763
Comments (27)
sorted by:
12
Rodger 12 points ago +12 / -0

Better yet let's just Immediately Nullify Pelosi, Shiff, Naddler, Schumer & their posse.

11
Selph 11 points ago +11 / -0

NO!!! Go forward with the trial. Get Pelosi, Nadler, Hunter/Joe Biden, Eric Ciaramella, Schiff, Fusion Gps, and all the other swamp rats in UNDER OATH. If they are so headstrong to fight this to the senate let them drown in their own swamp in the process.

4
nothingberg 4 points ago +4 / -0

No! The First Witness should be IMRAN AWAN

3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
1
minotaurbeach 1 point ago +1 / -0

They are already being investigated, one by one. Biden will give up the other ones, and Trumps Election hardly hit a bump in the road.

6
CliveCook1 6 points ago +6 / -0

Why is he waiting?

2
Mark2 2 points ago +2 / -0

My understanding is that it'll require a vote to change the rules in order to take up the trial without having formally received it by the house. Changing rules is tricky business. I, for one, would be very careful about what precedent is being set in dealing with a rogue speaker of the house.

1
CliveCook1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Does he have to 'take up the trial' to nullify the impeachment?

1
minotaurbeach 1 point ago +1 / -0

No, it will die in the next process

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
5
xxxMAGA420xxx 5 points ago +5 / -0

Taking the "Impeachment isn't valid" path is more dangerous to Trump than simply acquitting him in the Senate.

The democrats have already shown that they don't care what the law or rules say and are willing to disregard them as long as it pushes their agenda. If something is "dead," they can simply vote to make it not dead and then pass impeachment later if they ever get control of the Senate.

A more recent example that is likely to be in the 2020 election cycle is the Equal Rights Amendment to the US Constitution that was suppose to be dead as of 1982, but the Obama appointed leader of the National Archives is continuing to certify votes for the constitutional amendment, and will likely be added to the US Constitution when Virginia reconvenes its general assembly in 2020, unless republicans can stop them in the courts. https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/dec/19/jason-ravnsborg-equal-rights-amendment-lawsuit-tee/

I posted the above to show how democrats operate, so they might claim defeat now, just to bring impeachment back later when they are in power.

Trump's best way forward is to get his trial done and over with.

5
deleted 5 points ago +6 / -1
4
Suth2984 4 points ago +4 / -0

Nah, take it to trial and tie up 3 of the dem presidential candidates for months. Nancy will shit her pants when 2 of the leading candidates cant campaign coz they are duty bound to sit in an impeachment trial.

3
daty_dato 3 points ago +3 / -0

Levin's great but he's wrong in this case. Legally right, politically way off.

This needs to play out for a while into January. The heat will rise on Pelosi to act as all their members get slammed on why this isn't moving forward to remove Orange Man Bad. They can't explain this or their plans to their base if they actually have any.

2
Wearyman 2 points ago +2 / -0

This. Be patient, Pedes. Let the pot have time to simmer. The longer this charade goes on the more the hysterical lefties will have time to boil over and demand Nancy deliver the articles to the Senate.

ESPECIALLY if we keep up the pressure with the little nugget that Trump isn't actually impeached until those articles are delivered. The far left WILL NOT TOLERATE that!

3
Gryphoenix 3 points ago +4 / -1

Amen!

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Winning420 2 points ago +2 / -0

Cocaine Mitch knows how to play the game. He told the media he doesnt see this trial taking very long. He scared Pelosi into delaying impeachment bc it's the left's 'big play' for 2020. Mitch coerced the Dems to continue assuming responsibility for impeachment, which is wildly helpful for Trump (both in polls and fundraising). Pelosi overplayed her hand (trying to accommodate her base and party), let this play out. It only hurts the Dems. At some point, Twitter will realize that it has to go to trail before Trump is removed.

2
RealRedneck 2 points ago +2 / -0

NOPE. There has to be a process for the Senate to bring charges against the Speaker. Namely "Abuse of Power" and Obstruction of Congress" ... exactly what Pelosi is now doing!

2
Mark2 2 points ago +2 / -0

Our constitutional republic is in grave danger if Pelosi gets away with this.

2
trumpismypresident 2 points ago +2 / -0

Game, Set, Match!

2
Babycakes 2 points ago +2 / -0

TAKE IT TO TRIAL asap. WHO CARE IF NANCYSHITS HER PANTS.

2
try4gain 2 points ago +2 / -0

I truly hope this happens. Dems are going to shit their panties.

2
Cue_Cumber 2 points ago +2 / -0

According to some Leftist Harvard law professor, as quoted in the NYT, unless Nancy delivers the articles (the indictment) to the Senate (the court), POTUS is not legally impeached (indicted). However, if she does deliver them, then the Senate has made it clear they will acquit, lengthy trial or not. She has effectively trapped herself. She thought by holding them back, she was gaining leverage over the Senate. But it turns out, she has NO leverage, either way.

But of course. This is what happens when you cave in to the radical Commie hijackers in your party. They're idiots who destroy everything they touch, and now they've destroyed the Democrats (who didn't see that coming? Oh, right. Democrats.) No sympathy here.

Communism is among the most vicious, vacuous, idiotic and pathetic of ideologies, if it can even be said to rise to the level of an ideology; it's really just a con game. If it doesn't lie, cheat, rob and murder its way into power, it never gains it, because no sane people with any real understanding and grasp of history choose such nonsense.

That's why communism has to destroy education, culture, history, etc -- to dumb down populaces sufficiently so they can con them into supporting them. If that doesn't work, they start murdering people by the millions, thus terrorizing whoever is left into submission. (Their main genocidal weapon seems to be famine).

The main con? "Those guys are too rich! We'll redistribute their wealth!", appealing to and exploiting the basest human qualities of greed and envy. What they never say out loud: "We're going to redistribute ALL the wealth to ourselves and reduce everyone else to slaves dwelling in the most dire poverty."

Yeah. That generally won't sell.

1
Babycakes 1 point ago +1 / -0

better yet nullify immediately PELOSIM SCHUFF, NADLER, SCHUMER AND THE REST OF THE DEMS.

1
Batch77 1 point ago +2 / -1

He will, he is just letting the idiot hang more dems.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Logan051361 1 point ago +1 / -0

The Question is Why the fuck hasnt Mitch done this yet?