614
Neither Ciaramella nor the lawyers for the “whistleblower” have denied that it’s him, so Senate Republicans should assume it is, and they should make him testify. (www.washingtonexaminer.com)
posted ago by Sea_Still ago by Sea_Still +614 / -0
7 comments
7 comments share save hide report block hide child comments
Comments (7)
sorted by:
▲ 8 ▼
– ncmarc 8 points ago +8 / -0

They should have just asked a witness, do you know who Ciaramella is? and watch schiff have a meltdown. Then say, you mentioned this witness in the CBS document dump, we are quoting a name that YOU released!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– ERIC_CIARAMELLA 3 points ago +3 / -0

LEAVE ME ALONE

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– AtariArtist 3 points ago +3 / -0

Pfft. I'm with Scott Adams. Don't give the media anymore fucking fuel.

Tell them fuck off, this is bullshit, Game Over.

Save any witnesses for when Adam Shit is put on trial.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Cutter 1 point ago +1 / -0

Now THAT I would watch.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– DLane1 2 points ago +2 / -0

Make him testify anyway. He is supposedly a Ukraine "expert"

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– CanadianMeathead 1 point ago +1 / -0

With the position that he held, he seems like someone they would want to talk to anyway.

Bring him in, put him under oath and go get him. He pleads the 5th the entire time.

permalink save report block reply