97
Comments (34)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
6
AtariArtist 6 points ago +7 / -1

Solution - fight fire with fire. Who's the site owners. Can we have a chat with them? Since the site is in the news - and is public-facing - they would appear to be 'public figures'.

I'm not on there - looks like the data wasn't from before the 2016 election. I got a hat - which has since been discontinued, the white w/ gold lettering, and has been increasing in value. I wanted the White one for autograph purposes. It's still minty too.

8
KarenAbduulJabar [S] 8 points ago +8 / -0

All the names are “redacted for safety” how ironic

7
AtariArtist 7 points ago +8 / -1

Pfft - hardly - there's ways to find out. Hell - just challenge Kiwifarms. They find everyone.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
AtariArtist 3 points ago +4 / -1

Wikileaks wasn't on a mission to demonize voters. That's pushing up against civil-rights laws. They're not in the same orbit.

Considering the China tie - that's definitely election interference.

I say go crazy and explore all options. I suggested Kiwi because it's kind of their 'brand' - the same way 4chan/pol has it's crazy-ops 'brand'.

3
V43_of_ii_dim 3 points ago +3 / -0

https://www.bizapedia.com/de/public-service-media-group-inc.html

I’m starting here. Posted the sites hosting info elsewhere in the thread. Gonna start by looking for media appearances that might reveal a name. Gotta know who to sue.

SPEZ: Coming up empty handed so far. It’s the same people behind the “racist watch” website we we talking about last month. That site’s gone and this stands in its place.