Please explain what form of free speech you consider to be vandalism?
Also, please explain who is best to decide what opinions you are I are allowed to be exposed to? Is it you? Is it me? Is it a jihadist or an atheist or a Talmudic Jew or the most prudish person in the room?
A lot of what I see over there is there same things I see kids do in chat in games, which is try to be edgy.
Sorry, but of all people who post "questionable" stuff, anti-Semites come off as the least serious and most troll-like. They all come off as someone trying to make an augment in a way that makes the author look like a moron on purpose. I think 90% of it is trolling. Hence the vandalism claim.
Feel free to think as you please, but I too wonder who you would give the authority to. Do all people not have a right to their own opinion? Do my thought need to attain popularity before I am allowed to have them? Share them?
What is it exactly you are advocating for?
To me it seems any attempt at controlling the ability for free people to communicate is the very essence of tyranny.
A free people must be allowed to question the official stories.
Please explain what form of free speech you consider to be vandalism?
Also, please explain who is best to decide what opinions you are I are allowed to be exposed to? Is it you? Is it me? Is it a jihadist or an atheist or a Talmudic Jew or the most prudish person in the room?
A lot of what I see over there is there same things I see kids do in chat in games, which is try to be edgy.
Sorry, but of all people who post "questionable" stuff, anti-Semites come off as the least serious and most troll-like. They all come off as someone trying to make an augment in a way that makes the author look like a moron on purpose. I think 90% of it is trolling. Hence the vandalism claim.
Feel free to think as you please, but I too wonder who you would give the authority to. Do all people not have a right to their own opinion? Do my thought need to attain popularity before I am allowed to have them? Share them?
What is it exactly you are advocating for?
To me it seems any attempt at controlling the ability for free people to communicate is the very essence of tyranny.
A free people must be allowed to question the official stories.
I'm guessing the fifth one is the one to watch out for.