" to cut his penis off and claim he's a woman?
If your going to quote anything especially the word of God, be accurate.
1 Timothy 2:11-12 (NKJV) 11 Let a woman learn in silence with all submission. 12 And I do not permit a woman to teach or to have authority over a man, but to be in silence.
And why does Paul think this way?
1 Timothy 2:13-14 (NKJV) 13 For Adam was formed first, then Eve. 14 And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived, fell into transgression.
People sure get triggered when the Bible says things that they don't want to admit.
Are you trying to say that people deny passages of the bible or secretly support the literal interpretation of the word? Perhaps something else? I don't understand you.
But I'm not confused. I know what I said, and I said what I meant. You're just blurting out contrary, smug nonsense now because you're butthurt about something you have yet to articulate.
Isn't that exactly what a confused person in denial would say?
You're just blurting out contrary, smug nonsense
Well, that's like... your opinion. My opinion is the same, you're just blurting out contrary, smug nonsense.
because you're butthurt about something you have yet to articulate.
I'm pretty sure I articulated my grievance when I wrote that I don't understand you. Instead of doing anything to clarify what you meant, you're attacking me.
You don't have values, and the "gay porn to kids" argument is just a cover-up of how much of a fuck up letting women be the majority of teachers has been.
I'm sorry but I can't view archive.ph-links without disabling a lot of security measures, I'd rather have the original link. It's not like I'll support them by loading in any ads.
Deus vult.
Romans 8:31
Let's be honest with ourselves. They are no pagans. Pagans had much higher morales etc and were very community based. Think vikings.
It's all word games to distract from our true enemies, the satanic cult of kid fuckers running things.
The Star of Remphan
True enough
All satanic kid fuckers are pagans. Not all pagans are satanic kid fuckers, so you're partially correct. Most pagans just want to dance naked in a corn field. satanics want to fuck kids in the corn fields and then drink their blood. Big difference.
BUT they wouldn't be worshipping satan and fucking the kids so still not satanists.
Tweet https://x.com/EmeraldRobinson/status/1706281412398104784?s=20
If you read anything thru secular eyes it will look like whatever you want.
If you read it through Christian eyes it will look like whatever the will of God is.
Our form of government is wholly unsuitable for an ungodly people.
"We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion….Our Constitution was made only for a religious and moral people. It is wholly inadequate for the government of any other."
-John Adams
Beat Christ into them
At least our religion is the truth bringing eternal life. Their religion genocides, and sends you to hell.
I've seen anti faggot propaganda around my neighborhood. The Christians are pushing back
I hate Pat Robertson and the Christian Coalition and the 700 Club and all that shit, but I'd have them back in a second.
It’s time to send them to hell where they belong.
I prefer imposing muslim values on these gay faggots.
Mainstream Christian doctrines bear their roots to Roman Paganism.
Be careful when you use the word Pagan.
Our root is Jesus' sacrifice on the cross, nothing else
Really? Christians preach Jesus's sacrifice on the cross but believe in something else that is totally contrary and unbiblical. To see how many doctrines we believe are not originally from Jesus but from Rome, read this article.
No thanks
How bout you just leave me the fuck alone?
I’m not trading one brand of authoritarianism for another.
This attitude is how the commies took control
A power-vacuum will be filled.
One of the biggest lies perpetrated on Western society was the idea "secularism" was the absence of a religious authority.
Commies took over because of a vacuum left by shitty parenting, an uninformed populace and “representatives” in government who only represented their own financial/ideological interests.
Commies took over because they were allowed to usurp power that wasn’t given to them by the constitution. You think giving religious zealots the same unconstitutional power is somehow going to fix anything? Lol
The federal government’s power is supposed to be extremely limited. That goes for Globohomos and religious zealots alike. I’m in favor of restoring the constitution and dramatically limiting the power anyone has over my life.
Nothing funnier than watching “conservatives” clamor for government control over their lives, just because they think it will comport with their “values”. It’s the road to serfdom but you’re too shortsighted to see it.
Triggered wall of text
Lazy low IQ response…
Oh well.
People who 'just want to be left alone' never have, and never will run a damn thing, because you aren't interested in power.
That's how the world works. When this country decided to take that stance, the left simply walked right into the vacuum and took everything over.
Never again.
In order to be left alone, one must first conquer everything and everyone that promises to do the opposite. This is the lolbertarian paradox, because not only are they not willing to engage in the requisite conquest necessary to their ideal outcome, they actively discourage against it. So, at the end of the day, they're just impotent whiners who don't believe in their own bullshit.
It's this. There will come a point where we will have to make them leave us alone.
I reject authoritarianism in all its forms.
I don’t want some religious zealot “imposing their values” on me any more than I want some leftist Globohomo imposing theirs.
People clamoring for a brand of authoritarianism that’s more palatable to them personally is just a benchmark on the road to serfdom.
I choose individual liberty and am willing to die for that principle. I couldn’t care less if you agree.
A good father imposes his values on his son. If he doesn't, someone else will.
Yeah, that definitely speaks to my point. A good father, not government.
But for those individuals without the right values (often but not always the fault of their parents), the government needs to impose values on them
Don’t hurt people.
Don’t mess with other people’s property.
Don’t infringe on the rights of others.
Those are pretty much the agreed upon values we’ve delegated to law enforcement authorities to enforce and, as it is, I think government has already abused that contract beyond recognition. I have no reason to believe a more “virtuous” regime would be any different.
Notice that those examples all involve instances of our actions impacting someone else. That’s not good enough for most zealots, though. Those calling for using government to impose their brand of Christian values on others would like to see that list grow significantly, to include actions that impact no one but the individual. I think that’s dangerous; a case of the pendulum swinging too far back the other way, to the point of it being the other side of the same coin.
Considering how far left and unhinged they’ve pushed things, I think it was inevitable this type of sentiment would arise, by design or not.
Don’t forget, it’s the libs who want to use the gov to impose values on people.
That's the funny thing about individual liberty. You can choose which god you will serve, and even a prisoner in chains on the rack has it. Some choose themselves, some choose the one true God.
The world does not care what you want.
In my experience, people like you have tunnel vision. You only see the Government as an infringement on your rights.
When thieves and criminals can easily be the largest infringement of rights of all. Just look at all the cities nobody feels safe walking outside in.
If you can't feel safe exiting your home, do you have any 'rights'? Doesn't sound like it.
Look at El Salvador. You'd call their President a totalitarian, I am sure. He's systematically rounding up gang members wholesale. The country has seen crime lower dramatically, and the citizens are jubilant.
You'd disapprove of his actions, wouldn't you? But how are you going to use courts and due process to take out a gang problem that was far too massive for such civilized processes to deal with? You have no answer for that.
In my experience, people like you have a problem understanding the distinctions between a constitutionally limited federal government and no government or laws at all. Until recently, they were usually just liberals, though.
Just so we’re clear, liberal cities defunded their police departments and Soros DAs ignore laws and fail to hold criminals accountable, so you want to use the federal government to force my family and me to comply with your values? Lol
Which Christian values will be imposed upon the country? All of them, or do politicians get to decide? Do you really expect these “virtuous” politicians to adhere to the standards they set for everyone else?
What happens if I don’t agree with all of your values? What if I choose to teach my children differently? What if I teach them that many powerful Christians are just as corrupt and morally bankrupt as Marxists?Will I get fined? Lose my job? Will they kick my door in? Jimmy Swaggart reeducation camp for the whole family?
It just sounds like a hysterical statist argument to me and maybe even the Hegelian Dialectic at work.
They defunded the police and stopped prosecuting crime to create chaos. If I were you, I’d be trying to determine what they want as a result of that chaos, and how they’ll use the chaos to get it. Maybe they want you scared and pissed off. Maybe they want the public calling for authoritarian measures. Have you considered that possibility?
It’s amazing to me that, with the amount of historical examples available, people calling for authoritarianism never anticipate those measures eventually being used against them personally.
Restore the constitution. Dramatically reduce the power of the federal government. Promote your values culturally. Participate in the education process. Hold school boards’ feet to the fire. Resist the urge to use the explicit threat of prison or government violence to control other people.
It’s individual liberty or nothing. It’s not up for negotiation.
A myth.
I think it’s an ideal worth fighting for.
It’s unfortunate you don’t think the same.
Where do you think it comes from? Do you think you're immune to the formative effects of brain chemistry and social pressures because you're just so much le higher IQ than all the normie sheeple NPCs? Because that's vanity talking.
You claim it’s a myth but this question suggests you don’t really understand what individual liberty actually means. Maybe you’ve confused it with free will?
Individual liberty:
“the liberty of those persons who are free from external restraint in the exercise of those rights which are considered to be outside the province of a government to control”
That has nothing to do with brain chemistry or social pressures.
Except that only the White European Christian population (specifically in Northwestern Europe at that) could even come up with that idea, due to aforementioned.
Though since you bring it up, does a man have the "right" to cut his penis off and claim he's a woman?
(1 Timothy 2:11-12)
If your going to quote anything especially the word of God, be accurate.
And why does Paul think this way?
People sure get triggered when the Bible says things that they don't want to admit.
*case in point: these butthurt downvotes
(Leviticus 19:28)
My favorite Bible quote for people with Jesus tattoos
I'm glad I never got one. Now I'm edgy and unique because I don't have any tattoos or piercings.
There is no prohibition for Christians to have a Jesus tattoo. Why would you think that?
Are you trying to say that people deny passages of the bible or secretly support the literal interpretation of the word? Perhaps something else? I don't understand you.
What I said was pretty simple. Maybe you're over-thinking it and confusing yourself.
Perhaps. Perhaps you're simple-minded and don't see your own confusion?
But I'm not confused. I know what I said, and I said what I meant. You're just blurting out contrary, smug nonsense now because you're butthurt about something you have yet to articulate.
Isn't that exactly what a confused person in denial would say?
Well, that's like... your opinion. My opinion is the same, you're just blurting out contrary, smug nonsense.
I'm pretty sure I articulated my grievance when I wrote that I don't understand you. Instead of doing anything to clarify what you meant, you're attacking me.
Good bye, I won't think about you ever again.
Triggered for some reason. Okay, well bye.
You don't have values, and the "gay porn to kids" argument is just a cover-up of how much of a fuck up letting women be the majority of teachers has been.
Such an ignorant statement, everybody has values - Even if other might consider them negative to the point of evil.
Science has proven women do not have values. They just side with whatever helps themselves/the female in-group.
https://archive.ph/SLe75
I'm sorry but I can't view archive.ph-links without disabling a lot of security measures, I'd rather have the original link. It's not like I'll support them by loading in any ads.
You aren't wrong, women should not be the majority. My best teachers were always men.