160
Comments (13)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
4
ArtGuy [S] 4 points ago +4 / -0

He is saying the House should remove the second article of impeachment immediately.

3
MAGAlikethis 3 points ago +3 / -0

Because you don't have to comply with a Congressional subpoena for financial records unless the court tells you to, is that right? The entire basis of the second article was "obstruction" because refusal to comply with that subpoena?