471
Comments (12)
sorted by:
20
nanowerx 20 points ago +20 / -0

Good. It's an absolute conflict of interest to have people that are vying for a person's job, to be able to vote to remove that person from their job. But that is fine and they say Trump is meddling with his political opponents, it's fucking clown world!

5
rx1994z 5 points ago +5 / -0

well said friend

1
undefined 1 point ago +1 / -0

I say let them participate. It keeps them off the campaign trail and gives him tons of ammo for the debates.

“You called for an investigation into me, your political opponent - for calling for investigations into political opponents”.

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
6
shadypollster 6 points ago +6 / -0

I read this in Biden's voice. Lets resolve this outside fatso.

9
magaspif 9 points ago +9 / -0

Oh, this is so good.

Either these 5 'crat Senators get stuck in the trial, unable to campaign, or the house dems vote against this resolution. Bahaha.

6
Highwheeler6 6 points ago +6 / -0

No Democrat will ever do the right thing. Period.

2
Notme 2 points ago +2 / -0

They don't even do periods right.

2
Jebus454 2 points ago +2 / -0

I thought the idea was to tie them up in hearings and have the ability to question them under oath? I don't understand how letting them off that hook would be helpful to us.

2
Gilliais 2 points ago +2 / -0

I’d rather they be recused. It is the ultimate hypocrisy for them to vote to oust the incumbent they are running against. It’d be real election interference. Let em campaign at their sparsely attended campaign stops.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
3
SuperSilly 3 points ago +3 / -0

GEOTUS won't be the only one campaigning. Mayor Pete, Bloomenthal, and Biden will still be out there mucking shit up.