Or... it could it be that she knows that revealing his financial records sets a dangerous precedent... because then its grounds for looking into dems too.
But we don't have law in this country. That's the thing. What's good for the rest of the country is not good for the left. If a Democrat doesn't want to obey the law, they are under no obligation to do so, as demonstrated by the fact that they face absolutely zero consequences for flouting the law, while a private American citizen who lives between the coasts gets thrown in prison for taking a selfie on a submarine.
Precedent? The fuck do you mean about precedent. Dems don't operate based off of precedent, they operate based off their feelings. Feelings don't care about your precedents.
It absolutely does. The whole premise of roe vs wade hinges on the notion of privacy. Which is why I'm completely flaberghasted by the left these days. It doesn't take a supreme court justice to figure out that there are potential consequences.
It's fascinating that the temporary block requires a response from the whitehouse immediately after the IG holds a press conference about the FISA abuse report. Coincidence? I hope not.
This is what I think, it's blatantly illegal in the first place and the Dems are desperate for any kind of "We're not crazy activists who won't work within the system! I mean, not anymore!" cred.
She is pretty progressive, but I honestly would put a $100 dollars on her shaking her head at some of the constitutional abuses the Democrats are conducting to get Trump. I bet she is pretty pissed at some Democrats because right now they are burning the country to the ground to smoke out Trump.
MAYBE SHE'S SEEN THEM AND REALISES THAT THE DEMS ARE FUCKED IF THEY COME OUT AND SHOW THAT POTUS IS INDEED A VERY VERY RICH GEOTUS.
THIS WOULD DAMAGE THE DEMS BECAUSE OF ALL THE REEEEEING THEY DID.
MUCH BETTER TO NOT ALLOW THEM OUT SO THAT THE DEMS COULD CONTINUE TO REEEEEEE ABOUT TAX RETURNS ALL THE WAY THROUGH THE NEXT ELECTION AND FOR THE NEXT 35 YEARS.
Democrats: “Welp, you guys were right. Turns out she’s no longer fit to judge!”
Or could be that his financial records make him look good, not bad.
I think you're right that they make him look pretty good, so bad for them.?
That makes sense. She’s protecting them from repeating the Maddow incident.
If that's the case, we can expect to see them being leaked by a whistleblower that is familiar with the president's way of thinking!
I presume
Trump already said he might release them anyhow. It's just nomatter what they say it will lead to endless investigations.
HE SHOULD RELEASE THEM AFTER HE'S VOTED BACK IN AS A
'FUCK YOU GUYS - I'M RICH BIIITCHHH!!!'
I'm pretty sure that you're right.
Remember Obama was using the irs to get his enemies
I believe President Trump has already stated that he is constantly being audited. Besides, I can guarantee that Trump doesn't do his own taxes.
Precisely! The dems are ready to tank themselves on another witch-hunt.
The entire "Muh Taxes!" angle mandates that the IRS doesn't exist or would somehow magically ignore a random private citizen for decades on end.
Or
Democrats "Someone check on her! I want proof of life!"
Didn't RBG wear a pussy hat at some point?
I suspect this subpoena is likely just illegal and she saw an opportunity to score neutrality points by being the one who blocks it personally.
I bet she had sex that night for the first time in 27 years
I was expecting this comment to be on the picture I posted of Stacey Dash. I was unpleasantly surprised when I clicked on it ?
Or... it could it be that she knows that revealing his financial records sets a dangerous precedent... because then its grounds for looking into dems too.
But we don't have law in this country. That's the thing. What's good for the rest of the country is not good for the left. If a Democrat doesn't want to obey the law, they are under no obligation to do so, as demonstrated by the fact that they face absolutely zero consequences for flouting the law, while a private American citizen who lives between the coasts gets thrown in prison for taking a selfie on a submarine.
Precedent? The fuck do you mean about precedent. Dems don't operate based off of precedent, they operate based off their feelings. Feelings don't care about your precedents.
its harder for a court to deny the republicans request for financial records when its already been done before.
Theoretically this should be true.
Like in a non-corrupt system of laws where one party does not have outsized power and influence you have spoken the truth.
It absolutely does. The whole premise of roe vs wade hinges on the notion of privacy. Which is why I'm completely flaberghasted by the left these days. It doesn't take a supreme court justice to figure out that there are potential consequences.
Haha. Probably because his records will leave egg on the Democrats faces for the billionth time in the last 3 years.
She is a Lib, but not a communist. The dems will call for her retirement now.
A senile actvist judge can accidentally get it right.
even if she's alive, pretty sure it's still basically weekend at Bernie's with her and her clerks.
Article: https://outline.com/Ch3Nb9
It's fascinating that the temporary block requires a response from the whitehouse immediately after the IG holds a press conference about the FISA abuse report. Coincidence? I hope not.
I’m chalking this up to a “senior moment”; RBG has a huge deficit before she scores points for patriotism
Maybe she finally got "Actually read the constitution" crossed off her bucket list.
Dems; WTF?! I hate RGB now!!!
She is on her death bed. So she wants to do good now.
There was no way it would NOT get struck down. Might as well attach her name to it to make a case for libs not being biased.
This is what I think, it's blatantly illegal in the first place and the Dems are desperate for any kind of "We're not crazy activists who won't work within the system! I mean, not anymore!" cred.
Are we sure it was RBG? Could have been that RBG looking half mannequin that we saw being wheeled through the airport.
If I remember right, Geritol pills are red.
Okay I know the news refers to her as a alive...but has anyone seen her go to her office? Has any of he other judges physically seen her do work?
Because even if she's alive, I'm 99.9999999% she's just drooling on life support while her clerks do the work.
Plz link to the politics sub thread for maximum salt mining
RBG is definitely not conservative, but she's liberal in the mold of a liberal from the 1960's and 1970's.
Compared to modern Leftists, she's damn near as conservative as any of us.
We don't agree with her on many things, but we probably agree on more than we disagree on.
She is pretty progressive, but I honestly would put a $100 dollars on her shaking her head at some of the constitutional abuses the Democrats are conducting to get Trump. I bet she is pretty pissed at some Democrats because right now they are burning the country to the ground to smoke out Trump.
I would not take that bet.
MAYBE SHE'S SEEN THEM AND REALISES THAT THE DEMS ARE FUCKED IF THEY COME OUT AND SHOW THAT POTUS IS INDEED A VERY VERY RICH GEOTUS.
THIS WOULD DAMAGE THE DEMS BECAUSE OF ALL THE REEEEEING THEY DID.
MUCH BETTER TO NOT ALLOW THEM OUT SO THAT THE DEMS COULD CONTINUE TO REEEEEEE ABOUT TAX RETURNS ALL THE WAY THROUGH THE NEXT ELECTION AND FOR THE NEXT 35 YEARS.
maybe it is just a trick to make sure we quit wondering if she is dead.