884
Comments (30)
sorted by:
26
OrangeManBased 26 points ago +26 / -0

The Babylon Bee newsroom is probably the happiest place in all of media.

19
Cue_Cumber 19 points ago +19 / -0

Since they're a parody site, I don't think you can say it's a "newsroom" exactly . . . but whatever it is, I'm pretty sure that, yeah, it's a happy, fun- and laughter-filled place!

7
nanowerx 7 points ago +7 / -0

Lets be real, The Bee is more accurate news than the 'real' guys.

I swear they just wear the parody label so they dont get sued

18
polish_snausage 18 points ago +18 / -0

Is obstructing congress a thing? Or did they make it up?

17
YDS2016 [S] 17 points ago +17 / -0

they're making up everything these days so..

14
Belleoffreedom 14 points ago +14 / -0

They made it up. It's new. For some reason, they couldn't quite agree on the real term, which is "obstruction of justice," (for which there is no basis).

6
RedBloodedFather 6 points ago +6 / -0

It's as real as a third gender.

3
Justpeachy 3 points ago +3 / -0

It’s the technical term for “orange man bad”

3
pjabrony 3 points ago +3 / -0

"Contempt of justice...or obstructing Congress...or something."

15
bgovern 15 points ago +15 / -0

Hey guys....Super serious fact checker here. This MAY be a satirical news story. I've got a team of reporters who will call the White House to confirm as soon as they are done getting to the bottom of the Trump boxing picture and the picture of the president giving the dog a medal. Our highly accredited team of journalists has determined those pictures may have been altered. You can tell by the pixels.

5
YDS2016 [S] 5 points ago +5 / -0

Evan? Is that you?

9
LaughingMan 9 points ago +10 / -1

How did he "obstruct congress"? Trump even released transcripts of the call, which he didn't legally have to do. Because he declined to participate with interviews with the committee? There was no legal reason for Trump to comply to requests for an interview.

5
YDS2016 [S] 5 points ago +6 / -1

It's a parody site. You know, humor?

7
Belleoffreedom 7 points ago +7 / -0

But the Democrats are actually trying to impeach the US President for "obstruction of Congress."

3
YDS2016 [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

So can we then impeach them for attempted "obstuction of elections" ?

5
Southern_Belle 5 points ago +5 / -0

Or obstruction of the executive branch?

3
YDS2016 [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

Actually, both apply.

3
DanIsSwell 3 points ago +3 / -0

He didn’t let them dump a bucket of hot diarrhea on his head.

4
Licensetomeme 4 points ago +4 / -0

"Libertarians were smoking weed and didn't seem to understand the question.". Lmfao, I love the Babylon Bee.

4
suzookus 4 points ago +4 / -0

Pencilneck could have taken those White House officials to court to get them to testify. It was planned to not too so they had at least one fake article of obstruction.

3
YDS2016 [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

Whoa.. I made the front page! Makes me feel all comfy and cozy.. like I found a new home here on TD.WIN!

3
MAGAyote 3 points ago +3 / -0

I learned from Galagher (watermelon smashing comedian) that congress was the opposite of progress so why isnt this a good thing?

2
YDS2016 [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

They (Congress) are like a baby with a hammer. The mother doesn't know what the baby is going to do with the hammer, and the lord himself doesn't know. That is the trouble with Congress when they are in session.

  • Will Rogers
1
Licensetomeme 1 point ago +1 / -0

Etymologically, it's a conjunction of con-artist and regression.

2
Grindelwald 2 points ago +2 / -0

Obstructing Congress is all of our duty.

2
bubblegummy 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hahaha.... BEST OBSTRUCTION EVER!

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Calabash 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's good!

2
Yucky 2 points ago +2 / -0

The Bee always delivers!

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0