Edit: also, I don't feel the need to agree with everything Trump does. And, who knows, I could be wrong about something. That's the first step to good communication and trust. Though, I just say, "I'll have to think about that" rather than admit defeat as I may find out I was right or think of a response later on!
Edit2: never feel like you have to stay until the end if a conversation gets angry. Never let them lead you away from your good, first point. Don't just resound to whatever red meat / red herring they throw out. Don't rush to reply. Stop, get up, give yourself 5 minutes. Don't just shoot off in anger and repent at leisure. Etc.
Edit3: read old books, read theory, Ben Shapiro has many good articles about debating them well. But, just knowing both sides of an argument should be the starting point for any seeker of truth.
Impeachment would take a day to unpack so I avoid that. Wall, what the hell? Better that he is trying than them calling for open borders. Before Trump, I remember, nobody had the balls. And, its not like groups aren't looking up to stop new construction.
Basically, I'm not going to give away all my secrets but just approach them like I would any other human. If they present with aggression, I take a deep breath and remind them that we watch different news sources THOUGH I probably watch more from their side than they do of mine and so who's really the informed one? They slow down when I start mentioning the names and history of their trusted news anchors and secret honeycomb hideout podcasts, like, oh sh!t, respect, this guy knows more about my argument and more details of lib history than me. That's always fun. Helps that I used to be super activist liberal for years so know their arguments inside out and how shallow they are.
There's this quote that I'll leave you with, about science, that I think applies here.
Person one knows nothing about science and so doubts it.
Person two knows a little about science and so defends it shrilly.
Person three knows a lot about science and so doubts it.
The only people I'd waste my breath on is relatives that I care about.
The rest can hang.
If it's kinda like a debate with other peeps listening, then touch the raw nerve to get them spitting & sputtering, and walk away, aka get them to call you a nazi LOL... at this point, it's doubtful we're changing many minds, the camps are clearly set.
IE: if the partisan shampeachment isn't opening eyes, nuthin' will....
Moar better to organize rides to voting stations, and getting folks registered, as well as signing up to be a state voting watchdog via the local GOP & or the sec of state...IMHO...
An argument I make is that the impeachment / Spygate / all the other attacks on Trump is nothing more than smokescreen to hide the fact that the democrats ran a SPYRING out of congress that sold state secrets and did much much more.
This argument cannot be defeated because it's true
IMRAN AWAN exists, and was a spy and DID in fact take terabytes of intelligence he wasn't entitled to see from the HSPCI and sent it overseas. IE he committed espionage.
And yet he walks around a free man, because he's blackmailed the democrats
They have run all this crap on trump to hide this fact
That they are 100% compromised
That they are evil
and that they 100% failed the people of the US and cannot erase this fact
IN fact, they are guilty of a felony called misprision of a felony and misprision of treason. This is the tip of the iceberg of tehir crimes
One could argue easily that this smokescreen for the awans called 'impeach 45' is a treason, a conspiracy to overthrow the US government
Bookmark it. Share it: https://www.snowflakevictory.com/
Hey Ho! Thank you "Trump4a3rdTerm' that is a very good like you posted. Just what OP has requested, and now I have some MORE ammo!
Edit: also, I don't feel the need to agree with everything Trump does. And, who knows, I could be wrong about something. That's the first step to good communication and trust. Though, I just say, "I'll have to think about that" rather than admit defeat as I may find out I was right or think of a response later on!
Edit2: never feel like you have to stay until the end if a conversation gets angry. Never let them lead you away from your good, first point. Don't just resound to whatever red meat / red herring they throw out. Don't rush to reply. Stop, get up, give yourself 5 minutes. Don't just shoot off in anger and repent at leisure. Etc.
Edit3: read old books, read theory, Ben Shapiro has many good articles about debating them well. But, just knowing both sides of an argument should be the starting point for any seeker of truth.
Impeachment would take a day to unpack so I avoid that. Wall, what the hell? Better that he is trying than them calling for open borders. Before Trump, I remember, nobody had the balls. And, its not like groups aren't looking up to stop new construction.
Basically, I'm not going to give away all my secrets but just approach them like I would any other human. If they present with aggression, I take a deep breath and remind them that we watch different news sources THOUGH I probably watch more from their side than they do of mine and so who's really the informed one? They slow down when I start mentioning the names and history of their trusted news anchors and secret honeycomb hideout podcasts, like, oh sh!t, respect, this guy knows more about my argument and more details of lib history than me. That's always fun. Helps that I used to be super activist liberal for years so know their arguments inside out and how shallow they are.
There's this quote that I'll leave you with, about science, that I think applies here.
Person one knows nothing about science and so doubts it.
Person two knows a little about science and so defends it shrilly.
Person three knows a lot about science and so doubts it.
Why argue ?
The only people I'd waste my breath on is relatives that I care about.
The rest can hang.
If it's kinda like a debate with other peeps listening, then touch the raw nerve to get them spitting & sputtering, and walk away, aka get them to call you a nazi LOL... at this point, it's doubtful we're changing many minds, the camps are clearly set.
IE: if the partisan shampeachment isn't opening eyes, nuthin' will....
Moar better to organize rides to voting stations, and getting folks registered, as well as signing up to be a state voting watchdog via the local GOP & or the sec of state...IMHO...
An argument I make is that the impeachment / Spygate / all the other attacks on Trump is nothing more than smokescreen to hide the fact that the democrats ran a SPYRING out of congress that sold state secrets and did much much more.
This argument cannot be defeated because it's true
IMRAN AWAN exists, and was a spy and DID in fact take terabytes of intelligence he wasn't entitled to see from the HSPCI and sent it overseas. IE he committed espionage.
And yet he walks around a free man, because he's blackmailed the democrats
They have run all this crap on trump to hide this fact
That they are 100% compromised
That they are evil
and that they 100% failed the people of the US and cannot erase this fact
IN fact, they are guilty of a felony called misprision of a felony and misprision of treason. This is the tip of the iceberg of tehir crimes
One could argue easily that this smokescreen for the awans called 'impeach 45' is a treason, a conspiracy to overthrow the US government
It is exactly as it appears to be
here is a research nexus containing all the links you need to verify what I'm saying is in fact true
it's a crime that MSM didn't report this
Walls have worked for thousands of years and work today.
Impeachment means nothing if its 100% partisan, and it is. 5 democrats voted to impeach Clinton. 0 Republicans voted to impeach Trump.
What is this? Oppo research.... nice try cuck
That's a yikes from me bud. Google only gives me results from the Leftist/Liberal media. Thought I had a shot here.
I provided a link to a site that does what you're asking.
Eat shit. If you cant defend something don't take it up