REMINDER: These liberal "academics" who also claim Donald Trump is worse than Hitler, Mao and Stalin combined, are the same people who write (and revise) our history books.
"And for no reason at all, the German people voted Hitler into power" - mainstream history books
This is what desperation looks like. Can't win on merits, so come up with the most ridiculous plans to win anyway. So they publicize increasingly insane ideas hoping one will catch enough attention with "public opinion" whether manufactured or genuine, doesn't matter to them.
When FDR talked about expanding the supreme Court in order to stack it with justices who would let his unconstitutional crap go through, there was popular outcry against it, enough that it put a stop to it.
Now this is every Tuesday for the Democrats. Oh you just won an election in a red state? Time to change the voting laws so that they can't kick you out--and do so without regard to Justice or sanity, allow felons to vote from prison, eliminate all voter ID laws to enable voter fraud. Oh the civilians are trying to start a petition to recall your tyrannical asses? Pass a new law that raise is the requirements for such petitions.
oh and at the moment it's politically advantageous for them to use the popular vote, because States like California and New York and every major metropolitan area in the country will exploit lax voter ID laws to generate a shitload of fake votes for Democrat.
This being the case, the best option is to simply strip your state's voters from the right to determine their own electors. Let the fraudulent votes manufactured by the party leadership in California and New York decide who your vote counts for.
There is no bottom to what they will do. If they do managed to disarm this country, be advised they will start standing you up against the wall and shooting you for disagreeing with them.
This is becoming increasingly obvious, and I hope every independent who values their ability to make their own decisions about what political views they wish to express, and who they want to vote for takes it into consideration.
The bar for accepting a new state is also pretty high. Washington just can't declare itself 127 states.
First, you have to get the consent of the existing state and any other state you border on. So they would have to get both Maryland and Virginia to sign on.
Then you need a majority in the House, the Senate, and the President has to sign it into law. This is something that would certainly be filibustered.
On top of that, even Democratic heavy states would vote against this. This wouldn't just impact the electoral college. This would reduce the number of congressmen large states like California and Texas get. It would also give Washington DC complete control of the Senate. It would make all existing Senators irrelevant and the influence of large states irrelevant. Does anyone honestly believe Nancy Pelosi or Chuck Schumer would hand over their power?
It is utterly staggering that this would get so far to the point it got released. Someone should have told the people writing this "you are the stupidest motherfuckers I have ever seen" and stopped them. I guess our higher learning institutions have degraded that badly.
LNaturally the states must be divided strictly along racial lines--for the sake of the safety of the black people. Also ideally there to be no more than, say, 1000 black people per black state, wheras ideally all the white people will be bundled into just one state. This way black people will finally achieve the equality they deserve, in which their vote counts for at least 100 times as much as the average white person's.
Similarly, if possible, we will make men and women finally equal by making women's vote count officially for twice as much as a man's vote. Also sense a tendency to vote for conservative candidates is a good proxy for white privilege, votes for Republican candidates will count for 1/10 as much as a vote for a Democrat candidate.
Maybe with these reforms, sexism and racism will finally end. Of course we can expect backlash from sexist and racist white men who wish to continue oppressing women and minorities, and refuse to acknowledge their overwhelming privilege within our system. But this can be resolved via population management policies designed to bring about even fuller equality to the white community.
Why not instead break Oklahoma into 1004836599302 new states and end the Democrats as a viable party? Fuck it, let's divide the whole nation into units the size of individual domiciles with individual sub-units where required so every person gets an electoral college vote. You know, a popular vote but with extra steps.
"The anonymous writers, also say 'the Democratic caucus in Congress could be confident that new states created within the District would elect like-minded delegations to Congress.'"
Did you know that Texas can legally divide itself into 5 States if it wants. Each State would get 2 Senators. When Texas joined the U.S. it wrote this division ability into the resolution.
Harvard represents corruption and communism. Don't worship Harvard. Believe the opposite what Harvard says. And, don't send your kids there to get brainwashed.
Better idea: 1 state per million people. 700 senators. And 1 rep per 10k population = 35k representatives.
This would cause their heads to explode when they realize that NYC, LA, etc... would only be a single state with 2 senators, while all the "rural" counties would suddenly get representation in the senate and house.
The issue we are suffering in the US right now is our states are DIVIDED. Look at each state, you'll see TWO INDEPENDENT POPULATIONS that do not see eye-to-eye. Give the rural people their own state, let the cities be their own state, our country would look so different.
I guess these big brain smurt professors didn't get told that eliminating the electoral college is the fastest way towards rebellion. Starting from "fly over country" and expanding outward
REMINDER: These liberal "academics" who also claim Donald Trump is worse than Hitler, Mao and Stalin combined, are the same people who write (and revise) our history books.
"And for no reason at all, the German people voted Hitler into power" - mainstream history books
This is what desperation looks like. Can't win on merits, so come up with the most ridiculous plans to win anyway. So they publicize increasingly insane ideas hoping one will catch enough attention with "public opinion" whether manufactured or genuine, doesn't matter to them.
When FDR talked about expanding the supreme Court in order to stack it with justices who would let his unconstitutional crap go through, there was popular outcry against it, enough that it put a stop to it.
Now this is every Tuesday for the Democrats. Oh you just won an election in a red state? Time to change the voting laws so that they can't kick you out--and do so without regard to Justice or sanity, allow felons to vote from prison, eliminate all voter ID laws to enable voter fraud. Oh the civilians are trying to start a petition to recall your tyrannical asses? Pass a new law that raise is the requirements for such petitions.
oh and at the moment it's politically advantageous for them to use the popular vote, because States like California and New York and every major metropolitan area in the country will exploit lax voter ID laws to generate a shitload of fake votes for Democrat.
This being the case, the best option is to simply strip your state's voters from the right to determine their own electors. Let the fraudulent votes manufactured by the party leadership in California and New York decide who your vote counts for.
There is no bottom to what they will do. If they do managed to disarm this country, be advised they will start standing you up against the wall and shooting you for disagreeing with them.
This is becoming increasingly obvious, and I hope every independent who values their ability to make their own decisions about what political views they wish to express, and who they want to vote for takes it into consideration.
Subtitled: Screw White working taxpayer, By Any Means Necessary.
How are they this retarded?
The bar to changing the constitution is high.
The bar for accepting a new state is also pretty high. Washington just can't declare itself 127 states.
First, you have to get the consent of the existing state and any other state you border on. So they would have to get both Maryland and Virginia to sign on.
Then you need a majority in the House, the Senate, and the President has to sign it into law. This is something that would certainly be filibustered.
On top of that, even Democratic heavy states would vote against this. This wouldn't just impact the electoral college. This would reduce the number of congressmen large states like California and Texas get. It would also give Washington DC complete control of the Senate. It would make all existing Senators irrelevant and the influence of large states irrelevant. Does anyone honestly believe Nancy Pelosi or Chuck Schumer would hand over their power?
It is utterly staggering that this would get so far to the point it got released. Someone should have told the people writing this "you are the stupidest motherfuckers I have ever seen" and stopped them. I guess our higher learning institutions have degraded that badly.
I don’t know. I believe Hawaii became a ‘state’ by presidential decree...
Are some to be black, and some white, just like their graduation ceremonies?
LNaturally the states must be divided strictly along racial lines--for the sake of the safety of the black people. Also ideally there to be no more than, say, 1000 black people per black state, wheras ideally all the white people will be bundled into just one state. This way black people will finally achieve the equality they deserve, in which their vote counts for at least 100 times as much as the average white person's.
Similarly, if possible, we will make men and women finally equal by making women's vote count officially for twice as much as a man's vote. Also sense a tendency to vote for conservative candidates is a good proxy for white privilege, votes for Republican candidates will count for 1/10 as much as a vote for a Democrat candidate.
Maybe with these reforms, sexism and racism will finally end. Of course we can expect backlash from sexist and racist white men who wish to continue oppressing women and minorities, and refuse to acknowledge their overwhelming privilege within our system. But this can be resolved via population management policies designed to bring about even fuller equality to the white community.
This is the most terrible article I will read all day
TLDR: “We lost, change the rules”
Why not instead break Oklahoma into 1004836599302 new states and end the Democrats as a viable party? Fuck it, let's divide the whole nation into units the size of individual domiciles with individual sub-units where required so every person gets an electoral college vote. You know, a popular vote but with extra steps.
This is to counter the opposite proposal;
To bring back George Washington’s 10 mile square for the District of Columbia (add back the Virginia portion)
Expand the original 10 mile square by 5 miles on each side (making Dist of Columbia a 20 mile square)
This would put most of the Federal govt including Joint Base Andrews back on Federal soil.
This would also give the State of Virginia back to its voters (probably make VA a red state, again)
I don't think DC should get to vote in federal elections. That just seems like corruption.
Oh ok Let’s divide texas into 10000000 states
"The anonymous writers, also say 'the Democratic caucus in Congress could be confident that new states created within the District would elect like-minded delegations to Congress.'"
Of course they're anonymous.
Did Skull & Bones write this plan up with a crayon? Did they make a collage? ??
Did you know that Texas can legally divide itself into 5 States if it wants. Each State would get 2 Senators. When Texas joined the U.S. it wrote this division ability into the resolution.
Harvard can lick my dogs dingleberry encrusted asshole
Harvard represents corruption and communism. Don't worship Harvard. Believe the opposite what Harvard says. And, don't send your kids there to get brainwashed.
Better idea: 1 state per million people. 700 senators. And 1 rep per 10k population = 35k representatives.
This would cause their heads to explode when they realize that NYC, LA, etc... would only be a single state with 2 senators, while all the "rural" counties would suddenly get representation in the senate and house.
The issue we are suffering in the US right now is our states are DIVIDED. Look at each state, you'll see TWO INDEPENDENT POPULATIONS that do not see eye-to-eye. Give the rural people their own state, let the cities be their own state, our country would look so different.
Perhaps the federal grant money to Harvard should be stopped until it can be determined if anyone on the payroll is sober and drug free.
Harvard needs to be taken down to the studs and every professor not in STEM arrested
I guess these big brain smurt professors didn't get told that eliminating the electoral college is the fastest way towards rebellion. Starting from "fly over country" and expanding outward
Never happen. For that would spark a war that would eliminate all libs
I've literally never heard of anything more retarded than this.