I'm really tired of Quid Pro Quo getting such a bad rep. It is the essence of all contracts of which Treaties are a subset. It is even required for a legally valid contract under the name CONSIDERATION.
It is the exchange of public money for private gain which is wrong. It is BRIBERY.
I'm really tired of Quid Pro Quo getting such a bad rep. It is the essence of all contracts of which Treaties are a subset. It is even required for a legally valid contract under the name CONSIDERATION.
It is the exchange of public money for private gain which is wrong. It is BRIBERY.
Lawyers do quid pro all the time