You know the holocaust happened, right? Nazis killed 12 million innocent people, Jews, blacks, Gypsies, handicapped, intellectuals, and many more. I don’t think anyone should go to jail for being a racist, but being a Holocaust denier is kind of a shitty thing to be.
I trust our mainstream history books less than I trust our mainstream news media, and global warming science claims.
I trust our mainstream history books less because antisemitic hate speech laws can be used to force individuals and publishers to censor antisemitic facts or risk being sent to prison or sued into bankruptcy.
Mainstream history books describe Hitler and the German people's motivations in a way that make the criminals from Scooby-Doo seem complex.
Mainstream history books typically don't even mention the Jew's central role in the Bolsheviks coup of 1917.
>being a Holocaust denier is kind of a shitty thing to be
The problem with your premise is you're regurgitating misinformation that was fed to you by the mainstream news. Ursula Haverbeck isn't a holocaust denier - she simply claims that Auschwitz was a labor camp rather than a death camp.
Just because you consider a claim to be antisemitic doesn't mean it's not true.
You know the holocaust happened, right? Nazis killed 12 million innocent people, Jews, blacks, Gypsies, handicapped, intellectuals, and many more. I don’t think anyone should go to jail for being a racist, but being a Holocaust denier is kind of a shitty thing to be.
Various reports suggest that between one and nine million Germans starved to death towards the end and immediately after WW2, including civilians and prisoners...
...critical thinking forces me to consider the alleged photos of "starved death-camp Jews" may have been legitimate criminals who starved along with German civilians. Some reports suggest the starvation was caused by allied sanctions imposed on Germany has a punishment after WW2 ended.
With the ease that "some people" lie and the possibility that antisemitic speech could be abused to legally force agencies to publish bullshit or be sued or incarcerated, it forces us to maintain an open mind.
Germany doesn't have free speech now.
You'll get locked in a prison cage if you disagree with a Jew.
The problem with such hate speech laws is a claim can be both antisemitic and true.
Wow
You know the holocaust happened, right? Nazis killed 12 million innocent people, Jews, blacks, Gypsies, handicapped, intellectuals, and many more. I don’t think anyone should go to jail for being a racist, but being a Holocaust denier is kind of a shitty thing to be.
I trust our mainstream history books less than I trust our mainstream news media, and global warming science claims.
I trust our mainstream history books less because antisemitic hate speech laws can be used to force individuals and publishers to censor antisemitic facts or risk being sent to prison or sued into bankruptcy.
Mainstream history books don't mention the Jewish German Communist Party coup of 1933 or how the Jewish world declared a Holy War against Germany's Christians when their coup failed.
Mainstream history books describe Hitler and the German people's motivations in a way that make the criminals from Scooby-Doo seem complex.
Mainstream history books typically don't even mention the Jew's central role in the Bolsheviks coup of 1917.
>being a Holocaust denier is kind of a shitty thing to be
The problem with your premise is you're regurgitating misinformation that was fed to you by the mainstream news. Ursula Haverbeck isn't a holocaust denier - she simply claims that Auschwitz was a labor camp rather than a death camp.
Just because you consider a claim to be antisemitic doesn't mean it's not true.
what he said:
You know the holocaust happened, right? Nazis killed 12 million innocent people, Jews, blacks, Gypsies, handicapped, intellectuals, and many more. I don’t think anyone should go to jail for being a racist, but being a Holocaust denier is kind of a shitty thing to be.
If there's one thing our lying, seditious mainstream media has taught us, it's the need to verify claim and rely on critical thinking.
How do we know the same sort people who run CNN haven't filled our mainstream history books with similar lies?
Various reports suggest that between one and nine million Germans starved to death towards the end and immediately after WW2, including civilians and prisoners...
...critical thinking forces me to consider the alleged photos of "starved death-camp Jews" may have been legitimate criminals who starved along with German civilians. Some reports suggest the starvation was caused by allied sanctions imposed on Germany has a punishment after WW2 ended.
With the ease that "some people" lie and the possibility that antisemitic speech could be abused to legally force agencies to publish bullshit or be sued or incarcerated, it forces us to maintain an open mind.
TL;DR: Just because you read it in a book or the man in the television said so, doesn't mean it's true. We're living in an age of information warfare and perhaps the war started long ago?
This is a hot take:
https://twitter.com/PolishPatriotTM/status/1200518993494396929
We don't want our society free, if society as she uses it means government. We want our government limited and our people free.