83
Comments (16)
sorted by:
6
Mad_Hattie 6 points ago +6 / -0

But not child abuse to give them transgender drugs.

Not child abuse to refuse them protection or human rights in those "gun free" zones.

Not child abuse to keep them with a child trafficker.

Not child abuse to be hollywood pedos.

And not child abuse to kill it in the womb

Their entire "moral" high ground is nothing but bodies.

4
DeetheDeplorable [S] 4 points ago +4 / -0

That's why I added this. They are such hypocrites.

4
Mad_Hattie 4 points ago +4 / -0

I can only upvote you once. . .

I'm just venting, because they lie all the time or rephrase things to "sound better"

Women's choice sounds better than infantcide but its the same thing.

1
Gobberwarts 1 point ago +4 / -3

Watch it again, and pretend he's talking about Saint Greta, her parents, and her Gaiaian religion.

5
milpede0306 5 points ago +5 / -0

unhinged maga rally? really. this guy pakman looks like the poster kid for the impossible whopper

3
DeetheDeplorable [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

AGREE!!!!

4
MAG_n_KAG 4 points ago +4 / -0

But taking them to a Pride Rally where they get to see all these degenerates' fetishes out in full display is totally OK.

3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
3
K-Harbour 3 points ago +3 / -0

It is child abuse to send a kid to school.

2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
PNWArtist 2 points ago +2 / -0

Have some fun and troll the commenters.

Their beta cuck is quite upset, and it's not too hard to push a few over the edge.

2
Gobberwarts 2 points ago +5 / -3

Why would you take a child to a place where they might be assaulted by a violent leftwing protester? That's just irresponsible! Shame! Shame!

1
Gobberwarts 1 point ago +4 / -3

To address another stupid statement by this turd; The poor don't get poorer. They get richer. Here is a very simplified example:

Suppose we follow a group of people over time. 50% are rich people and 50% are poor people. The rich people get richer as everyone knows.

But let's look at a young kid right out of college. He has a crappy job, low income, and a lot of debt. Obviously poor. But (assuming he doesn't have a gender studies degree) he will get a better job, earn more money, and pay off that debt.

He is now within the "rich" category. The odd thing about this, is that he is no longer tracked within the "poor" category. His income doesn't get added into the average wages for poor people, it gets added to rich people average.

At the same time, another kid graduates from school and becomes "poor". The percentage of poor people stays the same and the average income for the group is stagnant. At the same time, the average income for the rich group is likely increasing, because once you hit that category, your wages generally always get higher.

Track any one person in America and you will likely find that they get richer, no matter what category we plug them into at the start.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1