Andy Ngo is a reporter. But he is not free to state truth, facts, and context, in a manner not prejucicial to any "group"—racial, sexual, gender, or otherwise.
For this he is essentially gagged and shoved in a closet.
This is the so-called FREE PRESS liberals are always crowing about.
They operate exactly the way state-run media does in communist countries.
Ironically, they are forcing the need for a state-run media here in the United States just so people can have a shot at getting information that is not pure leftist propaganda.* Instead it would be right-wing slanted pro-Trump, pro-veteran, pro-USA, pro-life, pro-everything good propaganda. Thus the ones screaming the loudest about their love for a FREE PRESS are the ones ensuring that the press is NOT FREE.
*Please note that propaganda, the way I'm using it here, while carrying a negative connotation due to accidental repeated misuse, actually is a neutral term. It just means information promoting a given viewpoint or agenda. Or, "the spreading of information in support of a cause" (vocabulary.com). When that viewpoint, agenda or cause is DEEMED by someone to be harmful, and then they call the info about it propaganda, that's when the word receives its negative veneer. Just so no one is confused by my use of "pro-USA propaganda" as if it meant something not good :)
The MSM is on life support my guy. We don't need state-run media, we just need time. Tim Pool constantly makes videos about how right-wing media is growing and left-wing media is shriveling up and dying. Ideally the media would just report the facts with no opinions but that's a looong way off
Andy Ngo is a reporter. But he is not free to state truth, facts, and context, in a manner not prejucicial to any "group"—racial, sexual, gender, or otherwise.
For this he is essentially gagged and shoved in a closet.
This is the so-called FREE PRESS liberals are always crowing about.
They operate exactly the way state-run media does in communist countries.
Ironically, they are forcing the need for a state-run media here in the United States just so people can have a shot at getting information that is not pure leftist propaganda.* Instead it would be right-wing slanted pro-Trump, pro-veteran, pro-USA, pro-life, pro-everything good propaganda. Thus the ones screaming the loudest about their love for a FREE PRESS are the ones ensuring that the press is NOT FREE.
*Please note that propaganda, the way I'm using it here, while carrying a negative connotation due to accidental repeated misuse, actually is a neutral term. It just means information promoting a given viewpoint or agenda. Or, "the spreading of information in support of a cause" (vocabulary.com). When that viewpoint, agenda or cause is DEEMED by someone to be harmful, and then they call the info about it propaganda, that's when the word receives its negative veneer. Just so no one is confused by my use of "pro-USA propaganda" as if it meant something not good :)
>state-run media
Oof.
The MSM is on life support my guy. We don't need state-run media, we just need time. Tim Pool constantly makes videos about how right-wing media is growing and left-wing media is shriveling up and dying. Ideally the media would just report the facts with no opinions but that's a looong way off
But you see what I'm saying
No one actually wants state-run media but MSM is forcing it (and being it, whenever dumbocrats are in power)