22
posted ago by Bubtwilu ago by Bubtwilu +22 / -0

Underlying all of this peach mints activity is this one major corruption: Many US congressmen are stealing US taxpayer dollars by laundering them through other countries disquised as aid. This is what we should be most upset about. While our deficient grows, our infrastructure suffers, and our veterans, homeless, and other worthy causes scrap for crumbs, politicians accumulate great wealth, not from their salaries, but from kickbacks from countires through their children, charities, or other means.

Now, as we hoped that when peach mints reached the senate, all of this corruption would be officially recognized, the Bidens would be called to testify, Hillary would have to account for the Clinton Foundation, Schiffy Schiff would have to to under oath to lie about his lies, we hear Lindsey say he wants to end it immediately with no witnesses.

While disguisihing this by saying he is doing the President and the country a favor since it is a sham, he wants to end it quickly and give it no merit. But what he really wants is to protect himself and others, on both sides, from further exposure to the money laundering that apparently he also enjoys.

I think to truly drain the swamp, Trump will have to burn it all down. I fear we cannot trust the Senate to do it. Too many are involved, paid off, being blackmailed, or scared.

As taxpayers, maybe we should sue the US for the laundered money amounts to force it to come to light?

Ok, I'm ranting and I am sure my facts may not be completely sound. But as happy as I will be to see the Senate end this thing, I will also be disappointed that the corruption will contine and criminals will continue to walk away freely with our tax money.

Comments (2)
sorted by:
2
masedit 2 points ago +2 / -0

No. They want a quick hearing because an in depth hearing will expose all of their involvement in Ukraine taxpayer money laundering.

Let's ask Mitt about Ukraine.

1
MagicCarpetBurns 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's NOT just Ukraine, they shakedown almost every aid package & expenditure they do, Insider trading is but a fraction compared to kickback from Billions in "aid".

consider too that they only get to keep a % of the rip-offs, they are expected to funnel $ to the upkeep of the machine.

I mean really, how did Obama actually get all the cash on those pallets for Iran ?

Now you KNOW !