To achieve a global government, we need a threat that streaches to all countries. The fake climate crisis theoretically affects all citizens of the world, so bowing to their dictates, would eventually lead to a tight control = globalism.
The only other option the globalists have is an alien threat that requires we all "get together under one roof" to fight a common enemy.
Yep. I'll wait for a real alien threat before I bow down to the flase flag of globalism. Climate crisis (with China excluded) just doen't cut it for me
Scott Adams believes in climate change, "most climate scientists believe in it so I guess it's true" he said on Rubin Report.
Well most academia are funded by the cabal and Adams is a simpleton.
The climate changes, that's what it does, how fast, how it changes and how we contribute is another matter. These people are claiming that the insignificant change happening over the last 150 years is all man made, while huge changes and cycles are clearly natural
They claim that there is an increase in extreme phenomena, but they carefully select their timeline to exclude things that have been documented and happened when the co2 levels were a lot lower.
Search Tony Heller on youtube, find his channel and see that the climate changing is true, but it is actually a lot milder than it was in the past and we are a lot better at dealing with the changes
Plus co2 has led to record crops and record Forest growth, most species that were endangered in the 90s are no longer at the brink of extinction
Which is why these people aren't actually proposing solutions - like nuclear - but are pushing stuff like carbon credits, climate refugees, redistribution of wealth and climate racism...
He spends so much time reading MSM that he likes to buy into some of it so he feels like he's discerning.
Alex Jones does a little better with it in that he knows the MSM is lying about everything every time. But he goes too far in trying to retell the truth.
The MSM is always lying. I don't always know how or about what, and I don't know what the truth is, but they're lying, so at least I know what isn't true and can get a fair idea of the truth by deduction.
You wouldn't even need to bring up academia funding. Start off by asking when was the survey that showed the opinion of "most climate scientists" and go from there.
You don't need to even do that. A consensus of belief isn't proof.
Half of the scientific answers we have today for things were once against "scientific consensus". Not being allowed to question things is unscientific. Claiming people who dare question it are "deniers" (deliberately invoking Holocaust deniers) to shame other scientific theories is even more so.
He always trusts in experts and believes nobody can understand anything complex. He's got some good points on persuasion, but he's functionally bereft of critical thinking. He still has no idea why climate crusaders are still against nuclear. Hint: because it's a solution that doesn't require global governance. He doesn't believe that climate change is just a front for communism or globalism.
He admits being wrong in his predictions 20% of the time.
IMHO he's just wrong about 20% of the time.
Scoffs at notion of wprld being run right now by a global cabal of satanic cannibal pedophile child-traffickers reaching from the Palace to the Vatican to the CIA and beyond.
When meteorologists predict the weather for the next week, they take countless variables into account and even with extreme localization are barely more accurate than a coin toss
But trying the predict the weather on a global scale 20 years from now? Cake walk! Only 1 variable matters - CO2 levels - and if you say the prediction is anything less than 100% accurate then you are an uneducated, science denying idiot
Averages are fine if you have a rather large data set with few outliers or if you're dealing with qualitative data (e.g. coins found in a parking lot).
Been reading a book "Ancestral Journeys." 8000 years ago, people were dealing with the exact same problems. Climate change. Soil erosion and depletion from overplanting and overgrazing.
And you know what happened every time they faced a crisis? They got smarter. Their skill set improved.
It's a marketing campaign for corporate interests. They've been using these scares forever to get money funneled towards their investments. Viruses, wars, food shortages, global cooling, global heating, drying, 9/11... These are all hoaxes or intentional calamities they have created to create investment opportunities.
They act like people like us do not want a clean, healthy breathable environment for our children and children's children.
We do!
We just disagree that their insane methods would do anything to help. PLUS we have made DRAMATIC improvement over our emissions and waste than ever before without government. We do not hear about acid rain too much anymore.
Should I be responsible for China's pollution or India using our oceans as a garbage dump?
These Doomsday Cultists are morons, like fear mongering authority figures imo.
LOOK AT THE UNIVERSE, we don't know what's out there! And they're trying to get people to fear dumb shit, when there's actual shit we can prepare for.
"Fear your nieghbor!" How about fear an alien invasion like Starship Troopers, Men in Black, or Alien Machines, frick. Being prepared and keeping each other strong, not weaker, should be common sense.
I'm not saying movies are real, using them as an example of what to prepare for.
In his book, State of Fear, Michael Crichton had a lot to say about climate alarmists, the Fake News fanning the flames, celebrities not living what they preach, scaring children with false narratives about us causing the end of the world, and scientists and global establishments making money off the knowingly false facts they submit.
It's pretty eye opening. And he even has the main protagonist who's a soft young city lawyer terrified of weapons become pro gun--I liked that part. ?
I remember watching a show when I was a kid narrated by Spock and it was doom and gloom with scary as fuck music telling me we we all going to freeze to death.
Then, just a matter of years later, I was going to burn to death!?!?!
Then it was climate change so whatever happens, they have their bases covered.
Cool. We can dismiss their hysteria with the phrase 'OK Doomer'.
Works for me.
The Earth is fine. THE PEOPLE ARE FUCKED
"The planet is fine, the planet isn't going anywhere...WE ARE! Pack you shit folks..." -George Carlin
Some people are fucked. You know the ones; can't hunt, can't farm, can't build, can't be fucked to learn to shoot, etc.
The rest of us will do just fine
Shame we can't hear Carlin's thoughts on the current state of the Dem party. For a hippie, he wasn't afraid to call out all BS.
We are doing better today than at any point in human history.
I’m doing it!
And for abortion proponents we can say 'OK womb broomer'
To achieve a global government, we need a threat that streaches to all countries. The fake climate crisis theoretically affects all citizens of the world, so bowing to their dictates, would eventually lead to a tight control = globalism.
The only other option the globalists have is an alien threat that requires we all "get together under one roof" to fight a common enemy.
I'd prefer a Childhood's End scenario without the sorta downer ending.
Independence Day.
Yep. I'll wait for a real alien threat before I bow down to the flase flag of globalism. Climate crisis (with China excluded) just doen't cut it for me
How about XCOM
Ha ha! "To Serve Man."
Scott Adams believes in climate change, "most climate scientists believe in it so I guess it's true" he said on Rubin Report. Well most academia are funded by the cabal and Adams is a simpleton.
The climate changes, that's what it does, how fast, how it changes and how we contribute is another matter. These people are claiming that the insignificant change happening over the last 150 years is all man made, while huge changes and cycles are clearly natural
They claim that there is an increase in extreme phenomena, but they carefully select their timeline to exclude things that have been documented and happened when the co2 levels were a lot lower.
Search Tony Heller on youtube, find his channel and see that the climate changing is true, but it is actually a lot milder than it was in the past and we are a lot better at dealing with the changes
Plus co2 has led to record crops and record Forest growth, most species that were endangered in the 90s are no longer at the brink of extinction
Which is why these people aren't actually proposing solutions - like nuclear - but are pushing stuff like carbon credits, climate refugees, redistribution of wealth and climate racism...
He spends so much time reading MSM that he likes to buy into some of it so he feels like he's discerning.
Alex Jones does a little better with it in that he knows the MSM is lying about everything every time. But he goes too far in trying to retell the truth.
The MSM is always lying. I don't always know how or about what, and I don't know what the truth is, but they're lying, so at least I know what isn't true and can get a fair idea of the truth by deduction.
You wouldn't even need to bring up academia funding. Start off by asking when was the survey that showed the opinion of "most climate scientists" and go from there.
You don't need to even do that. A consensus of belief isn't proof. Half of the scientific answers we have today for things were once against "scientific consensus". Not being allowed to question things is unscientific. Claiming people who dare question it are "deniers" (deliberately invoking Holocaust deniers) to shame other scientific theories is even more so.
He always trusts in experts and believes nobody can understand anything complex. He's got some good points on persuasion, but he's functionally bereft of critical thinking. He still has no idea why climate crusaders are still against nuclear. Hint: because it's a solution that doesn't require global governance. He doesn't believe that climate change is just a front for communism or globalism.
He admits being wrong in his predictions 20% of the time.
IMHO he's just wrong about 20% of the time.
Scoffs at notion of wprld being run right now by a global cabal of satanic cannibal pedophile child-traffickers reaching from the Palace to the Vatican to the CIA and beyond.
Still not too shabby for a self described lefty.
His stuff on persuasion is gold
When meteorologists predict the weather for the next week, they take countless variables into account and even with extreme localization are barely more accurate than a coin toss
But trying the predict the weather on a global scale 20 years from now? Cake walk! Only 1 variable matters - CO2 levels - and if you say the prediction is anything less than 100% accurate then you are an uneducated, science denying idiot
Averages are prone to inaccuracy from outlier data and should never be used for statistical analysis.
Averages are fine if you have a rather large data set with few outliers or if you're dealing with qualitative data (e.g. coins found in a parking lot).
Better yet, reffer to their beliefs as "Climatology" and call them "Climatologists"
It's a religion. A hellfire and brimstone religion from and for people who tell themselves they're too smart for religion.
Been reading a book "Ancestral Journeys." 8000 years ago, people were dealing with the exact same problems. Climate change. Soil erosion and depletion from overplanting and overgrazing.
And you know what happened every time they faced a crisis? They got smarter. Their skill set improved.
Cool pic :)
It's a marketing campaign for corporate interests. They've been using these scares forever to get money funneled towards their investments. Viruses, wars, food shortages, global cooling, global heating, drying, 9/11... These are all hoaxes or intentional calamities they have created to create investment opportunities.
Mock them with "ok doomer".
It's FAKE SCIENCE reported by FAKE NEWS.
I hear the country of Guyana is lovely this time of year.
Not to be confused with the Doomguy, our lord and slayer.
Fucking doomers.
Here is what I do not understand.
They act like people like us do not want a clean, healthy breathable environment for our children and children's children.
We do!
We just disagree that their insane methods would do anything to help. PLUS we have made DRAMATIC improvement over our emissions and waste than ever before without government. We do not hear about acid rain too much anymore.
Should I be responsible for China's pollution or India using our oceans as a garbage dump?
Quad 1's so no upvote
These Doomsday Cultists are morons, like fear mongering authority figures imo.
LOOK AT THE UNIVERSE, we don't know what's out there! And they're trying to get people to fear dumb shit, when there's actual shit we can prepare for.
"Fear your nieghbor!" How about fear an alien invasion like Starship Troopers, Men in Black, or Alien Machines, frick. Being prepared and keeping each other strong, not weaker, should be common sense.
I'm not saying movies are real, using them as an example of what to prepare for.
In his book, State of Fear, Michael Crichton had a lot to say about climate alarmists, the Fake News fanning the flames, celebrities not living what they preach, scaring children with false narratives about us causing the end of the world, and scientists and global establishments making money off the knowingly false facts they submit. It's pretty eye opening. And he even has the main protagonist who's a soft young city lawyer terrified of weapons become pro gun--I liked that part. ?
Wrong again:
https://cei.org/blog/wrong-again-50-years-failed-eco-pocalyptic-predictions
This is great. They are a doomsday cult from here on out.
I remember watching a show when I was a kid narrated by Spock and it was doom and gloom with scary as fuck music telling me we we all going to freeze to death. Then, just a matter of years later, I was going to burn to death!?!?! Then it was climate change so whatever happens, they have their bases covered.