Now wait, the last thing I want to do is defend twitter, cause we all know it's 100% anti-Trump. But this rule actually makes sense. Without this, you wouldn't be able to post the Sistine Chapel, because it has those naked little angels on the frescos. Of course, someone will abuse this rule to put up some postmodern, pedophilic piece, but in general, art pieces should be judged case by case.
But that's the point. You were allowed to post the sistene Chapel before, this is a rule for pedos. No surprise it's coming on the heel of tran's kids and drag fag story time
Honestly? Without this rule, they would be 100% right to ban the Sistine Chapel. Seeing that it's a Christian symbol, I'm sure they would be glad to do it. It does have naked "kids" on it, and it's art, and it should be allowed. The technicalities all apply. The problem is not with this rule. The problem is with the definition of art. Postmodernist, cultural marxist bullshit gets away under the guise of art. That's the real problem.
Photography?! No way that should be allowed, "art" or not. When did I imply that? I'm only talking about the fact that this rule may make sense if you talk about medieval paintings. Then again, twitter is twitter.
Now wait, the last thing I want to do is defend twitter, cause we all know it's 100% anti-Trump. But this rule actually makes sense. Without this, you wouldn't be able to post the Sistine Chapel, because it has those naked little angels on the frescos. Of course, someone will abuse this rule to put up some postmodern, pedophilic piece, but in general, art pieces should be judged case by case.
But that's the point. You were allowed to post the sistene Chapel before, this is a rule for pedos. No surprise it's coming on the heel of tran's kids and drag fag story time
Honestly? Without this rule, they would be 100% right to ban the Sistine Chapel. Seeing that it's a Christian symbol, I'm sure they would be glad to do it. It does have naked "kids" on it, and it's art, and it should be allowed. The technicalities all apply. The problem is not with this rule. The problem is with the definition of art. Postmodernist, cultural marxist bullshit gets away under the guise of art. That's the real problem.
That's not photography.
Photography?! No way that should be allowed, "art" or not. When did I imply that? I'm only talking about the fact that this rule may make sense if you talk about medieval paintings. Then again, twitter is twitter.