I love that phrase. Leftists always cry "it's right there, it says regulations!". Prime example of them using the Constitution when it fits their needs without actually knowing the language or context of what "well regulated" meant at the time.
Strictly speaking, owning an AR-15 would fall into the "well regulated" concept. Would it not make sense that the militia, who would likely be expected to operate in tandem with active military, be knowledgeable on at least standard issue equipment? What better way to acquire knowledge about a certain object than to own one?
Eh, an AR-10 would be out of regs since you no longer the same logistic compatibility. This is why I hate that the Army is planning on switching to a different round while the Marines aren't. They've created a supply problem that simply shouldn't exist in the name of compensating for inadequate training.
I love that phrase. Leftists always cry "it's right there, it says regulations!". Prime example of them using the Constitution when it fits their needs without actually knowing the language or context of what "well regulated" meant at the time.
Strictly speaking, owning an AR-15 would fall into the "well regulated" concept. Would it not make sense that the militia, who would likely be expected to operate in tandem with active military, be knowledgeable on at least standard issue equipment? What better way to acquire knowledge about a certain object than to own one?
maybe owning an Ar, 10 standard mags, and 5000 rounds, along with a spare parts kit.
Eh, an AR-10 would be out of regs since you no longer the same logistic compatibility. This is why I hate that the Army is planning on switching to a different round while the Marines aren't. They've created a supply problem that simply shouldn't exist in the name of compensating for inadequate training.
AR-15, 10 standard mags...
Good point though:)