Pam Bondi Lays Out Explosive Case Against Joe Biden, Hunter Biden, Burisma
(youtu.be)
🍑 PEACH MINTS 🌿
Comments (30)
sorted by:
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES
•
All
General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
Bondi was awesome!
This was a shot across the bow as well. She discussed at length about biden's which makes them material witnesses. Another guy talked extensively about Obama, now he's on the table as well. He's on tape pulling a quid pro quo. Now they can ask him about it and what he knew about Biden saying call the president.
Funny how he didn't carry any weight on his own but had to invoke Obama's name. What a pussy.
Absolutely, Pam Bondi as well as the lawyer that spoke after Bondi sliced, diced, smothered and covered that hearing with all things Biden.
I haven't been to the awful waffle in years but you make me want hash browns smothered (onions) covered (cheese) diced (tomatoes) spiced (peppers) chunked (ham bits) and topped (chili). With 2 over easy eggs on top.
Talk about hijacked. What is this fragrant layering place of which you speak?
Waffle House
You 'uns ain't from around here... The waffle House and s where low carb diets go to die. And totally worth it.
Not true. You can get eggs and bacon with a side of coffee. Carb friendly.
Ps: I love waffle house.
Who was the dude after Bondi? Is there a video?
https://www.c-span.org/video/?468552-1/senate-impeachment-trial&vod
It was Eric Herschmann.
Here is the beginning of his time: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6zHPfxOR0-E&t=2397s
Here is where they play the video of the Obama hot mic with Russian President Mendevev: https://youtu.be/6zHPfxOR0-E?t=2340
Well done Pam! She calmly laid out the facts, set up the timeline with Burisma and Hunter, quoted multiple MSM headlines from 2014, all showing the quid pro quo in their own words. It was glorious
I enjoyed this one. Very clear and methodical. None of Schiff's hokey condescension
One for the history books.
Pam got a bit nervous after dropping the Biden CFR video.
They went there first.
Y’all know Bloomberg is rooting for the GOP to bury Biden. Don’t take this wrong, I am sure the Bidens are corrupt, and we need to take them down. The problem is that everyone else but Bloomberg is too far left to seriously challenge Trump in the general election. If Biden is out, “Little Mikey” is the only candidate close enough to the center to appeal to moderate Dems and Independents - and the DNC. And he will have a tough time defending Stop & Frisk. Meanwhile, Trump can brag about the things he has done for New York City in the past and African Americans and other minorities during his administration.
Nothing ever happens
Continuing my comment history on the theme of pre-concsious processing and this impeachment proceeding...
Both sides are doing it.
The Democrats maleficently,
The Republicans beneficially.
Norman F. Dixon would make the following observation:
"Pam Bondi... make up, hair style, dress...
To whom does she bear a striking resemblance?"
Coincidence?
2024?
"That's a bingo!"
Bought fucking time. And she did it so well.
I'd like to go over the case details with her in private, if you catch my drift.
Why is Biden corruption off limits again? The Leftists keep telling me it is, but why seems to get lost in translation from WingNut to English
Listening to Schiff was like being subjected to garbage bins lifted and dumped into garbage trucks all day and all night. WTG congresszombies.
It sounded like she didn't have a lot of time with the material. Maybe she got the finished copy right before she went on. Still, it's the Senate and Senators can sort the information from the presentation.
Yeah, couldn't listen to it. Tried 3 or 4 times, I just phase out. Senate hearings aren't about entertainment, I guess, but having some more entertaining speakers on Trump's side would be nice. Starr was fun to listen to.
Don't get me wrong, I'm 100% Trump, just - need some better speakers out there. Even dry, I feel like I could have done a better job delivering this material.