I think the point of having Amy Barrett be next is that not even the dumbest Dem voter would believe that she was roaming around her law college as the 'drunken leader of a roving rape-gang'.
The 'best' they'll have for opposing is that she probably isn't a fan of babies being slaughtered,.. which is actually the political majority consensus, lately.
Or we could put the first Indian American on the bench who was Trump’s first Judicial nominee after Gorsuch. Thapar is only 50 years old and the left would have no dirt on him. They have been preparing for Barrett for years because of Roe v Wade. With Thapar they will have to find a way to attack a working class guy who still hangs out with working class people and writes opinions that we can understand.
Ok yeah I’m sold
I think the point of having Amy Barrett be next is that not even the dumbest Dem voter would believe that she was roaming around her law college as the 'drunken leader of a roving rape-gang'.
The 'best' they'll have for opposing is that she probably isn't a fan of babies being slaughtered,.. which is actually the political majority consensus, lately.
Or we could put the first Indian American on the bench who was Trump’s first Judicial nominee after Gorsuch. Thapar is only 50 years old and the left would have no dirt on him. They have been preparing for Barrett for years because of Roe v Wade. With Thapar they will have to find a way to attack a working class guy who still hangs out with working class people and writes opinions that we can understand.
They didn't have any dirt on Kavanaugh either.
It's a woman for Woman Thing IMO not that I agree.