19
Comments (6)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
3
burgerlander 3 points ago +3 / -0

omfg, dude wtf? Why is Joe Rogan such a dumbfuck? lol. Yeah, the hundreds of people who have set fires in Australia are "assholes". That's a very informed opinion, Joe. Yup, "assholes. They never knew it could get this big."

No questioning the ethnicity at. all.

This fucker used to have Gavin McInnes on and talk common sense. Now, he's seen the $light$ and is angling for Bill Maher's show.

He's gotten too comfortable. Anyways, why is every fucking guy who is halfway cool and interesting...turns out to be a fucking total dipshit when it comes to politics and SJW shit? Not al but all the popular ones makes millions.

Fucking RadioLab. Jesus Christ, Joe. What next?

"I was listening uncritically to This American Life and David Sedaris and pounding biotches and then interviewing Edward Snowden and was too busy smoking a joint to ask him anything for the first 45 minutes.

ugh.

Nature is badass and ruthless, though. That's why people worship a Christian God over Pangaea or Gaia or whatever.

0
EccentricSilver [S] 0 points ago +2 / -2

I mean just take out of it what you can? Until we get the Overton Window closer to us or start winning more of the Metapolitical / culture war, nobody famous is going to come out and question ethnicity or immigrants setting fires.

1
burgerlander 1 point ago +1 / -0

Even the guest is iffy.

The definitive firsthand account of the movement that permanently broke the American political consensus.

What do internet trolls, economic populists, white nationalists, techno-anarchists and Alex Jones have in common?Nothing, except for an unremitting hatred of evangelical progressivism and the so-called "Cathedral" from whence it pours forth.

Contrary to the dissembling explanations from the corporate press, this movement did not emerge overnight--nor are its varied subgroups in any sense interchangeable with one another. As united by their opposition as they are divided by their goals, the members of the New Right are willfully suspicious of those in the mainstream who would seek to tell their story. Fortunately, author Michael Malice was there from the very inception, and in 'The New Right' recounts their tale from the beginning.

Malice provides an authoritative and unbiased portrait of the New Right as a movement of ideas--ideas that he traces to surprisingly diverse ideological roots. From the heterodox right wing of the 1940s to the Buchanan/Rothbard alliance of 1992 and all the way through to what he witnessed personally in Charlottesville,The New Rightis a thorough firsthand accounting of the concepts, characters and chronology of this widely misunderstood sociopolitical phenomenon.

Today's fringe is tomorrow's orthodoxy. As entertaining as it is informative, 'The New Right' is required reading for every American across the spectrum who would like to learn more about the past, present and future of our divided political culture.