And the checks for the cash were each $99,999,999.99 to stay under the 0NE HUNDRED MILLION DOLLAR cap on the president's discretionary spending limit... He cut 17 checks for the cash designed to thwart his limits... An abuse of power... And money laundering.
Comments (71)
sorted by:
source?
Ahhh Remembering Obama Abuse of Office...Obama cuts 170 $99,999,999.99 checks... So why were the payments kept just a penny under $100m? To avoid caps on discretionary spending imposed by Congress... Dennis Hastert in prison for "structuring".
More questions were raised last week over the $1.3 billion. Strangely, the money was delivered to the mullahs in 13 installments of $99,999,999.99 drawn from a special State Department account known as the Judgment Fund. State can dip into the account to pay foreign claims against the U.S. without getting congressional approval.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/obama-buys-iran-privacy-at-99-999-99999-a-pop
You're not a libtard for asking for a source. Don't be an ass.
the link is the link to the story. just click on it.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/obama-buys-iran-privacy-at-99-999-99999-a-pop
Wow to sound like a fucking liberal for berating someone asking for a source. Are we about facts or faggy hivemind opinions like r/politics? Fucking lame ass
Some people are too lazy to google or duck duck...
That's true. But, some people waste our time with clickbait and propaganda. Without a source it's just noise. No reason why your source couldn't be linked in the original submission, or for a poster to have to ask for it.
Yup... I give them a little then tell them to go look themselves with whatever keywords. People are lazy and Lazy is how we got Obama
If you make a claim it's not up to me to go prove it for you. That burden is on you. SOme people are too lazy to support the claims they make. Usually libtards.
Yeah they are