The irony is that conservatives don't give a fuck nugget about what race you are. WE DON'T CARE! Judge each person on an individual bases.

"The smallest minority is the individual." -Ayn Rand

Misspelled Swedish. Sue me.

There is definitely anti white double standard these days.

MLK's universal principle of 'content of character rather than skin color' is now replaced with racist intersectionality that evaluate people by their skin colors.

What is your intersectionality score? https://intersectionalityscore.com/

"Whites", like "Blacks" is a social engineering term to erase your European, ethnic identity and Catholic heritage. I'd suggest listening to E. Michael Jones on the topic. "White" is not a race. You are Euro-American Christians. It is Christianity that bounded all Europeans and the Deep State via the media, academia, entertainment, the Scofield Bible, etc. weaken that bond. I'd suggest reading Slaughter of the Cities by E. Michael Jones to understand how these terms originated. It was an all out attack on Catholics. As time passed, it is now an all out attack on Christians and the fabric of America itself.

Irony is hearing a liberal colleague make this same complaint the other day. He'll lambast Trump and MAGA conservatives in one breath, then in the next breath talk about how white people are reviled and demeaned simply for existing. Dude, you can't have it both ways. You're either on board with rational, pragmatic thought or you shut up and bend over for your racist leftist overlords.

I'm thinking the guy is a closet Trump supporter, or maybe could be convinced that Orange Man is surely not as bad as CNN says.

Good lord! Still reading that friggin BOOK of an article but this was good:

In a recent Vox article based partly on the dissertation research I’ve been doing as a Ph.D. candidate in political science at Georgia State University, Matthew Yglesias described this ongoing transformation as “The Great Awokening.” In Yglesias’ account: “In the past five years, white liberals have moved so far to the left on questions of race and racism that they are now, on these issues, to the left of even the typical black voter. This change amounts to a ‘Great Awokening.’” There is no simple or single explanation for how this process got started. It appears to be driven by an interplay of factors: preexisting tendencies among white liberals; a series of polarizing events like the police shooting of Michael Brown and subsequent riots in Ferguson, and the migrant crisis; the rise of millenials as a political force, and the explosion of social media and “woke” clickbait journalism. The years between 2012 and 2016 were a watershed for white liberal racial consciousness. But the seismic attitudinal shifts of those years have implications that go beyond race: They are also tied to a significant decrease in support for Israel and—perhaps more surprisingly—a rise in the number of white liberals who express negative attitudes about the perceived political power of American Jews.

As white liberals have come to place far greater emphasis on racial injustice, they have also endorsed reparative race-related social policies in greater numbers. This is evident across a range of issues: the rapid growth in white liberals who favor affirmative action for blacks in the labor force; in the increase in white liberals who feel that we spend too little on helping blacks, and that the government should afford them special treatment; in the increase in white Democrats who think it’s the government’s job to ensure “equal income across all races”; and in the increase in white liberals and Democrats who think that white people have ‘too much’ political influence.

At the same time, there are growing levels of support for policies without such obvious connections to race. For instance, between 1965 and 2000, the percentage of white liberals preferring increased immigration levels never deviated far from 10%. From the mid-2000s to roughly the end of President Obama’s term in office, this figure gradually ascended into the 20-30% range. As of 2018, it sits at over 50%. Then, there is the marked shift in attitudes toward Israel. Between 1978 and 2014, white liberals consistently reported sympathizing more with Israel than the Palestinians. Since March of 2016, this trend has turned on its face: Significantly more white liberals now report greater sympathy for the Palestinians than for Israel.

Some of these changes arguably stem from Trump’s rhetoric and policies on immigration. But a glance at the data shows that, as with their attitudes toward blacks, the percentage of white liberals perceiving “a lot” or “a great deal” of discrimination against immigrants more than doubled between 2000 (29%) and 2013 (57%)—i.e., well before Trump arrived on the scene. Additionally, between 2006 and 2014, the percentage of white liberals saying they feel “very sympathetic” toward illegal immigrants and their families grew from 22% to 42%.

For the woke and their allies, these rapid changes are heralded as signs of progress, leading at times to harsh criticism of anyone who would stand in their way. This ideological stridency and triumphalist attitude can be powerful weapons against political opponents but are alienating—perhaps deliberately so—to moderates and conservatives. But, in a sense, no one is put in a more strained and problematic position by the politics of white liberals than the white liberals themselves. The woke elite act like white saviors who must lead the rest of the country, including the racial minorities whose interests they claim to represent, to a vision of justice the less enlightened groups would not choose for themselves.

Consider, for instance, that black and Asian Democrats and liberals are significantly more supportive of restrictive immigration policies and less positive toward racial/ethnic diversity than their white counterparts. Black and Hispanic Democrats and liberals are more sympathetic toward Israel than the Palestinians (likely due in part to the fact that they tend to be more religious). They are also more likely to part ways when it comes to contemporary social and gender-identity issues, including views of the #MeToo movement. In all, though they do converge on some issues, the attitudes and policy preferences of the woke white left are unrepresentative of the “marginalized communities” with whom they are supposed to be allies. And as woke liberals play a leading role in party politics, the Democrats, who are increasingly defined by their embrace of diversity and progressive stances on issues of racial justice, appear to do so, at least partly at the direction of a small white elite.

Eh, I'm curious to see how actual African-Americans view black Americans and vice-versa.

all of what you said PLUS, the fact that all the ethnic groups you mentioned are balled into WHITEY growing up near Detroit we had GREEKS/POLACKS/ITALIANS etc

now we're all WHITE BREAD?
Be proud of your heritage regardless of the cuck masses trying to erase our histories

It's because whites are the only group with the ability to see through all the bullshit while also thriving on their own, so whites are the only ones standing between the parasitic tyrants ("bankers") and communism (slavery and death). Whites are being targeted as a result. Asians may also have the ability to see through the bullshit, but too many of them (e.g., China) have already fallen for it and are preoccupied with their own agendas controlled by their own power hungry tyrants.

White people literally invented the concept of egalitarianism.

Ich bin auch ein Amerikaner!

Is this propaganda or did the writer hit his head just before writing. I for one have never heard 'wokeness' used to describe drowning yourself in extreme liberalism. I thought 'woke' was when you finally realized the idiocy of the whole liberal agenda.

America isn't a skin colour based tribe - it's a unified one imo* I'm pro-segragated cities based on skin colour or whatnot, mostly on the basis we either have Legal Segregated Cities where signs depict 'Outsiders Aren't Welcome', or we have these "Surprise" Segregated Cities, where if you stumble upon them, get attacked, they'll say "You have no common sense" and not pursue it any further. "Lambs to the Slaughter" I call these. Segregated Cities will also preserve "skin colour purities" for these people - they'll shut the fuck up to say the least.

Also, yes, to make a white person, both parents have to be white. Both grandparents have to be white. A lineage of White Only. It's how it was since the beginning of Humanity's time.

I'm against racial slurs and Hate Words because...they'll say saying a word is racist, and racist means to attack someone based on skin colour. Then you'll have these "Secret Segregated Cities" who attack Outsiders....Based on their skin colour... It's so hypocritical. And yes, you have Ghettos in America that attack you if you're too white. And You have White Ghettos like Poland Russia, that attack you if you're too black. Stupidity on all frickin' sides.

I guess I'll have to start calling myself a Texan-American now.

This will get banned.