>Graham's reading of cartoonishly biased texts from the key people who committed all the errors (that just happened to run uniformly in the anti-Trump direction)as pretty tactically smart.
I was hoping this would start getting some traction. There were 17 errors in the FISA applications, which were brushed off due to "poor training". Ok, the FBI isn't as good as it use to be, I guess. However, if it was due to only incompetence, then we would expect essentially coin-flip odds on whether it was detrimental or beneficial to DJT. That is, they would be just as likely to fuck up in his favor as to his disadvantage. Instead, 17 errors that just so happened to be unfavorable. The odds of that are 2^-17 , assuming 50/50 chance for each incident. That's less than one in 131,000. While not impossible, of course, but personally, if I saw a coin hit heads 17 times in a row, I would suspect it was weighted. Or, in other words, there was a bias that affected the outcome
Very thorough summary. I hate watching videos, so love to see this kind of summary. Very little personal opinion, if any, was inserted, just a basic review of what was said.
>Graham's reading of cartoonishly biased texts from the key people who committed all the errors (that just happened to run uniformly in the anti-Trump direction)as pretty tactically smart.
I was hoping this would start getting some traction. There were 17 errors in the FISA applications, which were brushed off due to "poor training". Ok, the FBI isn't as good as it use to be, I guess. However, if it was due to only incompetence, then we would expect essentially coin-flip odds on whether it was detrimental or beneficial to DJT. That is, they would be just as likely to fuck up in his favor as to his disadvantage. Instead, 17 errors that just so happened to be unfavorable. The odds of that are 2^-17 , assuming 50/50 chance for each incident. That's less than one in 131,000. While not impossible, of course, but personally, if I saw a coin hit heads 17 times in a row, I would suspect it was weighted. Or, in other words, there was a bias that affected the outcome
I liked the way Rush summed up his report:
"Everyone we interviewed said they had no bias"
Excellent because it's pretty much what went down
Very thorough summary. I hate watching videos, so love to see this kind of summary. Very little personal opinion, if any, was inserted, just a basic review of what was said.