1063
Comments (44)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
12
IMMORTAN_TRUMP 12 points ago +14 / -2

I'd honestly rather us return to a monarchy than a full 'democracy'. Republic obviously preferred. But will still take a theocratic christian monarchy over a true direct democracy.

12
CyclopticErotica 12 points ago +12 / -0

Direct democracy is literally the mob, but on the flipside look at Washington car tabs. The voters got rid of them and the elected officials sued them so a judge can overrule the people.

Same thing happened with drivers licenses for illegals in Oregon. Voters said no, and they said yes.

6
Tecumseh_S64 6 points ago +6 / -0

And somehow, the progressives are surprised by the backlash in court appointments.

5
MAGAlikethis 5 points ago +6 / -1

The only reason direct democracy sometimes turns into a mob is because it has an exploit, specifically when you alter the demographics of a nation to the point where assimilation stops taking place.

Otherwise, democracy is fine.

9
squarkle_bargle 9 points ago +9 / -0

The point is that Democracy is worthless if individual freedoms are not protected. Otherwise the majority can always vote to confiscate the rights, money, and property of a minority, as we see in "democratic socialist" countries.

The solution is to have individual rights and freedom further codified into our Constitution - including freedom of contract, freedom of association, etc.

6
Tecumseh_S64 6 points ago +6 / -0

What's more, the Bill of Rights tried to make this clear: that this was not a list protected by a government, but a set of hazard markers FOR government.

4
Techrev 4 points ago +4 / -0

When I talk to Canadian conservatives about why freedom of speech is outlawed in Canada, and how conservative appointed judges upheld the laws limiting speech here, I'm consistently confronted with - 'They're constitutionalists', as if that somehow excuses it. They're serving a higher cause! They're upholding the constitution!

I'm sorry, but if the constitution is broken, it becomes a bad thing to uphold that constitution. Defending something is only noble if the thing you are defending is noble.

3
fdagasfd 3 points ago +3 / -0

That's so fascinating to think about someone from a country where their constitution says "You shall not be free!" and everyone's like "Hey! That's our constitution buddy! Don't change it!".

Like, yeah I understand those words, but it's just a little different when an American says them...

6
MadMaxUSMC 6 points ago +6 / -0

What's the old saying? Democracy is two wolves and a sheep deciding what's for dinner.

4
KaliyugaNavigator 4 points ago +5 / -1

I always say it’s 10 whites hanging a black and watch the lefties squirm

3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
0
TheKekingKing [S] 0 points ago +0 / -0

Haha thanks pede.

4
feraxil 4 points ago +4 / -0

"theocratic christian monarchy"

Yes.

With dictators sworn to 1 year tours, chosen by the senate.

All the individual freedoms we currently enjoy, with the single minded focus of leadership we need.

Also, legitimate crusades can come back.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0