I don’t like the gay agenda, but that doesn’t mean you have to hate gay people.
And their bullshit about it not being a choice. If sexuality wasn’t a choice, they would have bred themselves out of existence thousands of years ago, clearly there is some fucking level of choice.
Wrong. If it was a choice, why would men in muslim countries "choose" to be gay? They are thrown off the rooftops there. It's idiocy. Gay acts are a choice, because you can choose whether to have sex with someone or not, but gay attraction is not a choice, the same way straight people can't help but be attracted to the opposite gender.
Face it. If you are a straight man, you can theoretically "choose" to have sex with a guy, it's not physically impossible, but why would you? However, you can never change your attraction towards women.
And the outbreeding argument is patently fallacious. For example, Meerkats have guards that whistle to warn for predators. The gene for this whistling is there in all Meerkats, and the whistler is highly likely to get eaten first, but because this overall strategy results in higher survival rates for the rest of the group, the gene is reinforced.
If you killed all gay people in the world, gay babies would still be born the next day. You can't eradicate it, just like Down syndrome. So is Down syndrome a choice as well? Why are they not outbred already?
I hate the LGBT lobby, but I hate people just as much who unjustly attack normal acting, often right-wing gays. Stormfront is always open for nazi fucks, if you are interested. Here in TheDonald.win, we deport them. Trump is the first President in US history who was pro-gay on the campaign trail.
Yes, but acts don't matter. The urge is what makes you gay. Straight people who have sex with guys are not even gay. They stay straight inside. They are like animals who have no morals or self-respect, only base insticts of filling a hole.
I really want to agree with you, and I'm not gonna research where I read this, but:
About 2-4 years ago I read an article in what I believed to be a fairly respectable scientific journal that found a direct link between women who used Ortho Novum, a popular birth control back in the '70s, and the rate of homosexuality in their CHILDREN'S male offspring (their grandkids).
My own speculation, based on my presumption that evolution is real and that survival traits - like baby bunnies instinctively knowing how to evade foxes - are genetically passed from generation to generation, is that messing with hormones, like many other things we do to "solve a problem", often creates other unforseen problems.
No, it's not. In the same vein, I can claim that nobody is born straight. What's your point? Stop hating normal gays you neanderthal. Trump himself disagrees with you, so as I said, stormfront is open for applicants.
Oh you’ll like this video by a professor explaining to his class how the gay movement was following the footsteps of pedophiles.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=2u3hmZCsXoE
I don’t like the gay agenda, but that doesn’t mean you have to hate gay people.
And their bullshit about it not being a choice. If sexuality wasn’t a choice, they would have bred themselves out of existence thousands of years ago, clearly there is some fucking level of choice.
Wrong. If it was a choice, why would men in muslim countries "choose" to be gay? They are thrown off the rooftops there. It's idiocy. Gay acts are a choice, because you can choose whether to have sex with someone or not, but gay attraction is not a choice, the same way straight people can't help but be attracted to the opposite gender.
Face it. If you are a straight man, you can theoretically "choose" to have sex with a guy, it's not physically impossible, but why would you? However, you can never change your attraction towards women.
And the outbreeding argument is patently fallacious. For example, Meerkats have guards that whistle to warn for predators. The gene for this whistling is there in all Meerkats, and the whistler is highly likely to get eaten first, but because this overall strategy results in higher survival rates for the rest of the group, the gene is reinforced.
If you killed all gay people in the world, gay babies would still be born the next day. You can't eradicate it, just like Down syndrome. So is Down syndrome a choice as well? Why are they not outbred already?
I hate the LGBT lobby, but I hate people just as much who unjustly attack normal acting, often right-wing gays. Stormfront is always open for nazi fucks, if you are interested. Here in TheDonald.win, we deport them. Trump is the first President in US history who was pro-gay on the campaign trail.
This comment is for both of you, by the way.
Yes, but acts don't matter. The urge is what makes you gay. Straight people who have sex with guys are not even gay. They stay straight inside. They are like animals who have no morals or self-respect, only base insticts of filling a hole.
No one is born gay. That's absurd.
I really want to agree with you, and I'm not gonna research where I read this, but:
About 2-4 years ago I read an article in what I believed to be a fairly respectable scientific journal that found a direct link between women who used Ortho Novum, a popular birth control back in the '70s, and the rate of homosexuality in their CHILDREN'S male offspring (their grandkids).
My own speculation, based on my presumption that evolution is real and that survival traits - like baby bunnies instinctively knowing how to evade foxes - are genetically passed from generation to generation, is that messing with hormones, like many other things we do to "solve a problem", often creates other unforseen problems.
No, it's not. In the same vein, I can claim that nobody is born straight. What's your point? Stop hating normal gays you neanderthal. Trump himself disagrees with you, so as I said, stormfront is open for applicants.