Assuming that the information is true, why does it matter from where the info was sourced? Is it legal if it came from an ally? If it's illegal to come from an "enemy" nation, how do we define an "enemy nation"? What if it was originally discovered by an enemy nation, but was later (perhaps through spying) obtained by an allied nation, who then forwarded it to us? This entire democrat/media line of argument is pure bullshit. How am I wrong?
Comments (3)
sorted by:
I don't think you are, the truth is the truth regardless of where it comes from...
I think these idiots like to try and alter the meaning of truth altogether and act like it's something that needs to be notarized in triplicate with a trail of forms surrounding it.
The demoncrats are afraid of getting caught doing the same thing first and are trying to deflect that. Quid Pro Joe is called that for a reason and that name fits him perfectly.