79
Comments (9)
sorted by:
5
Kerry000 5 points ago +5 / -0

What happens when the machine fails to recognize black faces like the XBox Kinect? Lol

Watch how fast the libtards start calling these scans "RAYCISS!"

2
Siteless_Vagrant [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Or what happens when it can see a face for a beard? We all going to have to shave now?

2
dukeofdoorcounty 2 points ago +2 / -0

They use infrared. All skin looks the same at aroud 850 nm.

2
Cutter 2 points ago +2 / -0

The irony here is that the vast majority of people complaining about things like facial recognition being an invasion of their privacy are connected at the hip to every social media known to man and any hacker knows more about them than they do about themselves. Remember the case where some kid discovered he can see the actions of a SEAL team in real time by hacking their Fitbits?

By contrast, I almost bought a cave to live in a few years ago; just didn't have the cash.

0
Siteless_Vagrant [S] 0 points ago +0 / -0

THIS. Dimwit: "Governement shouldn't spy on us" Also Dimwit: "Alexa, open my Facebook and post selfies of me with my entire gun collection and todays local newspaper"

1
dukeofdoorcounty 1 point ago +1 / -0

Japan does this. If you have Global Entry they do this every time you use the machine at a US airport

0
deleted 0 points ago +3 / -3
2
Siteless_Vagrant [S] 2 points ago +3 / -1

Keep that shit in Japan then.

-1
dukeofdoorcounty -1 points ago +1 / -2

by shit you mean no terrorist attacks?

5
520kj 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yes, surely it's Japan's draconian tracking methods that's preventing terrorism there.

It's definitely not because they live in a largely homogeneous society.

BTW, didn't some American from history once say something about liberty and security, and how if we're willing to give up one for the other we deserve neither?