Some sites don't allow posting entire articles. Not sure which, but NY Slimes is probably one of them. Better to archive it on the archive site and post a link to that.
spez_this - Yeah, I agree + Ack... didn't fillet the article too much, but I thought the news of Barr releasing this supplemental information (on short notice) was significant and the NYT's spin on this - like CS did not receive an opportunity to review in advance was really comical. Always good to read the opposition and that they actually reported on this.
spez_this - Yeah, I agree + Ack... didn't fillet the article too much, but I thought the news of Barr releasing this supplemental information (on short notice) was significant and the NYT's spin on this - like CS did not receive an opportunity to review in advance was really comical. Always good to read the opposition and that they actually reported on this.
@spez_this - Yeah, I agree + Ack... didn't fillet the article too much, but I thought the news of Barr releasing this supplemental information (on short notice) was significant and the NYT's spin on this - like CS did not receive an opportunity to review in advance was really comical. Always good to read the opposition and that they actually reported on this.
@spez_this - Yeah, I agree + Ack... didn't fillet the article too much, but I thought the news of Barr releasing this supplemental information (on short notice) was significant and the NYT's spin on this - like CS did not receive an opportunity to review in advance was really comical. Always good to read the opposition and that they actually reported on this.
Brookings institution anyone? This link Freaked Out the Deep State
https://thedonald.win/p/3nNfIXZ/we-the-people-march-on-kstreet-i/
Some sites don't allow posting entire articles. Not sure which, but NY Slimes is probably one of them. Better to archive it on the archive site and post a link to that.
Just a suggestion: When I see an article on the NY Slimes or Washington Compost I always check to see if the info is posted somewhere else:
https://www.rightwingreview.com/politics/barr-allows-for-release-of-additional-details-about-ex-spy-behind-steele-dossier/
spez_this - Yeah, I agree + Ack... didn't fillet the article too much, but I thought the news of Barr releasing this supplemental information (on short notice) was significant and the NYT's spin on this - like CS did not receive an opportunity to review in advance was really comical. Always good to read the opposition and that they actually reported on this.
spez_this - Yeah, I agree + Ack... didn't fillet the article too much, but I thought the news of Barr releasing this supplemental information (on short notice) was significant and the NYT's spin on this - like CS did not receive an opportunity to review in advance was really comical. Always good to read the opposition and that they actually reported on this.
@spez_this - Yeah, I agree + Ack... didn't fillet the article too much, but I thought the news of Barr releasing this supplemental information (on short notice) was significant and the NYT's spin on this - like CS did not receive an opportunity to review in advance was really comical. Always good to read the opposition and that they actually reported on this.
@spez_this - Yeah, I agree + Ack... didn't fillet the article too much, but I thought the news of Barr releasing this supplemental information (on short notice) was significant and the NYT's spin on this - like CS did not receive an opportunity to review in advance was really comical. Always good to read the opposition and that they actually reported on this.