they promote it as liberal, it becomes liberal.. liberals are guilted by politics more than religion. Even most dems (I know you don't want to hear it but you know it's true.) have conservative values in their homes but promote this bastardize version of so called liberties to the plebs. they promise utopia but desire a dystopia where the chosen few sit at the top and scraps are handed down to a controlled ignorant mass.
maybe a bit exaggerated but the way they're acting now, looking at the districts of the most iconic, living, still in office, democrats... they scapegoat staffers, their sacrificial lambs, usually too young to consider the consequences of taking one for the team when it's a federal crime.. some think there's a payoff, no it's pure ideology in most cases. presenting this fear mindset that we've seen that only exploded when Trump won.
how many of us have lost family, friends, employment, education for little else than being associated with DJT or the evergrowing alt-right by even just questioning the left. I don't know a single Trump supporter that hasn't faced insane levels of persecution and some of that even misdirected at the third parties (as it always is when someone's candidate doesn't win; you're taking away the votes, ,man) ... the sheer level of hostility that has resulted in physical violence as much as social smears.
you all want to have fun.. set up a pro-trump profile on a lgbt site, or even just republican, conservative... it's rarely reported but a lot of peeps suffered doxxing (but those campaigns, honestly started a few years before Trump when the craziness of the sjws first got out of hand; tumblr babies.. before cis white straight males, it was all about the gays that didn't want fats or fems or didn't want to screw a faghag or stopped supporting their icons - I think tori was the most known when her record sales went down her first reaction was how much she sacrificed for the gheys to stand naked on floats and take molly, soon followed madonna, janet, mariah, cher, bette midler, kathy griffin to eventually alcoholic and woke margaret cho, whining about cocksuckers unironically - but it did boost their lesbian following). Most of the crazy crap you see in the lgbt is pushed by straight liberals - yes, they'll scream how their actually bi but yet outside of drunk kissing and grabbing crotches on stage, they end up marrying dudes, even ani difranco. - anyone remember when lgbt hated the clintons? there were active, full frontal assaults on all the old guard activists and suddenly appeared the human rights campaign - that sends out memos straight from the democratic party, took credit for the log cabin republican's work and told it's supporters to accept homophobic democrats because they should be patient.
I digress but it's what they've done in every damn community, every minority.. they go in and take over or push out the non-partisan and it becomes a democratic lobbyist organization that is little else to launder money to candidates...
PP is no different in the end, their practices (see project v's videos) are appalling.. but the whole of the organization is funnel $ to democratic candidates by any means, in every capacity, whether selling baby parts or redirecting their funds to candidates directly or their 'projects'
It's so funny when they try to bring "morals" into abortion (a.k.a. murdering of innocent babies).
Imagine caring about animals more than your own offspring, a part of you. What's even more sickening is fathers don't get a say so, but they still have to pay child support with NO say so.
While I probably share your views, I actually do think you need to change your mind on your terminology.
Terrorism is all of these elements
1- violence or the threat of violence
2- by a non-state actor
3- against non-combatant targets
4- with a religious or ideological motivation
5- in an attempt to influence a third party audience
And while you can make a pretty good argument for parts 1-4, the fifth criterion is where it falls flat. Abortion doctors don’t kill a baby so that other people will be scared into complying, they kill a baby for the personal wishes of the mother. Basically, if the goal of the violence is the death of the recipient of the violence, you dont have terrorism. You only get terrorism if the goal of the violence is that you create a big terrifying violent news story.
it's difficult with PP but easier with the activist groups that support PP.
4 on the religious front there are a few groups, mostly supremacy from white to islamist. And of course, there's the radical groups.. a lot of conservatives have begun embracing radical feminists because of their stance on transgender but seem to be oblivious to their rhetoric in wanting to abort the majority ofo male babies to create a feminist dystopia.
see 4, see the democratic voters. (the third parties are more scattered, even those that promote choice have waivered in the last few years debating how far along, the revolving door, the decreased of push towards prevention in the last two decades, and the promotion of PP as a women's health clinic.. which has had detrimental affect on actual health clinics by way of public funding and private donations when they move into an area.. and by PP's donations to candidates in the areas they're setup which rarely sides with local voters aka lobbyist organization, like many lobbyists organizations masquerading as community organizations - slightly off topic, there was a radical takeover of lgbt, ethnic and other minority organizations by leftwing, soon catering to celebrities and politicians as the services became more limited despite the donations overflowing... even politicians acting against their interests, all one party.
on topic, it's where we have even more pro-life secular activists and pro-choice but anti-pp groups now... for related reasons.)
‘Third parties’ in this discussion does not refer to political parties. It refers to people other than the perpetrator of the violence and the victim of violence.
But it's not murder of innocents, it's a MEDICAL PROCEDUREEEEEEEEEEE
/s
Jeffrey Epstein didn't perform a medical procedure on himself.
Terrorism seeks political change through fear and violence. Industrial-scale abortion is genocide.
The Democrat craves the mutilation of babies to enable their debauchery.
less debauchery than $.
they promote it as liberal, it becomes liberal.. liberals are guilted by politics more than religion. Even most dems (I know you don't want to hear it but you know it's true.) have conservative values in their homes but promote this bastardize version of so called liberties to the plebs. they promise utopia but desire a dystopia where the chosen few sit at the top and scraps are handed down to a controlled ignorant mass.
maybe a bit exaggerated but the way they're acting now, looking at the districts of the most iconic, living, still in office, democrats... they scapegoat staffers, their sacrificial lambs, usually too young to consider the consequences of taking one for the team when it's a federal crime.. some think there's a payoff, no it's pure ideology in most cases. presenting this fear mindset that we've seen that only exploded when Trump won.
how many of us have lost family, friends, employment, education for little else than being associated with DJT or the evergrowing alt-right by even just questioning the left. I don't know a single Trump supporter that hasn't faced insane levels of persecution and some of that even misdirected at the third parties (as it always is when someone's candidate doesn't win; you're taking away the votes, ,man) ... the sheer level of hostility that has resulted in physical violence as much as social smears.
you all want to have fun.. set up a pro-trump profile on a lgbt site, or even just republican, conservative... it's rarely reported but a lot of peeps suffered doxxing (but those campaigns, honestly started a few years before Trump when the craziness of the sjws first got out of hand; tumblr babies.. before cis white straight males, it was all about the gays that didn't want fats or fems or didn't want to screw a faghag or stopped supporting their icons - I think tori was the most known when her record sales went down her first reaction was how much she sacrificed for the gheys to stand naked on floats and take molly, soon followed madonna, janet, mariah, cher, bette midler, kathy griffin to eventually alcoholic and woke margaret cho, whining about cocksuckers unironically - but it did boost their lesbian following). Most of the crazy crap you see in the lgbt is pushed by straight liberals - yes, they'll scream how their actually bi but yet outside of drunk kissing and grabbing crotches on stage, they end up marrying dudes, even ani difranco. - anyone remember when lgbt hated the clintons? there were active, full frontal assaults on all the old guard activists and suddenly appeared the human rights campaign - that sends out memos straight from the democratic party, took credit for the log cabin republican's work and told it's supporters to accept homophobic democrats because they should be patient.
I digress but it's what they've done in every damn community, every minority.. they go in and take over or push out the non-partisan and it becomes a democratic lobbyist organization that is little else to launder money to candidates...
PP is no different in the end, their practices (see project v's videos) are appalling.. but the whole of the organization is funnel $ to democratic candidates by any means, in every capacity, whether selling baby parts or redirecting their funds to candidates directly or their 'projects'
It's so funny when they try to bring "morals" into abortion (a.k.a. murdering of innocent babies).
Imagine caring about animals more than your own offspring, a part of you. What's even more sickening is fathers don't get a say so, but they still have to pay child support with NO say so.
Lady Pede here. I do find that men's rights in these cases are nearly limited. It's sticky, but in some cases I think unfair.
While I probably share your views, I actually do think you need to change your mind on your terminology.
Terrorism is all of these elements
1- violence or the threat of violence
2- by a non-state actor
3- against non-combatant targets
4- with a religious or ideological motivation
5- in an attempt to influence a third party audience
And while you can make a pretty good argument for parts 1-4, the fifth criterion is where it falls flat. Abortion doctors don’t kill a baby so that other people will be scared into complying, they kill a baby for the personal wishes of the mother. Basically, if the goal of the violence is the death of the recipient of the violence, you dont have terrorism. You only get terrorism if the goal of the violence is that you create a big terrifying violent news story.
it's difficult with PP but easier with the activist groups that support PP.
4 on the religious front there are a few groups, mostly supremacy from white to islamist. And of course, there's the radical groups.. a lot of conservatives have begun embracing radical feminists because of their stance on transgender but seem to be oblivious to their rhetoric in wanting to abort the majority ofo male babies to create a feminist dystopia.
on topic, it's where we have even more pro-life secular activists and pro-choice but anti-pp groups now... for related reasons.)
‘Third parties’ in this discussion does not refer to political parties. It refers to people other than the perpetrator of the violence and the victim of violence.
I come from the hood. Trust me, abortion is a very good thing
The Democrat Party is a terrorist organization. Change my mind.