52
posted ago by fac1 ago by fac1 +52 / -0

https://imgur.com/a/sJzHup2

This is anti-science coming from a publication that's supposed to be about science. Have they learned nothing about this subject from the James Damore incident?

Ironically, they put this in an issue with a cover story about extremists. Zero self-awareness.

I'm boycotting their site from now on. Used to be one of my go-to sites. Not anymore.

Comments (4)
sorted by:
4
PatriotDefense 4 points ago +4 / -0

A few journalists proved several scientific journals to be complete frauds by publishing complete bullshit that matched the current PC narrative. Of course, you don't hear much about it . . .

2
julianReyes 2 points ago +3 / -1

Today is a good day to learn about the definition of "scientism."

1
fac1 [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hmm... "The belief that the investigative methods of the physical sciences are applicable or justifiable in all fields of inquiry"

Not sure if that applies here. I think you meant that as a critique of the "social sciences". The problem with the "social sciences" isn't that they try to apply the Scientific Method to society - it's that they often do not use the Scientific Method, yet still claim to be science.

2
frogman1776 2 points ago +2 / -0

Totally agree with this. I rad my last issue last month. It’s a propagandist rag now.