If you read that stupid fucking comic, women STILL blame men for their increasing unhappiness.
Some speculations from the article:
Women who have careers are now "more aware" of "societal limitations", which causes unhappiness
Women are the victims in modern single-parent households while men "enjoy the spoils" of the sexual revolution
Career minded women now have to worry about work and family and women still do more work around the house, essentially saying men don't pull their weight and that men take away female leisure time
This article DOES NOT TRULY ACKNOWLEDGE ANYTHING, IT JUST PLACES THE BLAME ON MEN FOR ANY REMAINING ILLS OR COMPLAINTS THEY HAVE
FUCK FEMINISM
FEMINISTS ARE A CANCER UPON SOCIETY
There is so much wrong with this piece of shit article, I don't even know where to begin. I would recommend watching some Steven Crowder videos to debunk a lot of this stupid feminist shit.
Christina Sommers is also a great anti-feminist mind
They self-replicate. It takes just one idiot man to produce a hundred baby-mamas, in the lingo of the stupid. Single mothers, a scourge on mankind, replicate themselves over and over.
Our only hope is to stay strong ensuring that only the most desperate pathetic beta cucks take advantage of their dark offer. This will produce an enemy that is half retard-feminist and half retard-beta, thus stacking the deck in our favor.
If you listen to Molyneaux, you should know that a woman choosing a man is a conscious, voluntary choice. Women always have agency, but they only want to bring that up when it comes to their own advantage. When it doesn't, they're all suddenly victims of circumstance.
Men do not have this luxury. A man is always accountable. We have nothing to blame. You might think this is a bad thing, but it teaches men responsibility and self-reliance, which in turn makes us strong and resilient.
As I said before in this thread, I stay home with my kid and do a lot of housework (lol, takes two seconds).
Women have no idea that the reason they are miserable is because they decided to work like men, always thinking that men had it so great. Now they're beginning to understand. Working sucks. But instead of understanding this fact (because men hid it so well) they continue to blame men for their unhappiness, believing that we're "hiding" the "real happiness that comes from work".
The reason men worked so hard to begin with is to get a good a good woman. Women are realizing that other women don't give a shit that you're vice president of whatever at your company (in fact, they're probably contemptuous) , and furthermore, men don't either. So the thing they've been chasing is not making them happy like the libtards told them in would.
I have the shoe on the other foot right now, staying home and taking care of the kids. It's fucking great. Tons of free time, and I get to spend time with my kid constantly, watch him grow, teach him about the world. When he gets older I'll go back to work and continue my career.
Women used to have it made, but once again libtards infected their brains with the immorality and devil's bargain of "progress" and "equality" - meaningless words meant to sow division - as all Marxist tactics are. Now they're miserable.
Well, not everything... they want nothing to do with personal responsibility for example. Which is why usually whatever they are leader of typically collapses in epic fashion.
The heart and soul of the company is now that we are never responsible for anything? Congrats, we're irrelevant flakes nobody likes or trusts. We are Women, Inc.
I love that it shows that women are making way more than men in that graph and these people still complain. It's their own, stupid policies that have caused the decline of the nuclear family.
The more I read this, the more I'm inclined to pick it apart. I don't really have the time for that atm, but one big problem I have with the whole premise is exactly why men and women say they are happy or unhappy. We get a graph showing there's a little gap in happiness, but nothing further. Maybe there are more reasons why women are less happy than what is explored in the comic?
Edit: This "happiness gap" apparently is a recent phenomenon. Only after 1990 did women's happiness relative to men cross beneath them. Men's sunk too, but then both rebounded after 1995, and only then on is the gap! So what happened? Figure that out and you may find the answer!
That is really interesting to think about. My recollection of the early 90's is that divorce was really exploding, like every school had a bunch of kids whose parents had divorced.
I'm familiar with studies showing that men are happier without women and women are happier with men. What you've described would factually match up with a divorce explosion.
I remember it vividly. In grade school, around the mid-90's, one year, every child in my class had divorced parents. I was the only exception. Funny how Vox doesn't talk about that.
Women make decisions that destroy anything they are responsible for because they don't know how anything works.
Case in point: Women right here and now have more power than ever before and are realistically vying for more: Society is already beginning to collapse.
As a young woman, I am very adamant in using any given opportunity to proclaim my hatred of feminism/ feminist.
If a man goes out of his way to open a door for me I will always say thank you with a smile.
At work if I can't lift something I will go find a guy and explain my dilemma.
If I'm enjoying chicken wings at the bar and a guy buys me a beer I will always acknowledge their nice gesture and might even be so bold to even have a short conversation.
I love "toxic" patriarchy. God bless the good, strong men of this world.
It really is quite a depressing thing to watch the destruction of society in real time, and so many pretend nothing is wrong with what is happening, and pretend their behaviors are all unrelated to the growing problem.
Before this modern age of promiscuity, which applies to both men and women I believe, women were more selective with who they had sex with. Having a baby meant you had to take care of it. Thus, on average, most men they chose, were capable of providing, and most women only chose those men when they were mentally fit and capable of raising a child themselves. Men who had sex also understood the financial consequences of having a child.
But now the state will pay those who have a child and are unable to care or provide for it. So there is little risk to the men or women. Oh you have a baby by accident? Who cares! You can get your entire monthly food budget covered. You can get free, or heavily subsidizes housing. Men can run away from their responsibilities, and women can choose if they want to provide for their child as a single parent.
Women can also choose if they want the child at all? Oh you "accidentally" deliberately allowed a man to cum inside of you? Well no problem, just go get "healthcare" and "healthcare" that blob of cells away!
So people are having more and more sex because all the consequences have been removed, thus who they choose to have sex with becomes more superficial (primarily looks) as opposed to substantive reasons like compatibility based on values or ideals.
This erodes the ability for people to pair bond, and everyone grows increasingly lonely, even those having more sex than ever. No human connections make people crave meaning in their life, so they become attracted to Twitter Justice and Virtue Signaling to attribute meaning to their useless existences, and tear down the lives of others to feel good.
It saps out the spiritual satisfaction fathers had for providing fruits of his labor to his family. It takes out the role of the mother in various ways and creates a cascade effect of socially inept and unstable children. It forces men and women to vie for political gain in gender identity politics and produces turmoil within the traditional family. This generation has formed a fashion out of furbabies, which is nothing more than a woman's longing desire to act on her matrilineal instincts, but is too concerned about a doom prophecy over more babies. If women truly were concerned over their freedom, they would repeal the nineteenth. They no longer have the luxury to stay-at-home and reap the rewards of what once was the strength of the male wage; they must contend with other men, women, and sadly the foreign immigrants they allowed in to secure a second income. In a perfect world, it would be better to have only married women vote, instead of both sexes. But that is not happening.
I stay at home with the kids. I cook most nights and do a lot of the cleaning, along with all the major "man's work" around the house like repair and maintenance.
Sadly, I am much more happy than my wife. Women have no idea what they are looking for, which is why they're unhappy. They have no idea how good they had it.
> "But another explanation for the persistence of the male/female happiness gap is that men may have reaped more than their fair share of benefits from the women's movement"
You didn't think you were attending a circus, but behold the mental gymnastics and the clown show. That's right folk's, the primary beneficiaries of the women's movement was men.
What else would it have ever been? What do women have to materially gain by not being in healthy productive monogamous relationships? If a woman can rear her children and keep them healthy and happy without being away from home 10-12 hours a day what could she possibly gain by working and sleeping around?
Succesful men however have a biological imperative to spread their seed AND the government will take care of the wife and kids if he can't... making room sociologically for him to continue that pattern of behavior.
We spend all day at the office and we have less time to be with our family? No, that can't be right. It must be men taking advantage of us in some sneaky way.
Building your life around resentment doesn't lead to happiness? Men and women aren't interchangeable outside of having different genitals? Who knew!
Men and women are a team. We both play valuable roles, but are generally optimized for different ones. Trying to treat us as absolutely the same leads to a lot of confusion and opens the door to a lot of misplaced anger.
See, this is why I always say women shouldn't vote. Can't figure out why more unhappy so invent reasons to lie to myself! These are not people who should be voting or in political power
If you read that stupid fucking comic, women STILL blame men for their increasing unhappiness.
Some speculations from the article:
This article DOES NOT TRULY ACKNOWLEDGE ANYTHING, IT JUST PLACES THE BLAME ON MEN FOR ANY REMAINING ILLS OR COMPLAINTS THEY HAVE
FUCK FEMINISM
FEMINISTS ARE A CANCER UPON SOCIETY
There is so much wrong with this piece of shit article, I don't even know where to begin. I would recommend watching some Steven Crowder videos to debunk a lot of this stupid feminist shit.
Christina Sommers is also a great anti-feminist mind
Suicidal cat women are now their market niche, they wouldn't dream of even trying to save them.
Ok. I am starting to get the picture ...
you want us to work less,
stay at home more, and
expect you to provide for us.
Huh! ...I know a few guys like that; there wives don't seem happier.
BROKEN FAMILIES = 2 HOUSEHOLDS = 2x HOUSEHOLD PRODUCTS = PROFIT!!!
Money money money. The American feminists chose money over humanity. Maybe its not that women are stupid but that Americans are!!!
Hey women go be the biggest sluts you can be, you'll love it. - Vox
Free meaningless sex? Sign us up. - a lot of men
Clown world right here.
?????Thank you for not directing me to their site. Besides, archive everything.
That the feminists find it hard to be sexual and work at the same time?
No it shows that feminists want to replace men entirely and have them stay home and raise children and do housework.
The problem is, men avoid these women like the plague. Seriously.
Feminism is absolutely enraging and maddening to common sense men.
We avoid these types like they're diseased.
Hopefully lack of breeding takes them out of the gene pool in a couple generations
They self-replicate. It takes just one idiot man to produce a hundred baby-mamas, in the lingo of the stupid. Single mothers, a scourge on mankind, replicate themselves over and over.
Our only hope is to stay strong ensuring that only the most desperate pathetic beta cucks take advantage of their dark offer. This will produce an enemy that is half retard-feminist and half retard-beta, thus stacking the deck in our favor.
If you listen to Molyneaux, you should know that a woman choosing a man is a conscious, voluntary choice. Women always have agency, but they only want to bring that up when it comes to their own advantage. When it doesn't, they're all suddenly victims of circumstance.
Men do not have this luxury. A man is always accountable. We have nothing to blame. You might think this is a bad thing, but it teaches men responsibility and self-reliance, which in turn makes us strong and resilient.
As I said before in this thread, I stay home with my kid and do a lot of housework (lol, takes two seconds).
Women have no idea that the reason they are miserable is because they decided to work like men, always thinking that men had it so great. Now they're beginning to understand. Working sucks. But instead of understanding this fact (because men hid it so well) they continue to blame men for their unhappiness, believing that we're "hiding" the "real happiness that comes from work".
The reason men worked so hard to begin with is to get a good a good woman. Women are realizing that other women don't give a shit that you're vice president of whatever at your company (in fact, they're probably contemptuous) , and furthermore, men don't either. So the thing they've been chasing is not making them happy like the libtards told them in would.
I have the shoe on the other foot right now, staying home and taking care of the kids. It's fucking great. Tons of free time, and I get to spend time with my kid constantly, watch him grow, teach him about the world. When he gets older I'll go back to work and continue my career.
Women used to have it made, but once again libtards infected their brains with the immorality and devil's bargain of "progress" and "equality" - meaningless words meant to sow division - as all Marxist tactics are. Now they're miserable.
I don't care. They brought it on themselves.
Feminists want everything.
They want to be giver and recipient of every gift and good thing.
They want to be both hero and villain.
They are insane.
Well, not everything... they want nothing to do with personal responsibility for example. Which is why usually whatever they are leader of typically collapses in epic fashion.
The heart and soul of the company is now that we are never responsible for anything? Congrats, we're irrelevant flakes nobody likes or trusts. We are Women, Inc.
Hero and victim. FTFY
I love that it shows that women are making way more than men in that graph and these people still complain. It's their own, stupid policies that have caused the decline of the nuclear family.
All I read is : REEEEEEEEEEEEEEE its mens fault REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
All I see is : 1 more reason to avoid feminists like the pest
All I think is : Hopefully they die out if we keep them out of our gene-pool
Spoiler: men are still to blame.
The more I read this, the more I'm inclined to pick it apart. I don't really have the time for that atm, but one big problem I have with the whole premise is exactly why men and women say they are happy or unhappy. We get a graph showing there's a little gap in happiness, but nothing further. Maybe there are more reasons why women are less happy than what is explored in the comic?
Edit: This "happiness gap" apparently is a recent phenomenon. Only after 1990 did women's happiness relative to men cross beneath them. Men's sunk too, but then both rebounded after 1995, and only then on is the gap! So what happened? Figure that out and you may find the answer!
That is really interesting to think about. My recollection of the early 90's is that divorce was really exploding, like every school had a bunch of kids whose parents had divorced.
I'm familiar with studies showing that men are happier without women and women are happier with men. What you've described would factually match up with a divorce explosion.
I remember it vividly. In grade school, around the mid-90's, one year, every child in my class had divorced parents. I was the only exception. Funny how Vox doesn't talk about that.
WOMEN COERCE AND CAJOLE OTHER WOMEN INTO MAKING THE SAME BAD DECISIONS THEY MADE.
IT JUSTIFIES THE BAD DECISIONS THEY MAKE BECAUSE 'NUMBERS'.
It topped after Nixon and plummeted during Bill Clinton is a rapist.
"#notREALfeminism" "#RealFeminismHasNeverBeenTried"
Women make decisions that destroy anything they are responsible for because they don't know how anything works.
Case in point: Women right here and now have more power than ever before and are realistically vying for more: Society is already beginning to collapse.
I would replace 'women' with 'feminists', and I'd be on board.
Why, it's almost like it's a BIG FAT LIE!
Wow! It is almost like having the same expectations as men makes you more depressed and suicidal, like men!
Hilarious honestly
If a tree falls in a feminist's forest...
It is STILL the man's fault.
I am Womyn, hear me REEEE!
As a young woman, I am very adamant in using any given opportunity to proclaim my hatred of feminism/ feminist. If a man goes out of his way to open a door for me I will always say thank you with a smile. At work if I can't lift something I will go find a guy and explain my dilemma. If I'm enjoying chicken wings at the bar and a guy buys me a beer I will always acknowledge their nice gesture and might even be so bold to even have a short conversation. I love "toxic" patriarchy. God bless the good, strong men of this world.
It really is quite a depressing thing to watch the destruction of society in real time, and so many pretend nothing is wrong with what is happening, and pretend their behaviors are all unrelated to the growing problem.
Before this modern age of promiscuity, which applies to both men and women I believe, women were more selective with who they had sex with. Having a baby meant you had to take care of it. Thus, on average, most men they chose, were capable of providing, and most women only chose those men when they were mentally fit and capable of raising a child themselves. Men who had sex also understood the financial consequences of having a child.
But now the state will pay those who have a child and are unable to care or provide for it. So there is little risk to the men or women. Oh you have a baby by accident? Who cares! You can get your entire monthly food budget covered. You can get free, or heavily subsidizes housing. Men can run away from their responsibilities, and women can choose if they want to provide for their child as a single parent.
Women can also choose if they want the child at all? Oh you "accidentally" deliberately allowed a man to cum inside of you? Well no problem, just go get "healthcare" and "healthcare" that blob of cells away!
So people are having more and more sex because all the consequences have been removed, thus who they choose to have sex with becomes more superficial (primarily looks) as opposed to substantive reasons like compatibility based on values or ideals.
This erodes the ability for people to pair bond, and everyone grows increasingly lonely, even those having more sex than ever. No human connections make people crave meaning in their life, so they become attracted to Twitter Justice and Virtue Signaling to attribute meaning to their useless existences, and tear down the lives of others to feel good.
Man this is depressing lol
Feminism was a mistake down to its very core.
It saps out the spiritual satisfaction fathers had for providing fruits of his labor to his family. It takes out the role of the mother in various ways and creates a cascade effect of socially inept and unstable children. It forces men and women to vie for political gain in gender identity politics and produces turmoil within the traditional family. This generation has formed a fashion out of furbabies, which is nothing more than a woman's longing desire to act on her matrilineal instincts, but is too concerned about a doom prophecy over more babies. If women truly were concerned over their freedom, they would repeal the nineteenth. They no longer have the luxury to stay-at-home and reap the rewards of what once was the strength of the male wage; they must contend with other men, women, and sadly the foreign immigrants they allowed in to secure a second income. In a perfect world, it would be better to have only married women vote, instead of both sexes. But that is not happening.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WzVeH53jhlA
Looks the measurement of happiness in men went down too. The comic does not address why - though we can certainly make some educated guesses.
Maybe...What you are told will make you happy is really a deception. You are a VICTIM of Feminazism.
Need downvote button for this misleading post. The shill who posted it is laughing his ass off at us who upvote without clicking the link.
I stay at home with the kids. I cook most nights and do a lot of the cleaning, along with all the major "man's work" around the house like repair and maintenance.
Sadly, I am much more happy than my wife. Women have no idea what they are looking for, which is why they're unhappy. They have no idea how good they had it.
But what about undesirable women?
> "But another explanation for the persistence of the male/female happiness gap is that men may have reaped more than their fair share of benefits from the women's movement"
You didn't think you were attending a circus, but behold the mental gymnastics and the clown show. That's right folk's, the primary beneficiaries of the women's movement was men.
What else would it have ever been? What do women have to materially gain by not being in healthy productive monogamous relationships? If a woman can rear her children and keep them healthy and happy without being away from home 10-12 hours a day what could she possibly gain by working and sleeping around?
Succesful men however have a biological imperative to spread their seed AND the government will take care of the wife and kids if he can't... making room sociologically for him to continue that pattern of behavior.
> the government will take care of the wife and kids if he can't... making room sociologically for him to continue that pattern of behavior.
LUL let's just ignore child support completely
If your argument requires you to ignore reality...
If every father takes complete economic care of his family, present or not, then why does welfare exist? Jesus...
We spend all day at the office and we have less time to be with our family? No, that can't be right. It must be men taking advantage of us in some sneaky way.
Building your life around resentment doesn't lead to happiness? Men and women aren't interchangeable outside of having different genitals? Who knew!
Men and women are a team. We both play valuable roles, but are generally optimized for different ones. Trying to treat us as absolutely the same leads to a lot of confusion and opens the door to a lot of misplaced anger.
I love to fuck liberal chicks (no fatties/no uglies)
They all demand to be recognized as powerful women, but want me to choke them and want to call me daddy.
Bad liars.
See, this is why I always say women shouldn't vote. Can't figure out why more unhappy so invent reasons to lie to myself! These are not people who should be voting or in political power