Was pleased to see YT auto suggestion about "biden ukraine video". Yeah, they suggest a unimportant video from CFR (Council of Foreign Relation, the globalist scum org) and the clip above was way down the page
Open the Senate trial Mitch, slow roll that along for a few weeks or more, lettuce simmer this real slow and get all the ingredients tossed in this stew.
Years ago as a youngster Brown and Root would have these crawdad boils on Friday, everyone would walk by and toss in their favorite herb or spice or whatever.....life hack, careful eating around coonazzes down below Lafayette.
But that's what we should do isn't it, have a slow boil, let it simmer as ingredients are added, have some Kavanaughs and shoot the breeze as we cook it all down?
You don't need Nancy to call the Senate to order, you pointed that out to Nancy already.
He should do a Biden and be like, "Listen, I'm leaving in about...(checks watch)...six hours, and if the articles arent on my desk by then, then I'm gonna go ahead and call it void."
If the Senate moves ahead with the trial without receiving the articles, I'm wondering if that will give any witnesses subpoenaed a legal angle to refuse the subpoenas on the grounds the Senate trial is not legitimate?
I've wondered all along if this might be Pelosi's real game at hand here, not that she's trying to influence the Senate's handling of the trial. They are protecting themselves against the Senate calling witnesses the Democrats don't want to testify. Biden's already said he will refuse any subpoenas. By withholding the articles, Pelosi is creating a legal justification for any unwilling witnesses to refuse the subpoenas. "Muddying the waters", so to speak.
https://youtu.be/zkzWyOaS8kU?t=12
End of the week? Screw that. End of the hour is even too much time. Just Do It already Mitchy.
6 hours
https://youtu.be/KCF9My1vBP4?t=91
Was pleased to see YT auto suggestion about "biden ukraine video". Yeah, they suggest a unimportant video from CFR (Council of Foreign Relation, the globalist scum org) and the clip above was way down the page
This^^^^!!!
Fuck waiting for that cunt. Just declare Trump acquitted already! Fuck!
Open the Senate trial Mitch, slow roll that along for a few weeks or more, lettuce simmer this real slow and get all the ingredients tossed in this stew.
Years ago as a youngster Brown and Root would have these crawdad boils on Friday, everyone would walk by and toss in their favorite herb or spice or whatever.....life hack, careful eating around coonazzes down below Lafayette.
But that's what we should do isn't it, have a slow boil, let it simmer as ingredients are added, have some Kavanaughs and shoot the breeze as we cook it all down?
You don't need Nancy to call the Senate to order, you pointed that out to Nancy already.
Just Do It Mitch.
https://files.catbox.moe/9kz9lk.jpg
He should do a Biden and be like, "Listen, I'm leaving in about...(checks watch)...six hours, and if the articles arent on my desk by then, then I'm gonna go ahead and call it void."
Perfect comment
Trump raised a lot of money as a result of this.
If the Senate moves ahead with the trial without receiving the articles, I'm wondering if that will give any witnesses subpoenaed a legal angle to refuse the subpoenas on the grounds the Senate trial is not legitimate?
I've wondered all along if this might be Pelosi's real game at hand here, not that she's trying to influence the Senate's handling of the trial. They are protecting themselves against the Senate calling witnesses the Democrats don't want to testify. Biden's already said he will refuse any subpoenas. By withholding the articles, Pelosi is creating a legal justification for any unwilling witnesses to refuse the subpoenas. "Muddying the waters", so to speak.
The difference between The House Speaker and the Senate Leader is basically intelligence, and an understanding of the Constitution. Bye Felicia ?
SO THAT'S TOMORROW!!!
Marvelous.
So, 48 hrs. Let's see of she does it. (Highly doubt she will)
> the end of this week