999
Comments (23)
sorted by:
20
DeepStateEnemy 20 points ago +21 / -1

The FISA Court is in on the coup.

11
goldentomatoes1 11 points ago +11 / -0

They clearly don't care if anyone knows either. Otherwise, they would attempt to right the wrong.

9
betterlivinglinux 9 points ago +9 / -0

they have had a plenty of time to act...they are complicit and perhaps a bit scared with Nunes threatening to close the court.

6
fthecoup 6 points ago +6 / -0

This

6
buco 6 points ago +6 / -0

And who is the head of the FISA court? Deep State Roberts.

3
CQVFEFE 3 points ago +3 / -0

Correct

Another justice for Trump to replace!

11
Babycakes 11 points ago +11 / -0

another useless court with crooks as judges.

6
Gramma53 6 points ago +6 / -0

Kimberly is the best!

6
OneOfMany_MAGA 6 points ago +6 / -0

In the meantime send us hundreds of thousands of new spy requests for us to rubber stamp.

4
deleted 4 points ago +5 / -1
4
Shark_FL 4 points ago +4 / -0

because the court is corrupt and complicit in a coup de etat

4
Covfefe_Crusader 4 points ago +4 / -0

Gee golly, shucks I guess everyone is really extra super sorry so that makes it alllll better! Unless recognizable names in great quantity start getting locked up in cages then none of this has any fucking point at all.

4
MAGAnic316 4 points ago +4 / -0

Swampy court decides to be swampy ?‍♂️

4
MAG_n_KAG 4 points ago +4 / -0

Because theyre fucking in on it.

3
iClue 3 points ago +3 / -0

Shut this fucking shit down.

3
learntocode 3 points ago +3 / -0

That is because the FISA court was designed to be an end run around our civil rights, our actual courts, the rule of law, and to allow unelected police-state goons to destroy anyone at any time for any reason or no reason and face zero consequences. Repeal the friggin' Patriot Act, close these baloney "fusion centers", and do what the FBI could not do: prosecute terrorists as criminals and not "enemy combatants".

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
DudeNoOne 2 points ago +2 / -0

Get rid of them both

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
draintheswamp 2 points ago +2 / -0

At a minimum, as a start, contempt of court: arresting all those who signed. Judge can do that all by herself.

1
Belleoffreedom 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oh, I disagree. Look at the timeline. Look also at the requirement to say how this will be fixed and when, or say why the could should believe anything they say.

And look at the timeline, again. Those dates are for January.

Then consider that the court is publishing the application, its order, and in that will be a description of what happened.

1
Lordnigel 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’m shocked, SHOCKED!

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0