42
Comments (39)
sorted by:
8
DigitalWarrior 8 points ago +11 / -3

Taking 1 hour and doing some research will show you that Trump and team are trying to talk to everyone and this is the method they chose. Its an information war going on right now and the least we all can do is hear what there is to be said.

5
Lurker32 5 points ago +7 / -2

☝️This. Code. 100% talking to anons

5
deleted 5 points ago +7 / -2
2
FamburgerHelper 2 points ago +3 / -1

Gay people make up less than 5% of the US population yet GIANT corporations like Monsanto, Comcast, American Airlines, McDonald's all fly the rainbow flag during an entire month devoted to the gay cause. Twice as many people who are gay believe in Q. That's not insignificant.

I personally am too skeptical, I still don't know what Q is, but if it turned out to be true, I would rejoice. What an amazing story.

Michael Moore & Rosie O'Donnell making the beast with two backs if Q was what some purport it to be.

7
PitStains 7 points ago +10 / -3

I’ve been off and on watching Q stuff. It comes down to the same theory about Prophets; you make enough predictions one of them will come true., Or in this case, have enough people thoroughly analyzing every word/letter/number/symbol, you will make connections to anything.

7
Isaiah53 7 points ago +8 / -1

I definitely lean in this direction.

Just look at the horoscope industry. They collectively make tens of millions each year and, for what? Cryptic generalizations which eager consumers are more than willing to give a WIDE margin of error, and will actively seek to force conjecture to fit reality.

If Q were a person or persons with real info, they would simply dump it, like the Podesta or Clinton emails. The cryptic bullshit leaves everything open to individual interpretation.

Which is the point of monetizing this crap.

4
deleted 4 points ago +6 / -2
6
High_Energy 6 points ago +6 / -0

Too few explanations.

7
runonce 7 points ago +8 / -1

I liked finding Shia Labeouf's flag better. To each his own.

4
amicuscodex 4 points ago +4 / -0

That was glorious.

4
FamburgerHelper 4 points ago +4 / -0

he will nut inside us

4
deleted 4 points ago +5 / -1
4
deleted 4 points ago +6 / -2
7
Lurker32 7 points ago +8 / -1

No error. Spelling counts. By design

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
4
ArtGuy 4 points ago +4 / -0

Not only that, but intentionally kerned together to look like an m.

2
Belleoffreedom 2 points ago +2 / -0

Happens all the time when documents are converted to .pdf, scanned, and then re-converted so that text is copyable and searchable.

This is nothing but a common glitch that has been spotted and (maybe) taken advantage go by the kind of people who alter emails in order to get a judge's signature.

4
ProudAmerican 4 points ago +4 / -0

Definitely not an error, but it doesn’t mean Q has insight that isn’t readily available. It’s not a miracle, just good information mixed with hypothesis.

-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
3
Isaiah53 3 points ago +5 / -2

From what 2 leakers on the chans have said, Q is a group of data trackers, who monetized their probability outcome larp from the get-go.

6
Lurker32 6 points ago +8 / -2

So how have they gotten Oval Office pics , potus pen , timed tweets from potus and q drops within minutes, and Airforce 1 pics. The leakers are the larps is my guess

6
BarrBQ 6 points ago +7 / -1

This is what gets me. Sure, it's easy to point out all the happenings that never happened... but I can't bring myself to simply dismiss all the shit that is waaaaay to convenient to be coincudence.

5
DigitalWarrior 5 points ago +7 / -2

OK, and I guess they are in the DOJ dropping documents too right? Think logically. That idea doesnt hold up to the first reply you just got.

5
deleted 5 points ago +6 / -1
2
1eyeameye1 2 points ago +2 / -0

How about jfk was killed at 1:29p DC time?

2
ProudAmerican 2 points ago +3 / -1

I can’t trust anyone that puts an aftermarket, Casio level, rubber band on a $6,000 IWC Portuguese. In all seriousness, please look up the word conjecture. It might help you understand the phenomenon that is Q.

3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
4
user6395 4 points ago +5 / -1

Some people are not ready to break from the Matrix, that is all.

4
bubblegummy 4 points ago +5 / -1

Those two leakers don't know Q.

1
Eljefe 1 point ago +2 / -1

I haven't seen anyone mention the fact that the IG report is in PDF format, with blurry text, and text search is relying on image recognition which is not perfect.

With that said, there is still some weird shit going on.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
0
Qb_Valkyrie 0 points ago +1 / -1

It’s amazing how sentiments have changed. Was Spez the real cause for skepticism?

2
somethingnew 2 points ago +3 / -1

Nah, Q is larp and always has been. One thread where a bunch of Q tards congregate doesn't change that.

Remember the TrUsT SeSsIoNs, TrUsT wRaY BS.

Prior to that it was TrUsT MuElLer. It was and always has been a bunch of vague BS that a bunch of people got duped into believing.

If Trump wanted to communicate something, he'd do it publicly. There is no logical reason for this Q crap.

If it is secret messages that Trump wants to convey to the masses and hide from the deep state, it would not work. If you can figure it out, so can a whole lot of other people.

0
Juggs_DreDD 0 points ago +1 / -1

People believe when they put the pieces together themselves. The point is to get people to think instead of parrot. We have been trained to memorize and parrot for years. This method of information delivery forces people to think and break the conditioning that is present in education, social media, entertainment, news, etc.

1
somethingnew 1 point ago +2 / -1

The only people putting the pieces together are already believers. It is not like a bunch of fence sitters or liberals are following this Q BS, so that does not make any sense.

Putting out a bunch of cryptic messages on /pol no less, does not really help anyone break any kind of conditioning.

1
Juggs_DreDD 1 point ago +1 / -0

The number of people following has grown tremendously and they then disseminate that information to others, who can then check the veracity of the claims themselves. Humans are mostly unconscious creatures of habit, easily conditioned. Making some do the work themselves to be proven correct later then makes them credible voices when the truth becomes widely known so they can help the others understand. This is a mass awakening and some will take longer than others to overcome our nature in the very comfy lives we live.

1
somethingnew 1 point ago +1 / -0

If accuracy is not 100%, there will be more doubters than believers. and your larper's accuracy is at best ~50%. Notice no one came by to dispute that Q started with believe Sessions, Wray and Mueller BS.

Now first, you are not addressing my points you are just reading off of some script. Second, your point was that people would believe more if they do the work themselves. That only would be true if we start from the point that the source is some anonymous person.

Way more people would believe this information if it came from someone credible and in the know, like someone from the Trump administration. More people would follow it, and it would not require these cryptic messages that need to be interpreted.

Hell, if this Q was not a larper, he would just come out and say things in black and white and without any of this cryptic crap. If it pans out, it would spread way more since people would be more likely to believe it.

Example, gives a cryptic message about corn being harvested, and other BS. IG report drops and Comey is spelled Corney. People will easily dismiss it as just a coincidence.

vs.

come out and say that Comey's name will be spelled Corney in the IG report and give a hint or two about his involvement. A few days later, the report gets released and everyone sees that it accurate. Much harder to dismiss it.

Therefore, accurate and to the point predictions would bring far more followers and spread the message than this cryptic BS.

1
Juggs_DreDD 1 point ago +1 / -0

People have to learn to discern the truth for themselves instead of depending on an authority figure to tell them what is true. There will always be skeptics. Skepticism is a fine tool in discernment but is often applied too broadly and becomes reflexive dismissal.

0
wethepepe 0 points ago +2 / -2

It's always interesting to watch how info found through Q questions gradually seeps into the main

If Q is bs or not it doesn't really matter. Whatever it is, it's helping people find and expose really odd connections. That's not the worst thing people could be doing with their time!