He will be judged. He's got that Saint Malachy thing (the pope list - last pope) and that Fatima thing (the third one) hanging over him. Amazing coincidence. 10 years ago the Third Fatima Secret seemed fanciful and bloody unlikely. Now, I just hope the good guys get on with it. Plenty of these religious people should be frying in hell.
I don't think it's a Catholic thing. Some folks will just call it conspiracy theories, yada yada. Look up Wikipedia for starters. The thing about the Fatima Secrets is, they tried to make Pope John Paul II's attempted assasination match the Third Secret. It's a stretch. But given how Jorge B. behaves these days, it's far more likely to match him. Thus, Saint Malachy and the Third Fatima Secret lines up nicely. Weird for the scientifically-inclined, but no more weird than the Kek coincidences.
Speaking of Kek coincidences... I was in Casper Wy recently and there was a church dedicated to Fatima. I didn't know the story until a few days ago and here you are talking about it again.
> Given the very accurate description of popes up to around 1590 and lack of accuracy for the popes that follow, historians generally conclude that the alleged prophecy is a fabrication written shortly before publication.
It's more like the Saint Malarkey thing.
The 3rd secret of Fatima:
> at the left of Our Lady and a little above, we saw an Angel with a flaming sword in his left hand; flashing, it gave out flames that looked as though they would set the world on fire; but they died out in contact with the splendour that Our Lady radiated towards him from her right hand: pointing to the earth with his right hand, the Angel cried out in a loud voice: 'Penance, Penance, Penance!'. And we saw in an immense light that is God: 'something similar to how people appear in a mirror when they pass in front of it' a Bishop dressed in White 'we had the impression that it was the Holy Father'. Other Bishops, Priests, men and women Religious going up a steep mountain, at the top of which there was a big Cross of rough-hewn trunks as of a cork-tree with the bark; before reaching there the Holy Father passed through a big city half in ruins and half trembling with halting step, afflicted with pain and sorrow, he prayed for the souls of the corpses he met on his way; having reached the top of the mountain, on his knees at the foot of the big Cross he was killed by a group of soldiers who fired bullets and arrows at him, and in the same way there died one after another the other Bishops, Priests, men and women Religious, and various lay people of different ranks and positions. Beneath the two arms of the Cross there were two Angels each with a crystal aspersorium in his hand, in which they gathered up the blood of the Martyrs and with it sprinkled the souls that were making their way to God.
Pope Benedict's take on it:
> The purpose of the vision is not to show a film of an irrevocably fixed future. Its meaning is exactly the opposite: it is meant to mobilize the forces of change in the right direction. Therefore we must totally discount fatalistic explanations of the “secret”, such as, for example, the claim that the would-be assassin of 13 May 1981 was merely an instrument of the divine plan guided by Providence and could not therefore have acted freely, or other similar ideas in circulation. Rather, the vision speaks of dangers and how we might be saved from them.
I have 9 hours of interviews Father Martin did with Art Bell and he said he had to write this book in novel form or the entire world would freak out. It is, however, a true story.
There are devil worshipers in the Vatican and Bergoglio is obviously their chosen favorite.
Another excellent book by Fr. Malachi Martin is Hostage to the Devil. He interviews exorcists about their real life experiences and draws conclusions about the nature of demons and Evil. Fascinating read. The evil ramping up around us more and more every day always brings the Bible and his book to mind.
I heard a Ugandan pastor talk about the witchcraft in Africa and about one of the warlocks describe meetings with a demon/devil at the bottom of the ocean with catholic priest in attendance .
Jorge the Argentine.
The actual pope is still alive, afaik. Probably being kept in a locked room in a Vatican basement.
That said, I'm a Christian. Don't need a pope or a priest to intervene on my behalf, as I am saved by Grace. I appreciate intermediary prayer, but I don't have to rely on it.
If I did tho, Jorge the Argentine wouldn't do me any good because he's a fraud.
“In other parts there are walls that even separate children from parents. Herod comes to mind,” Francis said. “Yet for drugs, there’s no wall to keep them out.”
Build that wall faster -- the (fake) pope just reminded us we lack a wall to keep out the drugs.
Catholics have had both good and bad popes throughout its 2000 year history. This one, too, will pass.
This one's penchant for movie stars, global warming, and leftist causes is really pissing off some of the cafeteria catholic types. hopefully this gets them to think for themselves.
I respect all Christian denominations that don't preach violence, however I've never understood how the modern Vatican can possibly be what Jesus Christ had in mind.
The whole thing - all it's hierarchy and ceremony and indulgences and forgiveness seem like a perverse distraction from having a relationship with Jesus Christ.
If you want forgiveness then discuss it with Jesus directly. Having some guy in a white smock named Derick tell you that Jesus forgives you doesn't seem legitimate because Jesus doesn't work for him and only Jesus can make those calls and only God can judge us.
You're also viewing the Vatican through modern context. Remember that before America the world was full of kingdoms. There are a few notable exceptions in Greece and Rome (at times) but otherwise the rest of the world were monarchies.
The Vatican is unique in that historic context in that the lineage of Pope is not preordained at birth, but voted on by men of the cloth. If you view it as an extension of the period it was birthed from it is a lot less alien.
I see a lot of the Pharisees and Sadducees in today's religious landscape. The Pope is definitely like a Sadducee - aristocratic and secular, caring too much about maintaining the visual appearance of tradition and the prestige of the church, and ignoring the changing needs of his followers. The Sadducees did almost anything the Romans asked, allowing Pagans and hostile immigrants into Jerusalem to make their masters happy and thus stay in power. It didn't work out for them, as the hostility between the Jews and foreigners reached a point where the Romans finally banished the Jews from Jerusalem altogether, around 50AD.
You're right that it isn't what Jesus had in mind, and he directly fought against this in his waking life. "Beware the yeast of the Pharisees and Sadducees!"
I have and such blatant hatred for Jesus Christ makes it difficult to differentiate between the antichrist cults you named, based only on their beliefs and actions.
I suspect the scope is much wider than certain Pharisees and Sadducees.
I haven't read the Talmud, but my Master's degree is in History with a focus on early Christianity, so I've learned a lot about the context of Jesus' arrival on Earth.
The big difference is that the Sadducees were aristocratic, and the Pharisees were lower to middle class. The Pharisees also put a lot of value on oral tradition and local beliefs, whereas the Sadducees only cared about mosaic law and written canon (the Talmud).
If Jesus came today I can imagine most religious leaders would fight against him again. He'd disturb the status quo too much for their liking, make their target audiences uncomfortable, and dry up their funding.
There are some things that your history books neglect to mention because hate speech laws can be easily abused to prosecute individuals and bankrupt publishing companies who speak the truth.
Sometimes claims can be both "hate speech" and true.
I worry that this Pope is causing irreparable damage to the Catholic church. Like Vatican 2, but even worse. When you have people who claim to be Catholic, but openly and enthusiastically endorse abortion, sexual immorality, and libertinism overall, on an international platform, and are still given communion, I'm sorry, but that reeks of apostasy.
And that's before you even bring into account the child rape thing. Remember that recent sex scandal that jarred the Catholic church for about five minutes? It was even more horrifying than the last one. But this Satanic Pope literally ordered the media to stop talking about it. And that was the end of that. Not another peep about it, on left or right wing media.
Exactly !
The Church is not immune to all the tactics of the left. Some recognize this and at least stand firm.
As much as I hate to say it, the immunities of taxes etc. should be yanked from most of these "churches" Part of the corruption is money, and the 'causes' that money supports, such as catholic charities -a good part of their money also comes from the govt to get refugees settled. They do a lot of good, but the leftist agenda is a driving force, just one more infiltration to screw people out of traditional refuge from their storms.
Yet 'The Great Apostacy' is not.
While leaders are in disarray, there's a surge of renewal happening in 'men of goodwill'.
This Pope though -ain't he sumpthin' special !?!
Besides commenting, all we can do is pray for them, and us !
My problem with removing tax exempt status from churches is who decides which churches should lose their tax exempt status? The decision, invariably, would fall to a person, or a committee of people, who are the last kind of people we want having that kind of authority. It would make the problem worse, not better, because eventually we would reach a point where the only churches that have tax exempt status would be the most corrupt and the most apostate churches.
At least then tax returns would SHOW where the money is going.
As it is, one puts a buck into the collection and has no idea where it goes.
I would like to know that at least my $1 is not going toward undermining my country.
That wouldn't solve the problem, because remember, the law does not apply to the left. It would only apply to the churches following Jesus Christ, which now rules out the Catholic church.
I responded to a post in this thread and suddenly realized, Pope Francis is the RBG of Popes. He doesn't need the Bible or church doctrine. He's gonna tear down the Catholic Church. Make a new one. (with hookers and blackjack? j/k)
I heard Milo Yiannopoulos say in an interview with Jordan Peterson that the Catholic church in Africa is pre-Vatican 2 - Christian, in other words - and he wants the Catholic church to elect an African Pope for that reason.
The Catholic Church provided an incredible amount of support to Japanese Catholics after Hiroshima and Nagasaki. I'm not Catholic, but giving credit where credit is due is warranted. It doesn't negate the kwrongs, but it does highlight the differences between practitioners and the charlatans who guide them.
He's a Jesuit. The fact that he was a Jesuit who rose through the ranks in S. America in the era that he did tells you need to know about him. He's doing a great job of exposing the Catholic church though. Wheat from the chaff type stuff.
Sorry for the late reply, I've just checked my inbox for the first time. The Jesuits are the military arm of the Catholic church. The leader of the Jesuits is referred as the Black Pope. There's a reason a Jesuit was never meant to be the actual Pope. They were created in 1534 for the purpose of counter-reformation, to bring those protestant (think Martin Luther 95 theses 1517) skallywags to heel.
The significance of Francis rising up the ranks in the place and time he did has to do with Liberation Theology (leftist rot and a product of Latin America). The church backed the military govt in Argentina in the 70s. Bergoglio (Francis) has been accused of complicit silence or worse during the "dirty war" of murders and abductions carried out.
If you're a Christian or have given the Bible a skim, you will understand that Francis isn't even an actual Christian. He wouldn't say the blasphemous things he's said if he was. That is the norm for Jesuits, not the exception. I'll leave it at that.
I"m not catholic either, but I believe the big thing about the Jesuits when they were founded was that they pushed education among the clergy. Founded some time in the 1500's they are a relatively new order. I also know some Catholics that believe they're kind of power hungry within the church. Again, that's just an opinion, though.
The big difference with Jesuits is that they believe in using critical thought when discussing issues. Basically, they're liberals. Pope Francis is pretty much the RBG of Popes. While the changes he's pushing may be popular among people today, he is discarding traditions that go back hundreds if not thousands of years. Arguably he is destroying the Catholic Church. I mean, without those traditions, it may have the same name but it wont be the Catholic Church.
I agree that he's like RBG & is destroying the Catholic Church. I've lurked on a few forums where even Catholic priests are denouncing Jorge & what he says/does, and exhorting the concerned Catholics to maintain what they know is right & to stay faithful to the Church, to just wait it out until Jorge is gone. The priests were posting under their actual names, kinda concerning if ya know what I mean...
Anyway, thanks for the response. It's greatly appreciated.
Catholic church income revenues from America are undoubtedly going up as the country gets flooded with hispanic migrants, who are mostly Catholic. Its easy to see the cynical side of this Pope's disdain for American border integrity. He undoubtedly loves that his people are taking those sweet American jobs so the Vatican can get its tithes.
Read father Malachi Martin’s (Real life only priest without a church - only priest authorized to do exorcisms) book “Windswept House” about the church being hijacked by pedosatanists
They are a political organization now who is the number 1 enemy of Nationalist America.
Catholic charities fund the caravans. They give them jobs and homes. They have facilitated the globalist dream.
The Vatican and the Pope May as well be George Soros
"this as being an exact expression of
a great truth concerning the nature of the physical plane. That
truth is today a fundamental postulate of science, since physicists
have demonstrated that all forms of physical matter are
manifestations of a single energy, like light in its essential
nature, which is also the underlying power expressed in every
kind of vital activity.
This universal light-energy, the mystical Son, is made flesh
and dwells within us as the central point of illumination personified
as Horus in the Egyptian rituals, as Krishna in Hinduism,
where Krishna is termed "the ego seated in the heart of
man," as the liberating I H Sh V H in the esoteric Christianity
of the school which described that light also in the Rosicrucian
allegory of "Our Father and Brother, R. C."
The Declaration of Independence implies just what the seal
symbolizes by including, in the various ways just mentioned,
references to the abalistic and Hermetic spelling of the name
Jesus. The basis o7 all that our fathers fought for is the truth
that the underlying law of the universe is the law of liberty.
Tyrants seek to enslave humanity, but tyranny is self-destructive.
Old tyrannies have passed away, to give place to
others more subtle, but even these are doomed before the irresistible
force expressed in the law of liberty. Most of the world
today is in bondage to Mammon, but the time is at hand when
Mammon shall take its proper place as the servant, not the
master, of man. Millions are enslaved by the machine, but the
hour is striking when a revolution greater than that of 1776
shall throw off the shackles of that hateful servitude.
This revolution is now in progress, Its field is not the field of
battle between armies of men. It is the field of the human soul.
It is a revolution in consciousness, overturning the old false
standards of value.
Down through the ages prophets have foreseen this time.
l''heir visions have been ignored, misunderstood, disregarded.
Yet these visions are being realized in the history of our own
times. They who have eyes to see may discover abundant evidence
that the perfect law of liberty is about to become manifest
as never before in the affairs of men."
-P.F. Case, The Great Seal of the United States
PSA: Did you know that the "False Prophet" spoken of in the book of Revelations is the Pope of that day who supports the Antichrist. The more you know.
I am a Catholic, he is not my pope. He is not a pope at all. Vial and communist. He is of the world order. Just look at how he acts. Loved bo, that smells.
He is working for Satin, for he is stating lies and hate. To me that is not Catholic. That is why people dislike Catholics. Because of hypocrisy.
All priest that were caught molesting children, they should all be castrated.
The judgement is coming, Jesus is the only one, he just has some bad actors in his house like Trump.
On the evening of that first day of the week, when the disciples were together, with the doors locked for fear of the Jewish leaders, Jesus came and stood among them and said, “Peace be with you!” After he said this, he showed them his hands and side. The disciples were overjoyed when they saw the Lord.
Again Jesus said, “Peace be with you! As the Father has sent me, I am sending you.” And with that he breathed on them and said, “Receive the Holy Spirit. If you forgive anyone’s sins, their sins are forgiven; if you do not forgive them, they are not forgiven.”
Jorge Bergoglio harbors child rapists within the Vatican and protects them by refusing all extradition requests.
Anyone who protects a pedophile is no better than the child rapist.
His opinions are moot.
I don't condone assault, however the socially correct reply to anything Bergoglio says would be to spit in his face.
He will be judged. He's got that Saint Malachy thing (the pope list - last pope) and that Fatima thing (the third one) hanging over him. Amazing coincidence. 10 years ago the Third Fatima Secret seemed fanciful and bloody unlikely. Now, I just hope the good guys get on with it. Plenty of these religious people should be frying in hell.
Quick explainer for the non-Catholics?
I don't think it's a Catholic thing. Some folks will just call it conspiracy theories, yada yada. Look up Wikipedia for starters. The thing about the Fatima Secrets is, they tried to make Pope John Paul II's attempted assasination match the Third Secret. It's a stretch. But given how Jorge B. behaves these days, it's far more likely to match him. Thus, Saint Malachy and the Third Fatima Secret lines up nicely. Weird for the scientifically-inclined, but no more weird than the Kek coincidences.
Speaking of Kek coincidences... I was in Casper Wy recently and there was a church dedicated to Fatima. I didn't know the story until a few days ago and here you are talking about it again.
The "Saint Malachy thing" isn't. They're referring to the Prophecy of the Popes.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prophecy_of_the_Popes (published in 1595)
> Given the very accurate description of popes up to around 1590 and lack of accuracy for the popes that follow, historians generally conclude that the alleged prophecy is a fabrication written shortly before publication.
It's more like the Saint Malarkey thing.
The 3rd secret of Fatima:
> at the left of Our Lady and a little above, we saw an Angel with a flaming sword in his left hand; flashing, it gave out flames that looked as though they would set the world on fire; but they died out in contact with the splendour that Our Lady radiated towards him from her right hand: pointing to the earth with his right hand, the Angel cried out in a loud voice: 'Penance, Penance, Penance!'. And we saw in an immense light that is God: 'something similar to how people appear in a mirror when they pass in front of it' a Bishop dressed in White 'we had the impression that it was the Holy Father'. Other Bishops, Priests, men and women Religious going up a steep mountain, at the top of which there was a big Cross of rough-hewn trunks as of a cork-tree with the bark; before reaching there the Holy Father passed through a big city half in ruins and half trembling with halting step, afflicted with pain and sorrow, he prayed for the souls of the corpses he met on his way; having reached the top of the mountain, on his knees at the foot of the big Cross he was killed by a group of soldiers who fired bullets and arrows at him, and in the same way there died one after another the other Bishops, Priests, men and women Religious, and various lay people of different ranks and positions. Beneath the two arms of the Cross there were two Angels each with a crystal aspersorium in his hand, in which they gathered up the blood of the Martyrs and with it sprinkled the souls that were making their way to God.
Pope Benedict's take on it:
> The purpose of the vision is not to show a film of an irrevocably fixed future. Its meaning is exactly the opposite: it is meant to mobilize the forces of change in the right direction. Therefore we must totally discount fatalistic explanations of the “secret”, such as, for example, the claim that the would-be assassin of 13 May 1981 was merely an instrument of the divine plan guided by Providence and could not therefore have acted freely, or other similar ideas in circulation. Rather, the vision speaks of dangers and how we might be saved from them.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_Secrets_of_Fátima#Third_secret
Read Windswept House: A Vatican Novel by Fr. Malachi Martin.
https://www.worldcat.org/title/windswept-house-a-vatican-novel/oclc/755213084
I have 9 hours of interviews Father Martin did with Art Bell and he said he had to write this book in novel form or the entire world would freak out. It is, however, a true story.
There are devil worshipers in the Vatican and Bergoglio is obviously their chosen favorite.
Another excellent book by Fr. Malachi Martin is Hostage to the Devil. He interviews exorcists about their real life experiences and draws conclusions about the nature of demons and Evil. Fascinating read. The evil ramping up around us more and more every day always brings the Bible and his book to mind.
I heard a Ugandan pastor talk about the witchcraft in Africa and about one of the warlocks describe meetings with a demon/devil at the bottom of the ocean with catholic priest in attendance .
In R'lyeh?
Jorge the Argentine. The actual pope is still alive, afaik. Probably being kept in a locked room in a Vatican basement.
That said, I'm a Christian. Don't need a pope or a priest to intervene on my behalf, as I am saved by Grace. I appreciate intermediary prayer, but I don't have to rely on it.
If I did tho, Jorge the Argentine wouldn't do me any good because he's a fraud.
He said:
“In other parts there are walls that even separate children from parents. Herod comes to mind,” Francis said. “Yet for drugs, there’s no wall to keep them out.”
Build that wall faster -- the (fake) pope just reminded us we lack a wall to keep out the drugs.
Ha.
Catholics have had both good and bad popes throughout its 2000 year history. This one, too, will pass.
This one's penchant for movie stars, global warming, and leftist causes is really pissing off some of the cafeteria catholic types. hopefully this gets them to think for themselves.
I respect all Christian denominations that don't preach violence, however I've never understood how the modern Vatican can possibly be what Jesus Christ had in mind.
The whole thing - all it's hierarchy and ceremony and indulgences and forgiveness seem like a perverse distraction from having a relationship with Jesus Christ.
If you want forgiveness then discuss it with Jesus directly. Having some guy in a white smock named Derick tell you that Jesus forgives you doesn't seem legitimate because Jesus doesn't work for him and only Jesus can make those calls and only God can judge us.
You're also viewing the Vatican through modern context. Remember that before America the world was full of kingdoms. There are a few notable exceptions in Greece and Rome (at times) but otherwise the rest of the world were monarchies.
The Vatican is unique in that historic context in that the lineage of Pope is not preordained at birth, but voted on by men of the cloth. If you view it as an extension of the period it was birthed from it is a lot less alien.
I see a lot of the Pharisees and Sadducees in today's religious landscape. The Pope is definitely like a Sadducee - aristocratic and secular, caring too much about maintaining the visual appearance of tradition and the prestige of the church, and ignoring the changing needs of his followers. The Sadducees did almost anything the Romans asked, allowing Pagans and hostile immigrants into Jerusalem to make their masters happy and thus stay in power. It didn't work out for them, as the hostility between the Jews and foreigners reached a point where the Romans finally banished the Jews from Jerusalem altogether, around 50AD.
You're right that it isn't what Jesus had in mind, and he directly fought against this in his waking life. "Beware the yeast of the Pharisees and Sadducees!"
Have you read the Talmud?
I have and such blatant hatred for Jesus Christ makes it difficult to differentiate between the antichrist cults you named, based only on their beliefs and actions.
I suspect the scope is much wider than certain Pharisees and Sadducees.
I haven't read the Talmud, but my Master's degree is in History with a focus on early Christianity, so I've learned a lot about the context of Jesus' arrival on Earth.
The big difference is that the Sadducees were aristocratic, and the Pharisees were lower to middle class. The Pharisees also put a lot of value on oral tradition and local beliefs, whereas the Sadducees only cared about mosaic law and written canon (the Talmud).
If Jesus came today I can imagine most religious leaders would fight against him again. He'd disturb the status quo too much for their liking, make their target audiences uncomfortable, and dry up their funding.
You should read the Talmud.
There are some things that your history books neglect to mention because hate speech laws can be easily abused to prosecute individuals and bankrupt publishing companies who speak the truth.
Sometimes claims can be both "hate speech" and true.
I worry that this Pope is causing irreparable damage to the Catholic church. Like Vatican 2, but even worse. When you have people who claim to be Catholic, but openly and enthusiastically endorse abortion, sexual immorality, and libertinism overall, on an international platform, and are still given communion, I'm sorry, but that reeks of apostasy.
And that's before you even bring into account the child rape thing. Remember that recent sex scandal that jarred the Catholic church for about five minutes? It was even more horrifying than the last one. But this Satanic Pope literally ordered the media to stop talking about it. And that was the end of that. Not another peep about it, on left or right wing media.
The Catholic church is infested with evil.
Look at what they did to the Episcopal church - it's basically a Democratic organizing committee on Sunday mornings with vestments there now.
This is what the left does. They infiltrate institutions, and hollow them out. It's Invasion of the Body Snatchers.
Exactly ! The Church is not immune to all the tactics of the left. Some recognize this and at least stand firm.
As much as I hate to say it, the immunities of taxes etc. should be yanked from most of these "churches" Part of the corruption is money, and the 'causes' that money supports, such as catholic charities -a good part of their money also comes from the govt to get refugees settled. They do a lot of good, but the leftist agenda is a driving force, just one more infiltration to screw people out of traditional refuge from their storms.
Yet 'The Great Apostacy' is not.
While leaders are in disarray, there's a surge of renewal happening in 'men of goodwill'.
This Pope though -ain't he sumpthin' special !?!
Besides commenting, all we can do is pray for them, and us !
My problem with removing tax exempt status from churches is who decides which churches should lose their tax exempt status? The decision, invariably, would fall to a person, or a committee of people, who are the last kind of people we want having that kind of authority. It would make the problem worse, not better, because eventually we would reach a point where the only churches that have tax exempt status would be the most corrupt and the most apostate churches.
Yank it from all of them, then.
At least then tax returns would SHOW where the money is going. As it is, one puts a buck into the collection and has no idea where it goes. I would like to know that at least my $1 is not going toward undermining my country.
That wouldn't solve the problem, because remember, the law does not apply to the left. It would only apply to the churches following Jesus Christ, which now rules out the Catholic church.
I responded to a post in this thread and suddenly realized, Pope Francis is the RBG of Popes. He doesn't need the Bible or church doctrine. He's gonna tear down the Catholic Church. Make a new one. (with hookers and blackjack? j/k)
True.
But I imagine the evil of the vatican will lead to a rebirth of the Church in the hearts of men.
The vatican is part of our global deep state.
It will fall.
Then people will be liberated and move closer to Christ.
There are already Catholic groups that do not accept the current pope. I imagine there will be more Latin mass; more grassroots worship.
I'm not even Catholic, but there is much about the religion that I love. I'm even learning the Pater Noster. It's beautiful in Latin.
Short version: I don't blame Catholics for having a horrible fake pope. We had a horrible fake president.
In reaction, we now have a cool president.
I think the same will happen for them.
I heard Milo Yiannopoulos say in an interview with Jordan Peterson that the Catholic church in Africa is pre-Vatican 2 - Christian, in other words - and he wants the Catholic church to elect an African Pope for that reason.
I’ve said it once and I’ll say it again: I miss the days when “is the Pope Catholic?” was a rhetorical question.
The Catholic Church provided an incredible amount of support to Japanese Catholics after Hiroshima and Nagasaki. I'm not Catholic, but giving credit where credit is due is warranted. It doesn't negate the kwrongs, but it does highlight the differences between practitioners and the charlatans who guide them.
Francis the talking mule.
He's a Jesuit. The fact that he was a Jesuit who rose through the ranks in S. America in the era that he did tells you need to know about him. He's doing a great job of exposing the Catholic church though. Wheat from the chaff type stuff.
Serious question, what's the significance of him being Jesuit, the era, S America?
edit: I'm not a Catholic, obviously..
Sorry for the late reply, I've just checked my inbox for the first time. The Jesuits are the military arm of the Catholic church. The leader of the Jesuits is referred as the Black Pope. There's a reason a Jesuit was never meant to be the actual Pope. They were created in 1534 for the purpose of counter-reformation, to bring those protestant (think Martin Luther 95 theses 1517) skallywags to heel. The significance of Francis rising up the ranks in the place and time he did has to do with Liberation Theology (leftist rot and a product of Latin America). The church backed the military govt in Argentina in the 70s. Bergoglio (Francis) has been accused of complicit silence or worse during the "dirty war" of murders and abductions carried out. If you're a Christian or have given the Bible a skim, you will understand that Francis isn't even an actual Christian. He wouldn't say the blasphemous things he's said if he was. That is the norm for Jesuits, not the exception. I'll leave it at that.
No problem, pede. Thanks for the history lesson. I am a Christian, and agree 110% that Jorge isn't.
I"m not catholic either, but I believe the big thing about the Jesuits when they were founded was that they pushed education among the clergy. Founded some time in the 1500's they are a relatively new order. I also know some Catholics that believe they're kind of power hungry within the church. Again, that's just an opinion, though.
The big difference with Jesuits is that they believe in using critical thought when discussing issues. Basically, they're liberals. Pope Francis is pretty much the RBG of Popes. While the changes he's pushing may be popular among people today, he is discarding traditions that go back hundreds if not thousands of years. Arguably he is destroying the Catholic Church. I mean, without those traditions, it may have the same name but it wont be the Catholic Church.
Thanks, I learned a lot from what you've shared.
I agree that he's like RBG & is destroying the Catholic Church. I've lurked on a few forums where even Catholic priests are denouncing Jorge & what he says/does, and exhorting the concerned Catholics to maintain what they know is right & to stay faithful to the Church, to just wait it out until Jorge is gone. The priests were posting under their actual names, kinda concerning if ya know what I mean...
Anyway, thanks for the response. It's greatly appreciated.
Globalist shill pope
Catholic church income revenues from America are undoubtedly going up as the country gets flooded with hispanic migrants, who are mostly Catholic. Its easy to see the cynical side of this Pope's disdain for American border integrity. He undoubtedly loves that his people are taking those sweet American jobs so the Vatican can get its tithes.
Hispanics are notoriously stingy when the collection plate comes around.
I miss Benedict XVI so much.
Get this moron outta here. Bring that black Bishop in, he knows whats up.
this Pope is an anti-pope in the truest sense
he is Judas reborn and a vile puppet of the globalist luciferians....he is the black Pope of the Jesuits
sux being Catholic these days fam :(
Commies / Comintern have been duping the dupable masses through “progressive” religious leaders for the last 100 years.
Comrade frank is no different. Nothing new here.
This Pope is a dhimmi. Read about the Battle of LePanto to see how Catholics dealt with Islam in the past.
Um...should someone tell him that Trump's not the one trying to kill babies?
This Pope is as Catholic as Jim Jones.
He's not the Pope. Pope Benedict is.
Sheep and goats.
Forgive him Lord. Comfort the children who have been harmed at the Vaticans will.
Fuck Pope Frankie. He is a fraud and a globohomo shill.
You mean the pope, as in that holy guy who protects other holy guy pedophiles?
I’ve been to the Vatican many times.
Read father Malachi Martin’s (Real life only priest without a church - only priest authorized to do exorcisms) book “Windswept House” about the church being hijacked by pedosatanists
They are a political organization now who is the number 1 enemy of Nationalist America.
Catholic charities fund the caravans. They give them jobs and homes. They have facilitated the globalist dream.
The Vatican and the Pope May as well be George Soros
The POPE doesnt beleive in the physical resurrection of Christ....
FALSE POPE!
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7665347/Pope-Francis-denied-bodily-resurrection-Christ-says-Italian-friend.html
"this as being an exact expression of a great truth concerning the nature of the physical plane. That truth is today a fundamental postulate of science, since physicists have demonstrated that all forms of physical matter are manifestations of a single energy, like light in its essential nature, which is also the underlying power expressed in every kind of vital activity. This universal light-energy, the mystical Son, is made flesh and dwells within us as the central point of illumination personified as Horus in the Egyptian rituals, as Krishna in Hinduism, where Krishna is termed "the ego seated in the heart of man," as the liberating I H Sh V H in the esoteric Christianity of the school which described that light also in the Rosicrucian allegory of "Our Father and Brother, R. C." The Declaration of Independence implies just what the seal symbolizes by including, in the various ways just mentioned, references to the abalistic and Hermetic spelling of the name Jesus. The basis o7 all that our fathers fought for is the truth that the underlying law of the universe is the law of liberty. Tyrants seek to enslave humanity, but tyranny is self-destructive. Old tyrannies have passed away, to give place to others more subtle, but even these are doomed before the irresistible force expressed in the law of liberty. Most of the world today is in bondage to Mammon, but the time is at hand when Mammon shall take its proper place as the servant, not the master, of man. Millions are enslaved by the machine, but the hour is striking when a revolution greater than that of 1776 shall throw off the shackles of that hateful servitude. This revolution is now in progress, Its field is not the field of battle between armies of men. It is the field of the human soul. It is a revolution in consciousness, overturning the old false standards of value. Down through the ages prophets have foreseen this time. l''heir visions have been ignored, misunderstood, disregarded. Yet these visions are being realized in the history of our own times. They who have eyes to see may discover abundant evidence that the perfect law of liberty is about to become manifest as never before in the affairs of men." -P.F. Case, The Great Seal of the United States
Jorge Bergoglio aka 'Francis' is an anti-pope (false pope). Benedict XVI who's still alive but was forced to leave is the actual Pope.
https://www.barnhardt.biz/2019/11/30/we-must-be-getting-close-to-critical-mass-because-antipope-bergoglio-refuses-to-say-the-name-of-jesus-give-any-blessing-or-make-the-sign-of-the-cross/
Why is he trying to interfere in our election?
PSA: Did you know that the "False Prophet" spoken of in the book of Revelations is the Pope of that day who supports the Antichrist. The more you know.
I figure, he's working for Soros. Everything he says supports that devil's agenda.
Open the Vatican then
Pfft
"in ancient palestine".... Palestine was created in the 1900's
The ancient term is Philistine. Same place.
I am a Catholic, he is not my pope. He is not a pope at all. Vial and communist. He is of the world order. Just look at how he acts. Loved bo, that smells. He is working for Satin, for he is stating lies and hate. To me that is not Catholic. That is why people dislike Catholics. Because of hypocrisy. All priest that were caught molesting children, they should all be castrated.
The judgement is coming, Jesus is the only one, he just has some bad actors in his house like Trump.
The pope is a false prophet / idol, the Bible says nothing about needing another fellow sinner between you and Christ.
John 20:19-23
On the evening of that first day of the week, when the disciples were together, with the doors locked for fear of the Jewish leaders, Jesus came and stood among them and said, “Peace be with you!” After he said this, he showed them his hands and side. The disciples were overjoyed when they saw the Lord.
Again Jesus said, “Peace be with you! As the Father has sent me, I am sending you.” And with that he breathed on them and said, “Receive the Holy Spirit. If you forgive anyone’s sins, their sins are forgiven; if you do not forgive them, they are not forgiven.”
By supporting the Catholic Church you directly support child rape and molestation change my mind.