1173
Comments (80)
sorted by:
42
shadypollster 42 points ago +43 / -1

The gaystapo. Kek.

24
NocturnalPatrol 24 points ago +24 / -0

I really want some cartoonist to make a cartoon of a small, effeminate man with a fabulous haircut, and a pair of glasses, sashaying into a bakery while flanked by two tall and burly, cross-dressing men with ear-piercings and wearing women's makeup, and saying "Nice place you've got here. It would be a shame if something happened to it."

Because we are at that point now.

5
Dereliction 5 points ago +5 / -0

Hang around the right bakery long enough and you could just snap a photo of it.

18
CancelTheSwamp 18 points ago +18 / -0

“Celebrate my lifestyle you bigot, REEEEE!”

16
DeplorableLA 16 points ago +17 / -1

I agree with some who argue that LGB need to separate from T. And bullies of all types need to pipe down and behave.

18
NocturnalPatrol 18 points ago +18 / -0

The whole acronym is a lie. Dykes don't like fairies, fairies don't like dykes, dykes and fairies both hate trannies, and the jury's out on whether or not bisexuality is a real thing.

6
MagicCarpetBurns 6 points ago +6 / -0

It's Just a Jaded attempt to create a voting Block, it has worked for many years.

9
MAGA_NIGGA 9 points ago +11 / -2

MRI scans indicate that MtF transsexuals are either men aroused by the thought of possessing female genitalia or homosexuals who want to seduce straight men. https://archive.is/8wMFZ

More Tranny Statistics: https://pastebin.com/qXHQ3Xcu

5
Dereliction 5 points ago +5 / -0

In three words: Mentally Ill Perverts.

3
Adler 3 points ago +3 / -0

LGBTQQAPBBQ --> LGB* (even then, the B is iffy...)

-1
Taqiyya_Mockingbird -1 points ago +0 / -1

Replace it with it an S for Straight to make it more inclusive. Once that happens, the entitlement attitude will dissolve.

14
Belleoffreedom 14 points ago +26 / -12

You could just take the LGBTQ out of the title. We don't like bullies, whatever their chosen identity.

8
blumenkraft 8 points ago +12 / -4

Exactly this, nobody cares about their identity so they should just shove it.

11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
3
blumenkraft 3 points ago +5 / -2

So long as they don't try to shove it in my face, and don't try to educate kids about anal sex, they can do anything they want.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
0
deleted 0 points ago +4 / -4
13
deleted 13 points ago +13 / -0
6
krzyzowiec 6 points ago +7 / -1

It's not fine to celebrate degeneracy in public. Kids should not see such things.

5
MagicCarpetBurns 5 points ago +5 / -0

Nor have dollar bills stuffed in their tutu's -Just Sayin'

8
_deleted_ 8 points ago +9 / -1

They hate you and your whole family, and want you dead. Fact.

8
520kj 8 points ago +8 / -0

"And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues." -Rev 18:4, KJV

7
AlvinOfTheTrumpmunks 7 points ago +7 / -0

The LGB issue was settled when they got their marriage recognized by only the government handed to them from the Supreme Court.

Their activists are mafia/cult that allowed the more extreme weirdos to come out.

1
jgardner 1 point ago +1 / -0

The supreme court removed the debate from the halls of government. It is not over. Dred Scott was supposedly settled by the supreme court too.

5
deleted 5 points ago +7 / -2
4
Cutter 4 points ago +5 / -1

Nazis, damnit. "Nazi's" means belonging to a Nazi.

-Grammar got run over by a reindeer.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
5
0nlyL0s3rsC3ns0r 5 points ago +5 / -0

I don’t have an issue with gay people but the T and the Q need to go.

The first one needs a secured mental health facility and the second needs a regular prison.

4
Dreyfus 4 points ago +4 / -0

Dace Chapelle is on the same page. We are not even grasping the consequences of the blowback towards the politicization of the Ts and Qs.

3
CloakAndDagger 3 points ago +3 / -0

Gay nationalist here, 100% agree. T is not about orientation. It's about deluding yourself that you're a different gender than your biological sex. Gay rights is where the line must be drawn on the slippery slope. Not a step before or after.

1
DeplorableTech 1 point ago +1 / -0

When you say rights, what specifically are you referring to the line being? I mean this in a sincere way to understand a gay pedes perspective?

1
CloakAndDagger 1 point ago +2 / -1

Sure. I'm happy to talk about this with anyone because it's the left that wants to sow division in our ranks. The best we can do is understand one another.

  1. No special treatment to anyone. Basic rights (to speech, property, legal representation) etc should stay the same. Currently, islamic countries don't have this.
  2. Marriage - the state shouldn't be involved in marriage in the first place, but now that it is, civil marriage and the according rights (tax exemption, inheritance laws) etc should be the same. Churches should be allowed to choose if they want to provide church marriages to gays according to their own tenets.
  3. Blood donation - in many countries, gays are not allowed to donate blood or plasma, but it's stupid. The blood is filtered for diseases anyways, so if it's healthy, why forbid gays? It's not like the blood is any different. Healthy blood from gay people is better than blood from a straight person who has AIDS.
  4. No adoptions. Kids need a father and mother figure in their lives. Sorry fellow gays.

I guess that's it?

2
Dudemanfoo 2 points ago +2 / -0

We have the best gays don't we folks!!!

Bigly...

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
CloakAndDagger 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sadly, I don't know, cause so far I was always denied at the blood bank. They thought I wanted to save lives, but I was in fact executing my plan to turn all recipients gay by my gay blood...

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
DeplorableTech 1 point ago +1 / -0

I know this is a late response but I wanted to say thank you for the response! I have never found someone that has shared so similarly my beliefs on each of these points. The only opinion of these I have that has changed would be around the 4th point. While I agree that it is not ideal that a child would be raised without a mother or a father, I have in the past 5 years fostered a dozen or so kids and have had lots of exposure to really, really shitty parents. So while it is not ideal for the development of a child, I do think a based gay couple would be infinitely better than a child being left in the system without any parents.

1
monzzter221 1 point ago +1 / -0

Gay nationalist? how does that work? the Gs and the Ls diusgruntledly fuck each other for continuation of the gay nation?

1
CloakAndDagger 1 point ago +1 / -0

No. The words have no added connotation together. It just means I am a nationalist first and also gay. I do everything you do except having kids. This mockery of people who are on your side is what drives gay people away from the right, so your attitude is not helping.

1
monzzter221 1 point ago +1 / -0

I still do not understand how T has anything to do with LGB. LGBS makes more sense than LGBT.

And the Q... that is a nonexistent non-issue. Nobody calling themselves a Q has ever been persecuted, even in a superficial way. It is a made up thing by people who want attention, period. They just want to scream their way into an acronym.

5
MakeALaskaGreatAgain 5 points ago +6 / -1

Christianity and homosexuality are opposed to each other there is no way around that. The lord Himself confirms the judgement of Sodom as having come from God thus the saying jesus never spoke against gay people is untrue.

Furthermore Both the old testament and new testament state this behavior as sin.

The gay community will always move to persecute Christians now that society has granted them rights. legitimizing their behavior has not brought peace nor can it for as long as a person truly belongs to the Lord there will be hostility with the world.

I do not state this as a call for violence but rather to let Christians who are thinking otherwise understand that peace cannot be made because this movement opposes Christ and wants to rewrite scripture to manufacture a false acceptance before God.

2
DeplorableTech 2 points ago +2 / -0

There is a stark difference between how a country should be run and tenets of Christianity. The old testament also said there should not be kings, judges, or rulers but the people begged for it. The state and christianity are always in direct opposition. That is not a call for violent opposition, quite the opposite. But we cannot legislate Christianity as inevitably it will be bastardized.

1
jgardner 1 point ago +3 / -2

When Christians were running the show, gay people could do whatever they wanted as long as they kept quiet about it. Lots and lots of gay men had children. If gay is a gene, then Christians kept it alive and the gay marriage will make it disappear. The gay movement is literally genociding itself and only Christianity csn save it.

2
krzyzowiec 2 points ago +6 / -4

I love to see Christians finally standing up. Now let's make sure we don't allow these radical gays to infiltrate the conservative/MAGA movement and subvert it from within. You want to be gay? Keep it to yourself. We don't care or need to know about it.

If you want to flaunt your degeneracy, there's already another party for that.

1
monzzter221 1 point ago +1 / -0

the homos have been a part of this movement since the beginning, well before the Cruz supporting thumpers jumped on an independently successful bandwagon.

2
monzzter221 2 points ago +2 / -0

I am not a christian, and i don't think it is anyones business who fucks who in a free country like ours, but i am with you guys on this one.

As a younger person the idea that the bible beaters want a theocracy was all the rage. As a grown up I just don't see it. Sure, there is a push here and there, and there are perfectly good organizations successfully pushing back, but the doom and gloom hysteria is bullshit. And it is easy to see why: pretty much every single christian denomination in this country came here from Europe escaping religious persecution. I would even argue that America changed christianity worldwide and helped create the peaceful religion it is today, where the usual view is "you're going to hell and i don't want you to, but that is not really my business, it is between you and god". I have met thousands of christians, and i can count on one hand the number of people who have tried to pressure me into going to their church.

Instead what i see is the people i thought were right when i was younger are trying to force you fine people into accepting things you are ideologically opposed to into your personal lives. That is unacceptable.

1
NavyGuy 1 point ago +1 / -0

New rules have! We win you lose!

1
Robyna7 1 point ago +1 / -0

The comment section on that page is cancer giving.

1
oakley 1 point ago +1 / -0

Re 'Some schools will no longer honor valedictorians, for it’s unfair some students earn better grades where others do not.' It's all part of the dumbing down of education. Not all people offer something of equal value to society, but schools and liberals don't want to admit this.

1
n3IVI0 1 point ago +1 / -0

Or, to simplify the terminology, just call them perverts.

1
deleted 1 point ago +4 / -3
3
Winning2024 3 points ago +8 / -5

Oh you’ll like this video by a professor explaining to his class how the gay movement was following the footsteps of pedophiles.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=2u3hmZCsXoE

I don’t like the gay agenda, but that doesn’t mean you have to hate gay people.

And their bullshit about it not being a choice. If sexuality wasn’t a choice, they would have bred themselves out of existence thousands of years ago, clearly there is some fucking level of choice.

4
CloakAndDagger 4 points ago +4 / -0

Wrong. If it was a choice, why would men in muslim countries "choose" to be gay? They are thrown off the rooftops there. It's idiocy. Gay acts are a choice, because you can choose whether to have sex with someone or not, but gay attraction is not a choice, the same way straight people can't help but be attracted to the opposite gender.

Face it. If you are a straight man, you can theoretically "choose" to have sex with a guy, it's not physically impossible, but why would you? However, you can never change your attraction towards women.

And the outbreeding argument is patently fallacious. For example, Meerkats have guards that whistle to warn for predators. The gene for this whistling is there in all Meerkats, and the whistler is highly likely to get eaten first, but because this overall strategy results in higher survival rates for the rest of the group, the gene is reinforced.

If you killed all gay people in the world, gay babies would still be born the next day. You can't eradicate it, just like Down syndrome. So is Down syndrome a choice as well? Why are they not outbred already?

I hate the LGBT lobby, but I hate people just as much who unjustly attack normal acting, often right-wing gays. Stormfront is always open for nazi fucks, if you are interested. Here in TheDonald.win, we deport them. Trump is the first President in US history who was pro-gay on the campaign trail.

This comment is for both of you, by the way.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
CloakAndDagger 1 point ago +2 / -1

Yes, but acts don't matter. The urge is what makes you gay. Straight people who have sex with guys are not even gay. They stay straight inside. They are like animals who have no morals or self-respect, only base insticts of filling a hole.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
3
CloakAndDagger 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yea, I tried that as a teenager. To say that it did not help is an understatement. I discovered my orientation after falling in love with my high school best friend - straight of course - and I was greatly displeased because I wanted a family and kids later in my life. I did not "turn to gays" because I was ever rejected, it's the opposite. I was dreaming of girlfriends and my heart said "No, you're going to fall in love with that guy."

So I tried to persevere and force myself to be straight through sheer willpower (I was raised rightwing from like age 2). Chose a girl from the class and acted as if I was interested, but I could not go through with it. I told the truth to both my friend and the girl but paradoxically still tried to court the girl who had some serious problems of her own, and strangely, half-heartedly went along. I also pushed my friend away because I wanted to stop my feelings. The end result? Years of misery and depression for both me and the girl (that actually became physically dangerous at one point) and the friendship between me and the guy almost ruined.

What saved me was meeting my first boyfriend (and Trump). Yea, he was nothing special, and we probably used eachother as emotional crutches, but feeling loved worked wonders. Now I'm still good friends with the guy from highschool, parted with the girl (and the ex) on good terms, I'm happy, motivated and the most important thing; I'm more of a dedicated right-winger than ever, because I've learned the price of ideologies and learned to appreciate it. And Trump sounded the horn that called for greatness. MAGA does not just mean the US, because "America" is symbolic around the world. He is a source of inspiration every day too.

Sorry for the story. You might not have been interested in it. You might even think it's bullshit that I've just made up. I'm just saying that it's impossible to deny your desires. You're much better off being a rightwing gay guy with principles than a self-hating, conflicted mess.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
krzyzowiec 1 point ago +2 / -1

No one is born gay. That's absurd.

3
Cutter 3 points ago +3 / -0

I really want to agree with you, and I'm not gonna research where I read this, but:

About 2-4 years ago I read an article in what I believed to be a fairly respectable scientific journal that found a direct link between women who used Ortho Novum, a popular birth control back in the '70s, and the rate of homosexuality in their CHILDREN'S male offspring (their grandkids).

My own speculation, based on my presumption that evolution is real and that survival traits - like baby bunnies instinctively knowing how to evade foxes - are genetically passed from generation to generation, is that messing with hormones, like many other things we do to "solve a problem", often creates other unforseen problems.

1
CloakAndDagger 1 point ago +1 / -0

Exactly. My view is that gays are affected by hormones in the womb and that's what affects the brain of the developing fetus. I also read it in a study, which I might look up if necessary, but as a gay guy, I KNOW that even when I was a very small child, I "checked out" other boys, and I was curious about them the same way other kids were curious about girls - though at that age I had no idea about the concept, of course.

So I know from my own experience that orientation does not suddenly come at puberty. Children are born with them. And yea, I was never molested either, by anyone, so that argument also falls flat. Why are people so obsessed with this?

Hate the LGBT lobby all you want. I hate them too. But leave us decent people alone. It's hard enough to be a nationalist in today's globalist, decadent world. But it's double hard when people on the left attack you for being a nationalist, and people on the right attack you for being gay. I'm on your side FFS.

1
Cutter 1 point ago +1 / -0

What makes us "us" will forever remain a mystery, at least to me. My thinking regarding sex is as long as it involves consenting adults, I don't need to know and certainly don't WANT to know.

1
CloakAndDagger 1 point ago +1 / -0

Agreed 100%. I make sure never to bring it up, unless someone else brings it up first. For example, this thread.

0
krzyzowiec 0 points ago +1 / -1

Children are not sexual. Now you could say that at puberty, their genes are expressing themselves and so is their sexual preference, but you could just as easily say that by the time they hit puberty, they have been conditioned by their environment to be a certain way.

Look into how many homosexuals experienced sexual abuse, particularly at the hands of a family member. I have a hunch that homosexuality is a type of mind virus that replicates through abuse. The person who goes through that and is unable to cope with it unconsciously seeks out circumstances where they can recreate the event, inflicting it on an innocent and becoming a predator in the process.

That's why you often see extremely inappropriate behavior at these "gay pride" events involving children. Even if you accepted that degeneracy as normal sexual behavior, what kind of person would bring a kid to that event?

It's fine to speculate, who knows the cause, but I'm sure you could see why it would be in the interest of many gays and liberals for the cause to be genetic in nature. It would mean no responsibility for their behavior, and it would give them a reason to enforce acceptance. ("it's normal!")

Now if it was genetic, why is it so rare? People have rare disorders and the like, but if there was some evolutionary advantage in terms of survival (which is a common argument by liberals) then you would think it might be expressed by something more like 15% of the population instead of being less than 1%.

Thinking about it logically, homosexuality is equivalent to being sterile. It has negative value and cannot be considered the norm or beneficial because engaging in it means you are ending your genetic line. If you accept evolution based on increasing your odds of survival and subsequently reproduction (the ultimate goal) then how could homosexuality help?

Edit: Adding to my suspicion, the poster I was originally responding to admits he is homosexual and is trying to convince me that children are born with sexual preferences. That strikes me as a rationalization for his condition, considering that I know children well and have never ever seen anything to indicate sexuality before puberty.

1
CloakAndDagger 1 point ago +1 / -0

No, it's not. In the same vein, I can claim that nobody is born straight. What's your point? Stop hating normal gays you neanderthal. Trump himself disagrees with you, so as I said, stormfront is open for applicants.

1
jgardner 1 point ago +2 / -1

The urge to reproduce is present in all organisms.

2
CloakAndDagger 2 points ago +2 / -0

No, the urge to have sex is. With straight people, it correlates with reproduction, which is the intended goal, but with gay people, the urge to have sex stays even without reproduction. I fail to see what you're implying. Do you have any logical opposition to gays? Without using the Bible, because I can invent a religion that says wearing glasses is evil, but that doesn't make it true.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
1
CloakAndDagger 1 point ago +1 / -0

Do you ever get tired of being wrong? Sexual preferences exist even when you're a child. Why do you think little kids are obsessed with "boobs" and how kids are made? Before you misunderstand, I'm 100% against the sexualization of kids and all manners of pedophilia and freudian psychology. But it's a fact that kids already posess a clear sexual orientation. You make zero arguments in support of your retarded views, just that "it's wrong cuz it's wrong".

I see you're from the westboro baptist church, or a shariablue shill who's paid to post hateful shit on this site to false flag it. Stormfront is waiting for you with open arms. This is Thedonald.win. Trump himself finds no problems with homosexuality. Deported.

1
krzyzowiec 1 point ago +1 / -0

"Before you misunderstand, I'm 100% against the sexualization of kids"

Then stop sexualizing them. I've been around plenty of children, babysitting and so on. They are curious about things like how kids came to be, but it has nothing to do with sexual arousal.

Look, I see from your other comments that you happen to suffer from this affliction. I sympathize, but there is nothing normal about homosexuality.

I don't hate you. I wish you the best and I hope you overcome it, but I'm not going to stop saying it is wrong because you take offense to it.

1
Taqiyya_Mockingbird 1 point ago +2 / -1

Replace the T and Q with an S for Straight. Watch how quickly it dissolves from there.

1
9MoreYearsxx 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes you will

1
Pedict 1 point ago +1 / -0

The alphabet people are less than 3% of the population. Their rights have been secured. So now they can shut the fuck up and leave the rest of us alone.

1
AwakeAwareNow 1 point ago +1 / -0

Go back 2 years ago.. I'm a huge Trump supporter and I was for gay rights and REAL trans people... now I'm rethinking this whole thing.. I am turning against gay and trans .. trying not to because the real gay and trans but damn.. they are looking like they have mental health issues for sure.. sooooo thanks Dems.. I've changed my position on Pro-Choice.. and gay rights.. all because they are jamming it to us and bullying us.. F THAT!

1
selfstarter20 1 point ago +1 / -0

I will read some more Deuteronomy, It is the Best Bible Book on what works and what Doesn't.

-1
jgardner -1 points ago +1 / -2

I am a Christian. No sin, no matter how large or small, is to be tolerated. Everyone must embrace Christ and repent and find salvation through him. Gays aren't special to me. They don't get a free pass. They have to repent too or they will be destroyed when Jesus cones again. How can anyone find the love of Jesus except through his true disciples?

-1
Redmoon -1 points ago +3 / -4

>Year 2000 - we just want the same rights as you! it's not like we are going to try to indoctrinate your kids!

>Year 2013 - bake my cake bigot, or else!

>Year 2019 - its our right to indoctrinate your children, if you won't let us we will sue you and steal your children from you